arXiv++ Combinatorics

The convexity number of a set $X \subset \mathbb{R}^2$ is the minimum number of convex subsets required to cover it. We study the following question: what is the largest possible convexity number $f(n)$ of $\mathbb{R}^2 \setminus S$, where $S$ is a set of $n$ points in general position in the plane? We prove that for all $n \geq 4$, $\lfloor\frac{n+5}{2}\rfloor \leq f(n) \leq \frac{7n+44}{11}$. We also show that for every $n \geq 4$, if the points of $S$ are in convex position then the convexity number of $\mathbb{R}^2 \setminus S$ is $\lfloor\frac{n+5}{2}\rfloor$. This solves a problem of Lawrence and Morris [Finite sets as complements of finite unions of convex sets, Disc. Comput. Geom. 42 (2009), 206-218].

Finite unions of convex sets are a central object of study in discrete and computational geometry. In this paper we initiate a systematic study of complements of such unions -- i.e., sets of the form $S=\mathbb{R}^d \setminus (\cup_{i=1}^n K_i)$, where $K_i$ are convex sets. In the first part of the paper we study isolated points in $S$, whose number is related to the Betti numbers of $\cup_{i=1}^n K_i$ and to its non-convexity properties. We obtain upper bounds on the number of such points, which are sharp for $n=3$ and significantly improve previous bounds of Lawrence and Morris (2009) for all $n \ll \frac{2^d}{d}$. In the second part of the paper we study coverings of $S$ by well-behaved sets. We show that $S$ can be covered by at most $g(d,n)$ flats of different dimensions, in such a way that each $x \in S$ is covered by a flat whose dimension equals the `local dimension' of $S$ in the neighborhood of $x$. Furthermore, we determine the structure of a minimum cover that satisfies this property. Then, we study quantitative aspects of this minimum cover and obtain sharp upper bounds on its size in various settings.

A family $\mathcal{F}$ of sets satisfies the $(p,q)$-property if among every $p$ members of $\mathcal{F}$, some $q$ can be pierced by a single point. The celebrated $(p,q)$-theorem of Alon and Kleitman asserts that for any $p \geq q \geq d+1$, any family $\mathcal{F}$ of compact convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$ that satisfies the $(p,q)$-property can be pierced by a finite number $c(p,q,d)$ of points. A similar theorem with respect to piercing by $(d-1)$-dimensional flats, called $(d-1)$-transversals, was obtained by Alon and Kalai. In this paper we prove the following result, which can be viewed as an $(\aleph_0,k+2)$-theorem with respect to $k$-transversals: Let $\mathcal{F}$ be an infinite family of closed balls in $\mathbb{R}^d$, and let $0 \leq k < d$. If among every $\aleph_0$ elements of $\mathcal{F}$, some $k+2$ can be pierced by a $k$-dimensional flat, then $\mathcal{F}$ can be pierced by a finite number of $k$-dimensional flats. We derive this result as a corollary of a more general result which proves the same assertion for families of not necessarily convex objects called \emph{near-balls}, to be defined below. This is the first $(p,q)$-theorem in which the assumption is weakened to an $(\infty,\cdot)$ assumption. Our proofs combine geometric and topological tools.

For a family $\mathcal{F}$ of sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$, the Krasnoselskii number of $\mathcal{F}$ is the smallest $m$ such that for any $S \in \mathcal{F}$, if every $m$ points of $S$ are visible from a common point in $S$, then any finite subset of $S$ is visible from a single point. More than 35 years ago, Peterson asked whether there exists a Krasnoselskii number for general sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$. Excluding results for special cases of sets with strong topological restrictions, the best known result is due to Breen, who showed that if such a Krasnoselskii number in $\mathbb{R}^2$ exists, then it is larger than $8$. In this paper we answer Peterson's question in the negative by showing that there is no Krasnoselskii number for the family of all sets in $\mathbb{R}^2$. The proof is non-constructive, and uses transfinite induction and the well ordering theorem. In addition, we consider Krasnoselskii numbers with respect to visibility through polygonal paths of length $ \leq n$, for which an analogue of Krasnoselskii's theorem was proved by Magazanik and Perles. We show, by an explicit construction, that for any $n \geq 2$, there is no Krasnoselskii number for the family of general sets in $\mathbb{R}^2$ with respect to visibility through paths of length $\leq n$. (Here the counterexamples are finite unions of line segments.)

