arXiv++ Combinatorics

The Erdős--Stone Theorem asserts that if a graph has edge density $1-1/r+δ$ then it contains a complete $(r+1)$-partite graph with $b$ vertices in each part, where $b=b_n(r,δ) \gg 1$. The celebrated Chvátal--Szemerédi theorem determined the exact order of $b_n(r,δ)$ for every $δ< 1/r^3$. Their bound, however, is not tight when $δ=1/r-ε$, that is, when the graph has edge density $1-ε$ for small $ε$. Our main result in this paper determines the correct order in this remaining regime, thereby enabling us to give a tight bound for the Erdős--Stone problem for all edge densities. More precisely, we prove that for every integer $r\geq 2$ and $0< δ< 1/r$ we have $$ b_n(r,δ)=Θ\left(\frac{\log n}{(1/r-δ)r\log(1/δ)}\right)\;. $$ The lower bound is obtained using a Kövari-Sós-Turán-type argument combined with a variant of Nikiforov's method of constructing large blow-ups, while the upper bound is proved using a correlated random graph construction, related to tensor powers.

Graph $k$-coloring is one of the classic NP-complete problems. Previous work has studied its average time complexity, defined to be the average runtime of computing a $k$-coloring over the set of all $k$-colorable graphs on $n$ vertices. A highly influential result of Dyer-Frieze from 1989 gave an algorithm with $O(n^2)$ average runtime for constant $k$. This quadratic runtime appeared natural (and possibly even optimal) since almost all $k$-colorable graphs have $Θ(n^2)$ edges, so one needs at least this time in order to read the (entire) input. However, this was later improved by Kučera in 1995 to average runtime $O(n^2/k)$ for every $k \leq n^{c}$ where $c \in (0, 1)$. Nevertheless, in the most interesting case of $k = O(1)$, the best-known bound remained quadratic in $n$. The true average complexity of the $k$-coloring problem has remained elusive for the last three decades. We break the longstanding quadratic barrier. Our main result in this paper shows that the exact average-case complexity of this fundamental problem is $Θ(nk)$ for every $k \leq n^{c'}$ and some $c' \in (0, 1)$. For $k = O(1)$, this reveals the average sublinear nature of $k$-colorability: the average-case complexity is linear in $n$, and thus sublinear in the size of the input. We further show that our $Θ(nk)$ average runtime is optimal, since a simple bound proves that every algorithm that correctly $k$-colors all $k$-colorable graphs requires $Ω(n k)$ average runtime. Our proofs draw on ideas from sublinear and local algorithms and also yield a local computation algorithm (LCA) for $k$-coloring with average-case probe complexity $\text{poly}(k)$. A key new ingredient in our algorithm is a method for certifying the unique colorability of random subgraphs, using tools from the theory of graph regularity.

A central objective in Ramsey theory is determining whether restricted families of discrete structures necessarily contain substantially larger homogeneous substructures, compared to the unrestricted structures. In the setting of tournaments, it is well known that every tournament contains a transitive subgraph of size $\log n$, and that this is best possible up to a constant factor. A restricted family of tournaments that has been extensively studied is the family of $k$-majority tournaments. They are obtained by taking $2k-1$ linear orders of a set $X$, and defining a tournament on $X$ which has an edge from $u$ to $v$ if $u$ precedes $v$ in at least $k$ of these orders. Milans, Schreiber, and West proved that such tournaments indeed have significantly larger transitive tournaments. More precisely, they proved that every $k$-majority tournament contains a transitive tournament of size $n^{2^{-Θ(k)}}$. Our main goal in this paper is to give an exponential improvement in the dependence of the exponent on $k$ by showing that every $k$-majority tournament contains a transitive set of size $n^{Ω(1/k)}$. Finally, we highlight several open problems and conjectural directions related to random $k$-majority tournaments.

Property testers are fast, randomized "election polling"-type algorithms that determine if an input (e.g., graph or hypergraph) has a certain property or is $\varepsilon$-far from the property. In the dense graph model of property testing, it is known that many properties can be tested with query complexity that depends only on the error parameter $\varepsilon$ (and not on the size of the input), but the current bounds on the query complexity grow extremely quickly as a function of $1/\varepsilon$. Which properties can be tested efficiently, i.e., with $\mathrm{poly}(1/\varepsilon)$ queries? This survey presents the state of knowledge on this general question, as well as some key open problems.

