arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study a natural extension of Ramsey theory relative to the classes of maximally planar and maximally outerplanar graphs. This can be seen as a continuation of the study of `Planar Ramsey theory', introduced by Axenovich et al. The question we ask is the following: For a fixed family $\mathcal{K}$ of graphs and a pair of graphs $\{H,F\}$, does there exist an integer $r_{\mathcal{K}} (H, F)$ such that for every graph $G \in \mathcal{K}$ with $|G| \geq r_{\mathcal{K}}(H, F)$, every red/blue edge-colouring of $G$ admits a red copy of $H$ or a blue copy of $F$? When such an integer exists, we say $\{H,F\}$ is unavoidable in $\mathcal{K}$,, and otherwise $\{H,F\}$ is avoidable in $\mathcal{K}$. Our work focuses on this problem where $\mathcal{K} = \mathcal{K}_{\mathrm{MOP}}$ and $\mathcal{K} = \mathcal{K}_{\mathrm{MP}}$, which denote the families of maximal outerplanar (MOP) graphs and maximal planar (MP) graphs, respectively. This framework generalises the classical Ramsey problem relative to these classes, as the case with $\mathcal{K} = \{K_n \colon n \geq 2\}$ corresponds to classical Ramsey. We also study the corresponding Ramsey numbers for MOP and MP, which we denote as $r_{\mathrm{MOP}}(H, F)$ and $r_{\mathrm{MP}}(H, F)$. In the case when $\mathcal{K} = \mathcal{K}_{\mathrm{MOP}}$, we completely determine all unavoidable pairs $\{H, F\}$ with $|E(F)| \geq 2$, together with upper bounds and sometimes exact values of $r_{\mathrm{MOP}}(H, F)$. When $\mathcal{K} = \mathcal{K}_{\mathrm{MP}}$, we completely determine all unavoidable pairs in the diagonal case $\{H, H\}$ when $H$ is connected, showing that $H$ must be one of the graphs $P_3$, $P_4$, $P_5$, $K_{1, 3}$ or the fork graph $S_{2,1,1}$. This work opens up further possibilities in the study of Ramsey theory relative to a class, and we offer several open problems in this vein.

We consider the following problem: Let $H$ and $F$ be two graphs on $k$ vertices and assume $F \neq H$. We say that $H$ and $F$ are incomparable if neither $F$ nor $H$ contains the other. Let $H$ be a graph on $k$ vertices and let $G$ be a graph on at least $k$ vertices. Then $G$ is said to be $H$-exact if any induced subgraph of $G$ on $k$ vertices is either isomorphic to $H$ or incomparable with $H$. Exact($H$) is the family of all graphs $G$ which are $H$-exact. We pose the following problem: For a graph $H$ on $k$ vertices, determine or estimate $f(H) = \max \{n: \exists G \in \text{Exact}(H), |V (G)| = n\}$. Among the many results obtained in this paper the following are representatives concerning trees and matchings: 1. For a tree on $k \geq 3$ vertices, $ (k - 1)(\left \lceil \frac{k}{2} \right \rceil -1 ) \leq f(T) \leq ( k-1)^2$. 2. For $k \geq 4$, $f(K_{1,k-1}) = (k-1)(k-2)$. 3. For $k \geq 5$, $f(P_k) = \frac{(k-1)}{2}$ if $k$ is odd and $f(P_k) = \frac{(k-1)(k-2)}{2}+1$ if $k$ is even. 4. $f(nK_2) = 3n$ for $n = 2, 3$ and $f(nK_2) = 4n - 4$ for $n \geq 4$.

The graph isolation problem was introduced by Caro and Hansberg in 2015. It is a vast generalization of the classical graph domination problem and its study is expanding rapidly. In this paper, we address a number of questions that arise naturally. Let $F$ be a graph. We show that the $F$-isolating set problem is NP-complete if $F$ is connected. We investigate how the $F$-isolation number $ι(G,F)$ of a graph $G$ is affected by the minimum degree $d$ of $G$, establishing a bounded range, in terms of $d$ and the orders of $F$ and $G$, for the largest possible value of $ι(G,F)$ with $d$ sufficiently large. We also investigate how close $ι(G,tF)$ is to $ι(G,F)$, using domination and, in suitable cases, the Erdos-Posa property.

