arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a graph $H$, the $H$-freeness edge-deletion problem is the algorithmic problem of finding, for an input graph $G$, the minimum number of edges of $G$ whose deletion turns $G$ into an $H$-free graph. We show that for every graph $H$ containing a cycle, this problem is NP-hard. This proves a conjecture of Gishboliner, Levanzov and Shapira, and completes the characterization of the complexity of the $H$-freeness edge-deletion problem, answering a question of Alon, Shapira and Sudakov.

Motivated by recent work on tree independence number, we study the path independence number of a graph $G$: the minimum integer $k$ such that there is a path decomposition of $G$ where each bag induces a graph with independence number at most $k$. We show that every graph excluding both an induced forest minor and an induced star has bounded path independence number. This characterises when a graph class that excludes an induced star has bounded path independence number while also partially resolving a conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milani{č}, Munaro, Štorgel and Wiederrecht (2024). Furthermore, we show that graphs excluding both an apex-forest induced minor and an induced star have bounded tree independence number. As a consequence, for every fixed apex-forest $H$ and integer $t$, there is a polynomial-time algorithm to test whether a $K_{1,t}$-induced-subgraph-free graph contains $H$ as an induced minor. Moreover, it follows that the Maximum Weight Independent Set problem, as well as several other NP-hard problems, can be solved in polynomial-time on $K_{1,t}$-induced-subgraph-free graphs that exclude $H$ as an induced minor.

We show that approximately counting the vertices of a bounded 0/1 polytope, presented as a system of rational linear inequalities, is, informally speaking, NP-hard. In particular, there is no FPRAS for this problem unless RP=NP. The proof is by a reduction from approximately counting homomorphisms from a given graph to a particular four-vertex graph. The main proof ideas were found using GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra.

The cluster graphs on $n$ vertices, the disjoint unions of complete graphs, have the integer partitions of $n$ as their isomorphism classes, and the quotient edit distance $q^*(λ,μ)=\min_{σ\in S_n}|E(G_λ)\triangleσE(G_μ)|$ makes that set a metric space. Its metric geometry and its computational complexity both issue from one identity: $q^*$ is an affine function of the maximum of $\lVert X\rVert_F^2$ over the contingency tables with margins $λ$ and $μ$. Combinatorially, it yields two explicit $\ell_1$ models: the vertex-mass metric $δ_1$ on sorted degree sequences, with $\frac12δ_1\le q^*<\frac32δ_1$ and both constants optimal, and the block-energy metric $B$ on the vectors $\bigl(\binom{λ_i}2\bigr)_i$, with $q^*\le B\le2q^*-1$ by a per-table refinement measuring how far an alignment is from a block bijection. Hence $c_1(\mathcal K_n)\le2$, and an $O(n\log n)$-time algorithm returns an alignment of cost below $2q^*$ with the certificate $q^*\in[\lceil(B+1)/2\rceil,B]$. The Euclidean distortion of the class is $c_2(\mathcal K_n)=Θ(n^{1/4})$; against it we measure the weighted dyadic sums $F^{(γ)}$ of the Ferrers staircase, of dimension below $4n$ and computable in $O(n)$ time. The unweighted member has distortion exactly $Θ(n^{1/4}\sqrt{\log n})$, while the critical weight $γ=\frac14$ improves this unconditionally to $O(n^{1/4}(\log n)^{1/4})$ through an inverse energy inequality proved from the quantization of staircase jumps; removing the residual $(\log n)^{1/4}$ is reduced to one inverse inequality on the realizable cone. Computationally, the same identity gives a classification: deciding $q^*(λ,μ)\le Q$ is strongly NP-complete, evaluation is strongly NP-hard and admits no FPTAS unless $\mathrm P=\mathrm{NP}$, while the farthest alignment is polynomial-time solvable.

