arXiv++ Combinatorics

For fixed $m$ and $R\subseteq \{0,1,\ldots,m-1\}$, take $A$ to be the set of positive integers congruent modulo $m$ to one of the elements of $R$, and let $p_A(n)$ be the number of ways to write $n$ as a sum of elements of $A$. Nathanson proved that $\log p_A(n) \leq (1+o(1)) π\sqrt{2n|R|/3m}$ using a variant of a remarkably simple method devised by Erdős in order to bound the partition function. In this short note we describe a simpler and shorter proof of Nathanson's bound.

The pantograph differential equation and its solution, the deformed exponential function, are remarkable objects that appear in areas as diverse as combinatorics, number theory, statistical mechanics, and electrical engineering. In this article we describe a new surprising application of these objects in graph theory, by showing that the set of all cliques is not forcing for quasirandomness. This provides a natural example of an infinite family of graphs, which is not forcing, and answers a natural question posed by P. Horn.

Since counting subgraphs in general graphs is, by and large, a computationally demanding problem, it is natural to try and design fast algorithms for restricted families of graphs. One such family that has been extensively studied is that of graphs of bounded degeneracy (e.g., planar graphs). This line of work, which started in the early 80's, culminated in a recent work of Gishboliner et al., which highlighted the importance of the task of counting homomorphic copies of cycles (i.e., cyclic walks) in graphs of bounded degeneracy. Our main result in this paper is a surprisingly tight relation between the above task and the well-studied problem of detecting (standard) copies of directed cycles in general directed graphs. More precisely, we prove the following: 1. One can compute the number of homomorphic copies of $C_{2k}$ and $C_{2k+1}$ in $n$-vertex graphs of bounded degeneracy in time $\tilde{O}(n^{d_{k}})$, where the fastest known algorithm for detecting directed copies of $C_k$ in general $m$-edge digraphs runs in time $\tilde{O}(m^{d_{k}})$. 2. Conversely, one can transform any $O(n^{b_{k}})$ algorithm for computing the number of homomorphic copies of $C_{2k}$ or of $C_{2k+1}$ in $n$-vertex graphs of bounded degeneracy, into an $\tilde{O}(m^{b_{k}})$ time algorithm for detecting directed copies of $C_k$ in general $m$-edge digraphs. We emphasize that our first result does not use a black-box reduction (as opposed to the second result which does). Instead, we design an algorithm for computing the number of $C_k$-homomorphisms in degenerate graphs and show that one part of its analysis can be reduced to the analysis of the fastest known algorithm for detecting directed cycles in general digraphs, which was carried out in a recent breakthrough of Dalirrooyfard, Vuong and Vassilevska Williams.

We show that there exist linear $3$-uniform hypergraphs with $n$ vertices and $Ω(n^2)$ edges which contain no copy of the $3 \times 3$ grid. This makes significant progress on a conjecture of Füredi and Ruszinkó. We also discuss connections to proving lower bounds for the $(9,6)$ Brown-Erdős-Sós problem and to a problem of Solymosi and Solymosi.

We consider the problem of counting the number of copies of a fixed graph $H$ within an input graph $G$. This is one of the most well-studied algorithmic graph problems, with many theoretical and practical applications. We focus on solving this problem when the input $G$ has bounded degeneracy. This is a rich family of graphs, containing all graphs without a fixed minor (e.g. planar graphs), as well as graphs generated by various random processes (e.g. preferential attachment graphs). We say that $H$ is easy if there is a linear-time algorithm for counting the number of copies of $H$ in an input $G$ of bounded degeneracy. A seminal result of Chiba and Nishizeki from '85 states that every $H$ on at most 4 vertices is easy. Bera, Pashanasangi, and Seshadhri recently extended this to all $H$ on 5 vertices, and further proved that for every $k > 5$ there is a $k$-vertex $H$ which is not easy. They left open the natural problem of characterizing all easy graphs $H$. Bressan has recently introduced a framework for counting subgraphs in degenerate graphs, from which one can extract a sufficient condition for a graph $H$ to be easy. Here we show that this sufficient condition is also necessary, thus fully answering the Bera--Pashanasangi--Seshadhri problem. We further resolve two closely related problems; namely characterizing the graphs that are easy with respect to counting induced copies, and with respect to counting homomorphisms.

