arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a graph $G$, a proper coloring of $G$ is called proper conflict-free if for every non-isolated vertex $u$, there is at least one color appearing exactly once in $N_G(u)$. A graph $G$ is proper conflict-free $f$-choosable if for every list assignment $L$ with $|L(v)|\ge f(v)$ for each vertex $v$, $G$ admits a proper conflict-free $L$-coloring. Recently, Kashima, Škrekovski, and Xu proposed a conjecture on proper conflict-free list coloring. For a graph $G$, let $κ_G:V(G)\to \mathbb{N}$ be defined by \[ κ_G(v)= \begin{cases} 4, & \text{if } d_G(v)=2,\\[4pt] d_G(v)+1, & \text{if } d_G(v)\neq 2. \end{cases} \] They conjectured that every connected graph other than $C_5$ is proper conflict-free $κ_G$-choosable. In this paper, we confirm this conjecture in two classes of graphs with bounded average degree, thereby generalizing results of Kashima, Škrekovski, and Xu and of Wang and Zhang. We prove that every connected graph $G\neq C_5$ with either $\operatorname{mad}(G)<\frac{12}{5}$ or $Δ(G)\le3$ is proper conflict-free $κ_G$-choosable. To prove these results, we introduce a method based on systems of proper conflict-free representatives and develop a construction of auxiliary graphs that preserves the maximum average degree bound.

A proper conflict-free (PCF) $k$-coloring of a graph $G$ is a proper $k$-coloring such that there exists a color that appears exactly once in the neighborhood of every non-isolated vertex $v\in V(G)$. The PCF chromatic number, denoted by $χ_{pcf}(G)$, is the least integer $k$ such that there exists a PCF $k$-coloring of $G$. Given a graph $G$ and a positive integer $k$, PCF $k$-COLORABILITY is to decide whether $G$ admits a PCF $k$-coloring. Ahn et al. [Discrete Appl. Math. 377 (2025) 10-17] proved that PCF $k$-COLORABILITY is NP-complete for bipartite graphs. We strengthen this result by proving that PCF $k$-COLORABILITY is NP-complete for perfect elimination bipartite graphs, which is a proper subclass of bipartite graphs. We also show that the PCF chromatic number of a graph cannot be approximated within $O(n^{1-\varepsilon})$ unless P=NP, for any $\varepsilon>0$. On the positive side, we provide linear-time algorithms for PCF $k$-COLORABILITY in block graphs, proper interval graphs, chain graphs, and pseudo-split graphs. We show that $χ_{pcf}(G)\leq ω(G)+1$ for block graphs, proper interval graphs, and pseudo-split graphs (except $C_5$), and we characterize all graphs for which the equality holds.

A proper conflict-free coloring is a proper vertex coloring in which every nonisolated vertex has a color occurring uniquely in its open neighborhood. We prove that every graph with neither a $K_5$-minor nor a $Q_6$-minor admits such a coloring with at most seven colors, where $Q_6=K_3\vee\overline{K_3}$. In particular, this improves the previous general upper bound of eight for planar graphs. The proof combines a previously developed iterated distance-three selector construction with a general anchor-contraction lifting principle. The first supplies independently colored witnesses in closed neighborhoods, while the second combines those witnesses with a proper coloring of a suitable minor. We also develop the parity analogue of the first mechanism and show that, whenever the $K_{k+1}$ case of Hadwiger's conjecture holds, every $K_{k+1}$-minor-free graph can be proper vertex colored with $2k-1$ colors such that every nonisolated vertex has a color occurring an odd number of times in its open neighborhood.

We efficiently conflict-free color every planar graph with 4 colors. An (open-neighborhood) conflict-free coloring assigns colors to vertices in a way that every vertex v has a neighbor w such that the color of w is distinct from the colors of the other neighbors of v (i.e., the color of w is unique in the open neighborhood of v). A previous best upper bound on the conflict-free chromatic number of planar graphs was 5, and it is known that 4 colors are sometimes necessary. Deciding whether, e.g., a planar graph admits a conflict-free coloring with 3 colors is NP-complete. Our approach uses a refined variant of the classical Gallai-Edmonds decomposition and the Four Color Theorem. In fact, our result is equivalent to the Four Color Theorem.

Given a graph $G$ and a mapping $f:V(G) \to \mathbb{N}$, an $f$-list assignment of $G$ is a function that maps each $v \in V(G)$ to a set of at least $f(v)$ colors. For an $f$-list assignment $L$ of a graph $G$, a proper conflict-free $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring $φ$ of $G$ such that for every vertex $v \in V(G)$, $φ(v) \in L(v)$ and some appears precisely once in the neighborhood of $v$. We say that $G$ is proper conflict-free $f$-choosable if for every $f$-list assignment $L$ of $G$, there exists a proper conflict-free $L$-coloring of $G$. If $G$ is proper conflict-free $f$-choosable and there is a constant $k$ such that $f(v)= d_G(v)+k$ for every vertex $v$ of $G$, then we say $G$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosable. In this paper, we consider graphs with a bounded maximum average degree. We show that every graph with the maximum average degree less than $\frac{10}{3}$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+3)$-choosable, and that every graph with the maximum average degree less than $\frac{18}{7}$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+2)$-choosable. As a result, every planar graph with girth at least $5$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+3)$-choosable, and every planar graph with girth at least $9$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+2)$-choosable.