An odd independent set $S$ in a graph $G=(V,E)$ is an independent set of vertices such that, for every vertex $v \in V \setminus S$, either $N(v) \cap S = \emptyset$ or $|N(v) \cap S| \equiv 1$ (mod 2), where $N(v)$ stands for the open neighborhood of $v$. The largest cardinality of odd independent sets of a graph $G$, denoted $α_{od}(G)$, is called the odd independence number of $G$. This new parameter is a natural companion to the recently introduced strong odd chromatic number. A proper vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a strong odd coloring if, for every vertex $v \in V(G)$, each color used in the neighborhood of $v$ appears an odd number of times in $N(v)$. The minimum number of colors in a strong odd coloring of $G$ is denoted by $χ_{so}(G)$. A simple relation involving these two parameters and the order $|G|$ of $G$ is $α_{od}(G)\cdotχ_{so}(G) \geq |G|$, parallel to the same on chromatic number and independence number. In the present work, which is a companion to our first paper on the subject [The odd independence number of graphs, I: Foundations and classical classes], we focus on grid-like and chessboard-like graphs and compute or estimate their odd independence number and their strong odd chromatic number. Among the many results obtained, the following give the flavour of this paper: (1) $0.375 \leq \varrho_{od}(P_\infty \Box P_\infty) \leq 0.384615...$, where $\varrho_{od}(P_\infty \Box P_\infty)$ is the odd independence ratio. (2) $χ_{so}(G_d) = 3$ for all $d \geq 1$, where $G_d$ is the infinite $d$-dimensional grid. As a consequence, $\varrho_{od}(G_d) \geq 1/3$. (3) The $r$-King graph $G$ on $n^2$ vertices has $α_{od}(G) = \lceil n/(2r+1) \rceil^2$. Moreover, $χ_{so}(G) = (2r + 1)^2$ if $n \geq 2r + 1$, and $χ_{so}(G) = n^2$ if $n \leq 2r$. Many open problems are given for future research.

An odd independent set $S$ in a graph $G=(V,E)$ is an independent set of vertices such that, for every vertex $v \in V \setminus S$, either $N(v) \cap S = \emptyset$ or $|N(v) \cap S| \equiv 1$ (mod 2), where $N(v)$ stands for the open neighborhood of $v$. The largest cardinality of odd independent sets of a graph $G$, denoted $α_{od}(G)$, is called the odd independence number of $G$. This new parameter is a natural companion to the recently introduced strong odd chromatic number. A proper vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a strong odd coloring if, for every vertex $v \in V(G)$, each color used in the neighborhood of $v$ appears an odd number of times in $N(v)$. The minimum number of colors in a strong odd coloring of $G$ is denoted by $χ_{so}(G)$. A simple relation involving these two parameters and the order $|G|$ of $G$ is $α_{od}(G)\cdot χ_{so}(G) \geq |G|$, parallel to the same on chromatic number and independence number. We develop several basic inequalities concerning $α_{od}(G)$, and use already existing results on strong odd coloring, to derive lower bounds for odd independence in many families of graphs. We prove that $α_{od}(G) = α(G^2)$ holds for all claw-free graphs $G$, and present many results, using various techniques, concerning the odd independence number of cycles, paths, Moore graphs, Kneser graphs, the complete subdivision $S(K_n)$ of $K_n$, the half graphs $H_{n,n}$, and $K_p \Box K_q$. Further, we consider the odd independence number of the hypercube $Q_d$ and also of the complements of triangle-free graphs. Many open problems for future research are stated.

A $k$-decomposition $(G_1,\dots,G_k)$ of a graph $G$ is a partition of its edge set into $k$ spanning subgraphs $G_1,\dots,G_k$. The classical theorem of Nordhaus and Gaddum bounds $χ(G_1) + χ(G_2)$ and $χ(G_1) χ(G_2)$ over all 2-decompositions of $K_n$. For a graph parameter $p$, let $p(k,G) = \max \{ \sum_{i=1}^k p(Gi) \}$, taken over all $k$-decompositions of graph $G$. In this paper we consider $M(k,K_n) = M(k,n) = \max \{ \sum_{i=1}^k \mathrm{Mad}(G_i) \}$, taken over all $k$-decompositions of the complete graph $K_n$, where $\mathrm{Mad}(G)$ denotes the maximum average degree of $G$, $\mathrm{Mad}(G) = \max \{ 2e(H)/|H| : H \subseteq G \} = \max \{d(H) : H \subseteq G \}$. Among the many results obtained in this paper we mention the following selected ones. (1) $M(k, n) < \sqrt{k} n$, and $\lim_{k\to\infty} ( \liminf_{n\to\infty} \frac{M(k,n)}{\sqrt{k}\,n} ) = 1$. (2) Exact determination of $M(2,n)$. (3) Exact determination of $M(k,n)$ when $k = \binom{n}{2} - t$, $0 \leq t\leq (n-1)^2/3$. Applications of these bounds to other parameters considered before in the literature are given.

