arXiv++ Combinatorics

For graphs $G, T$ and a graph-family $\mathcal{H}$, let $ex(G,T,\mathcal{H})$ denote the maximum possible number of copies of $T$ in an $\mathcal{H}$-free subgraph of $G$. Alon and Shikhelman conjectured that for every family of graphs $\mathcal{H}$ with $χ(H) > s$ for every $H \in \mathcal{H}$, it is NP-hard to compute $ex(G,K_s,\mathcal{H})$, and even to approximate it up to additive error $n^{s-δ}$ on $n$-vertex graphs, for any fixed $δ> 0$. The case $s=2$ was established in a breakthrough result of Alon, Shapira and Sudakov. We prove the Alon-Shikhelman conjecture for finite families $\mathcal{H}$. In particular, we obtain an elementary proof of the Alon-Shapira-Sudakov result when $\mathcal{H}$ is finite.

We investigate the domination polynomial of the co-maximal graph $Γ(\mathbb{Z}_n)$ related to the ring of integers modulo $n$. Such a polynomial encodes domination sets of all possible sizes, a NP-hard problem for general graph. We give exact formulas for prime powers, integers with two distinct prime divisors, and products of three distinct primes. A prime-support decomposition gives a finite explicit formula for arbitrary $n$, including repeated prime factors. Further results determine the highest coefficients, the precise threshold beyond which every vertex subset dominates, and the number of non-dominating subsets. We discuss unimodality and log-concavity, and derive justified bounds for nonzero domination roots using the Eneström--Kakeya theorem.

We prove that deciding whether the weak partition connectivity (WPC) of an unweighted hedgegraph is at most a given integer is NP-complete, resolving an open question about its computational complexity. Hardness holds even for connected full-support split systems, where each hedge consists of two nonempty, vertex-disjoint hyperedges covering all vertices. We also obtain hardness on connected edge-colored simple graphs in which each color class is a spanning forest with exactly two nontrivial trees. On both classes, exact computation of fractional WPC is NP-hard, whereas hedge connectivity is computable exactly in polynomial time. A binary matrix formulation yields the reduction and a deterministic polynomial-time exact algorithm under a linear intersection condition on row supports after normalization and column compression. In particular, both integer and fractional WPC are computable in polynomial time when these supports have size at most two, whereas NP-hardness holds already when their size is bounded by three. For every fixed $b$, we give deterministic and randomized efficient polynomial-time approximation schemes on hedgegraphs in which each hedge has at most $b$ connected components, counting isolated vertices. Both schemes return one partition that simultaneously approximates integer and fractional WPC. Unless $\mathrm P=\mathrm{NP}$, neither objective admits a deterministic FPTAS, even on the two hard instance classes.

The total $\{k\}$-domination problem ($T\{k\}DP$) seeks a minimum-weight function such that the sum of weights in every open neighborhood is at least $k$. While this problem is known to be NP-hard for general graphs, we demonstrate that for the family of caterpillars, it simplifies to the classical total domination number ($k=1$) via the identity $γ^{\{k\}}_t(G) = kγ_t(G)$. This reduction is supported by a general upper bound established for all graphs, which we prove to be tight specifically for caterpillars. The central tool for our analysis is the introduction of a $(T,R)$-representation, a one-to-one mapping that abstracts caterpillar structure into discrete vectors based on support vertex distribution and central path segment lengths. By characterizing these segments through congruence modulo 4, we derive an exact closed-form expression for the total $\{k\}$-domination number of any caterpillar graph.

The Strong Total Cover Problem (STCP) is a novel covering problem defined on a graph $G = (V, E)$, where the objective is to find a minimum-cardinality subset $T \subseteq V \cup E$ such that every element of $V \cup E$ is covered. In this setting, a vertex covers itself and all its incident edges, while an edge covers itself together with its two endpoints. The STCP resembles classical covering problems such as Vertex Cover and Edge Cover problems, and naturally arises as the dual of the total matching problem. In this paper, we investigate the STCP from algorithmic, complexity, and polyhedral perspectives. We first establish close connections between STCP, the Dominating Set Problem, and the Maximum Induced Matching Problem. These relationships provide structural insights, imply the NP-hardness of STCP, and identify graph classes for which the problem is polynomial-time solvable. We then investigate the weighted version of STCP, showing that it remains NP-hard even on complete graphs with binary weights. On the other hand, we present a 2-approximation algorithm, and a polynomial-time algorithm for complete bipartite graphs. On the polyhedral side, we introduce the Strong Total Cover Polytope and derive several families of valid inequalities, some of which are shown to define facets. Finally, we provide a complete linear description of the associated polytope for triangular cactus graphs, revealing an interesting contrast with the considerably more intricate facial structure of the dominating set polytope on cactus graphs.

