arXiv++ Combinatorics

We define and give results on the game NecklaceNim NN($n$,$k$) which is PathNim PN($n$,$k$) with an additional move allowed on the end vertices. This game arises as a sub-game in the context of solving CircularNim CN($n$,$k$) when $k-2$ consecutive stacks have been depleted, therefore its solution is critical to solving CircularNim. We solve the infinite families of NN($n$,$k$) when play is allowed on at least half the stacks.

Slow Exact $k$-Nim is a variant of the well-known game of Nim. The rules of this variant are that in each move, $k$ of the $n$ stacks are selected and then one token is removed from each of the $k$ stacks. We will extend known results by proving results on the structure of the P-positions for the infinite family of Slow Exact $k$-Nim games where we play on all but one of the $n$ stacks. In addition, we will introduce a more general family of "slow" Nim variants, Slow SetNim($n$,$A$) which specifies the allowed moves via the set $A$. This family of games contains both Slow Exact $k$-Nim and the slow version of Moore's $k$-Nim. We give results for the infinite family of Slow SetNim($n$,$A$) for $A=\{n-1,n\}$, whose P-positions are closely related to those of Slow Exact $k$-Nim for $k=n-1$.

Circular Nim is a two-player impartial combinatorial game consisting of $n$ stacks of tokens placed in a circle. A move consists of choosing $k$ consecutive stacks and taking at least one token from one or more of the stacks. The last player able to make a move wins. The question of interest is: Who can win from a given position if both players play optimally? In an impartial combinatorial game, there are only two types of positions. An $\mathcal{N}$-position is one from which the next player to move has a winning strategy. A $\mathcal{P}$-position is one from which the next player is bound to lose, no matter what moves s/he makes. Therefore, the question who wins is answered by identifying the $\mathcal{P}$-positions. We will prove results on the structure of the $\mathcal{P}$-positions for $n = 7$ and $k = 4$, extending known results for other games in this family. The interesting feature of the set of $\mathcal{P}$-positions of this game is that it splits into different subsets, unlike the structure for the known games in this family.

We study the $\star$-operator (Larsson et al. 2011) of impartial vector subtraction games (Golomb 1965). Here we extend the notion to the misère-play convention, and prove convergence and other properties; notably more structure is obtained under misère-play as compared with the normal-play convention (Larsson 2012).

The game of nim, with its simple rules, its elegant solution and its historical importance is the quintessence of a combinatorial game, which is why it led to so many generalizations and modifications. We present a modification with a new spin: building nim. With given finite numbers of tokens and stacks, this two-player game is played in two stages (thus belonging to the same family of games as e.g. nine-men's morris): first building, where players alternate to put one token on one of the, initially empty, stacks until all tokens have been used. Then, the players play nim. Of course, because the solution for the game of nim is known, the goal of the player who starts nim play is a placement of the tokens so that the Nim-sum of the stack heights at the end of building is different from 0. This game is trivial if the total number of tokens is odd as the Nim-sum could never be 0, or if both the number of tokens and the number of stacks are even, since a simple mimicking strategy results in a Nim-sum of 0 after each of the second player's moves. We present the solution for this game for some non-trivial cases and state a general conjecture.

A circular Nim game is a two player impartial combinatorial game consisting of n stacks of tokens placed in a circle. A move consists of choosing k consecutive stacks, and taking at least one token from one or more of the k stacks. The last player able to make a move wins. We prove results on the structure of the losing positions for small n and k and pose some open questions for further investigations.