We start a systematic investigation concerning bipartite Turán number for trees. For a graph $F$ and integers $1 \leq a \leq b$ we define: $(i)$\quad $ex_b(a, b, F)$ is the largest number of edges that an $F$-free bipartite graph can have with part sizes $a$ and $b$. We write $ex_b(n, F)$ for $ex_b(n, n, F)$. $(ii)$\quad $ex_{b,c}(a, b, F)$ is the largest number of edges that an $F$-free connected, bipartite graph can have with part sizes $a$ and $b$. We write $ex_{b,c}(n, F)$ for $ex{b,c}(n, n, F)$. Both definitions are similar for a family $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs. We prove general lower bounds depending on the maximum degree of $F$, as well as on the cardinalities of the two vertex classes of $F$. We derive upper and lower bounds for $ex_b(n,F)$ in terms of $ex(2n,F)$ and $ex(n, F)$, the corresponding classical (not bipartite) Turán numbers. We solve both problems for various classes of graphs, including all trees up to six vertices for any $n$, for double stars $D_{s ,t}$ if $a \geq f(s,t )$, for some families of spiders, and more. We use these results to supply an answer to a problem raised by L. T. Yuan and X. D. Zhang [{\it Graphs and Combinatorics}, 2017] concerning $ex_b( n, \mathcal{T}_{k,\ell} )$, where $\mathcal{T}_{k,\ell}$ is the family of all trees with vertex classes of respective cardinalities $k$ and $\ell$. The asymptotic worst-case ratios between Turán-type functions are also inverstigated.

We start with a systematic study of the zero-sum Ramsey numbers. For a graph $G$ with $0 \ (\!\!\!\!\mod 3)$ edges, the zero-sum Ramsey number is defined as the smallest positive integer $R(G, \mathbb{Z}_3)$ such that for every $n \geq R(G, \mathbb{Z}_3)$ and every edge-colouring $f$ of $K_n$ using $\mathbb{Z}_3$, there is a zero-sum copy of $G$ in $K_n$ coloured by $f$, that is: $\sum_{e \in E(G)} f(e) \equiv 0 \ (\!\!\!\!\mod 3)$. Only sporadic results are known for these Ramsey numbers, and we discover many new ones. In particular we prove that for every forest $F$ on $n$ vertices and with $0 \ (\!\!\!\!\mod 3)$ edges, $R(F, \mathbb{Z}_3) \leq n+2$, and this bound is tight if all the vertices of $F$ have degrees $1 \ (\!\!\!\!\mod 3)$. We also determine exact values of $R(T, \mathbb{Z}_3)$ for infinite families of trees.

Anti-Ramsey theory was initiated in 1975 by Erdős, Simonovits and Sós, inspiring hundreds of publications since then. The present work is the third and last piece of our trilogy in which we introduce a far-reaching generalization via the following two functions for any graph $G$ and family ${\cal F}$ of graphs: If $K_2 \in {\cal F}$, let $f(n,G|{\cal F})$ be the smallest integer $k$ such that every edge coloring of $K_n$ with at least $k$ colors forces a copy of $G$ in which all color classes are members of ${\cal F}$. If $K_2 \notin {\cal F}$, let $g(n,G|{\cal F})$ be the largest integer $k$ for which there exists an edge coloring of $K_n$ using exactly $k$ colors, such that every copy of $G$ contains an induced color class which is a member of ${\cal F}$. We develop methods suitable for deriving asymptotically tight results for the $f$-function and the $g$-function for many combinations of $G$ and ${\cal F}$. The preceding parts of the trilogy are arXiv: 2405.19812 and 2408.04257, published in Discrete Applied Math. Vol. 363 and Mathematics Vol. 12:23, respectively.

