Papers by Michael A. Henning
84 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Fair Domination in Graphs
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
A fair dominating set in a graph $G$ (or FD-set) is a dominating set $S$ such that all vertices not in $S$ are dominated by the same number of vertices from $S$; that is, every two vertices not in $S$ have the same number of neighbors in $S$. The fair domination number, $fd(G)$, of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a FD-set. We present various results on the fair domination number of a graph. In particular, we show that if $G$ is a connected graph of order $n \ge 3$ with no isolated vertex, then $fd(G) \le n - 2$, and we construct an infinite family of connected graphs achieving equality in this bound. We show that if $G$ is a maximal outerplanar graph, then $fd(G) < 17n/19$. If $T$ is a tree of order $n \ge 2$, then we prove that $fd(T) \le n/2$ with equality if and only if $T$ is the corona of a tree.
Equality in a Linear Vizing-Like Relation that Relates the Size and Total Domination Number of a Graph
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Let $G$ be a graph each component of which has order at least 3, and let $G$ have order $n$, size $m$, total domination number $γ_t$ and maximum degree $Δ(G)$. Let $Δ= 3$ if $Δ(G) = 2$ and $Δ= Δ(G)$ if $Δ(G) \ge 3$. It is known [J. Graph Theory 49 (2005), 285--290; J. Graph Theory 54 (2007), 350--353] that $m \le Δ(n- γ_t)$. In this paper we characterize the extremal graphs $G$ satisfying $m = Δ(n- γ_t)$.
Directed Domination in Oriented Graphs
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
A directed dominating set in a directed graph $D$ is a set $S$ of vertices of $V$ such that every vertex $u \in V(D) \setminus S$ has an adjacent vertex $v$ in $S$ with $v$ directed to $u$. The directed domination number of $D$, denoted by $γ(D)$, is the minimum cardinality of a directed dominating set in $D$. The directed domination number of a graph $G$, denoted $Γ_d(G)$, which is the maximum directed domination number $γ(D)$ over all orientations $D$ of $G$. The directed domination number of a complete graph was first studied by Erdös [Math. Gaz. 47 (1963), 220--222], albeit in disguised form. We extend this notion to directed domination of all graphs. If $α$ denotes the independence number of a graph $G$, we show that if $G$ is a bipartite graph, we show that $Γ_d(G) = α$. We present several lower and upper bounds on the directed domination number.
A Greedy Partition Lemma for Directed Domination
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
A directed dominating set in a directed graph $D$ is a set $S$ of vertices of $V$ such that every vertex $u \in V(D) \setminus S$ has an adjacent vertex $v$ in $S$ with $v$ directed to $u$. The directed domination number of $D$, denoted by $γ(D)$, is the minimum cardinality of a directed dominating set in $D$. The directed domination number of a graph $G$, denoted $Γ_d(G)$, which is the maximum directed domination number $γ(D)$ over all orientations $D$ of $G$. The directed domination number of a complete graph was first studied by Erdös [Math. Gaz. 47 (1963), 220--222], albeit in disguised form. In this paper we prove a Greedy Partition Lemma for directed domination in oriented graphs. Applying this lemma, we obtain bounds on the directed domination number. In particular, if $α$ denotes the independence number of a graph $G$, we show that $α\le Γ_d(G) \le α(1+2\ln(n/α))$.