Papers by Mathieu Dutour Sikirić
25 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Perfect but not generating Delaunay polytopes
In his seminal 1951 paper "Extreme forms" Coxeter \cite{cox51} observed that for $n \ge 9$ one can add vectors to the perfect lattice $\sfA_9$ so that the resulting perfect lattice, called $\sfA_9^2$ by Coxeter, has exactly the same set of minimal vectors. An inhomogeneous analog of the notion of perfect lattice is that of a lattice with a perfect Delaunay polytope: the vertices of a perfect Delaunay polytope are the analogs of minimal vectors in a perfect lattice. We find a new infinite series $P(n,s)$ for $s\geq 2$ and $n+1\geq 4s$ of $n$-dimensional perfect Delaunay polytopes. A remarkable property of this series is that for certain values of $s$ and all $n \ge 13$ one can add points to the integer affine span of $P(n,s)$ in such a way that $P(n,s)$ remains a perfect Delaunay polytope in the new lattice. Thus, we have constructed an inhomogeneous analog of the remarkable relationship between $\sfA_9$ and $\sfA_9^2$.
Combinatorial cube packings in cube and torus
We consider sequential random packing of cubes $z+[0,1]^n$ with $z\in \frac{1}{N}\ZZ^n$ into the cube $[0,2]^n$ and the torus $\QuotS{\RR^n}{2\ZZ^n}$ as $N\to\infty$. In the cube case $[0,2]^n$ as $N\to\infty$ the random cube packings thus obtained are reduced to a single cube with probability $1-O(\frac{1}{N})$. In the torus case the situation is different: for $n\leq 2$, sequential random cube packing yields cube tilings, but for $n\geq 3$ with strictly positive probability, one obtains non-extensible cube packings.
So, we introduce the notion of combinatorial cube packing, which instead of depending on $N$ depend on some parameters. We use use them to derive an expansion of the packing density in powers of $\frac{1}{N}$. The explicit computation is done in the cube case. In the torus case, the situation is more complicate and we restrict ourselves to the case $N\to\infty$ of strictly positive probability. We prove the following results for torus combinatorial cube packings: We give a general Cartesian product construction. We prove that the number of parameters is at least $\frac{n(n+1)}{2}$ and we conjecture it to be at most $2^n-1$. We prove that cube packings with at least $2^n-3$ cubes are extensible. We find the minimal number of cubes in non-extensible cube packings for $n$ odd and $n\leq 6$.
Automorphism groups of root systems matroids
Given a root system $\mathsf{R}$, the vector system $\tilde{\mathsf{R}}$ is obtained by taking a representative $v$ in each antipodal pair $\{v, -v\}$. The matroid $M(\mathsf{R})$ is formed by all independent subsets of $\tilde{\mathsf{R}}$. The automorphism group of a matroid is the group of permutations preserving its independent subsets. We prove that the automorphism groups of all irreducible root systems matroids $M(\mathsf{R})$ are uniquely determined by their independent sets of size 3. As a corollary, we compute these groups explicitly, and thus complete the classification of the automorphism groups of root systems matroids.
The decomposition of the hypermetric cone into L-domains
The hypermetric cone $\HYP_{n+1}$ is the parameter space of basic Delaunay polytopes in n-dimensional lattice. The cone $\HYP_{n+1}$ is polyhedral; one way of seeing this is that modulo image by the covariance map $\HYP_{n+1}$ is a finite union of L-domains, i.e., of parameter space of full Delaunay tessellations.
In this paper, we study this partition of the hypermetric cone into L-domains. In particular, it is proved that the cone $\HYP_{n+1}$ of hypermetrics on n+1 points contains exactly {1/2}n! principal L-domains. We give a detailed description of the decomposition of $\HYP_{n+1}$ for n=2,3,4 and a computer result for n=5 (see Table \ref{TableDataHYPn}). Remarkable properties of the root system $\mathsf{D}_4$ are key for the decomposition of $\HYP_5$.
How to compute the rank of a Delaunay polytope
Roughly speaking, the rank of a Delaunay polytope (first introduced in \cite{DGL92}) is its number of degrees of freedom. In \cite{DL}, a method for computing the rank of a Delaunay polytope $P$ using the hypermetrics related to $P$ is given. Here a simpler more efficient method, which uses affine dependencies instead of hypermetrics is given. This method is applied to classical Delaunay polytopes.
Then, we give an example of a Delaunay polytope, which does not have any affine basis.