arXiv++ Combinatorics

A hereditary class H of graphs is $χ$-bounded if there is a $χ$-binding function f such that for every $G$ in $H$, $χ(G)$ less than or equal to $f(ω(G))$. Here we prove that if a graph $G$ is free of 1. {Chair; P$_4$+K$_1$} or 2. {Chair; HVN}, then $χ(G)$ is linearly bounded by maximum clique size of G. We further prove that if $G$ is free of 3. {P$_4$+K$_1$; P$_3$ $\cup$ K$_1$} or 4. {P4+K1; K$_2$ $\cup$ 2K$_1$} or 5. {HVN; P$_3$ $\cup$ K$_1$} or 6. {HVN; K$_2$ $\cup$ 2K$_1$} or 7. {K$_{5-e}$; P$_3$ $\cup$ K$_1$} or 8. {K$_{5-e}$; K$_2$ $\cup$ 2K$_1$}, then there is a tight linear $χ$-bound for $G$.

Problem of finding an optimal upper bound for the chromatic no. of a graph is still open and very hard. Borodin and Kostochka Conjecture is still open and if proved will improve Brook bound on Chromatic no. of a graph. Here we prove Borodin & Kostochka Conjecture for (1) (P4 Union K1)-free (2) P5-free (3) Chair-free graphs and 4) graphs with dense neighbourhoods. Certain known results follow as Corollaries.

Reed Conjecture is open for more than 20 years now. Here we prove that Reed Conjecture is valid for (1) {P4UnionK1, Kite}-free graphs (2) {Chair, Kite}-free graphs (3) {K2UnionK2complement , H}-free graphs and (4) {2K2, M}-free graphs where H and M are graphs on six vertices each. Reed conjecture is still open in general.

Problem of finding an optimal upper bound for the chromatic no. of even 3K1-free graphs is still open and pretty hard. Here we prove Borodin & Kostochka Conjecture for 4K1-free graphs G i.e. If maximum degree of a {4 Times K1}-free graph is greater than or equal to 9, then the chromatic number of the graph is less than or equal to maximum of ω and {δ-1}.

Here we prove that Reed Conjecture is valid for {P5, Flag_Complement}-free graphs where FlagComplement is the complement of the Flag graph. Some of the known results follow as corollaries to our result. Reed conjecture is still open in general.

Borodin & Kostochka conjectured that if maximum degree of a graph is greater than or equal to 9, then the chromatic number of the graph is less than or equal to maximum of ω and maximum degree minus 1. Here we prove that this Conjecture is true for {P3 UNION K1}-free graphs and {K2 UNION complement of K2}-free graphs.

Problem of finding an optimal upper bound for the chromatic no. of a (3 Times K1)-free graph is still open and pretty hard. Here we prove that for a (3 Times K1)-free graph G with maximum degree greater than or equal to 8, χ is less than or equal to max (maximum degree-1, ω). We also prove that if G is (3 Times K1)-free, ω is equal to 4 and maximum degree is greater than or equal to 7, then χ is less than or equal to maximum degree-1. This implies that Borodin & Kostochka Conjecture is true for (3 Times K1)-free graphs as a corollary.

Here we prove that for a 2K2-free graph G with maximum degree greater than or equal to 5, the chromatic number is less than or equal to max{maximum degree-1, maximum clique size}. This implies that Borodin & Kostochka Conjecture is true for 2K2-free graphs.

Here we prove that a graph without some three induced subgraphs has chromatic number at the most equal to its maximum clique size plus one. Further we show that the bounds are tight and give examples to show that each of the three forbidden subgraphs is necessary in the hypothesis.

Although the chromatic number of a graph is not known in general, attempts have been made to find good bounds for the number. Here we prove that for a graph G with two forbidden subgraphs and maximum degree less than or equal to 2ω - 3, χ equals its maximum clique size. We also give examples to show that the condition is necessary.

Here in particular, we give a characterization of Quasi-line Graphs in terms of forbidden induced subgraphs. In general, we prove a necessary and sufficient condition for a graph to be a union of two cliques.

Problem of finding an optimal upper bound for χ of (3 Times K1)-free graphs is still open and pretty hard. It was proved by Choudum et al that upper bound on the χ of {3 Times K1, {2 Times K1 + (K2 UNION K1)}-free graphs is 2ω. We improve this by proving that if G is {3 Times K1, {2 Times K1 + (K2 UNION K1)}-free, then χ less than or equal to 3ω divided by 2 for ω not equal to 5, and χ less than or equal to 8 for ω = 5 where ω is the size of a maximum clique in G. We also give examples of extremal graphs.

Problem of finding an optimal upper bound for the chromatic no. of 3K1-free graphs is still open and pretty hard. It was proved by Choudum et al that an upper bound on the chromatic no. of {3K1, K1+C4}-free graphs, is 2ω. We improve this by proving that if G is {3K1, K1+C4}-free, then its chromatic no. is less than or equal to 3ω divided by 2, where ω is the size of a maximum clique in G. Also we give examples to show that this bound is tight.

Problem of finding an optimal upper bound for a chromatic no. of 3K1-free graphs is still open and pretty hard. Here we find a tight chromatic upper bound for {3K1, C5}-free graphs. We prove that if G is {3K1, C5}-free, then the chromatic no. <= (3ω-1)/2 where ω is the size of a maximum clique in G and show with examples that the bound is tight.