A $u\hbox{-}v$ separator in $G$ is a set $S\subseteq V(G)\setminus\{u,v\}$ such that there is no $u\hbox{-}v$ path in $G\setminus S$. A minimal separator in $G$ is a set $S$ such that for some $u,v\in V(G)\setminus S$, $S$ is a $u\hbox{-}v$ separator in $G$ but no proper subset of $S$ is. A set $S$ is bisimplicial if it is the union of at most two cliques. Recognizing graphs in which every minimal separator is the union of at most $k$ cliques is polynomial-time solvable for $k=1$ and NP-hard for every fixed $k\geq 3$. We settle the remaining case $k=2$ by giving a polynomial-time algorithm to decide whether every minimal separator in a graph is bisimplicial. A set $S$ is triad-free if its independence number $α(S)$ is at most two. Given a graph $G$ and two vertices $u,v$, the problem of finding a $u\hbox{-}v$ separator $S$ with $α(S)\leq k$ had the same complexity gap: it was known to be polynomial-time solvable for $k=1$ and NP-hard for every fixed $k\geq 3$. We resolve the remaining case $k=2$ by giving a polynomial-time algorithm that finds a triad-free $u\hbox{-}v$ separator or determines that none exists.

We study the computational complexity of graph distortion distances, a family of graph metrics measuring how vertex distances differ between two graphs. Formally, these distances are defined in terms of standard matrix norms on the difference of distance matrices under an optimal vertex alignment. The resulting metrics have natural interpretations, corresponding to three ways of measuring the distortion of shortest-path distances: the maximum distortion among all vertex pairs (entrywise maximum norm), global aggregation (entrywise $p$-norms), and local aggregation (operator $p$-norms) of distortions. For maximum distortion, we show that approximation below a factor of two is NP-hard even for highly restricted trees. Due to the close connection to the Gromov-Hausdorff distance, we obtain a similar hardness result for the latter. In both cases, we show essentially optimal additive inapproximability. On the algorithmic side, we give a subcubic-time algorithm for optimal embeddings of connected graphs into paths, based on a structural decomposition along a diametral path. Additionally, we give a simple approximation algorithm when one input graph has a "relatively path-like" metric structure, i.e. has bounded pathlength. For local and global distortion, we derive various hardness results even for restricted inputs. Making use of a close connection between the global distortion distances and Gromov-Wasserstein distances, we give the first formal proof of NP-hardness of the latter, which has been claimed in the literature many times but has, to the best of our knowledge, never been correctly proven.

For a fixed graph $T$ and a fixed nonempty family $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs, let $\operatorname{ex}(G, T, \mathcal{F})$ denote the maximum number of copies of $T$ in an $\mathcal{F}$-free subgraph of a graph $G$. Alon and Shikhelman~[Algorithmica, 2022] conjectured that if $e(T)> 0$ and no member of $\mathcal{F}$ is a subgraph of a blow-up of $T$, then for every $\varepsilon>0$, approximating $\operatorname{ex}(G, T, \mathcal{F})$ within an additive error $n^{v(T)-\varepsilon}$ is NP-hard for an input graph $G$ on $n$ vertices. The previously established general cases for this conjecture include $\operatorname{ex}(G, K_2, \mathcal{F})$ by Alon, Shapira and Sudakov~[Ann. of Math., 2009], and $\operatorname{ex}(G, K_m, K_k)$ by Alon and Shikhelman. In this paper, we confirm this conjecture for every bipartite graph $T$ and every clique $T$. Our reductions use iterative leaf additions, symmetric rooted extensions and random transversals to encode the maximum number of edges in a $(k-1)$-colorable subgraph of $G$, where $k=\min_{F\in \mathcal{F}}χ(F)$.