While Szemerédi's graph regularity lemma is an indispensable tool for studying extremal problems in graph theory, using it comes with a hefty price, since a worst-case graph may only have regular partitions of tower-type size. It is thus sensible to ask if there is some natural restriction which forces graphs to have much smaller regular partitions. A celebrated result of this type, due to Alon-Fischer-Newman and Lovász-Szegedy, states that for graphs of bounded VC dimension, one can reduce the tower-type bounds to polynomial. The graph regularity lemma has been extended to the setting of $k$-graphs by Gowers, Nagle-Rödl-Schacht-Skokan, and Tao. Unfortunately, these lemmas come with even larger Ackermann-type bounds. Chernikov-Starchenko and Fox-Pach-Suk considered a strong notion of $k$-graph VC dimension and proved that $k$-graphs of bounded VC dimension have regular partitions of polynomial size. Shelah introduced a weaker and combinatorially natural notion of dimension, called VC$_2$ dimension, which has since been extensively studied. In particular, Chernikov, Towsner, Terry, and Wolf asked if one can improve the worst case bounds for 3-graph regularity when the 3-graph has bounded VC$_2$ dimension. Our main result in this paper answers this question positively in the following strong sense: in the setting of bounded VC$_2$ dimension, one can reduce the bounds for 3-graph regularity by one level in Ackermann hierarchy. Furthermore, our new bound is best possible. Our proof has two key steps. We first introduce a new method for designing regularity lemmas for graphs of bounded VC dimension, based on the cylinder regularity lemma. We then prove a hypergraph version of the cylinder regularity lemma, which allows us to extend this method to hypergraphs. We also highlight a few other applications of this cylinder regularity lemma, which we expect to find many other uses.

Hypergraph $2$-colorability is one of the classical NP-hard problems. Person and Schacht [SODA'09] designed a deterministic algorithm whose expected running time is polynomial over a uniformly chosen $2$-colorable $3$-uniform hypergraph. Lee, Molla, and Nagle recently extended this to $k$-uniform hypergraphs for all $k\geq 3$. Both papers relied heavily on the regularity lemma, hence their analysis was involved and their running time hid tower-type constants. Our first result in this paper is a new simple and elementary deterministic $2$-coloring algorithm that reproves the theorems of Person-Schacht and Lee-Molla-Nagle while avoiding the use of the regularity lemma. We also show how to turn our new algorithm into a randomized one with average expected running time of only $O(n)$. Our second and main result gives what we consider to be the ultimate evidence of just how easy it is to find a $2$-coloring of an average $2$-colorable hypergraph. We define a coloring oracle to be an algorithm which, given vertex $v$, assigns color red/blue to $v$ while inspecting as few edges as possible, so that the answers to any sequence of queries to the oracle are consistent with a single legal $2$-coloring of the input. Surprisingly, we show that there is a coloring oracle that, on average, can answer every vertex query in time $O(1)$.

Let $F$ and $G$ be two graphs. A spanning subgraph $H$ of $G$ is called weakly $F$-saturated if one can add to $H$ the edges of $G \setminus H$ in some order, so that whenever a new edge is added, a new copy of $F$ is formed. Obtaining lower bounds for the minimum size $\mathrm{wsat}(G,F)$ of such an $H$ is a classical problem in extremal combinatorics. In particular, in the past 40 years, various algebraic tools have been developed to prove lower bounds on the weak saturation number $\mathrm{wsat}(G,F)$. Our paper uncovers a new connection of weak saturation to topology of clique complexes, that allows to prove tight lower bounds in some cases when the algebraic tools are not efficient. It is easy to see that the smallest $K_3$-saturating graphs in $K_n$ are trees, thus $\mathrm{wsat}(K_n,K_3)=n-1$. In 2017, Korándi and Sudakov proved that this is also the case in dense random graphs $G\sim G_{n,p}$, $p=\mathrm{const}\in(0,1)$, and posed the question of determining the smallest $p$ for which $G_{n,p}$ contains a $K_3$-saturating tree with high probability. Using the new topological connection, we show that this critical $p$ is of order $n^{-1/3-o(1)}$. Inspired by Gromov's local-to-global principle for hyperbolic groups, we further develop our topological approach and determine the critical probability up to a constant factor, for trees with diameter at most $n^{c}$, for some $c>0$. The new connection also enables us to improve the best known upper bound on the threshold probability for simple connectivity of the 2-dimensional clique complex of $G_{n,p}$, due to Kahle.

