arXiv++ Combinatorics

We introduce and begin the study of sequence b-colorings, a natural generalization of the classical notion of b-colorings introduced by Irving and Manlove in 1999. In a sequence b-coloring, each color class is required to contain a prescribed minimum number of color-dominating vertices (CDVs). We establish several fundamental properties of the associated parameters, prove that every sequence is realizable, and show that the problem of deciding whether a particular graph realizes a particular sequence is NP-complete. We also characterize the sequences realized by cycles, obtain results on regular graphs with prescribed girth, and investigate colorings requiring one additional CDV, including a characterization of connected graphs with chromatic number $3$ for which no such coloring exists.

The directed clique number $\vecω(T)$ of a tournament $T$ is the minimum, over all orderings of the vertices of $T$, of the clique number of the graph whose edges are the arcs that point backward with respect to the ordering. In this paper, we prove that, for every integer $k \geq 3$, deciding whether $\vecω(T) \leq k$ is NP-complete. This answers a question of Nguyen, Scott, and Seymour, and contrasts with the classical undirected setting, where deciding whether $ω(G) \leq k$ is polynomial-time solvable for every fixed integer $k$. On the other hand, we give a polynomial-time algorithm distinguishing tournaments with $\vecω(T) \leq 2$ from those with $\vecω(T) > 100$. We also study the tournament analogue of the Gyárfás--Sumner conjecture. We construct new $\vecχ$-bounding tournaments and thereby prove a conjecture of Aboulker, Aubian, Charbit, and Lopes stating that every class of tournaments with bounded twin-width is $\vecχ$-bounded. We then exhibit new tournaments that are not $\vecχ$-bounding, disproving another conjecture of Aboulker, Aubian, Charbit, and Lopes, as well as two conjectures of Kim. Finally, we present infinite families of 3-$\vecω$-critical and 4-$\vecω$-critical tournaments.

We study graph coloring with color preferences, in which each vertex ranks the available colors. In addition to assigning different colors to adjacent vertices, we require the coloring to be stable: no group of vertices can cyclically exchange their assigned colors so that each strictly prefers its new color to its original one. We define the stable chromatic number $χ_\mathrm{stable}(G)$ of a graph $G$ as the minimum integer $k$ such that every preference profile admits a stable $k$-coloring of $G$. We establish several upper and lower bounds. In particular, for any acyclic orientation of the edges of $G$, the largest number of vertices reachable from a vertex by directed paths, including the vertex itself, is an upper bound on $χ_\mathrm{stable}(G)$. This shows that $χ_\mathrm{stable}(G)$ is well-defined. We also show that $O(t \log (1+n/t))$ colors suffice for an $n$-vertex graph $G$ of treewidth $t$, and complement this with a lower bound in terms of the Grundy number. Turning to the problem of finding a minimum stable coloring for a given profile, we show that stable $2$-colorability is polynomial-time solvable, whereas stable $k$-colorability is NP-complete for every fixed $k\ge 3$. Using the treewidth bound, we give a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm parameterized by treewidth.