Brooks' Theorem is a foundational result in graph coloring: if a graph is connected, not a clique, and has maximum degree $Δ\geq 3$, then it admits a proper $Δ$-coloring. In this paper, we give a new proof of a much stronger result: every such graph admits exponentially many proper $Δ$-colorings. Exponential lower bounds have been obtained previously by applying the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz. In contrast, our proof is via a surprisingly simple and constructive analysis of a textbook greedy coloring algorithm. The entire argument is accessible to non-specialists. We extend our techniques to provide quantitative lower bounds on the number of colorings in several more general settings, namely $Δ$-length list coloring, degree-length list coloring (degree-choosability), and degenerate partitioning. In the latter setting, one is asked to partition the vertices such that each partite set induces a subgraph of bounded degeneracy. In contrast to the other coloring variants considered, no clean Brooks-type characterization is possible, since it is known that for some combinations of parameters determining the existence of even one valid partition is NP-hard. We give a new reduction which significantly extends the parameter regime for which determining the existence of a valid partition is NP-hard. Finally, we give a new proof of the classic degree-choosability theorem, generalizing the techniques behind a recent proof of Brooks' Theorem.

In a binary polynomial optimization problem (BPO, in short) we are maximizing a multilinear polynomial expression depending on n binary variables. This is a hard optimization class, containing many NP-hard problems, including unconstrained quadratic binary optimization. Several tractable special classes were considered in the literature, including problems with bounded tree-width (Crama, Hansen, Jaumard, 1990), Berge-acyclic problems (Buchheim, Crama, and Heck, 2019), $β$-acyclic problems (Del Pia and Di Gregorio, 2022, 2023), limited reach problems (Clausen, Crama, Lusby, Rodríguez, and Ropke, 2024), and $α$-acyclic problems with bounded rank (Del Pia and Khajavirad, 2025). We focus on a general variable elimination scheme for BPO, and develop the unique explicit multi-linear polynomial form for the equivalent BPO problem obtained after the elimination of a given subset of the variables. The obtained closed form representation of such an equivalent BPO problem allows us to characterize new special classes for which this elimination method, when applied recursively, provides a computationally efficient solution. Our approach is elementary1, algebraic, and provides efficient solution to a wide problem class that properly generalizes all of the above mentioned tractable special cases.

We study separable discrete convex optimization over indegree vectors of orientations of an undirected graph, focusing on the effect of imposing acyclicity. Since the extreme points of the indegree polytope are precisely the indegree vectors of acyclic orientations, this amounts to comparing optimization over its integer points with optimization over its extreme points. Over all orientations, minimizing a vertex-separable discrete convex objective is strongly polynomial-time solvable by minimum-cost flow. Over acyclic orientations, for every fixed discrete convex function shared by all vertices, we obtain a dichotomy: if the function is linear on the positive integers, the problem is solvable in linear time; otherwise exact optimization is NP-hard on connected simple graphs, and APX-hard when the function is non-negative. We also give strongly polynomial-time constant-factor approximation algorithms for broad classes of convex and concave objectives. For the $p$-power sum of indegrees, this yields a $2^p$-approximation for every fixed integer $p\geq1$, while the problem is APX-complete for every fixed integer $p\geq2$; if $p$ is part of the input, no deterministic polynomial-time $2^{p^{1-\varepsilon}}$-approximation exists for any fixed $\varepsilon>0$ unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$. We further give an exact $O(2^{|V|}|V|+\operatorname{poly}(|V|,|E|))$-time dynamic program for general separable objectives, with a matching lower bound in the exponent under the Exponential Time Hypothesis. Finally, decreasingly minimal and increasingly maximal acyclic orientations need not coincide and are both NP-hard, while minimizing the maximum weighted indegree over acyclic orientations remains strongly polynomial-time solvable.

The Double-Partition Coloring Problem (DPCP) is a recently introduced generalization of several coloring problems on graphs and hypergraphs, including the Partition Coloring Problem, the List Coloring Problem, and the Conflict-Free Coloring Problem (CFCP). In this work, we further investigate the structural and computational properties of the DPCP and develop exact and heuristic solution approaches. We derive structural results that allow the detection of infeasible instances and the reduction of their size. We propose one-step and two-step heuristics for obtaining high-quality solutions. These procedures are incorporated into an enhanced branch-and-price algorithm based on a set covering formulation of the DPCP. The algorithm further includes new strategies for solving the NP-hard pricing problem. Computational experiments show that the proposed branch-and-price algorithm and a compact integer programming formulation complement each other: while the compact formulation is generally more effective on sparse instances, branch-and-price performs particularly well on denser and larger instances. In particular, these are the first exact algorithms to be computationally evaluated on various CFCP instances.

