arXiv++ Combinatorics

We prove a nearly polynomial inverse theorem for the Gowers $U^d$ norm, over finite fields of non-small characteristic, for polynomials of degree $d+1$. The case of degree $d$ was very recently settled by Milićević and Randelović with a fully polynomial bound. We moreover provide a nearly polynomial inverse theorem for homogeneous polynomials of any degree smaller than $2d$.

We show that three notions of rank for matrices of multilinear forms are equivalent. This result generalizes a classical result of Flanders, corrects a minor hole in work of Fortin and Reutenauer, answers a question of Lampert on the relation between the analytic and slice ranks of trilinear forms, and establishes a special case of the conjecture that the analytic and partition ranks of a tensor are equivalent.

A regularity lemma for polynomials provides a decomposition in terms of a bounded number of approximately independent polynomials. Such regularity lemmas play an important role in numerous results, yet suffer from the familiar shortcoming of having tower-type bounds or worse. In this paper we design a new, weaker regularity lemma with strong bounds. The new regularity lemma in particular provides means to quantitatively study the curves contained in the image of a polynomial map, which is beyond the reach of standard methods. Applications include strong bounds for a problem of Karam on generalized rank, as well as a new method to obtain upper bounds for fan-in parameters in arithmetic circuits. For example, we show that if the image of a polynomial map $\mathbf{P} \colon \mathbb{F}^n \to \mathbb{F}^m$ of degree $d$ does not contain a line, then $\mathbf{P}$ can be computed by a depth-$4$ arithmetic formula with bottom fan-in at most $d/2$ and top fan-in at most $(2m)^{C(d)}$ (with $C(d)=2^{(1+o(1))d}$). One implication of our work is a certain ``barrier'' to arithmetic circuit lower bounds, in terms of the smallest degree of a polynomial curve contained in the image of the given polynomial map.

The Laplace expansion expresses the $n \times n$ determinant $\det_n$ as a sum of $n$ products. Do shorter expansions exist? In this paper we: - Fully determine the slice rank decompositions of $\det_n$ (where each product must contain a linear factor): In this case, we show that $n$ summands are necessary, and moreover, the only such expansions with $n$ summands are equivalent (in a precise sense) to the Laplace expansion. - Prove a logarithmic lower bound for the partition rank of $\det_n$ (where each product is of multilinear forms): In this case, we show that at least $\log_2(n)+1$ summands are needed. We also explain why existing techniques fail to yield any nontrivial lower bound, and why our new method cannot give a super-logarithmic lower bound. - Separate partition rank from slice rank for $\det_n$: we find a quadratic expansion for $\det_4$, over any field, with fewer summands than the Laplace expansion. This construction is related to a well-known example of Green-Tao and Lovett-Meshulam-Samorodnitsky disproving the naive version of the Gowers Inverse conjecture over small fields. An important motivation for these questions comes from the challenge of separating structure and randomness for tensors. On the one hand, we show that the random construction fails to separate: for a random tensor of partition rank $r$, the analytic rank is $r-o(1)$ with high probability. On the other hand, our results imply that the determinant yields the first asymptotic separation between partition rank and analytic rank of $d$-tensors, with their ratio tending to infinity with $d$.

Chen and Ye recently proved that the analytic rank of tensors is stable under field extensions, assuming a fixed base field. Using a more careful analysis, we show that this assumption is unnecessary.

An important conjecture in additive combinatorics, number theory, and algebraic geometry posits that the partition rank and analytic rank of tensors are equal up to a constant, over any finite field. We prove the conjecture up to a logarithmic factor. Our proof is largely independent of previous work, utilizing recursively constructed polynomial identities and random walks on zero sets of polynomials. We also introduce a new, vector-valued notion of tensor rank (``local rank''), which serves as a bridge between partition and analytic rank, and which may be of independent interest as a tool for analyzing higher-degree polynomials.

The (weak) Nullstellensatz over finite fields says that if $P_1,\ldots,P_m$ are $n$-variate degree-$d$ polynomials with no common zero over a finite field $\mathbb{F}$ then there are polynomials $R_1,\ldots,R_m$ such that $R_1P_1+\cdots+R_mP_m \equiv 1$. Green and Tao [Contrib. Discrete Math. 2009, Proposition 9.1] used a regularity lemma to obtain an effective proof, showing that the degrees of the polynomials $R_i$ can be bounded independently of $n$, though with an Ackermann-type dependence on the other parameters $m$, $d$, and $|\mathbb{F}|$. In this paper we use the polynomial method to give a proof with a degree bound of $md(|\mathbb{F}|-1)$. We also show that the dependence on each of the parameters is the best possible up to an absolute constant. We further include a generalization, offered by Pete L. Clark, from finite fields to arbitrary subsets in arbitrary fields, provided the polynomials $P_i$ take finitely many values on said subset.