Let G be a complete convex geometric graph, and let F be a family of subgraphs of G. A blocker for F is a set of edges, of smallest possible size, that has an edge in common with every element of F. In [C. Keller and M. A. Perles, Blockers for simple Hamiltonian paths in convex geometric graphs of even order, Disc. Comput. Geom., 60(1) (2018), pp. 1-8] we gave an explicit description of all blockers for the family of simple (i.e., non-crossing) Hamiltonian paths (SHPs) in G in the `even' case |V(G)|=2m. It turned out that all the blockers are simple caterpillar trees of a certain class. In this paper we give an explicit description of all blockers for the family of SHPs in the `odd' case |V(G)|=2m-1. In this case, the structure of the blockers is more complex, and in particular, they are not necessarily simple. Correspondingly, the proof is more complicated.

Let G be a complete convex geometric graph on 2m vertices, and let F be a family of subgraphs of G. A blocker for F is a set of edges, of smallest possible size, that meets every element of F. In [C. Keller and M. A. Perles, On the smallest sets blocking simple perfect matchings in a convex geometric graph, Israel J. Math. 187 (2012), pp. 465-484], we gave an explicit description of all blockers for the family of simple perfect matchings (SPMs) of G. In this paper we show that the family of simple Hamiltonian paths (SHPs) in G has exactly the same blockers as the family of SPMs. Our argument is rather short, and provides a much simpler proof of the result of [KP12].

Let P be a finite set of points in general position in the plane. The structure of the complete graph K(P) as a geometric graph includes, for any pair [a,b],[c,d] of vertex-disjoint edges, the information whether they cross or not. The simple (i.e., non-crossing) spanning trees (SSTs) of K(P) are the vertices of the so-called Geometric Tree Graph of P, G(P). Two such vertices are adjacent in G(P) if they differ in exactly two edges, i.e., if one can be obtained from the other by deleting an edge and adding another edge. In this paper we show how to reconstruct from G(P) (regarded as an abstract graph) the structure of K(P) as a geometric graph. We first identify within G(P) the vertices that correspond to spanning stars. Then we regard each star S(z) with center z as the representative in G(P) of the vertex z of K(P). (This correspondence is determined only up to an automorphism of K(P) as a geometric graph.) Finally we determine for any four distinct stars S(a), S(b), S(c), and S(d), by looking at their relative positions in G(P), whether the corresponding segments cross.

We say that a finite set S of points in R^d is in "strong general position" if for any collection {F_1,..., F_r} of r pairwise disjoint subsets of S (1 <= r <= |S|) we have: d-dim (the intersection of aff F_1,aff F_2,...,aff F_r) = min{d+1, (d-dim aff F_1)+(d-dim aff F_2)+...+(d-dim aff F_r)}. In this paper we reduce the set of conditions that one has to check in order to determine if S is in "strong general position".

A well-known result of Kupitz from 1982 asserts that the maximal number of edges in a convex geometric graph (CGG) on $n$ vertices that does not contain $k+1$ pairwise disjoint edges is $kn$ (provided $n>2k$). For $k=1$ and $k=n/2-1$, the extremal examples are completely characterized. For all other values of $k$, the structure of the extremal examples is far from known: their total number is unknown, and only a few classes of examples were presented, that are almost symmetric, consisting roughly of the $kn$ "longest possible" edges of $CK(n)$, the complete CGG of order $n$. In order to understand further the structure of the extremal examples, we present a class of extremal examples that lie at the other end of the spectrum. Namely, we break the symmetry by requiring that, in addition, the graph admit an independent set that consists of $q$ consecutive vertices on the boundary of the convex hull. We show that such graphs exist as long as $q \leq n-2k$ and that this value of $q$ is optimal. We generalize our discussion to the following question: what is the maximal possible number $f(n,k,q)$ of edges in a CGG on $n$ vertices that does not contain $k+1$ pairwise disjoint edges, and, in addition, admits an independent set that consists of $q$ consecutive vertices on the boundary of the convex hull? We provide a complete answer to this question, determining $f(n,k,q)$ for all relevant values of $n,k$ and $q$.