Let $G$ be a graph and $\mathcal{F}$ a family of graphs. Define $α_{\mathcal{F}}(G)$ as the maximum order of any induced subgraph of $G$ that belongs to the family $\mathcal{F}$. For the family $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs with \emph{chromatic number} at most~$k$, we prove that if $G$ is $K_{1,r}$-free, then $α_{\mathcal{F}}(G) \le (r-1)kγ(G)$, where $γ(G)$ is the \emph{domination number}. When $\mathcal{F}$ is the family of empty graphs, this bound simplifies to $α(G) \le 2γ(G)$ for $K_{1,3}$-free (claw-free) graphs, where $α(G)$ is the \emph{independence number} of $G$. For $d$-regular graphs, this is further refined to the bound $α(G) \le 2\left(\frac{d+1}{d+2}\right)γ(G)$, which is tight for $d \in \{2, 3, 4\}$. Using Ramsey theory, we extend this framework to edge-hereditary graph families, showing that for $K_{1,r}$-free graphs, we have $α_{\mathcal{F}}(G) \le r(K_r, \mathcal{F^*})γ(G)$, where $\mathcal{F^*}$ is the set of graphs not in $\mathcal{F}$. Specializing to $K_q$-free graphs, we show $α_{\mathcal{F}}(G) \le (r(K_q, K_r) - 1)γ(G)$. Finally, for the \emph{$k$-independence number} $α_k(G)$, we prove that if $G$ is $K_{1,r}$-free with order $n$ and minimum degree $δ\ge k+1$, \[ α_k(G) \le \left( \frac{(r-1)(k+1)}{δ- k + (r-1)(k+1)} \right) n, \] and this bound is sharp for all parameters.

A strong odd coloring of a simple graph $G$ is a proper coloring of the vertices of $G$ such that for every vertex $v$ and every color $c$, either $c$ is used an odd number of times in the open neighborhood $N_G(v)$ or no neighbor of $v$ is colored by $c$. The smallest integer $k$ for which $G$ admits a strong odd coloring with $k$ colors is the strong odd chromatic number, $χ_{soc}(G)$. These coloring notion and graph parameter were recently defined in [H. Kwon and B. Park, Strong odd coloring of sparse graphs, ArXiv:2401.11653v2]. We answer a question raised by the originators concerning the existence of a constant bound for the strong odd chromatic number of all planar graphs. We also consider strong odd colorings of trees, unicyclic graphs and graph products.

A graph $G$ of constant link $L$ is a graph in which the neighborhood of any vertex induces a graph isomorphic to $L$. Given two different graphs, $H$ and $G$, the induced Turán number ${\rm ex}(n; H, G{\rm -ind})$ is defined as the maximum number of edges in an $n$-vertex graph having no subgraph isomorphic to $H$ and no copy from $G$ as an induced subgraph. Our main motivation in this paper is to establish a bridge between graphs with constant link and induced Turán numbers via the class of $t$-regular, $k$-uniform (linear) hypergraphs of girth at least $4$, as well as to present several methods of constructing connected graphs with constant link. We show that, for integers $t \geq 3$ and $k \geq 3$, ${\rm ex}(n; C_k, K_{1,t}{\rm -ind}) \leq (k - 2)(t - 1)n/2$ and that equality holds for infinitely many values of $n$. This result is built upon the existence of graphs with constant link $tL$ with restricted cycle length, which we prove in another theorem. More precisely, we show that, given a graph $F$ with constant link $L$ and circumference $c$, then, for all integers $t \geq 2$ and $g > c$, there exists a graph with constant link $tL$ which is free of cycles of length $l$, for all $c < l < g$. We provide two proofs of this result using distinct approaches. We further present constructions of graphs with constant links $tL$, $t \geq 2$, and restricted cycle length based on Steiner Systems. Finally, starting from a connected graph of constant link $tL$, for $t \geq 2$, having order $n$ and restricted cycle lengths, we provide a method to construct an infinite collection of connected graphs of constant link $tL$ that preserves the cycle length restriction, and whose orders form an arithmetic progression $qn$, $q \geq 1$.

Let $G$ be a simple graph and let $L(G)$ denote the \emph{line graph} of $G$. A \emph{$p$-independent} set in $G$ is a set of vertices $S \subseteq V(G)$ such that the subgraph induced by $S$ has maximum degree at most $p$. The \emph{$p$-independence number} of $G$, denoted by $α_p(G)$, is the cardinality of a maximum $p$-independent set in $G$. In this paper, and motivated by the recent result that independence number is at most matching number for regular graphs~\cite{CaDaPe2020}, we investigate which values of the non-negative integers $p$, $q$, and $r$ have the property that $α_p(G) \leq α_q(L(G))$ for all r-regular graphs. Triples $(p, q, r)$ having this property are called \emph{valid $α$-triples}. Among the results we prove are: \begin{itemize} \item $(p, q, r)$ is valid $α$-triple for $p \geq 0$, $q \geq 3$ , and $r\geq 2$. \item $(p, q, r)$ is valid $α$-triple for $p \leq q < 3$ and $r\geq 2$. \item $(p, q, r)$ is valid $α$-triple for $p \geq 0$, $q = 2$, and $r$ even. \item $(p, q, r)$ is valid $α$-triple for $p \geq 0$, $q = 2$, and $r$ odd with $r = \max \Big \{ 3, \frac{17(p+1)}{16}\Big \}$. \end{itemize} We also show a close relation between undetermined possible valid $α$-triples, the Linear Aboricity Conjecture, and the Path-Cover Conjecture.