A finite connected graph is rarely a Cayley graph. We measure how far it is from being one: given $G$ with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, how few edges must be added, or added and deleted, before the result is a Cayley graph of an abelian group of order $n$ on the same vertex set? This defines two invariants, the completion number $γ^{+}$ (additions only) and the Cayley edit distance $γ_{\triangle}$ (both), each normalized by $m$. We show that deciding the edit version is NP-complete already for a fixed cyclic host, by a reduction from Hamiltonian Cycle in which the edit cost of a labeling is $n+m-2k$ when it realizes a longest path with $k$ edges; the optimal cost is $m-n+2pp(G)$, bounded in polynomial time by the matching number. We prove that irregularity alone forces $γ^{+}(G)\ge nΔ^{*}/(2m)-1$, where $Δ^{*}$ is the least $d\geΔ$ with $nd$ even, computable in linear time from the degree sequence; we characterize equality exactly. It is attained on the star, where $γ^{+}(K_{1,q})=(q-1)/2$ and the star maximizes $γ^{+}$, while $γ_{\triangle}$ stays bounded by an absolute constant. We determine paths and grids exactly, $γ^{+}(P_n)=γ^{+}(P_n\,\square\,P_n)=1/(n-1)$, and show $γ_{\triangle}(K_{1,q})\to 2$, not the $3/2$ suggested by the additive case. We report an exhaustive certified census of all $995$ connected graphs on at most seven vertices. The degree bound is attained on $89.4\%$ and the two invariants separate strictly on $84.7\%$, though both rates vary sharply with order: attainment $100\%,100\%,84.8\%,89.7\%$ and separation $0\%,61.9\%,73.2\%,87.7\%$ for $n=4,5,6,7$, dominated by the $853$ graphs on seven vertices. The star uniquely maximizes both. Edit count and the bi-Lipschitz distortion of the completed host are independent, moving oppositely on stars and paths.Data and certificates at doi:10.5281/zenodo.21852006.

In this paper, we study fair division problems in which resources are structured as graphs and agents must receive connected bundles. This connectivity requirement fundamentally alters the problem, making it significantly more challenging than its classical counterpart. We focus on the fairness notion of $\mathrm{EF1}_{\mathrm{outer}}$, where envy can be eliminated by removing at most one vertex whose deletion does not disconnect the bundle -- a critical constraint for applications such as land division and network allocation. Our first result extends prior work by establishing the existence of $\mathrm{EF1}_{\mathrm{outer}}$ allocations for an infinite family of non-traceable graphs (that is, graphs that do not admit a Hamiltonian path), answering a central open question and generalizing Bilò et al.'s result for traceable graphs. We then make progress on a conjecture concerning the $\mathrm{EF1}_{\mathrm{outer}}$ spectrum of trees due to Chen and Zwicker. Finally, we complement our structural results with algorithmic insights, showing that deciding the existence of an $\mathrm{EF1}_{\mathrm{outer}}$ allocation is NP-complete even for binary additive valuations, thereby resolving an open complexity question. Taken together, our results deepen the connection between graph theory and fair division, and offer new tools for studying fairness in structured resource environments.

This article studies identifying codes in oriented graphs from a computational complexity perspective. We investigate the $\mathcal{F}$-Id Code problem, where given a simple graph $G$ and a vertex subset $C$, which induces a subgraph in the family $\mathcal{F}$, as inputs and ask whether it is possible to orient $G$ in such a way that $C$ becomes its oriented identifying code. Focusing on the family $\mathcal{F}_d$ of $d$-regular graphs, we establish a complete dichotomy by proving that the problem is polynomial-time solvable for $d\leq1$ and NP-complete for all $d\geq2$.

For two digraph properties $P_1$ and $P_2$, a $(P_1,P_2)$-arc-decomposition of a digraph $D$ is a partition $A(D)=A_1\mathbin{\dot\cup}A_2$ such that the spanning subdigraphs $D[A_1]$ and $D[A_2]$ have properties $P_1$ and $P_2$, respectively. For example, a (strong,strong)-arc-decomposition of a digraph $D=(V,A)$ is a partitioning $A=A_1\cup{}A_2$ of $A$ so that each of the spanning digraphs $D_i=(V,A_i)$, $i=1,2$ are strongly connected. We prove that it is NP-complete to decide whether a digraph admits an arc-decomposition with properties $(P_1,P_2)$ where $(P_1,P_2)\in \{$(is a perfect matching, having no odd directed cycle), (perfect matching, strong), (perfect matching, having an out-branching), (is a cycle factor, having no odd directed cycle)$\}$. These results settle some open problems posed by Bang-Jensen, Bessy, Gonçalves, and Picasarri-Arrieta [Theoret. Comput. Sci. 928 (2022), 167--182].