We prove that the partition rank and the analytic rank of tensors are equal up to a constant, over finite fields of any characteristic and any large enough cardinality depending on the analytic rank. Moreover, we show that a plausible improvement of our field cardinality requirement would imply that the ranks are equal up to 1+o(1) in the exponent over every finite field. At the core of the proof is a technique for lifting decompositions of multilinear polynomials in an open subset of an algebraic variety, and a technique for finding a large subvariety that retains all rational points such that at least one of these points satisfies a finite-field analogue of genericity with respect to it. Proving the equivalence between these two ranks, ideally over fixed finite fields, is a central question in additive combinatorics, and was reiterated by multiple authors. As a corollary we prove, allowing the field to depend on the value of the norm, the Polynomial Gowers Inverse Conjecture in the d vs. d-1 case.

We prove that the slice rank of a 3-tensor (a combinatorial notion introduced by Tao in the context of the cap-set problem), the analytic rank (a Fourier-theoretic notion introduced by Gowers and Wolf), and the geometric rank (an algebro-geometric notion introduced by Kopparty, Moshkovitz, and Zuiddam) are all equal up to an absolute constant. As a corollary, we obtain strong trade-offs on the arithmetic complexity of a biased bilinear map, and on the separation between computing a bilinear map exactly and on average. Our result settles open questions of Haramaty and Shpilka [STOC 2010], and of Lovett [Discrete Anal. 2019] for 3-tensors.

Motivated by problems in algebraic complexity theory (e.g., matrix multiplication) and extremal combinatorics (e.g., the cap set problem and the sunflower problem), we introduce the geometric rank as a new tool in the study of tensors and hypergraphs. We prove that the geometric rank is an upper bound on the subrank of tensors and the independence number of hypergraphs. We prove that the geometric rank is smaller than the slice rank of Tao, and relate geometric rank to the analytic rank of Gowers and Wolf in an asymptotic fashion. As a first application, we use geometric rank to prove a tight upper bound on the (border) subrank of the matrix multiplication tensors, matching Strassen's well-known lower bound from 1987.

Szemeredi's regularity lemma is one instance in a family of regularity lemmas, replacing the definition of density of a graph by a more general coefficient. Recently, Fan Chung proved another instance, a regularity lemma for clustering graphs, and asked whether good upper bounds could be derived for the quantitative estimates it supplies. We answer this question in the negative, for every generalized regularity lemma.

The hypergraph regularity lemma -- the extension of Szemerédi's graph regularity lemma to the setting of $k$-uniform hypergraphs -- is one of the most celebrated combinatorial results obtained in the past decade. By now there are several (very different) proofs of this lemma, obtained by Gowers, by Nagle-Rödl-Schacht-Skokan and by Tao. Unfortunately, what all these proofs have in common is that they yield regular partitions whose order is given by the $k$-th Ackermann function. We show that such Ackermann-type bounds are unavoidable for every $k \ge 2$, thus confirming a prediction of Tao. Prior to our work, the only result of this type was Gowers' famous lower bound for graph regularity.

Let $\text{Tr}(n,m,k)$ denote the largest number of distinct projections onto $k$ coordinates guaranteed in any family of $m$ binary vectors of length $n$. The classical Sauer-Perles-Shelah Lemma implies that $\text{Tr}(n, n^r, k) = 2^k$ for $k \le r$. While determining $\text{Tr}(n,n^r,k)$ precisely for general $k$ seems hopeless even for constant $r$, estimating it, and more generally estimating the function $\text{Tr}(n,m,k)$ for all range of the parameters, remains a widely open problem with connections to important questions in computer science and combinatorics. Here we essentially resolve this problem when $k$ is linear and $m=n^r$ where $r$ is constant, proving that, for any constant $α>0$, $\text{Tr}(n,n^r,αn) = \tildeΘ(n^C)$ with $C=C(r,α)=\frac{r+1-\log(1+α)}{2-\log(1+α)}$. For the proof we establish a "sparse" version of another classical result, the Kruskal-Katona Theorem, which gives a stronger guarantee when the hypergraph does not induce dense sub-hypergraphs. Furthermore, we prove that the parameters in our sparse Kruskal-Katona theorem are essentially best possible. Finally, we mention two simple applications which may be of independent interest.

The hypergraph regularity lemma -- the extension of Szemerédi's graph regularity lemma to the setting of $k$-uniform hypergraphs -- is one of the most celebrated combinatorial results obtained in the past decade. By now there are several (very different) proofs of this lemma, obtained by Gowers, by Nagle-Rödl-Schacht-Skokan and by Tao. Unfortunately, what all these proofs have in common is that they yield regular partitions whose order is given by the $k$-th Ackermann function. We show that such Ackermann-type bounds are unavoidable for every $k \ge 2$, thus confirming a prediction of Tao. Prior to our work, the only result of the above type was Gowers' famous lower bound for graph regularity. In this paper we describe the key new ideas which enable us to overcome several barriers which stood in the way of establishing such bounds for hypergraphs of higher uniformity. One of them is a tight bound for a new (very weak) version of the {\em graph} regularity lemma. Using this bound, we prove a lower bound for any regularity lemma of $3$-uniform hypergraphs that satisfies certain mild conditions. We then show how to use this result in order to prove a tight bound for the hypergraph regularity lemmas of Gowers and Frankl--Rödl. We will obtain similar results for hypergraphs of arbitrary uniformity $k\geq 2$ in a subsequent paper.

