arXiv++ Combinatorics

Many algorithms are designed to work well on average over inputs. But when such an algorithm is run on an arbitrary input, the question arises: Can we trust the algorithm on this input? This question is especially relevant in network science, where algorithms for theoretical random graph models are often applied to individual real-world networks. We identify a new class of algorithmic problems addressing this, which we call "Quality Control Problems." These problems are specified by a "quality function" $ρ$ and a distribution $D$ such that, with high probability, a sample drawn from $D$ is "high quality," meaning its $ρ$-value is near $1$. The goal is to accept most inputs $x \sim D$ and reject potentially adversarially generated inputs $x$ with $ρ(x)$ far from $1$. In this work, we consider the sublinear version of the quality control problem, where $D \in Δ(\{0,1\}^N)$ and the goal is to solve the $(D,ρ)$-quality problem with $o(N)$ queries and time. As a case study, we consider random graphs, i.e., $D = G_{n,p}$ (and $N = \binom{n}2$), and the $k$-clique count function $ρ_k := C_k(G)/\mathbb{E}_{G' \sim G_{n,p}}[C_k(G')]$, where $C_k(G)$ is the number of $k$-cliques in $G$. In suitable parameter ranges, worst-case approximate $k$-clique counting requires $p^{-Ω(k^2)}$ queries. In contrast, we show that the quality control problem for $G_{n,p}$ (with $n\geq p^{-ck}$ for some constant $c$) with respect to $ρ_k$ can be tested with $p^{-O(k)}$ queries and time, showing quality control is provably superpolynomially more efficient in this setting. More generally, for a motif $H$ of maximum degree $Δ(H)$, we show that the corresponding quality control problem can be solved with $p^{-O(Δ(H))}$ queries and running time.

In recent work, Marcussen, Rubinfeld, and Sudan introduced the notion of quality control problems, which aim to capture the task of determining if a given input is truly random. Formally, their goal is to accept typical inputs from the specified distribution while rejecting every input whose value of a specified statistic is far from the distributional baseline. This captures the empirical practice of using specified statistics as a proxy for the quality of randomness. Empirical algorithms, however, have not exploited the asymmetry in the definition of quality control problems, which require soundness guarantees in the worst-case while only seeking average-case completeness. Their work abstracted a problem definition emphasizing this asymmetry and used it to give efficient quality control algorithms for assessing the randomness of graphs. In this work, we introduce and study quality control problems over sequences, where the goal is to distinguish a sequence of i.i.d. characters from sequences where some specified pattern appears too often (or too infrequently) as a subsequence. We consider this problem in both the finite-alphabet setting and for real-valued sequences. We refer to the former setting as the pattern counting problem. In the latter case, the natural notion of a pattern is to consider the relative ordering of the characters in the subsequence, and we refer to this as the permutation pattern counting problem. Algorithms to approximately count (permutation) patterns of length $k$ in a worst-case sequence of length $n$ can provably require exponential in $k$ queries into the sequence. In contrast, we show that by taking advantage of the asymmetry in the definition of quality control, we give algorithms that run in poly$(k)$ time to solve these problems. We also prove that any quality control algorithm (over some natural distributions) requires superlinear queries in $k$.

Graph $k$-coloring is one of the classic NP-complete problems. Previous work has studied its average time complexity, defined to be the average runtime of computing a $k$-coloring over the set of all $k$-colorable graphs on $n$ vertices. A highly influential result of Dyer-Frieze from 1989 gave an algorithm with $O(n^2)$ average runtime for constant $k$. This quadratic runtime appeared natural (and possibly even optimal) since almost all $k$-colorable graphs have $Θ(n^2)$ edges, so one needs at least this time in order to read the (entire) input. However, this was later improved by Kučera in 1995 to average runtime $O(n^2/k)$ for every $k \leq n^{c}$ where $c \in (0, 1)$. Nevertheless, in the most interesting case of $k = O(1)$, the best-known bound remained quadratic in $n$. The true average complexity of the $k$-coloring problem has remained elusive for the last three decades. We break the longstanding quadratic barrier. Our main result in this paper shows that the exact average-case complexity of this fundamental problem is $Θ(nk)$ for every $k \leq n^{c'}$ and some $c' \in (0, 1)$. For $k = O(1)$, this reveals the average sublinear nature of $k$-colorability: the average-case complexity is linear in $n$, and thus sublinear in the size of the input. We further show that our $Θ(nk)$ average runtime is optimal, since a simple bound proves that every algorithm that correctly $k$-colors all $k$-colorable graphs requires $Ω(n k)$ average runtime. Our proofs draw on ideas from sublinear and local algorithms and also yield a local computation algorithm (LCA) for $k$-coloring with average-case probe complexity $\text{poly}(k)$. A key new ingredient in our algorithm is a method for certifying the unique colorability of random subgraphs, using tools from the theory of graph regularity.

Hypergraph $2$-colorability is one of the classical NP-hard problems. Person and Schacht [SODA'09] designed a deterministic algorithm whose expected running time is polynomial over a uniformly chosen $2$-colorable $3$-uniform hypergraph. Lee, Molla, and Nagle recently extended this to $k$-uniform hypergraphs for all $k\geq 3$. Both papers relied heavily on the regularity lemma, hence their analysis was involved and their running time hid tower-type constants. Our first result in this paper is a new simple and elementary deterministic $2$-coloring algorithm that reproves the theorems of Person-Schacht and Lee-Molla-Nagle while avoiding the use of the regularity lemma. We also show how to turn our new algorithm into a randomized one with average expected running time of only $O(n)$. Our second and main result gives what we consider to be the ultimate evidence of just how easy it is to find a $2$-coloring of an average $2$-colorable hypergraph. We define a coloring oracle to be an algorithm which, given vertex $v$, assigns color red/blue to $v$ while inspecting as few edges as possible, so that the answers to any sequence of queries to the oracle are consistent with a single legal $2$-coloring of the input. Surprisingly, we show that there is a coloring oracle that, on average, can answer every vertex query in time $O(1)$.

Constructing a spanning tree of a graph is one of the most basic tasks in graph theory. Motivated by several recent studies of local graph algorithms, we consider the following variant of this problem. Let G be a connected bounded-degree graph. Given an edge $e$ in $G$ we would like to decide whether $e$ belongs to a connected subgraph $G'$ consisting of $(1+ε)n$ edges (for a prespecified constant $ε>0$), where the decision for different edges should be consistent with the same subgraph $G'$. Can this task be performed by inspecting only a {\em constant} number of edges in $G$? Our main results are: (1) We show that if every $t$-vertex subgraph of $G$ has expansion $1/(\log t)^{1+o(1)}$ then one can (deterministically) construct a sparse spanning subgraph $G'$ of $G$ using few inspections. To this end we analyze a "local" version of a famous minimum-weight spanning tree algorithm. (2) We show that the above expansion requirement is sharp even when allowing randomization. To this end we construct a family of $3$-regular graphs of high girth, in which every $t$-vertex subgraph has expansion $1/(\log t)^{1-o(1)}$.