arXiv++ Combinatorics

We consider a model for complex networks that was recently proposed as a model for complex networks by Krioukov et al. In this model, nodes are chosen randomly inside a disk in the hyperbolic plane and two nodes are connected if they are at most a certain hyperbolic distance from each other. It has been previously shown that this model has various properties associated with complex networks, including a power-law degree distribution and a strictly positive clustering coefficient. The model is specified using three parameters : the number of nodes $N$, which we think of as going to infinity, and $α, ν> 0$ which we think of as constant. Roughly speaking $α$ controls the power law exponent of the degree sequence and $ν$ the average degree. Earlier work of Kiwi and Mitsche has shown that when $α< 1$ (which corresponds to the exponent of the power law degree sequence being $< 3$) then the diameter of the largest component is a.a.s.~polylogarithmic in $N$. Friedrich and Krohmer have shown it is a.a.s.~$Ω(\log N)$ and they improved the exponent of the polynomial in $\log N$ in the upper bound. Here we show the maximum diameter over all components is a.a.s.~$O(\log N)$ thus giving a bound that is tight up to a multiplicative constant.

Let A be a finite subset of a commutative additive group Z. The sumset and difference set of A are defined as the sets of pairwise sums and differences of elements of A, respectively. The well-known inequality $σ(A)^{1/2} \leq δ(A) \leq σ(A)^2,$ where $σ(A)=\frac{|A+A|}{|A|}$ is the doubling constant of A and $δ(A)=\frac{|A-A|}{|A|}$ is the difference constant of A, relates the relative sizes of the sumset and difference set of A. The exponent 2 in this inequality is known to be optimal, for the exponent 1/2 this is unknown. We determine those sets for which equality holds in the above inequality. We find that equality holds if and only if A is a coset of some finite subgroup of Z or, equivalently, if and only if both the doubling constant and difference constant are equal to 1. This implies that there is space for possible improvement of the exponent 1/2 in the inequality. We then use the derived methods to show that Plünnecke's inequality is strict when the doubling constant is larger than 1.