The hypergraph regularity lemma -- the extension of Szemerédi's graph regularity lemma to the setting of $k$-uniform hypergraphs -- is one of the most celebrated combinatorial results obtained in the past decade. By now there are several (very different) proofs of this lemma, obtained by Gowers, by Nagle-Rödl-Schacht-Skokan and by Tao. Unfortunately, what all these proofs have in common is that they yield regular partitions whose order is given by the $k$-th Ackermann function. In a recent paper we have shown that these bounds are unavoidable for $3$-uniform hypergraphs. In this paper we extend this result by showing that such Ackermann-type bounds are unavoidable for every $k \ge 2$, thus confirming a prediction of Tao.

We introduce a new variant of Szemerédi's regularity lemma which we call the "sparse regular approximation lemma" (SRAL). The input to this lemma is a graph $G$ of edge density $p$ and parameters $ε, δ$, where we think of $δ$ as a constant. The goal is to construct an $ε$-regular partition of $G$ while having the freedom to add/remove up to $δ|E(G)|$ edges. As we show here, this weaker variant of the regularity lemma already suffices for proving the graph removal lemma and the hypergraph regularity lemma, which are two of the main applications of the (standard) regularity lemma. This of course raises the following question: can one obtain quantitative bounds for SRAL that are significantly better than those associated with the regularity lemma? Our first result answers the above question affirmatively by proving an upper bound for SRAL given by a tower of height $O(\log 1/p)$. This allows us to reprove Fox's upper bound for the graph removal lemma. Our second result is a matching lower bound for SRAL showing that a tower of height $Ω(\log 1/p)$ is unavoidable. We in fact prove a more general multicolored lower bound which is essential for proving lower bounds for the hypergraph regularity lemma.

A paradigm that was successfully applied in the study of both pure and algorithmic problems in graph theory can be colloquially summarized as stating that "any graph is close to being the disjoint union of expanders". Our goal in this paper is to show that in several of the instantiations of the above approach, the quantitative bounds that were obtained are essentially best possible. These results are obtained as corollaries of a new family of graphs, which we construct by picking random subgraphs of the hypercube, and analyze using (simple) arguments from the theory of metric embedding.

Constructing a spanning tree of a graph is one of the most basic tasks in graph theory. Motivated by several recent studies of local graph algorithms, we consider the following variant of this problem. Let G be a connected bounded-degree graph. Given an edge $e$ in $G$ we would like to decide whether $e$ belongs to a connected subgraph $G'$ consisting of $(1+ε)n$ edges (for a prespecified constant $ε>0$), where the decision for different edges should be consistent with the same subgraph $G'$. Can this task be performed by inspecting only a {\em constant} number of edges in $G$? Our main results are: (1) We show that if every $t$-vertex subgraph of $G$ has expansion $1/(\log t)^{1+o(1)}$ then one can (deterministically) construct a sparse spanning subgraph $G'$ of $G$ using few inspections. To this end we analyze a "local" version of a famous minimum-weight spanning tree algorithm. (2) We show that the above expansion requirement is sharp even when allowing randomization. To this end we construct a family of $3$-regular graphs of high girth, in which every $t$-vertex subgraph has expansion $1/(\log t)^{1-o(1)}$.

The arithmetic regularity lemma due to Green [GAFA 2005] is an analogue of the famous Szemer{é}di regularity lemma in graph theory. It shows that for any abelian group $G$ and any bounded function $f:G \to [0,1]$, there exists a subgroup $H \le G$ of bounded index such that, when restricted to most cosets of $H$, the function $f$ is pseudorandom in the sense that all its nontrivial Fourier coefficients are small. Quantitatively, if one wishes to obtain that for $1-ε$ fraction of the cosets, the nontrivial Fourier coefficients are bounded by $ε$, then Green shows that $|G/H|$ is bounded by a tower of twos of height $1/ε^3$. He also gives an example showing that a tower of height $Ω(\log 1/ε)$ is necessary. Here, we give an improved example, showing that a tower of height $Ω(1/ε)$ is necessary.

A celebrated result of Gowers states that for every ε> 0 there is a graph G so that every ε-regular partition of G (in the sense of Szemeredi's regularity lemma) has order given by a tower of exponents of height polynomial in 1/ε. In this note we give a new proof of this result that uses a construction and proof of correctness that are significantly simpler and shorter.