A proper conflict-free coloring of a graph is a proper vertex coloring wherein each non-isolated vertex's open neighborhood contains at least one color appearing exactly once. For a non-negative integer $k$, a graph $G$ is said to be proper conflict-free (degree+$k$)-choosable if given any list assignment $L$ for $G$ where $|L(v)| = d(v) + k$ holds for every vertex $v \in V(G)$, there exists a proper conflict-free coloring $φ$ of $G$ such that $φ(v) \in L(v)$ for all $v \in V(G)$. Recently, Kashima, Škrekovski, and Xu proposed two related conjectures on proper conflict-free choosability: the first asserts the existence of an absolute constant $k$ such that every graph is proper conflict-free (degree+$k$)-choosable, while the second strengthens this claim by restricting to connected graphs other than the cycle of length 5 and reducing the constant to $k=2$. In this paper, we confirm the second conjecture for three graph classes: $K_4$-minor-free graphs with maximum degree at most 4, outer-1-planar graphs with maximum degree at most 4, and planar graphs with girth at least 12; we also confirm the first conjecture for these same graph classes, in addition to all outer-1-planar graphs (without degree constraints). Moreover, we prove that planar graphs with girth at least 12 and outer-1-planar graphs are proper conflict-free $6$-choosable.

A proper coloring $φ$ of $G$ is called a proper conflict-free coloring of $G$ if for every non-isolated vertex $v$ of $G$, there is a color $c$ such that $|φ^{-1}(c)\cap N_G(v)|=1$. As an analogy of degree-choosability of graphs, we introduced the notion of proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosability of graphs. For a non-negative integer $k$, a graph $G$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosable if for any list assignment $L$ of $G$ with $|L(v)|\geq d_G(v)+k$ for every vertex $v\in V(G)$, $G$ admits a proper conflict-free coloring $φ$ such that $φ(v)\in L(v)$ for every vertex $v\in V(G)$. In this note, we first remark if a graph $G$ is $d$-degenerate, then $G$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+d+1)$-choosable. Furthermore, when $d=1$, we can reduce the number of colors by showing that every tree is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+1)$-choosable. This motivates us to state a question.

A proper coloring $φ$ of $G$ is called a proper conflict-free coloring of $G$ if for every non-isolated vertex $v$ of $G$, there is a color $c$ such that $|φ^{-1}(c)\cap N_G(v)|=1$. As an analogy to degree-choosability of graphs, the authors recently, in a previous paper, introduced the notion of proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosability of graphs. For a non-negative integer $k$, a graph $G$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosable if for any list assignment $L$ of $G$ with $|L(v)|\geq d_G(v)+k$ for every vertex $v\in V(G)$, $G$ admits a proper conflict-free coloring $φ$ such that $φ(v)\in L(v)$ for every vertex $v\in V(G)$. In this paper, we show that every connected outerplanar graph other than the $5$-cycle is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+2)$-choosable. This bound is tight in the sense that there are infinitely many connected outerplanar graphs that are not proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+1)$-choosable. We conclude the paper with two questions for further work.

Given a graph $G$ and a mapping $f:V(G) \to \mathbb{N}$, an $f$-list assignment of $G$ is a function that maps each $v \in V(G)$ to a set of at least $f(v)$ colors. For an $f$-list assignment $L$ of a graph $G$, a proper conflict-free $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring $φ$ of $G$ such that $φ(v) \in L(v)$ for every vertex $v\in V(G)$ and $v$ has a color that appears precisely once at its neighborhood for every non-isolated vertex $v\in V(G)$. We say that $G$ is proper conflict-free $f$-choosable if for any $f$-list assignment $L$ of $G$, there exists a proper conflict-free $L$-coloring of $G$. For a non-negative integer $k$, we say that $G$ is \emph{proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosable} if $G$ is proper conflict-free $f$-choosable where $f$ is a mapping with $f(v)= d_G(v)+k$ for every vertex $v\in V(G)$. Motivated by degree-choosability of graphs, we investigate the proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+k)$-choosability of graphs, especially for cases $k=1,2,3$. As the 5-cycle is not proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+2)$-choosable and it is the only such graph we know, it is possible that every connected graph other than the 5-cycle is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+2)$-choosable and thus every graph is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+3)$-choosable. To support these, we show that every connected graph with maximum degree at most 3 distinct from the 5-cycle is proper conflict-free $(\text{degree}+2)$-choosable, and that $S(G)$ is proper conflict-free $(\text{degree}+2)$-choosable for every graph $G$, where $S(G)$ is a graph obtained from $G$ by subdividing each edge once. Furthermore, by adapting the technique of DP-colorings, we prove that every graph with maximum degree at most $4$ is proper conflict-free $({\rm degree}+3)$-choosable.