Jackson and Thomassen conjectured that every $2k$-strong digraph admits a spanning $k$-strong oriented subdigraph [Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 555 (1989) 402-412]. The conjecture holds for $k=1$ but other than some partial results that have been obtained for general $k$ in some special families of digraphs, including symmetric digraphs, the conjecture remains wide open in general. Even the existence of an integer $K$ such that every $K$-strong digraph has a 2-strong spanning oriented subdigraph is open. As a natural optimization counterpart, the minimum spanning $k$-strong subdigraph (MSSS$_k$) problem, is to find the minimum number of arcs in a spanning $k$-strong subdigraph of a $k$-strong digraph. This problem is NP-hard already for $k=1$ as it generalizes the hamiltonian cycle problem. In this paper, we address both problems simultaneously for the class of split digraphs, by constructing sparse spanning $k$-strong oriented subdigraphs. Specifically, we prove that every $k$-strong split digraph $D = (V_1, V_2; A)$ with minimum semi-degree {$δ^0(D)\geq 26k+15$} contains a spanning $k$-strong oriented subdigraph with no more than $kn+k|V_1|+98k^2+38k+3$ arcs, where $kn + k|V_1|$ is tight and the $k^{2}$ term is tight up to a constant factor. For the class of $k$-strong tournaments with minimum semi-degree at least $26k+15$ our results improve the bound obtained by Kang in [Combin. Probab. Comput., 27:892-907, 2018].

We study per-colour independent (k)-rainbow domination and its connection with independent domination in generalized prisms. Building on the known prism identity and the trivial regime above the maximum degree, we focus on the boundary case where the number of colours equals the maximum degree. For every fixed (k\ge 3), we prove that the decision problem remains NP-complete even on a highly restricted class of graphs: (C_4)-free, bipartite, ((k,2))-biregular subdivision graphs arising from simple (k)-regular graphs. The reduction gives an exact correspondence between optimal rainbow-independent dominating functions on the subdivision graph and proper (k)-edge-colourings of the original graph. We also introduce an excess parameter measuring how far the domination number lies above its natural lower bound. For cubic graphs, this excess coincides with the classical edge-colouring degree and therefore with standard resistance parameters for subcubic graphs. These results reveal a sharp one-unit threshold: above the maximum degree the problem becomes trivial for every graph, while at the boundary NP-hard instances already occur within a very narrow structural family.

A dominating set $S$ of a graph $G$ is a locating-dominating set (LDS) if, for each pair of distinct vertices not in~$S$, their neighbourhoods in $S$ are distinct. Finding a minimum-cardinality LDS in finite graphs is a well-known NP-hard problem. On infinite graphs, this problem naturally generalises to finding an LDS of minimum density. While density bounds have been widely studied for specific infinite regular grids, no computational complexity results exist for infinite graphs. We prove that the minimum-density LDS problem in infinite $\mathbb{Z}$-periodic graphs with a finite period is NP-hard. This result bridges the gap between cardinality minimization on finite graphs and density minimization on infinite graphs via a rigorous periodic reduction. Furthermore, our approach can be adapted to establish NP-hardness for related structural problems on infinite periodic graphs.

For a matroid $M$, a join is a set $J\subseteq E(M)$ that meets every circuit $C$ in at most $|C|/2$ elements. Let $μ(M)$ denote the maximum size of a join. Motivated by Frank's min--max theorem for graphic matroids, we compare $μ(M)$ with an ear-decomposition parameter $η(M)=(r(M)+\varphi(M))/2$, where $\varphi(M)$ is the minimum number of even lobes in an ear decomposition of $M$. Frank's theorem implies $μ(M)=η(M)$ for connected graphic matroids. Here we study how far this equality extends beyond graphic matroids. We show that the exact equality does not hold in general: it already fails for cographic matroids, hence within the binary class. Furthermore, the class of matroids satisfying $μ(M)=η(M)$ is not minor-closed, thus there is little hope for a forbidden minor characterization. We also prove that computing a maximum join is NP-hard for cographic matroids, hard to approximate within a factor of $519/520$, and NP-hard for sparse paving matroids given by their list of bases. Despite these negative results, we show that the two parameters remain quantitatively comparable in several natural classes. We prove comparison bounds for binary, paving, cographic, and arbitrary connected matroids. In particular, using Seymour's decomposition theorem, we combine the equality for graphic matroids, the bound for cographic matroids, and a direct analysis of $R_{10}$ to obtain $η(M)\leq 6μ(M)-2$ for every regular matroid $M$.

