arXiv++ Combinatorics

Patterns are words with terminals and variables. The language of a pattern is the set of words obtained by uniformly substituting all variables with words that contain only terminals. In their original definition, patterns only allow for multiple distinct occurrences of some variables to be related by the equality relation, represented by using the same variable multiple times. In an extended notion, called relational patterns and relational pattern languages, variables may be related by arbitrary other relations. We extend the ongoing investigation of the main decision problems for patterns (namely, the membership problem, the inclusion problem, and the equivalence problem) to relational pattern languages under a wide range of individual relations. It is shown show that - even for many much simpler or less restrictive relations - the complexity and (un)decidability characteristics of these problems do not change compared to the classical case where variables are related only by equality.

In this work, we investigate the relationship between $k$-repre\-sentable graphs and graphs representable by $k$-local words. In particular, we show that every graph representable by a $k$-local word is $(k+1)$-representable. A previous result about graphs represented by $1$-local words is revisited with new insights. Moreover, we investigate both classes of graphs w.r.t. hereditary and in particular the speed as a measure. We prove that the latter ones belong to the factorial layer and that the graphs in this classes have bounded clique-width.

Patterns are words with terminals and variables. The language of a pattern is the set of words obtained by uniformly substituting all variables with words that contain only terminals. Length constraints restrict valid substitutions of variables by associating the variables of a pattern with a system (or disjunction of systems) of linear diophantine inequalities. Pattern languages with length constraints contain only words in which all variables are substituted to words with lengths that fulfill such a given set of length constraints. We consider membership, inclusion, and equivalence problems for erasing and non-erasing pattern languages with length constraints. Our main result shows that the erasing equivalence problem - one of the most prominent open problems in the realm of patterns - becomes undecidable if length constraints are allowed in addition to variable equality. Additionally, it is shown that the terminal-free inclusion problem, a prominent problem which has been shown to be undecidable in the binary case for patterns without any constraints, is also generally undecidable for all larger alphabets in this setting. Finally, we also show that considering regular constraints, i.e., associating variables also with regular languages as additional restrictions together with length constraints for valid substitutions, results in undecidability of the non-erasing equivalence problem. This sets a first upper bound on constraints to obtain undecidability in this case, as this problem is trivially decidable in the case of no constraints and as it has unknown decidability if only regular- or only length-constraints are considered.

Patterns are words with terminals and variables. The language of a pattern is the set of words obtained by uniformly substituting all variables with words that contain only terminals. Regular constraints restrict valid substitutions of variables by associating with each variable a regular language representable by, e.g., finite automata. Pattern languages with regular constraints contain only words in which each variable is substituted according to a set of regular constraints. We consider the membership, inclusion, and equivalence problems for erasing and non-erasing pattern languages with regular constraints. Our main result shows that the erasing equivalence problem, one of the most prominent open problems in the realm of patterns, becomes undecidable if regular constraints are allowed in addition to variable equality.

A {\em subsequence} of a word $w$ is a word $u$ that can be obtained by deleting some letters from $w$ while maintaining the relative order of the remaining letters, e.g., $\mathtt{lala}$ is a subsequence of $\mathtt{alfalfa}$. A word, over some alphabet $Σ$, which has all possible words of length $ι$ over $Σ$ as subsequences is called $ι$-universal, and the largest $ι$ for which this holds is called the universality index of $w$, and denoted $ι(w)$. Moreover, words that are not subsequences of $w$ are called absent subsequences (AS) of $w$, and their investigation was started in (Kosche et al., 2022). In this paper, we present tight bounds on the number of AS of a given length $k$ among all words with the same universality index $ι$. For both the lower and upper bound, we construct words that have, respectively, a minimal and maximal number of absent subsequences of the respective length $k$, and, in the case of the lower bound, we provide the exact number of missing subsequences as a closed form. Finally, we present efficient enumeration algorithms for the set of subsequences of given length of a word: we give a novel, optimal enumeration algorithm with output linear delay of this set of subsequences, with preprocessing time $O(|w|)$, which is further improved to an incremental enumeration algorithm with $O(1)$ delay of this set of subsequences, with preprocessing time $O(|w|)$.