A reduced word of the longest permutation $w_0\in S_m$, taken up to commutations, encodes a wiring diagram of $m$ pseudolines, and a braid move $σ_iσ_{i+1}σ_i\leftrightarrowσ_{i+1}σ_iσ_{i+1}$ flips one of its triangles. We prove that deciding whether two wiring diagrams are within a given braid-move distance is NP-complete. Equivalently, deciding flip distance is NP-complete in the higher Bruhat order $B(m,2)$, for triangle flips of marked arrangements of pseudolines, and for rhombic tilings of a $2m$-gon; this answers an open question on flip graphs of pseudoline arrangements (SODA 2024). The reduction is from Vertex Cover: for every graph $G$ we construct two wiring diagrams at braid-move distance $|D|+2\,\mathrm{VC}(G)$, where $\mathrm{VC}(G)$ is the vertex cover number of $G$ and the Hamming distance $|D|$ is the number of triples of wires whose triangles are oriented differently. The construction glues copies of a seven-wire gadget whose braid-move distance exceeds its Hamming distance by $2$; flipping either of two disjoint triangles in both diagrams removes the excess. Adding a line at infinity transfers the construction to rank-$3$ uniform oriented matroids, where two oriented matroids are adjacent in the mutation graph if their chirotopes differ in one basis; so deciding mutation distance is NP-complete in rank $3$. An iterate of Rambau's expansion of signotopes amplifies the excess and gives NP-hardness in every fixed rank $r\ge 4$. By duality we obtain the corresponding results for every fixed corank at least $3$. The same instances show that flip distance in the higher Bruhat orders $B(n,k)$ is NP-complete for every fixed $k\ge 2$.

Boolean matrix factorization (BMF) has many applications in data mining, bioinformatics, and network analysis. The goal of BMF is to decompose a given binary matrix as the Boolean product of two smaller binary matrices, revealing underlying structure in the data. When interpreting a binary matrix as the adjacency matrix of a bipartite graph, BMF is equivalent to the NP-hard biclique cover problem. By approaching this problem through the lens of commutative algebra, we utilize algebraic structures and techniques--particularly the Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity of combinatorially defined ideals--to establish new lower bounds for Boolean matrix rank.

Motivated by the burning and cooling processes, the burning game is introduced. Two players (Burner and Staller) play the game on a graph $G$ by alternately selecting vertices of $G$ to burn; as in the burning process, burning vertices spread fire to unburned neighbors. Burner aims to burn all vertices of $G$ as quickly as possible, while Staller wants the process to last as long as possible. If both players play optimally, then the number of time steps needed to burn the whole graph $G$ is the game burning number $b_{\rm g}(G)$ if Burner makes the first move, and the Staller-start game burning number $b_{\rm g}'(G)$ if Staller starts. In this paper, basic bounds on $b_{\rm g}(G)$ are given and several fundamental properties of the burning game established. Graphs with small game burning numbers are characterized and the game is studied on paths and cycles. An analogue of the burning number conjecture for the burning game is also considered. Finally, it is shown that the problem of determining whether or not $b_{\rm g}(G) \le k$ is NP-hard.

The maximum independent set (MIS) problem is a fundamental NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem with applications in scheduling, resource allocation, and network analysis. Exact solvers can provide high-quality solutions or optimality certificates, but their computational cost grows rapidly with graph size, while hand-crafted heuristics improve scalability at the expense of guarantees. Learning-based methods offer an alternative by exploiting structural patterns across graph instances, yet directly predicting independent sets can make global coordination difficult on large graphs. We instead use learning to guide multilevel graph coarsening while retaining combinatorial search for final decision making. Our Dual-GNN Multilevel Coarsening framework uses a Partition GNN to score candidate contractions and a Representative GNN to select top-k local independent-set states for each final cluster. Experiments on Erdős--Rényi graphs with up to 2,000 vertices demonstrate a favorable quality--runtime trade-off. On 500-vertex instances with certified optima, our method achieves an average independent-set size of 19.20, corresponding to 99.5\% of the optimal value of 19.30, while reducing the mean wall-clock time from 643.57 seconds for exact solving to 3.41 seconds, yielding an approximately 189$\times$ speedup. On larger graphs with 1,000 and 2,000 vertices, our method achieves the best mean solution quality among all evaluated methods. Moreover, although trained only on Erdős--Rényi graphs with edge probability $p=0.35$, the learned coarsening policy generalizes effectively across both unseen graph densities and structurally different graph families.