Symmetric Numerical Three-Dimensional Matching (SN3DM) asks whether three disjoint labeled classes with identical weight multisets can be partitioned into class-transversal triples of one common target sum. Its theme is role recovery under marginal symmetry: identical numerical catalogues force the asymmetric source roles to be reconstructed from incidence structure alone. This tutorial develops three complementary hardness results for that symmetry restriction. Part I gives a unary-polynomial reduction from N3DM. Source roles become ports in one common occurrence set, a uniquely forced filler system reserves one main incidence per port, bipartite edge coloring restores the output-class labels, and a no-carry mixed-radix encoding packs four coordinates into positive integers. Hence SN3DM is strongly NP-complete. Part II studies Max-SN3DM, for which strong NP-hardness alone does not exclude a PTAS. Two numerical compilers lift Petrank's perfect-completeness gap for bounded 3DM to unary Max-N3DM, and a defect-stability lemma shows that a symmetric matching of size 13n - d yields a source matching of size at least n - 21d, where n is the multiset cardinality, and d is a symmetric defect. Hence, for some epsilon > 0, it is NP-hard to separate perfect instances from those of optimum at most (1- epsilon) times perfect, so no PTAS exists unless P = NP. Every maximal legal triple matching is a 3-approximation, placing the problem in APX. Part III supplies the approximation-preserving reduction Part II does not claim. An exact pair compiler and a one-live-port separation map degree-three Maximum 3DM to unary Max-SN3DM with OPT(Max-SN3DM) = Gamma + OPT(Max-3DM) for a fixed offset Gamma and one-for-one optimum-error transfer. The L-reduction has constants alpha = 764 and beta = 1, so Max-SN3DM is APX-complete. The two are incomparable; worked yes / no instances audit each construction.

The global and local $\mathcal{G}$-covering number $c_{\mathrm{g}}^{\mathcal{G}}(H)$ and $c_{\mathrm{l}}^{\mathcal{G}}(H)$ encode how well the edges of a graph $H$ can be covered with graphs from a graph class $\mathcal{G}$: in the global setting, we minimize the number of graphs from $\mathcal{G}$ required, in the local setting how often a vertex is hit by the graphs of the cover. Within this work we consider for $\mathcal{G}$ the graph classes $\mathcal{B}$ of all bipartite and $\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{c}}$ of all complete bipartite graphs. We give a tight lower bound on $c_{\mathrm{l}}^{\mathcal{B}}(H)$ in terms of the fractional chromatic number of $H$, thereby giving a local analogue of a result by Harary, Hsu and Miller. Answering a question by Fishburn and Hammer, we show that it is NP-hard to determine $c_{\mathrm{l}}^{\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{c}}}(H)$. Further, we provide a finite and monotone graph class $\mathcal{G}$ such that $c_{\mathrm{g}}^{\mathcal{G}}(H)$ can be computed in constant time for every graph $H$ while determining $c_{\mathrm{l}}^{\mathcal{G}}(H)$ is NP-hard. This yields a natural example to a question raised by Knauer and Ueckerdt.

Let $\mathcal F$ be a graph class that is closed under topological minors and 1-sums, has decidable membership, contains a triangle, and is not the class of all graphs. Recently, Lee, Liu, and Tsai [ICALP 2026] showed that the edge-decomposition problem into $k \geq 3$ elements of $\mathcal F$ is NP-hard. In particular, their general hardness reduction covers a long-standing problem on outerthickness (when $\mathcal F$ is the class of outerplanar graphs). On the other hand, it is well known that decomposing a graph into forests is polynomial-time solvable, as implied by work of Edmonds [J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. B. 1965]. In this paper, we take a first step toward determining the complexity of edge-decomposition problems into just two graphs (the case $k=2$). We consider the simplest possible graph class $\mathcal F$ satisfying the criteria above: the triangular forests, that is, graphs in which every 2-connected component is a triangle. We prove that determining whether a graph can be edge-decomposed into two triangular forests is NP-complete.

Inspired by the notion of tricolorability of knots, we introduce the concept of lean coloring for hypergraphs and the associated lean number of a hypergraph. Lean coloring often involves very few colors, yet still requires the methods of usual graph coloring, forcing the overall complexity to be NP-Hard. We provide two alternative formulations of the lean coloring problem that involve a type of coloring on abstract simplicial complexes and a partial coloring on bipartite graphs. We then provide bounds for the lean numbers of hypergraphs that are $k$-uniform, $k$-partite, wide-path connected, or $r$-complete. Python-like script is included to allow the implementation and study of a lean coloring algorithm. We conclude with some directions for future work and present the lean numbers of $130$ knots and links.