A partition of a (hyper)graph is $\varepsilon$-homogenous if the edge densities between almost all clusters are either at most $\varepsilon$ or at least $1-\varepsilon$. Suppose a $3$-graph has the property that the link of every vertex has an $\varepsilon$-homogenous partition of size $\text{poly}(1/\varepsilon)$. Does this guarantee that the $3$-graph also has a small homogenous partition? Terry and Wolf proved that such a $3$-graph has an $\varepsilon$-homogenous partition of size given by a wowzer-type function. Terry recently improved this to a double exponential bound, and conjectured that this bound is tight. Our first result in this paper disproves this conjecture by giving an improved (single) exponential bound, which is best possible. We further obtain an analogous result for $k$-graphs of all uniformities $k \geq 3$. The above problem is part of a much broader programme which seeks to understand the conditions under which a (hyper)graph has small $\varepsilon$-regular partitions. While this problem is fairly well understood for graphs, the situation is (as always) much more involved already for $3$-graphs. For example, it is natural to ask if one can strengthen our first result by only requiring each link to have $\varepsilon$-regular partitions of size $\text{poly}(1/\varepsilon)$. Our second result shows that surprisingly the answer is `no', namely, a $3$-graph might only have regular partitions of tower-type size, even though the link of every vertex has an $\varepsilon$-regular partition of polynomial size.

For a fixed graph $F$, let $ex_F(G)$ denote the size of the largest $F$-free subgraph of $G$. Computing or estimating $ex_F(G)$ for various pairs $F,G$ is one of the central problems in extremal combinatorics. It is thus natural to ask how hard is it to compute this function. Motivated by an old problem of Yannakakis from the 80's, Alon, Shapira and Sudakov [ASS'09] proved that for every non-bipartite graph $F$, computing $ex_F(G)$ is NP-hard. Addressing a conjecture of Ailon and Alon (2007), we prove a hypergraph analogue of this theorem, showing that for every $k \geq 3$ and every non-$k$-partite $k$-graph $F$, computing $ex_F(G)$ is NP-hard. Furthermore, we conjecture that our hardness result can be extended to all $k$-graphs $F$ other than a matching of fixed size. If true, this would give a precise characterization of the $k$-graphs $F$ for which computing $ex_F(G)$ is NP-hard, since we also prove that when $F$ is a matching of fixed size, $ex_F(G)$ is computable in polynomial time. This last result can be considered an algorithmic version of the celebrated Erdős-Ko-Rado Theorem. The proof of [ASS'09] relied on a variety of tools from extremal graph theory, one of them being Turán's theorem. One of the main challenges we have to overcome in order to prove our hypergraph extension is the lack of a Turán-type theorem for $k$-graphs. To circumvent this, we develop a completely new graph theoretic approach for proving such hardness results.

A linear equation $E$ is said to be sparse if there is $c>0$ so that every subset of $[n]$ of size $n^{1-c}$ contains a solution of $E$ in distinct integers. The problem of characterizing the sparse equations, first raised by Ruzsa in the 90's, is one of the most important open problems in additive combinatorics. We say that $E$ in $k$ variables is abundant if every subset of $[n]$ of size $\varepsilon n$ contains at least poly$(\varepsilon)\cdot n^{k-1}$ solutions of $E$. It is clear that every abundant $E$ is sparse, and Girão, Hurley, Illingworth and Michel asked if the converse implication also holds. In this note we show that this is the case for every $E$ in $4$ variables. We further discuss a generalization of this problem which applies to all linear equations.

Graph modification problems ask for the minimal number of vertex/edge additions/deletions needed to make a graph satisfy some predetermined property. A (meta) problem of this type, which was raised by Yannakakis in 1981, asks to determine for which properties ${\mathcal P}$, it is NP-hard to compute the smallest number of edge deletions needed to make a graph satisfy ${\mathcal P}$. Despite being extensively studied in the past 40 years, this problem is still wide open. In fact, it is open even when ${\mathcal P}$ is the property of being $H$-free, for some fixed graph $H$. In this case we use $\text{rem}_{H}(G)$ to denote the smallest number of edge deletions needed to turn $G$ into an $H$-free graph. Alon, Sudakov and Shapira [Annals of Math. 2009] proved that if $H$ is not bipartite, then computing $\text{rem}_{H}(G)$ is NP-hard. They left open the problem of classifying the bipartite graphs $H$ for which computing $\text{rem}_{H}(G)$ is NP-hard. In this paper we resolve this problem when $H$ is a forest, showing that computing $\text{rem}_{H}(G)$ is polynomial-time solvable if $H$ is a star forest and NP-hard otherwise. Our main innovation in this work lies in introducing a new graph theoretic approach for Yannakakis's problem, which differs significantly from all prior works on this subject. In particular, we prove new results concerning an old and famous conjecture of Erdős and Sós, which are of independent interest.