In a graph $G$, a set of edges $F$ is called a \emph{forcing set} if there exists a unique perfect matching $M$ such that $F \subseteq M$. Similarly, a set of edges $A$ is called an \emph{anti-forcing set} if the graph with edge set $ E(G)\setminus A$ has a unique perfect matching. It is known that, given a bipartite graph $G$ of maximum degree~$3$ and a perfect matching $M$, the problem of deciding whether there exists a forcing set of size at most $k$ for $M$ is NP-complete. Moreover, given a bipartite graph $G$ of maximum degree~$4$ and a perfect matching $M$, the problem of deciding whether there exists an anti-forcing set of size at most $k$ for $M$ is NP-complete. Furthermore, given a bipartite graph of maximum degree~$5$, the problem of deciding whether there exists a perfect matching $M$ that can be made unique by a forcing set of size at most $k$ is also NP-complete. In contrast, the computational complexity of deciding whether there exists a perfect matching $M$ that can be made unique by an anti-forcing set of size at most $k$ is not known, even for general graphs. In this paper, we show that all of these problems remain NP-complete even when restricted to bipartite graphs of maximum degree~$3$.

The cluster graphs on $n$ vertices, the disjoint unions of complete graphs, have the integer partitions of $n$ as their isomorphism classes, and the quotient edit distance $q^*(λ,μ)=\min_{σ\in S_n}|E(G_λ)\triangleσE(G_μ)|$ makes that set a metric space. Its metric geometry and its computational complexity both issue from one identity: $q^*$ is an affine function of the maximum of $\lVert X\rVert_F^2$ over the contingency tables with margins $λ$ and $μ$. Combinatorially, it yields two explicit $\ell_1$ models: the vertex-mass metric $δ_1$ on sorted degree sequences, with $\frac12δ_1\le q^*<\frac32δ_1$ and both constants optimal, and the block-energy metric $B$ on the vectors $\bigl(\binom{λ_i}2\bigr)_i$, with $q^*\le B\le2q^*-1$ by a per-table refinement measuring how far an alignment is from a block bijection. Hence $c_1(\mathcal K_n)\le2$, and an $O(n\log n)$-time algorithm returns an alignment of cost below $2q^*$ with the certificate $q^*\in[\lceil(B+1)/2\rceil,B]$. The Euclidean distortion of the class is $c_2(\mathcal K_n)=Θ(n^{1/4})$; against it we measure the weighted dyadic sums $F^{(γ)}$ of the Ferrers staircase, of dimension below $4n$ and computable in $O(n)$ time. The unweighted member has distortion exactly $Θ(n^{1/4}\sqrt{\log n})$, while the critical weight $γ=\frac14$ improves this unconditionally to $O(n^{1/4}(\log n)^{1/4})$ through an inverse energy inequality proved from the quantization of staircase jumps; removing the residual $(\log n)^{1/4}$ is reduced to one inverse inequality on the realizable cone. Computationally, the same identity gives a classification: deciding $q^*(λ,μ)\le Q$ is strongly NP-complete, evaluation is strongly NP-hard and admits no FPTAS unless $\mathrm P=\mathrm{NP}$, while the farthest alignment is polynomial-time solvable.

Arboricity and degeneracy are two fundamental and closely related graph parameters that measure the sparsity of a graph. Every $k$-degenerate graph is $k$-arboric, but some $k$-arboric graphs are only $(2k-1)$-degenerate. However, every maximal $k$-arboric multigraph with $n$ vertices and every maximal $k$-degenerate multigraph with $n$ vertices has exactly $k(n-1)$ edges. These basic observations lead to a natural structural question: How far are $k$-arboric graphs from being $k$-degenerate? We answer this question by showing that: By at most a $(k-1)$-bounded-degree graph apart. More specifically, we prove that a $k$-arboric multigraph admits a $(k,k-1)$-decomposition, that is, its edges can be partitioned into two multisets such that one spans a $k$-degenerate multigraph and the other spans a multigraph with every vertex having degree at most $k-1$. Moreover, we provide a complete characterisation of all possible such decomposition types. Namely, for any integers $k \ge 1$ and $d,h \ge 0$ we show that every $k$-arboric multigraph admits a $(d,h)$-decomposition if and only if $d\geq k$ and $d+h\geq 2k-1$. Our proofs are constructive and we present a polynomial time algorithm that produces such decompositions. By contrast, we show that related decision problems for general graphs (without constraints on the arboricity) are NP-complete.