Identifiability criteria certify that a given tensor decomposition is a unique rank decomposition. Kruskal's classical condition is one of the best-known deterministic criteria for identifiability. However, no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm is known under the Kruskal condition, and verifying the condition itself is NP-hard. Lovitz and Petrov introduced a strictly more general identifiability condition which, in contrast, is polynomial-time verifiable, but no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm was previously known under this condition. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for tensor decomposition under the Lovitz--Petrov condition. Moreover, combining our algorithm with polynomial-time verification of the Lovitz--Petrov condition yields an efficient end-to-end certification procedure: after computing a decomposition, one can deterministically certify in polynomial time that it is unique and therefore of minimum rank. This contrasts with an arbitrary tensor decomposition, which certifies only an upper bound on the tensor rank, while determining tensor rank is NP-hard in general.

The edge complexity of a weighted graph is the smallest ratio of the Fourier $\ell^1$ and $\ell^2$ norms of its adjacency matrix over all vertex labelings. We study the difficulty of finding this minimum by relating it to a graph symmetry. Adding a universal vertex with sufficiently large incident weight produces an explicit Fourier $\ell^1$ lower bound. We show that equality holds exactly when the source graph has a fixed-point-free involutory automorphism. Two-sided estimates compare the excess above this bound with the squared Frobenius distance to the nearest weighted graph having such a symmetry. For sources of constant weighted degree, these estimates determine the exact leading term as the added weight tends to infinity. A stronger separation for simple source graphs proves that additive $\frac{1}{256N^{\frac{7}{2}}}$ approximation of weighted edge complexity is NP-hard, even on connected graphs of odd order $N$ with at most two distinct positive integer weights, each at most $N^2$. We also prove that recognizing a simple graph with a real Fourier labeling is NP-complete. A seven-vertex example shows that every minimizing labeling can have nonreal Fourier coefficients even when real Fourier labelings exist. An exact rational certificate for this example is included in the appendix.

Eternal Vertex Cover (EVC) is a turn-based attacker-defender game on an undirected graph $G$. To begin with, the defender places $k$ guards on vertices of $G$. The attacker, on their turn, can choose an edge $e$ not already occupied at both endpoints to "attack". The edge $e$ is defended if a guard moves along the edge $e$. The defender, on their turn, can move any subset of guards. A guard can only move to a neighboring vertex. The minimum number of guards needed to indefinitely defend against any sequence of attacks is called the eternal vertex cover number, generalizing the classic vertex cover number. Determining this number is NP-hard in general, motivating the study of parameterized and approximation algorithms. The problem is known to be FPT when parameterized by the cover number, but structural parameters remain relatively unexplored in the literature. In this work, we explore structural parameterizations for EVC. We show that EVC is FPT parameterized by the cluster vertex deletion number, which generalizes the previously studied parameterization by vertex cover number. We next study the problem parameterized by vertex integrity, which is the smallest number of vertices we need to delete from $G$ so that the resulting graph is a disjoint union of constant-sized components. We first show that Eternal Vertex Cover is XP parameterized by vertex integrity. Then, we develop a polynomial-time approximation algorithm, which computes an additive $6k+1$ ($g(k)$) approximation, where $k$ is equal to the cluster vertex deletion number (vertex integrity). Finally, we show a FPT algorithm for when the deletion set produces "nice" connected components, which are components that are bounded in size and satisfy a technical condition.

Kemeny's constant quantifies the expected time for a random walk to reach a randomly chosen vertex, capturing global properties of a Markov chain. We develop a matrix-analytic framework for bounding Kemeny's constant of a finite connected weighted graph using degree-weighted compressions of the normalized adjacency matrix, pinching inequalities, and eigenvalue interlacing. Our main partition theorem gives lower bounds in terms of the compressed spectrum, with complete equality characterizations, and converts structural graph information into spectrally computable estimates. For instance, when applied to proper color partitions, the proposed method yields a sharp lower bound on Kemeny's constant in terms of the chromatic number \[ K(G)\ge n-2+\frac{1}{χ(G)}, \] which extends a bipartite bound of Ciardo, Dahl, and Kirkland (2022) to arbitrary chromatic number, and which is incomparable with the normalized Hoffman bound by Chung (1997). For unweighted graphs, we also characterize all equality cases of this bound. We further illustrate the power of the proposed matrix framework by deriving spectral bounds for NP-hard graph problems involving normalized cuts and conductance. Our results include an asymptotically sharp conductance bound, two-sided interlacing bounds from principal submatrices and quotient matrices, and estimates for the change in Kemeny's constant under connectivity-preserving deletion of multiple edges.