A theorem of Rödl states that for every fixed $F$ and $\varepsilon>0$ there is $δ=δ_F(\varepsilon)$ so that every induced $F$-free graph contains a vertex set of size $δn$ whose edge density is either at most $\varepsilon$ or at least $1-\varepsilon$. Rödl's proof relied on the regularity lemma, hence it supplied only a tower-type bound for $δ$. Fox and Sudakov conjectured that $δ$ can be made polynomial in $\varepsilon$, and a recent result of Fox, Nguyen, Scott and Seymour shows that this conjecture holds when $F=P_4$. In fact, they show that the same conclusion holds even if $G$ contains few copies of $P_4$. In this note we give a short proof of a more general statement.

A distance estimator for a graph property $\mathcal{P}$ is an algorithm that given $G$ and $α, \varepsilon >0$ distinguishes between the case that $G$ is $(α-\varepsilon)$-close to $\mathcal{P}$ and the case that $G$ is $α$-far from $\mathcal{P}$ (in edit distance). We say that $\mathcal{P}$ is estimable if it has a distance estimator whose query complexity depends only on $\varepsilon$. Every estimable property is also testable, since testing corresponds to estimating with $α=\varepsilon$. A central result in the area of property testing, the Fischer--Newman theorem, gives an inverse statement: every testable property is in fact estimable. The proof of Fischer and Newman was highly ineffective, since it incurred a tower-type loss when transforming a testing algorithm for $\mathcal{P}$ into a distance estimator. This raised the natural problem, studied recently by Fiat--Ron and by Hoppen--Kohayakawa--Lang--Lefmann--Stagni, whether one can find a transformation with a polynomial loss. We obtain the following results. 1. If $\mathcal{P}$ is hereditary, then one can turn a tester for $\mathcal{P}$ into a distance estimator with an exponential loss. This is an exponential improvement over the result of Hoppen et. al., who obtained a transformation with a double exponential loss. 2. For every $\mathcal{P}$, one can turn a testing algorithm for $\mathcal{P}$ into a distance estimator with a double exponential loss. This improves over the transformation of Fischer--Newman that incurred a tower-type loss. Our main conceptual contribution in this work is that we manage to turn the approach of Fischer--Newman, which was inherently ineffective, into an efficient one. On the technical level, our main contribution is in establishing certain properties of Frieze--Kannan Weak Regular partitions that are of independent interest.

The triangle removal states that if $G$ contains $\varepsilon n^2$ edge-disjoint triangles, then $G$ contains $δ(\varepsilon)n^3$ triangles. Unfortunately, there are no sensible bounds on the order of growth of $δ(\varepsilon)$, and at any rate, it is known that $δ(\varepsilon)$ is not polynomial in $\varepsilon$. Csaba recently obtained an asymmetric variant of the triangle removal, stating that if $G$ contains $\varepsilon n^2$ edge-disjoint triangles, then $G$ contains $2^{-\mathrm{poly}(1/\varepsilon)}\cdot n^5$ copies of $C_5$. To this end, he devised a new variant of Szemerédi's regularity lemma. We obtain the following results: - We first give a regularity-free proof of Csaba's theorem, which improves the number of copies of $C_5$ to the optimal number $\mathrm{poly}(\varepsilon)\cdot n^5$. - We say that $H$ is $K_3$-abundant if every graph containing $\varepsilon n^2$ edge-disjoint triangles has $\mathrm{poly}(\varepsilon)\cdot n^{|V(H)|}$ copies of $H$. It is easy to see that a $K_3$-abundant graph must be triangle-free and tripartite. Given our first result, it is natural to ask if all triangle-free tripartite graphs are $K_3$-abundant. Our second result is that assuming a well-known conjecture of Ruzsa in additive number theory, the answer to this question is negative. Our proofs use a mix of combinatorial, number-theoretic, probabilistic, and Ramsey-type arguments.

The celebrated Brown-Erdős-Sós conjecture states that for every fixed $e$, every $3$-uniform hypergraph with $Ω(n^2)$ edges contains $e$ edges spanned by $e+3$ vertices. Up to this date all the approaches towards resolving this problem relied on highly involved applications of the hypergraph regularity method, and yet they supplied only approximate versions of the conjecture, producing $e$ edges spanned by $e+O(\log e/\log \log e)$ vertices. In this short paper we describe a completely different approach, which reduces the problem to a variant of another well-known conjecture in extremal graph theory. A resolution of the latter would resolve the Brown-Erdős-Sós conjecture up to an absolute additive constant.