A vertex cover of a graph $G$ is a subset of vertices $C \subseteq V(G)$ such that every edge of $G$ is incident to at least one vertex in $C$. The vertex cover number of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a vertex cover of $G$ and is denoted by $τ(G)$. A snark is a connected, bridgeless, cubic graph that has an edge chromatic number of four, meaning its edges cannot be properly colored with only three colors. In this work, we investigate the problem of determining the value of a minimum vertex cover for classes of snark graphs. Given a positive integer $k$, we firstly prove that determining whether an arbitrary snark has a vertex cover $C$ with size $|C| \leq k$ is an NP-complete problem. Secondly, we determine the vertex cover number $τ(G)$ for several subclasses of snark graphs, such as Flower snarks, Goldberg snarks, Generalized Blanuša snarks and Loupekine snarks.

A proper conflict-free (PCF) $k$-coloring of a graph $G$ is a proper $k$-coloring such that there exists a color that appears exactly once in the neighborhood of every non-isolated vertex $v\in V(G)$. The PCF chromatic number, denoted by $χ_{pcf}(G)$, is the least integer $k$ such that there exists a PCF $k$-coloring of $G$. Given a graph $G$ and a positive integer $k$, PCF $k$-COLORABILITY is to decide whether $G$ admits a PCF $k$-coloring. Ahn et al. [Discrete Appl. Math. 377 (2025) 10-17] proved that PCF $k$-COLORABILITY is NP-complete for bipartite graphs. We strengthen this result by proving that PCF $k$-COLORABILITY is NP-complete for perfect elimination bipartite graphs, which is a proper subclass of bipartite graphs. We also show that the PCF chromatic number of a graph cannot be approximated within $O(n^{1-\varepsilon})$ unless P=NP, for any $\varepsilon>0$. On the positive side, we provide linear-time algorithms for PCF $k$-COLORABILITY in block graphs, proper interval graphs, chain graphs, and pseudo-split graphs. We show that $χ_{pcf}(G)\leq ω(G)+1$ for block graphs, proper interval graphs, and pseudo-split graphs (except $C_5$), and we characterize all graphs for which the equality holds.

We study per-colour independent (k)-rainbow domination and its connection with independent domination in generalized prisms. Building on the known prism identity and the trivial regime above the maximum degree, we focus on the boundary case where the number of colours equals the maximum degree. For every fixed (k\ge 3), we prove that the decision problem remains NP-complete even on a highly restricted class of graphs: (C_4)-free, bipartite, ((k,2))-biregular subdivision graphs arising from simple (k)-regular graphs. The reduction gives an exact correspondence between optimal rainbow-independent dominating functions on the subdivision graph and proper (k)-edge-colourings of the original graph. We also introduce an excess parameter measuring how far the domination number lies above its natural lower bound. For cubic graphs, this excess coincides with the classical edge-colouring degree and therefore with standard resistance parameters for subcubic graphs. These results reveal a sharp one-unit threshold: above the maximum degree the problem becomes trivial for every graph, while at the boundary NP-hard instances already occur within a very narrow structural family.