Property testers are fast randomized algorithms whose task is to distinguish between inputs satisfying some predetermined property ${\cal P}$ and those that are far from satisfying it. Since these algorithms operate by inspecting a small randomly selected portion of the input, the most natural property one would like to be able to test is whether the input does not contain certain forbidden small substructures. In the setting of graphs, such a result was obtained by Alon et al., who proved that for any finite family of graphs ${\cal F}$, the property of being induced ${\cal F}$-free (i.e. not containing an induced copy of any $F \in {\cal F}$) is testable. It is natural to ask if one can go one step further and prove that more elaborate properties involving induced subgraphs are also testable. One such generalization of the result of Alon et al. was formulated by Goldreich and Shinkar who conjectured that for any finite family of graphs ${\cal F}$, and any linear inequality involving the densities of the graphs $F \in {\cal F}$ in the input graph, the property of satisfying this inequality can be tested in a certain restricted model of graph property testing. Our main result in this paper disproves this conjecture in the following strong form: some properties of this type are not testable even in the classical (i.e. unrestricted) model of graph property testing. The proof deviates significantly from prior non-testability results in this area. The main idea is to use a linear inequality relating induced subgraph densities in order to encode the property of being a quasirandom graph.

Let $f(n,v,e)$ denote the maximum number of edges in a $3$-uniform hypergraph not containing $e$ edges spanned by at most $v$ vertices. One of the most influential open problems in extremal combinatorics then asks, for a given number of edges $e \geq 3$, what is the smallest integer $d=d(e)$ so that $f(n,e+d,e) = o(n^2)$? This question has its origins in work of Brown, Erdős and Sós from the early 70's and the standard conjecture is that $d(e)=3$ for every $e \geq 3$. The state of the art result regarding this problem was obtained in 2004 by Sárközy and Selkow, who showed that $f(n,e + 2 + \lfloor \log_2 e \rfloor,e) = o(n^2)$. The only improvement over this result was a recent breakthrough of Solymosi and Solymosi, who improved the bound for $d(10)$ from 5 to 4. We obtain the first asymptotic improvement over the Sárközy--Selkow bound, showing that $$ f(n, e + O(\log e/ \log\log e), e) = o(n^2). $$

An $r$-uniform hypergraph ($r$-graph for short) is called linear if every pair of vertices belong to at most one edge. A linear $r$-graph is complete if every pair of vertices are in exactly one edge. The famous Brown-Erdős-Sós conjecture states that for every fixed $k$ and $r$, every linear $r$-graph with $Ω(n^2)$ edges contains $k$ edges spanned by at most $(r-2)k+3$ vertices. As an intermediate step towards this conjecture, Conlon and Nenadov recently suggested to prove its natural Ramsey relaxation. Namely, that for every fixed $k$, $r$ and $c$, in every $c$-colouring of a complete linear $r$-graph, one can find $k$ monochromatic edges spanned by at most $(r-2)k+3$ vertices. We prove that this Ramsey version of the conjecture holds under the additional assumption that $r \geq r_0(c)$, and we show that for $c=2$ it holds for all $r\geq 4$.

The hypergraph regularity lemma -- the extension of Szemerédi's graph regularity lemma to the setting of $k$-uniform hypergraphs -- is one of the most celebrated combinatorial results obtained in the past decade. By now there are several (very different) proofs of this lemma, obtained by Gowers, by Nagle-Rödl-Schacht-Skokan and by Tao. Unfortunately, what all these proofs have in common is that they yield regular partitions whose order is given by the $k$-th Ackermann function. We show that such Ackermann-type bounds are unavoidable for every $k \ge 2$, thus confirming a prediction of Tao. Prior to our work, the only result of this type was Gowers' famous lower bound for graph regularity.

The area of graph property testing seeks to understand the relation between the global properties of a graph and its local statistics. In the classical model, the local statistics of a graph is defined relative to a uniform distribution over the graph's vertex set. A graph property $\mathcal{P}$ is said to be testable if the local statistics of a graph can allow one to distinguish between graphs satisfying $\mathcal{P}$ and those that are far from satisfying it. Goldreich recently introduced a generalization of this model in which one endows the vertex set of the input graph with an arbitrary and unknown distribution, and asked which of the properties that can be tested in the classical model can also be tested in this more general setting. We completely resolve this problem by giving a (surprisingly "clean") characterization of these properties. To this end, we prove a removal lemma for vertex weighted graphs which is of independent interest.

A well known observation of Lovász is that if a hypergraph is not $2$-colorable, then at least one pair of its edges intersect at a single vertex. %This very simple criterion turned out to be extremly useful . In this short paper we consider the quantitative version of Lovász's criterion. That is, we ask how many pairs of edges intersecting at a single vertex, should belong to a non $2$-colorable $n$-uniform hypergraph? Our main result is an {\em exact} answer to this question, which further characterizes all the extremal hypergraphs. The proof combines Bollobás's two families theorem with Pluhar's randomized coloring algorithm.