Let $N_{\mathcal{P}}(n,H)$ denote the maximum number of copies of $H$ in an $n$ vertex planar graph. The problem of bounding this function for various graphs $H$ has been extensively studied since the 70's. A special case that received a lot of attention recently is when $H$ is the path on $2m+1$ vertices, denoted $P_{2m+1}$. Our main result in this paper is that $$ N_{\mathcal{P}}(n,P_{2m+1})=O(m^{-m}n^{m+1})\;.$$ This improves upon the previously best known bound by a factor $e^{m}$, which is best possible up to the hidden constant, and makes a significant step towards resolving conjectures of Gosh et al. and of Cox and Martin. The proof uses graph theoretic arguments together with (simple) arguments from the theory of convex optimization.

Let $Q(n)$ denote the number of integers $1 \leq q \leq n$ whose prime factorization $q= \prod^{t}_{i=1}p^{a_i}_i$ satisfies $a_1\geq a_2\geq \ldots \geq a_t$. Hardy and Ramanujan proved that $$ \log Q(n) \sim \frac{2π}{\sqrt{3}} \sqrt{\frac{\log(n)}{\log\log(n)}}\;. $$ Before proving the above precise asymptotic formula, they studied in great detail what can be obtained concerning $Q(n)$ using purely elementary methods, and were only able to obtain much cruder lower and upper bounds using such methods. In this paper we show that it is in fact possible to obtain a purely elementary (and much shorter) proof of the Hardy--Ramanujan Theorem. Towards this goal, we first give a simple combinatorial argument, showing that $Q(n)$ satisfies a (pseudo) recurrence relation. This enables us to replace almost all the hard analytic part of the original proof with a short inductive argument.

Given a fixed $k$-uniform hypergraph $F$, the $F$-removal lemma states that every hypergraph with few copies of $F$ can be made $F$-free by the removal of few edges. Unfortunately, for general $F$, the constants involved are given by incredibly fast-growing Ackermann-type functions. It is thus natural to ask for which $F$ one can prove removal lemmas with polynomial bounds. One trivial case where such bounds can be obtained is when $F$ is $k$-partite. Alon proved that when $k=2$ (i.e. when dealing with graphs), only bipartite graphs have a polynomial removal lemma. Kohayakawa, Nagle and Rödl conjectured in 2002 that Alon's result can be extended to all $k>2$, namely, that the only $k$-graphs $F$ for which the hypergraph removal lemma has polynomial bounds are the trivial cases when $F$ is $k$-partite. In this paper we prove this conjecture.

Given a fixed hypergraph $H$, let $\mbox{wsat}(n,H)$ denote the smallest number of edges in an $n$-vertex hypergraph $G$, with the property that one can sequentially add the edges missing from $G$, so that whenever an edge is added, a new copy of $H$ is created. The study of $\mbox{wsat}(n,H)$ was introduced by Bollobás in 1968, and turned out to be one of the most influential topics in extremal combinatorics. While for most $H$ very little is known regarding $\mbox{wsat}(n,H)$, Alon proved in 1985 that for every graph $H$ there is a limiting constant $C_H$ so that $\mbox{wsat}(n,H)=(C_H+o(1))n$. Tuza conjectured in 1992 that Alon's theorem can be (appropriately) extended to arbitrary $r$-uniform hypergraphs. In this paper we prove this conjecture.

For a set of positive integers $A$, let $p_A(n)$ denote the number of ways to write $n$ as a sum of integers from $A$, and let $p(n)$ denote the usual partition function. In the early 40s, Erdős extended the classical Hardy--Ramanujan formula for $p(n)$ by showing that $A$ has density $α$ if and only if $\log p_A(n) \sim \log p(αn)$. Nathanson asked if Erdős's theorem holds also with respect to $A$'s lower density, namely, whether $A$ has lower-density $α$ if and only if $\log p_A(n) / \log p(αn)$ has lower limit $1$. We answer this question negatively by constructing, for every $α> 0$, a set of integers $A$ of lower density $α$, satisfying $$ \liminf_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\log p_A(n)}{\log p(αn)} \geq \left(\frac{\sqrt{6}}π-o_α(1)\right)\log(1/α)\;. $$ We further show that the above bound is best possible (up to the $o_α(1)$ term), thus determining the exact extremal relation between the lower density of a set of integers and the lower limit of its partition function. We also prove an analogous theorem with respect to the upper density of a set of integers, answering another question of Nathanson.