arXiv++ Combinatorics

The specification number $σ_n(f)$ of a Boolean threshold function $f$ on $n$ variables is the least number of points whose $f$-values determine $f$ uniquely among all threshold functions. Its essential points form the unique minimum such set. We develop Zuev's geometric interpretation: the threshold functions are the chambers of a central hyperplane arrangement in the $(n+1)$-dimensional space of weights and thresholds, and the essential points of a function correspond exactly to the facets of its chamber, so the specification number is the chamber's facet number. The lower bound $σ_n(f)\ge n+1$ becomes the fact that a pointed full-dimensional cone has at least $n+1$ facets, with equality for simplicial chambers. The average specification number $\overlineσ_n$ becomes an average facet count. We evaluate this average exactly via the resonance arrangement and bound it through a theorem of Fukuda, Tamura, and Tokuyama, obtaining $\overlineσ_n\le 2n$; hence $\overlineσ_n=Θ(n)$. This settles a question of Gutekunst, Mészáros, and Petersen. The method also extends to polynomial threshold functions. The same geometry links threshold functions with a threshold zonotope, whose vertices are modified Chow vectors. Its one-skeleton is the one-inclusion graph, and a vertex's degree is the specification number of that function. Finally, we treat the operations of Lozin et al. on functions of minimum specification number. Adding a variable and extending on a variable both take the product of a chamber closure with a half-line, preserving simpliciality. For the symmetric-variables extension we give an exact thresholdness criterion and show that minimum specification number is preserved whenever the extension is a threshold function. We also resolve a question they pose concerning a fourth operation.

A pseudo-Boolean function is a real-valued function $f(x)=f(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n)$ of $n$ binary variables; that is, a mapping from $\{0,1\}^n$ to $\mathbb{R}$. For a pseudo-Boolean function $f(x)$ on $\{0,1\}^n$, we say that $g(x,y)$ is a quadratization of $f$ if $g(x,y)$ is a quadratic polynomial depending on $x$ and on $m$ auxiliary binary variables $y_1,y_2,\ldots,y_m$ such that $f(x)= \min \{g(x,y) : y \in \{0,1\}^m \}$ for all $x \in \{0,1\}^n$. By means of quadratizations, minimization of $f$ is reduced to minimization (over its extended set of variables) of the quadratic function $g(x,y)$. This is of some practical interest because minimization of quadratic functions has been thoroughly studied for the last few decades, and much progress has been made in solving such problems exactly or heuristically. A related paper \cite{ABCG} initiated a systematic study of the minimum number of auxiliary $y$-variables required in a quadratization of an arbitrary function $f$ (a natural question, since the complexity of minimizing the quadratic function $g(x,y)$ depends, among other factors, on the number of binary variables). In this paper, we determine more precisely the number of auxiliary variables required by quadratizations of symmetric pseudo-Boolean functions $f(x)$, those functions whose value depends only on the Hamming weight of the input $x$ (the number of variables equal to $1$).