The dimension of a poset $P$ is the minimum positive integer $d$ such that $P$ is an induced subposet of $\mathbb{R}^d$ equipped with the product order. We give a constant-factor polynomial-time approximation algorithm for computing dimension in the class of posets with a planar (Hasse) diagram. While computing the dimension of a poset is NP-hard in general, the computational complexity of the problem for planar posets remains open. The algorithmic result is driven by a structural understanding of the canonical obstruction to small dimension: standard examples. A longstanding problem, originating in the early 1980s, asked whether every poset with a planar diagram has dimension bounded by a function of the maximum order of a standard example that it contains. In the first paper of the series, we have resolved the problem in a more general setting of posets with planar cover graphs by establishing a polynomial bound. We prove a stronger bound in the original setting, namely, for every poset $P$ with a planar diagram $\mathrm{dim}(P) \leq 96\mathrm{se}(P)+672$, where $\mathrm{dim}(P)$ denotes the dimension of $P$ and $\mathrm{se}(P)$ denotes the maximum order of a standard example contained in $P$.

Given a nonnegative matrix $X$, a factorization rank $r$ and a real parameter $p$, entrywise power matrix factorization (EPMF) looks for a low-rank matrix $X_r$ such that $X = |X_r|^{\circ p}$ (exact case) or $X \approx |X_r|^{\circ p}$ (approximate case), where $(\cdot)^{\circ p}$ denotes the component-wise exponent. EPMF includes the modulus model ($p=1$) and component-wise square factorization ($p=2$) as special cases, the latter being closely related to the square root rank. We analyze the computational complexity of the exact decision problem and the Frobenius-norm approximation problem, and establish a complete complexity landscape. In the exact case, we show that EPMF is equivalent to the combinatorial problem of flipping the signs of the entries of a given matrix $X$ to obtain a rank-$r$ matrix, which we refer to as the signing problem. We first show that the signing problem, and hence exact EPMF, is strongly NP-hard, improving a weak NP-hardness result for the square-root-rank of Fawzi et al. (Math. Prog., 2015). We then show that the signing problem can be solved in polynomial-time when $r$ is fixed. Moreover, when the rank $r$ is part of the input, we show that for generic matrices the algorithm is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) in the parameter $r$; in fact, the running time is linear in the input size $X$. In the approximate case using the Frobenius norm as an error measure, we show that EPMF is NP-hard, already when $r=2$, the smallest nontrivial case.

For graphs $F$ and $H$, a spanning subgraph $G$ of $F$ is weakly $H$-saturated in $F$ if the edges in $E(F)\setminus E(G)$ can be added one at a time, each addition creating a new copy of $H$. Recently, Tancer and Tyomkyn proved that, given an $n$-vertex graph $F$, deciding whether $\mathrm{wsat}(F,K_3)=n-1$ is NP-hard. In this paper, we study the decision version of the weak saturation problem and show that, for every fixed integer $r\ge 3$, given a graph $F$ and an integer $k$, deciding whether $\mathrm{wsat}(F,H)\le k$ is NP-complete when $H\in\{K_r,K_{r,r}\}$. Our approach uses new graph-theoretic and topological ideas and techniques, yielding new constructions that build on the construction of Tancer and Tyomkyn. In particular, our proofs further reveal a connection between weak saturation and the flag-no-square property, a fundamental property in topology that is of independent interest.

The geodesic treewidth of a graph $ G $ is the smallest $k$ for which there is a partition $\mathcal{P}$ into geodesics such that $G/\mathcal{P}$ has treewidth $k$, where $G/\mathcal{P}$ is obtained from $ G $ by contracting each part of $ \mathcal{P} $. Based on this notion, row treewidth was developed and is defined for a graph $ G $ as the smallest $ k $ such that $ G \subseteq H \boxtimes P $ for some graph $ H $ of treewidth $ k $ and a path $ P $. Equivalently, the row treewidth of a graph $ G $ is the smallest $ k $ for which there is a partition $ \mathcal{P} $ into disjoint unions of geodesics that are aligned with respect to some layering such that $ G/\mathcal{P} $ has treewidth $ k $. We separate the two notions by showing that bounded row treewidth does not imply bounded geodesic treewidth and by presenting a polynomial-time algorithm to decide whether a graph of treewidth 2 has geodesic treewidth 1, which is known to be NP-hard for row treewidth [Biedl, Eppstein, Ueckerdt, 2025]. More generally, we provide an algorithm to decide whether a given graph has geodesic treewidth at most $ d $ that is XP in the treewidth, whereas there is no such algorithm for row treewidth, unless P = NP [Biedl, Eppstein, Ueckerdt, 2025]. On the other hand, we show that computing the geodesic treewidth is NP-hard and that every graph with geodesic treewidth 1 has bounded row treewidth. Moreover, we improve the best known lower bound on the geodesic treewidth of planar graphs to 5.