In this paper we present a complete characterization of the smallest sets that block all the simple spanning trees (SSTs) in a complete geometric graph. We also show that if a subgraph is a blocker for all SSTs of diameter at most 4, then it must block all simple spanning subgraphs, and in particular, all SSTs. For convex geometric graphs, we obtain an even stronger result: being a blocker for all SSTs of diameter at most 3 is already sufficient for blocking all simple spanning subgraphs.

We give a tight upper bound on the polygonal diameter of the interior, resp. exterior, of a simple $n$-gon, $n \ge 3$, in the plane as a function of $n$, and describe an $n$-gon $(n \ge 3)$ for which both upper bounds (for the interior and the exterior) are attained \emph{simultaneously}.

Consider the complete convex geometric graph on $2m$ vertices, $CGG(2m)$, i.e., the set of all boundary edges and diagonals of a planar convex $2m$-gon $P$. In [C. Keller and M. Perles, On the Smallest Sets Blocking Simple Perfect Matchings in a Convex Geometric Graph], the smallest sets of edges that meet all the simple perfect matchings (SPMs) in $CGG(2m)$ (called "blockers") are characterized, and it is shown that all these sets are caterpillar graphs with a special structure, and that their total number is $m \cdot 2^{m-1}$. In this paper we characterize the co-blockers for SPMs in $CGG(2m)$, that is, the smallest sets of edges that meet all the blockers. We show that the co-blockers are exactly those perfect matchings $M$ in $CGG(2m)$ where all edges are of odd order, and two edges of $M$ that emanate from two adjacent vertices of $P$ never cross. In particular, while the number of SPMs and the number of blockers grow exponentially with $m$, the number of co-blockers grows super-exponentially.

In this paper we present a complete characterization of the smallest sets which block all the simple perfect matchings in a complete convex geometric graph on $2m$ vertices. In particular, we show that all these sets are caterpillar graphs with a special structure, and that their total number is $m \cdot 2^{m-1}$.

Let V be a finite set of points in Euclidean d-space (d >= 2). The intersection of all unit balls B(v,1) centered at v, where v ranges over V, henceforth denoted by B(V) is the ball polytope associated with V. Note that B(V) is non-empty iff the circumradius of V is <= 1. After some preparatory discussion on spherical convexity and spindle convexity, the paper focuses on two central themes. [a] Define the boundary complex of B(V) (assuming it is non-empty, of course), i.e., define its vertices, edges and facets in dimension 3 (in dimension 2 this complex is just a circuit), and investigate its basic properties. [b] Apply results of this investigation to characterize finite sets of diameter 1 in (Euclidean) 3-space for which the diameter is attained a maximal number of times as a segment (of length 1) with both endpoints in V. A basic result for such a characterization goes back to Grunbaum, Heppes and Straszewicz, who proved independently that the diameter of V is attained at most 2|V|-2 times, thus affirming a conjecture of Vazsonyi from circa 1935. Call V extremal if its diameter is attained this maximal number (2|V|-2) of times. We extend the aforementioned basic result by showing that V is extremal iff V coincides with the set of vertices of its ball polytope B(V) and show that in this case the boundary complex of B(V) is self-dual in some strong sense. For the sake of priority we mention that, in the present form (except for a few changes in the footnotes), the paper was submitted to a journal already in February 1, 2008.

The well know theorem of Tverberg states that if n > (d+1)(r-1) then one can partition any set of n points in R^d to r disjoint subsets whose convex hulls have a common point. The numbers T(d,r) = (d + 1)(r - 1) + 1 are known as Tverberg numbers. Reay asks the following question: if we add an additional parameter k (1 < k < r+1) what is the minimal number of points we need in order to guarantee that there exists an r partition of them such that any k of the r convex hulls intersect. This minimal number is denoted by T(d,r,k). Reay conjectured that T(d,r,k) = T(d,r) for all d,r and k. In this article we prove that this is true for the following cases: when k > [ (d+3)/2 ]-1 or when d < rk/(r-k)-1 and for the specific values d = 3; r = 4; k = 2 and d = 5; r = 3; k = 2.