arXiv++ Combinatorics

Sourav Chatterjee, Persi Diaconis, Allan Sly and Lingfu Zhang, prompted by a question of Ramis Movassagh, renewed the study of a process proposed in the early 1980s by Jean Bourgain. A state vector $v \in \mathbb R^n$, labeled with the vertices of a connected graph, $G$, changes in discrete time steps following the simple rule that at each step a random edge $(i,j)$ is picked and $v_i$ and $v_j$ are both replaced by their average $(v_i+v_j)/2$. It is easy to see that the value associated with each vertex converges to $1/n$. The question was how quickly will $v$ be $ε$-close to uniform in the $L^{1}$ norm in the case of the complete graph, $K_{n}$, when $v$ is initialized as a standard basis vector that takes the value 1 on one coordinate, and zeros everywhere else. They have established a sharp cutoff of $\frac{1}{2\log 2}n\log n + O(n\sqrt{\log n})$. Our main result is to prove, that $\frac{(1-ε)}{2\log2}n\log n-O(n)$ is a general lower bound for all connected graphs on $n$ nodes. We also get sharp magnitude of $t_{ε,1}$ for several important families of graphs, including star, expander, dumbbell, and cycle. In order to establish our results we make several observations about the process, such as the worst case initialization is always a standard basis vector. Our results add to the body of work of Aldous, Aldous and Lanoue, Quattropani and Sau, Cao, Olshevsky and Tsitsiklis, and others. The renewed interest is due to an analogy to a question related to the Google's supremacy circuit. For the proof of our main theorem we employ a concept that we call 'augmented entropy function' which may find independent interest in the computer science and probability theory communities.

Given a set of terminals in 2D/3D, the network with the shortest total length that connects all terminals is a Steiner tree. On the other hand, with enough budget, every terminal can be connected to every other terminals via a straight edge, yielding a complete graph over all terminals. In this work, we study a generalization of Steiner trees asking what happens in between these two extremes. Focusing on three terminals with equal pairwise path weights, we characterize the full evolutionary pathway between the Steiner tree and the complete graph, which contains intriguing intermediate structures.

Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid classical-quantum algorithm to approximately solve NP optimization problems such as MAX-CUT. We describe a new application area of QAOA circuits: graph structure discovery. We omit the time-consuming parameter-optimization phase and utilize the dependence of QAOA energy on the graph structure for randomly or judiciously chosen parameters to learn about graphs. In the first part, Following up on Wang et. al. and Brandao et. al. we give explicit formulas. We show that the layer-one QAOA energy for the MAX-CUT problem for three regular graphs carries exactly the information: {\em (# of vertices, # of triangles)}. We have calculated our explicit formulas differently from \cite{wang2018quantum}, by developing the notion of the $U$ polynomial of a graph $G$. Many of our discoveries can be interpreted as computing $U(G)$ under various restrictions. The most basic question when comparing the structure of two graphs is if they are isomorphic or not. We find that the QAOA energies separate all non-isomorphic three-regular graphs up to size 18, all strongly regular graphs up to size 26 and the Praust and the smallest Miyazaki examples. We observe that the QAOA energy values can be also used as a proxy to how much graphs differ. Unfortunately, we have also found a sequence of non-isomorphic pairs of graphs, for which the energy gap seems to shrink at an exponential rate as the size grows. Our negative findings however come with a surprise: if the QAOA energies do not measurably separate between two graphs, then both of their energy landscapes must be extremely flat (indistinguishable from constant), already when the number of QAOA layers is intermediately large. This holds due to a remarkable uncoupling phenomenon that we have only deduced from computer simulation.

We elucidate a close connection between the Theory of Judgment Aggregation (more generally, Evaluation Aggregation), and a relatively young but rapidly growing field of universal algebra, that was primarily developed to investigate constraint satisfaction problems. Our connection yields a full classification of non-binary evaluations into possibility and impossibility domains both under the idempotent and the supportive conditions. Prior to the current result E. Dokow and R. Holzman nearly classified non-binary evaluations in the supportive case, by combinatorial means. The algebraic approach gives us new insights to the easier binary case as well, which had been fully classified by the above authors. Our algebraic view lets us put forth a suggestion about a strengthening of the Non-dictatorship criterion, that helps us avoid "outliers" like the affine subspace. Finally, we give upper bounds on the complexity of computing if a domain is impossible or not (to our best knowledge no finite time bounds were given earlier).