For a finite hypergraph H, the complements of the models of its associated definite Horn CNF are exactly the stopping sets of H; hence the complements of its coatoms are the inclusion-minimal nonempty stopping sets. We study their output-sensitive enumeration from the hypergraph incidence representation. Our main result is a representation of arbitrary Horn model posets whose incidence size is linear in the incidence length of the normalized Horn input. Given a Horn CNF $Γ$, we construct a hypergraph $C(Γ)$ of rank at most three whose proper-model poset is inclusion-order isomorphic to the model poset of $Γ$; equivalently, each source model has a unique extension to a proper target model. Thus maximal models of $Γ$ correspond bijectively to target coatoms. Combining this representation with the maximal-model construction of Kavvadias, Sideri, and Stavropoulos shows that coatom enumeration is not in OutputP unless P=NP, even when all hyperedges have size two or three. Incidence splitting reduces maximum element frequency to three while preserving the stopping-set poset, and a local replacement of two-element hyperedges yields the same lower bound for three-uniform hypergraphs of maximum element frequency at most three. These thresholds are conditionally sharp for arbitrary-order enumeration: rank at most two and maximum element frequency at most two both admit output-linear total-time generation; in the frequency-two case, a polynomial-delay, polynomial-space algorithm is also available. In contrast, coatom extension is NP-complete already for three-uniform hypergraphs of exact element frequency two.

Symmetric Numerical Three-Dimensional Matching (SN3DM) asks whether three disjoint labeled classes with identical weight multisets can be partitioned into class-transversal triples of one common target sum. Its theme is role recovery under marginal symmetry: identical numerical catalogues force the asymmetric source roles to be reconstructed from incidence structure alone. This tutorial develops three complementary hardness results for that symmetry restriction. Part I gives a unary-polynomial reduction from N3DM. Source roles become ports in one common occurrence set, a uniquely forced filler system reserves one main incidence per port, bipartite edge coloring restores the output-class labels, and a no-carry mixed-radix encoding packs four coordinates into positive integers. Hence SN3DM is strongly NP-complete. Part II studies Max-SN3DM, for which strong NP-hardness alone does not exclude a PTAS. Two numerical compilers lift Petrank's perfect-completeness gap for bounded 3DM to unary Max-N3DM, and a defect-stability lemma shows that a symmetric matching of size 13n - d yields a source matching of size at least n - 21d, where n is the multiset cardinality, and d is a symmetric defect. Hence, for some epsilon > 0, it is NP-hard to separate perfect instances from those of optimum at most (1- epsilon) times perfect, so no PTAS exists unless P = NP. Every maximal legal triple matching is a 3-approximation, placing the problem in APX. Part III supplies the approximation-preserving reduction Part II does not claim. An exact pair compiler and a one-live-port separation map degree-three Maximum 3DM to unary Max-SN3DM with OPT(Max-SN3DM) = Gamma + OPT(Max-3DM) for a fixed offset Gamma and one-for-one optimum-error transfer. The L-reduction has constants alpha = 764 and beta = 1, so Max-SN3DM is APX-complete. The two are incomparable; worked yes / no instances audit each construction.

A role colouring of a graph $G$ is an assignment of colours to the vertices of $G$ such that two vertices of the same colour have identical sets of colours in their neighbourhoods. This model is used to capture the idea of vertices having roles in a contact network, consistent with the set of roles of their contacts. We define an extension of the role colouring problem to temporal graphs. Temporal roles are defined via an automaton with states and transitions capturing both the current colour of a vertex and information about its current and past adjacencies. We show, by a reduction from the static problem, that the temporal role colouring problem is NP-complete. To contend with this intractability, we explore several parameterisations. We give fixed-parameter tractability results with respect to the number of states of the automaton combined with either the vertex-interval-membership width or the tree-interval-membership width of the temporal graph. We further show the problem is in FPT parameterised by the treewidth of the underlying graph, the lifetime of the temporal graph and the number of colours combined.

A connected graph G is said to be a bisplit graph if the vertex set of G can be partitioned into a stable set and a complete bipartite graph. We establish the following dichotomy with chordality being the parameter; for chordal bisplit graphs, Hamiltonian cycle (HCYCLE) and Hamiltonian path (HPATH) problems are polynomial-time solvable, and for chordal bipartite bisplit graphs, HCYCLE (HPATH) is NP-complete. We further strengthen the result of [1] and show that HCYCLE (HPATH) is polynomial-time solvable on P5-free chordal bipartite graphs (bipartite chain graphs) and NP-complete on P10-free chordal bipartite graphs. By using our polynomial results on HCYCLE (HPATH) as a framework, we solve many variants and generalizations of HCYCLE (HPATH), which are also reported in this paper.