We consider extremal edge-coloring problems inspired by the theory of anti-Ramsey / rainbow coloring, and further by odd-colorings and conflict-free colorings. Let $G$ be a graph, and $F$ any given family of graphs. For every integer $n \geq |G|$, let $f(n,G|F)$ denote the smallest integer $k$ such that any edge coloring of the complete graph $K_n$ with at least $k$ colors forces a copy of $G$ in which each color class induces a member of $F$. Observe that in anti-Ramsey problems each color class is a single edge; i.e., $F=\{K_2\}$. In our previous paper [arXiv:2405.19812], attention was given mostly to the case where $F$ is hereditary under subgraph inclusion. In the present work we consider coloring problems inspired by odd-coloring and conflict-free coloring. As we shall see, dealing with these problems requires distinct additional tools to those used in our first paper on the subject. Among the many results introduced in this paper, we mention: (1) For every graph $G$, there exists a constant $c=c(G)$ such that in any edge coloring of $K_n$ with at least $cn$ colors there is a copy of $G$ in which every vertex $v$ is incident with an edge whose color appears only once among all edges incident with $v$. (2) In sharp contrast to the above result we prove that if $F$ is the class of all odd graphs (having vertices with odd degrees only) then $f(n,K_k|F)=(1+o(1))$ex$(n,K_{\lceil k/2 \rceil})$, which is quadratic for $k \geq 5$. (3) We exactly determine $f(n,G|F)$ for small graphs when $F$ belongs to several families representing various odd/even coloring constraints.

We consider coloring problems inspired by the theory of anti-Ramsey / rainbow colorings that we generalize to a far extent. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a hereditary family of graphs; i.e., if $H\in \mathcal{F}$ and $H'\subset H$ then also $H'\subset \mathcal{F}$. For a graph $G$ and any integer $n \geq |G|$, let $f(n,G|\mathcal{F})$ denote the smallest number $k$ of colors such that any edge coloring of $K_n$ with at least $k$ colors forces a copy of $G$ in which each color class induces a member of $\mathcal{F}$. The case $\mathcal{F} = \{K_2\}$ is the notorious anti-Ramsey / rainbow coloring problem introduced by Erdős, Simonovits and Sós in 1973. Using the $\mathcal{F}$-deck of $G$, $D(G|\mathcal{F}) = \{ H : H = G - D, \, D \in \mathcal{F}\}$, we define $χ_\mathcal{F}(G) = \min \{ χ(H) : H \in D(G|\mathcal{F}) \}$. The main theorem we prove is: Suppose $\mathcal{F}$ is a hereditary family of graphs, and let $G$ be a graph not a member of $\mathcal{F}$. (1) If $χ_\mathcal{F}(G) \geq 3$, then $f(n, G |\mathcal{F}) = (1+o(1)) \, ex(n, K_{χ_\mathcal{F}(G)})$. (2) Otherwise $f(n, G |\mathcal{F}) = o(n^2)$. Among the families covered by this theorem are: matchings, acyclic graphs, planar and outerplanar graphs, $d$-degenerate graphs, graphs with chromatic number at most $k$, graphs with bounded maximum degree, and many more. We supply many concrete examples to demonstrate the wide range of applications of the main theorem; the next result is a representative of these examples. For $p \geq 5$ and $\mathcal{F} = \{ tK_2 : t \geq 1 \}$, we have $f(n,K_p |\mathcal{F}) = (1+o(1)) \, ex(n, K_{\lceil p/2 \rceil})$; this means a properly colored copy of $K_p$. In other words, a certain number of colors forces nearly twice as large properly edge-colored complete subgraphs as rainbow ones.

