arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the computational complexity of graph distortion distances, a family of graph metrics measuring how vertex distances differ between two graphs. Formally, these distances are defined in terms of standard matrix norms on the difference of distance matrices under an optimal vertex alignment. The resulting metrics have natural interpretations, corresponding to three ways of measuring the distortion of shortest-path distances: the maximum distortion among all vertex pairs (entrywise maximum norm), global aggregation (entrywise $p$-norms), and local aggregation (operator $p$-norms) of distortions. For maximum distortion, we show that approximation below a factor of two is NP-hard even for highly restricted trees. Due to the close connection to the Gromov-Hausdorff distance, we obtain a similar hardness result for the latter. In both cases, we show essentially optimal additive inapproximability. On the algorithmic side, we give a subcubic-time algorithm for optimal embeddings of connected graphs into paths, based on a structural decomposition along a diametral path. Additionally, we give a simple approximation algorithm when one input graph has a "relatively path-like" metric structure, i.e. has bounded pathlength. For local and global distortion, we derive various hardness results even for restricted inputs. Making use of a close connection between the global distortion distances and Gromov-Wasserstein distances, we give the first formal proof of NP-hardness of the latter, which has been claimed in the literature many times but has, to the best of our knowledge, never been correctly proven.

We revisit the algorithmic problem of reconstructing a graph from homomorphism counts that has first been studied in (Böker et al., STACS 2024): given graphs $F_1,\ldots,F_k$ and counts $m_1,\ldots,m_k$, decide if there is a graph $G$ such that the number of homomorphisms from $F_i$ to $G$ is $m_i$, for all $i$. We prove that the problem is NEXP-hard if the counts $m_i$ are specified in binary and $Σ_2^p$-complete if they are in unary. Furthermore, as a positive result, we show that the unary version can be solved in polynomial time if the constraint graphs are stars of bounded size.

Quantifying the similarity between two graphs is a fundamental algorithmic problem at the heart of many data analysis tasks for graph-based data. In this paper, we study the computational complexity of a family of similarity measures based on quantifying the mismatch between the two graphs, that is, the "symmetric difference" of the graphs under an optimal alignment of the vertices. An important example is similarity based on graph edit distance. While edit distance calculates the "global" mismatch, that is, the number of edges in the symmetric difference, our main focus is on "local" measures calculating the maximum mismatch per vertex. Mathematically, our similarity measures are best expressed in terms of the adjacency matrices: the mismatch between graphs is expressed as the difference of their adjacency matrices (under an optimal alignment), and we measure it by applying some matrix norm. Roughly speaking, global measures like graph edit distance correspond to entrywise matrix norms like the Frobenius norm and local measures correspond to operator norms like the spectral norm. We prove a number of strong NP-hardness and inapproximability results even for very restricted graph classes such as bounded-degree trees.