The Erdős--Hajnal Theorem asserts that non-universal graphs, that is, graphs that do not contain an induced copy of some fixed graph $H$, have homogeneous sets of size significantly larger than one can generally expect to find in a graph. We obtain two results of this flavor in the setting of $r$-uniform hypergraphs. A theorem of Rödl asserts that if an $n$-vertex graph is non-universal then it contains an almost homogeneous set (i.e one with edge density either very close to $0$ or $1$) of size $Ω(n)$. We prove that if a $3$-uniform hypergraph is non-universal then it contains an almost homogeneous set of size $Ω(\log n)$. An example of Rödl from 1986 shows that this bound is tight. Let $R_r(t)$ denote the size of the largest non-universal $r$-graph $G$ so that neither $G$ nor its complement contain a complete $r$-partite subgraph with parts of size $t$. We prove an Erdős--Hajnal-type stepping-up lemma, showing how to transform a lower bound for $R_{r}(t)$ into a lower bound for $R_{r+1}(t)$. As an application of this lemma, we improve a bound of Conlon--Fox--Sudakov by showing that $R_3(t) \geq t^{Ω(t)}$.

The hypergraph regularity lemma -- the extension of Szemerédi's graph regularity lemma to the setting of $k$-uniform hypergraphs -- is one of the most celebrated combinatorial results obtained in the past decade. By now there are several (very different) proofs of this lemma, obtained by Gowers, by Nagle-Rödl-Schacht-Skokan and by Tao. Unfortunately, what all these proofs have in common is that they yield regular partitions whose order is given by the $k$-th Ackermann function. We show that such Ackermann-type bounds are unavoidable for every $k \ge 2$, thus confirming a prediction of Tao. Prior to our work, the only result of the above type was Gowers' famous lower bound for graph regularity. In this paper we describe the key new ideas which enable us to overcome several barriers which stood in the way of establishing such bounds for hypergraphs of higher uniformity. One of them is a tight bound for a new (very weak) version of the {\em graph} regularity lemma. Using this bound, we prove a lower bound for any regularity lemma of $3$-uniform hypergraphs that satisfies certain mild conditions. We then show how to use this result in order to prove a tight bound for the hypergraph regularity lemmas of Gowers and Frankl--Rödl. We will obtain similar results for hypergraphs of arbitrary uniformity $k\geq 2$ in a subsequent paper.

The hypergraph regularity lemma -- the extension of Szemerédi's graph regularity lemma to the setting of $k$-uniform hypergraphs -- is one of the most celebrated combinatorial results obtained in the past decade. By now there are several (very different) proofs of this lemma, obtained by Gowers, by Nagle-Rödl-Schacht-Skokan and by Tao. Unfortunately, what all these proofs have in common is that they yield regular partitions whose order is given by the $k$-th Ackermann function. In a recent paper we have shown that these bounds are unavoidable for $3$-uniform hypergraphs. In this paper we extend this result by showing that such Ackermann-type bounds are unavoidable for every $k \ge 2$, thus confirming a prediction of Tao.

The investigation of conditions guaranteeing the appearance of cycles of certain lengths is one of the most well-studied topics in graph theory. In this paper we consider a problem of this type which asks, for fixed integers ${\ell}$ and $k$, how many copies of the $k$-cycle guarantee the appearance of an $\ell$-cycle? Extending previous results of Bollobás--Győri--Li and Alon--Shikhelman, we fully resolve this problem by giving tight (or nearly tight) bounds for all values of $\ell$ and $k$. We also present a somewhat surprising application of the above mentioned estimates to the study of the graph removal lemma. Prior to this work, all bounds for removal lemmas were either polynomial or there was a tower-type gap between the best known upper and lower bounds. We fill this gap by showing that for every super-polynomial function $f(\varepsilon)$, there is a family of graphs ${\cal F}$, such that the bounds for the ${\cal F}$ removal lemma are precisely given by $f(\varepsilon)$. We thus obtain the first examples of removal lemmas with tight super-polynomial bounds. A special case of this result resolves a problem of Alon and the second author, while another special case partially resolves a problem of Goldreich.

Suppose one needs to change the direction of at least $εn^2$ edges of an $n$-vertex tournament $T$, in order to make it $H$-free. A standard application of the regularity method shows that in this case $T$ contains at least $f^*_H(ε)n^h$ copies of $H$, where $f^*_H$ is some tower-type function. It has long been observed that many graph/digraph problems become easier when assuming that the host graph is a tournament. It is thus natural to ask if the removal lemma becomes easier if we assume that the digraph $G$ is a tournament. Our main result here is a precise characterization of the tournaments $H$ for which $f^*_H(ε)$ is polynomial in $ε$, stating that such a bound is attainable if and only if $H$'s vertex set can be partitioned into two sets, each spanning an acyclic directed graph. The proof of this characterization relies, among other things, on a novel application of a regularity lemma for matrices due to Alon, Fischer and Newman, and on probabilistic variants of Ruzsa-Szemerédi graphs. We finally show that even when restricted to tournaments, deciding if $H$ satisfies the condition of our characterization is an NP-hard problem.