We introduce the \emph{externally supported independence number} $α_{\rm es}(G)$ of a graph $G$ as the maximum cardinality of an independent set $B$ with an additional condition, that vertices from $N(B)$ are dominated by vertices in $V(G)-N[B]$. This parameter yields an improved upper bound on the isolation number $ι(G)$. We show that computing $α_{\rm es}(G)$ is NP-hard, while for trees we present a linear-time algorithm. We also establish several sharp bounds on $α_{\rm es}(G)$ for general graphs, with additional refined results for trees. In several cases, we completely describe the extreme graph classes attaining these bounds.

Given a hypergraph with edges of size at most 3, the 3-set cover problem asks to determine the minimum size of a family of edges which covers the vertex set. As the problem is NP-hard, it is natural to consider its fractional (linear programming) relaxation, which provides a lower bound on the value of the optimal solution. The ratio between the actual value and that of the fractional relaxation is called the integrality gap. A classic bound of Lovász implies that the integrality gap in this problem is at most 11/6. This has been improved to 5/3 by Fujito and Okumura. Here we prove that the integrality gap is at most 3/2, which is best possible. A corollary of this result is that the vertex set of any 3-uniform, regular hypergraph on n vertices can be covered by n/2 (or fewer) edges. This solves the k=3 case of a problem of de A. Moreira and Kohayakawa. As another application, we derive a certain variant of the Gale-Shapley stable marriage theorem for triples.

The saturation number $μ^*(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a maximal matching, and $H(G)$ is its harmonic index. TxGraffiti conjectured in 2023 that $μ^*(G) \le H(G)$ for every nontrivial connected graph $G$, and Bıyıkoğlu refuted this by showing that the ratio $μ^*(G)/H(G)$ can be made arbitrarily large. Restricting to trees bounds the ratio sharply. Every nontrivial tree $T$ satisfies $μ^*(T) < \frac{3}{2} H(T)$, with the constant $3/2$ best possible. A complementary bound $H(G) < 4μ^*(G)$ holds for every graph with an edge, so on a nontrivial tree the saturation number is pinned to $\frac{1}{4} H(T) < μ^*(T) < \frac{3}{2} H(T)$, both constants best possible. The friendship graph $F_4$ is a smallest counterexample to the conjecture, on nine vertices, and the smallest tree counterexample is the subdivided star on eleven vertices. For each positive integer $m$ a family of graphs with $m$ hubs has ratio approaching $m+1$, while the conjecture holds whenever all vertices have equal degree. Both invariants arise in applications, the harmonic index as a molecular descriptor and the saturation number as a measure of adsorption inefficiency, and the bounds estimate the latter, which is NP-hard to compute, by the former, which is computable in linear time.

Designing rapid transportation routes requires balancing efficiency and reachability. Shortest-path models ensure direct, cost-efficient routes but ignore coverage, while centrality-based approaches maximize accessibility but do not enforce operational constraints. We study the problem of selecting a shortest path that maximizes reachability, measured as the number of nodes within a fixed distance of the path. To do this, we introduce the $k$-Step-Central Shortest Path problem and analyse its structural properties. We show that optimal solutions on unweighted graphs can be found in polynomial time and propose an algorithm with a novel pruning rule. We also prove that the problem becomes NP-hard when edge weights are introduced. Additionally, we show that our algorithm can be used to solve the NP-hard problem of finding the closeness-central shortest path in a graph. We demonstrate the efficiency and scalability of our algorithm on synthetic and real-world networks with up to 2,000 nodes. Our results show that improving reachability can substitute for route expansion: increasing the reach of transit lines drastically increases their coverage with shorter routes. This suggests that investments in active transport infrastructure that improve reachability can be more effective than extending primary routes, providing a data-driven basis for allocating resources in network design.