This paper concerns $(r,c)$-constant graphs, which are $r$-regular graphs in which the subgraph induced by the open neighbourhood of every vertex has precisely $c$ edges. The family of $(r,c)$-graphs contains vertex-transitive graphs (and in particular Cayley graphs), graphs with constant link (sometimes called locally isomorphic graphs), $(r,b)$-regular graphs, strongly regular graphs, and much more. This family was recently introduced in [arXiv:2312.08777] serving as important tool in constructing flip graphs [arXiv:2312.08777, arXiv:2401.02315]. In this paper we shall mainly deal with the following: i. Existence and non-existence of $(r, c)$-planar graphs. We completely determine the cases of existence and non-existence of such graphs and supply the smallest order in the case when they exist. ii. We consider the existence of $(r, c)$-circulant graphs. We prove that for $c \equiv 2 \ (\mathrm{mod} \ 3)$ no $(r,c)$-circulant graph exists and that for $c \equiv 0, 1 \ (\mathrm{mod} \ 3)$, $c > 0$ and $r \geq 6 + \sqrt{\frac{8c - 5}{3}}$ there exists $(r,c)$-circulant graphs. Moreover for $c = 0$ and $r \geq 1$, $(r, 0)$-circulants exist. iii. We consider the existence and non-existence of small $(r,c)$-constant graphs, supplying a complete table of the smallest order of graphs we found for $0 \leq c \leq \binom{r}{2}$ and $r \leq 6$. We shall also determine all the cases in this range for which $(r,c)$-constant graphs don't exist. We establish a public database of $(r,c)$-constant graphs for varying $r$, $c$ and order.

In this paper, we address problems related to parameters concerning edge mappings of graphs. Inspired by Ramsey's Theorem, the quantity $m(G, H)$ is defined to be the minimum number $n$ such that for every $f: E(K_n) \rightarrow E(K_n)$ either there is a fixed copy of $G$ with $f ( e) = e$ for all $e\in E(G)$, or a free copy of $H$ with $f( e) \notin E(H)$ for all $e\in E(H)$. We extend many old results from the 80's as well as proving many new results. We also consider several new interesting parameters with the same spirit.

In this paper, we address problems related to parameters concerning edge mappings of graphs. The quantity $h(n,G)$ is defined to be the maximum number of edges in an $n$-vertex graph $H$ such that there exists a mapping $f: E(H)\rightarrow E(H)$ with $f(e)\neq e$ for all $e\in E$ and further in all copies $G'$ of $G$ in $H$ there exists $e\in E(G')$ with $f(e)\in E(G')$. Among other results, we determine $h(n, G)$ when $G$ is a matching and $n$ is large enough. As a related concept, we say that $H$ is unavoidable for $G$ if for any mapping $f: E(H)\rightarrow E(H)$ with $f(e)\neq e$ there exists a copy $G'$ of $G$ in $H$ such that $f(e)\notin E(G')$ for all $e\in E(G)$. The set of minimal unavoidable graphs for $G$ is denoted by $\mathcal{M}(G)$. We prove that if $F$ is a forest, then $\mathcal{M}(F)$ is finite if and only if $F$ is a matching, and we conjecture that for all non-forest graphs $G$, the set $\mathcal{M}(G)$ is infinite. Several other parameters are defined with basic results proved. Lots of open problems remain.

It is proved that for integers $b, r$ such that $3 \leq b < r \leq \binom{b+1}{2} - 1$, there exists a red/blue edge-colored graph such that the red degree of every vertex is $r$, the blue degree of every vertex is $b$, yet in the closed neighborhood of every vertex there are more blue edges than red edges. The upper bound $r \le \binom{b+1}{2}-1$ is best possible for any $b \ge 3$. We further extend this theorem to more than two colours, and to larger neighbourhoods. A useful result required in some of our proofs, of independent interest, is that for integers $r,t$ such that $0 \leq t \le \frac{r^2}{2} - 5r^{3/2}$, there exists an $r$-regular graph in which each open neighborhood induces precisely $t$ edges. Several explicit constructions are introduced and relationships with constant linked graphs, $(r,b)$-regular graphs and vertex transitive graphs are revealed.

An infinite family of graphs ${\cal F}$ is called feasible if for any pair of integers $(n,m)$, $n \geq 1$, $0 \leq m \leq \binom{n}{2}$, there is a member $G \in {\cal F}$ such that $G$ has $n$ vertices and $m$ edges. We prove that given a graph $G$, the family ${\cal F}$$(G)$ of all induced $G$-free graphs is feasible if and only if $G$ is not $K_k$, $K_k\backslash K_2$, $\overline{K_k}$, $\overline{K_k\backslash K_2}$, for $k \geq 2$.