Obtaining an efficient bound for the triangle removal lemma is one of the most outstanding open problems of extremal combinatorics. Perhaps the main bottleneck for achieving this goal is that triangle-free graphs can be highly unstructured. For example, triangle-free graphs might have only regular partitions (in the sense of Szemerédi) of tower-type size. And indeed, essentially all the graph properties ${\cal P}$ for which removal lemmas with reasonable bounds were obtained, are such that every graph satisfying ${\cal P}$ has a small regular partition. So in some sense, a barrier for obtaining an efficient removal lemma for property ${\cal P}$ was having an efficient regularity lemma for graphs satisfying ${\cal P}$. In this paper we consider the property of being induced $C_4$-free, which also suffers from the fact that a graph might satisfy this property but still have only regular partitions of tower-type size. By developing a new approach for this problem we manage to overcome this barrier and thus obtain a merely exponential bound for the induced $C_4$ removal lemma. We thus obtain the first efficient removal lemma that does not rely on an efficient version of the regularity lemma. This is the first substantial progress on a problem raised by Alon in 2001, and more recently by Alon, Conlon and Fox.

A common theme in many extremal problems in graph theory is the relation between local and global properties of graphs. One of the most celebrated results of this type is the Ruzsa-Szemerédi triangle removal lemma, which states that if a graph is $\varepsilon$-far from being triangle free, then most subsets of vertices of size $C(\varepsilon)$ are not triangle free. Unfortunately, the best known upper bound on $C(\varepsilon)$ is given by a tower-type function, and it is known that $C(\varepsilon)$ is not polynomial in $\varepsilon^{-1}$. The triangle removal lemma has been extended to many other graph properties, and for some of them the corresponding function $C(\varepsilon)$ is polynomial. This raised the natural question, posed by Goldreich in 2005 and more recently by Alon and Fox, of characterizing the properties for which one can prove removal lemmas with polynomial bounds. Our main results in this paper are new sufficient and necessary criteria for guaranteeing that a graph property admits a removal lemma with a polynomial bound. Although both are simple combinatorial criteria, they imply almost all prior positive and negative results of this type. Moreover, our new sufficient conditions allow us to obtain polynomially bounded removal lemmas for many properties for which the previously known bounds were of tower-type. In particular, we show that every {\em semi-algebraic} graph property admits a polynomially bounded removal lemma. This confirms a conjecture of Alon.

We introduce a new variant of Szemerédi's regularity lemma which we call the "sparse regular approximation lemma" (SRAL). The input to this lemma is a graph $G$ of edge density $p$ and parameters $ε, δ$, where we think of $δ$ as a constant. The goal is to construct an $ε$-regular partition of $G$ while having the freedom to add/remove up to $δ|E(G)|$ edges. As we show here, this weaker variant of the regularity lemma already suffices for proving the graph removal lemma and the hypergraph regularity lemma, which are two of the main applications of the (standard) regularity lemma. This of course raises the following question: can one obtain quantitative bounds for SRAL that are significantly better than those associated with the regularity lemma? Our first result answers the above question affirmatively by proving an upper bound for SRAL given by a tower of height $O(\log 1/p)$. This allows us to reprove Fox's upper bound for the graph removal lemma. Our second result is a matching lower bound for SRAL showing that a tower of height $Ω(\log 1/p)$ is unavoidable. We in fact prove a more general multicolored lower bound which is essential for proving lower bounds for the hypergraph regularity lemma.

We consider the following Turán-type problem: given a fixed tournament $H$, what is the least integer $t=t(n,H)$ so that adding $t$ edges to any $n$-vertex tournament, results in a digraph containing a copy of $H$. Similarly, what is the least integer $t=t(T_n,H)$ so that adding $t$ edges to the $n$-vertex transitive tournament, results in a digraph containing a copy of $H$. Besides proving several results on these problems, our main contributions are the following: (1) Pach and Tardos conjectured that if $M$ is an acyclic $0/1$ matrix, then any $n \times n$ matrix with $n(\log n)^{O(1)}$ entries equal to $1$ contains the pattern $M$. We show that this conjecture is equivalent to the assertion that $t(T_n,H)=n(\log n)^{O(1)}$ if and only if $H$ belongs to a certain (natural) family of tournaments. (2) We propose an approach for determining if $t(n,H)=n(\log n)^{O(1)}$. This approach combines expansion in sparse graphs, together with certain structural characterizations of $H$-free tournaments. Our result opens the door for using structural graph theoretic tools in order to settle the Pach-Tardos conjecture.