The Kemeny rule aggregates rankings by minimizing their total Kendall-tau distance from an aggregate order. We prove that Kemeny Score is NP-complete for exactly three unweighted rankings, even when every candidate pair is split $2$-to-$1$. On the same profiles, the winner, unique-winner, and possible- and necessary-precedence problems are $Θ_2^p$-complete, while recognizing a Kemeny-optimal or uniquely Kemeny-optimal aggregate is coNP-complete. The hard instances induce tournaments of majority dimension exactly $3$. The reduction also determines the exact maximum-cut value from the optimal Kemeny score and recovers a maximum cut from any Kemeny-optimal aggregate. For every fixed $q\geq3$ and $\lceil q/2\rceil\leq s\leq q$, minimum pairwise support $s$ yields a sharp dichotomy: the score problem is NP-complete, the winner and precedence problems are $Θ_2^p$-complete, and the recognition problems are coNP-complete when $3s\leq2q$; for $3s>2q$, the majority tournament is transitive and its unique topological order is the unique Kemeny-optimal aggregate. Exact support $s$ suffices in the hard case when $s>q/2$, and supports in ${s,s+1}$ suffice when $s=q/2$. These results give complete fixed-profile-size classifications and transfer to Slater orders, permutation medians, and maximum-likelihood central rankings in the Mallows model. Finally, a six-copy construction proves NP-completeness of both Kemeny Score and Kendall--Tau Center for three pairwise-equidistant rankings that still split every pair $2$-to-$1$. For $N$ output candidates, their common distance is $\frac23\binom N2$, the largest possible for an equidistant triple. The construction gives affine formulas for both optimal values, characterizes all Kemeny-optimal output orders, and shows that the output has a unique Kemeny-optimal order and a unique center exactly when the input has a unique Kemeny-optimal order.

Graph $k$-coloring is one of the classic NP-complete problems. Previous work has studied its average time complexity, defined to be the average runtime of computing a $k$-coloring over the set of all $k$-colorable graphs on $n$ vertices. A highly influential result of Dyer-Frieze from 1989 gave an algorithm with $O(n^2)$ average runtime for constant $k$. This quadratic runtime appeared natural (and possibly even optimal) since almost all $k$-colorable graphs have $Θ(n^2)$ edges, so one needs at least this time in order to read the (entire) input. However, this was later improved by Kučera in 1995 to average runtime $O(n^2/k)$ for every $k \leq n^{c}$ where $c \in (0, 1)$. Nevertheless, in the most interesting case of $k = O(1)$, the best-known bound remained quadratic in $n$. The true average complexity of the $k$-coloring problem has remained elusive for the last three decades. We break the longstanding quadratic barrier. Our main result in this paper shows that the exact average-case complexity of this fundamental problem is $Θ(nk)$ for every $k \leq n^{c'}$ and some $c' \in (0, 1)$. For $k = O(1)$, this reveals the average sublinear nature of $k$-colorability: the average-case complexity is linear in $n$, and thus sublinear in the size of the input. We further show that our $Θ(nk)$ average runtime is optimal, since a simple bound proves that every algorithm that correctly $k$-colors all $k$-colorable graphs requires $Ω(n k)$ average runtime. Our proofs draw on ideas from sublinear and local algorithms and also yield a local computation algorithm (LCA) for $k$-coloring with average-case probe complexity $\text{poly}(k)$. A key new ingredient in our algorithm is a method for certifying the unique colorability of random subgraphs, using tools from the theory of graph regularity.

In this work, we introduce $t$-colorable $k$-plane drawings, that is, drawings of graphs with a $t$-edge-coloring where every edge is crossed by at most $k$ edges of each color. We give tight upper bounds on the edge- and crossing density for small values of $t$ and $k$ and show that the recognition of such drawings is NP-complete if $t\geq 2$ and $k\geq1$.