A '(partial) conflict-free coloring' of a hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$ is an assignment of colors to (a subset of) the vertex set of $\mathcal{H}$ such that every hyperedge in $\mathcal{H}$ has a vertex whose color is distinct from every other vertex in that hyperedge. The minimum number of colors required for such a coloring is known as the '(partial) conflict-free chromatic number' of $\mathcal{H}$. It is easy to see that the conflict-free chromatic number of a hypergraph is at most its partial conflict-free chromatic number plus one. Conflict-free coloring has also been studied on the open/closed neighborhood hypergraphs of a given graph under the name open/closed neighborhood conflict-free coloring. In this paper, we study partial and full list variants of conflict-free coloring where, for every vertex $v$, we are given a list of admissible colors $L_v$ such that $v$ is allowed to be colored only from $L_v$. Bhyravarapu, Kalyanasundaram, and Mathew [Journal of Graph Theory, 2021] showed that the closed-neighborhood conflict-free chromatic number of any graph $G$ with maximum degree $Δ$ is at most $O(\ln^2 Δ)$. In this paper, we extend the $O(\ln^2 Δ)$ upper bound to the partial list variant of the closed-neighborhood conflict-free chromatic number. Further, we establish computational complexity results concerning the list open/closed-neighborhood conflict-free chromatic numbers.

We study the conflict-free chromatic number of hypergraphs derived from the family of facets of $d$-dimensional cyclic polytopes with $n$ vertices. While in odd dimensions $d$ the problem is easy, for even dimensions the problem becomes very difficult and exhibits interesting connections to extremal graph theory. We provide sharp asymptotic bounds for the conflict-free chromatic number in several small even dimensions and non-trivial upper and lower bounds for general even dimensions. The main purpose of this paper is revealing a surprising relation between conflict-free colorings and the celebrated Erdős girth conjecture, opening new avenues for future research.

We consider extremal edge-coloring problems inspired by the theory of anti-Ramsey / rainbow coloring, and further by odd-colorings and conflict-free colorings. Let $G$ be a graph, and $F$ any given family of graphs. For every integer $n \geq |G|$, let $f(n,G|F)$ denote the smallest integer $k$ such that any edge coloring of the complete graph $K_n$ with at least $k$ colors forces a copy of $G$ in which each color class induces a member of $F$. Observe that in anti-Ramsey problems each color class is a single edge; i.e., $F=\{K_2\}$. In our previous paper [arXiv:2405.19812], attention was given mostly to the case where $F$ is hereditary under subgraph inclusion. In the present work we consider coloring problems inspired by odd-coloring and conflict-free coloring. As we shall see, dealing with these problems requires distinct additional tools to those used in our first paper on the subject. Among the many results introduced in this paper, we mention: (1) For every graph $G$, there exists a constant $c=c(G)$ such that in any edge coloring of $K_n$ with at least $cn$ colors there is a copy of $G$ in which every vertex $v$ is incident with an edge whose color appears only once among all edges incident with $v$. (2) In sharp contrast to the above result we prove that if $F$ is the class of all odd graphs (having vertices with odd degrees only) then $f(n,K_k|F)=(1+o(1))$ex$(n,K_{\lceil k/2 \rceil})$, which is quadratic for $k \geq 5$. (3) We exactly determine $f(n,G|F)$ for small graphs when $F$ belongs to several families representing various odd/even coloring constraints.

We introduce a new tool useful for greedy coloring, which we call the forb-flex method, and apply it to odd coloring and proper conflict-free coloring of planar graphs. The odd chromatic number, denoted $χ_{\mathsf{o}}(G)$, is the smallest number of colors needed to properly color $G$ such that every non-isolated vertex of $G$ has a color appearing an odd number of times in its neighborhood. The proper conflict-free chromatic number, denoted $χ_{\mathsf{PCF}}(G)$, is the smallest number of colors needed to properly color $G$ such that every non-isolated vertex of $G$ has a color appearing uniquely in its neighborhood. Our new tool works by carefully counting the structures in the neighborhood of a vertex and determining if a neighbor of a vertex can be recolored at the end of a greedy coloring process to avoid conflicts. Combining this with the discharging method allows us to prove $χ_{\mathsf{PCF}}(G) \leq 4$ for planar graphs of girth at least 11, and $χ_{\mathsf{o}}(G) \leq 4$ for planar graphs of girth at least 10. These results improve upon the recent works of Cho, Choi, Kwon, and Park.

A conflict-free open neighborhood coloring of a graph is an assignment of colors to the vertices such that for every vertex there is a color that appears exactly once in its open neighborhood. For a graph $G$, the smallest number of colors required for such a coloring is called the conflict-free open neighborhood (CFON) chromatic number and is denoted by $χ_{ON}(G)$. By considering closed neighborhood instead of open neighborhood, we obtain the analogous notions of conflict-free closed neighborhood (CFCN) coloring, and CFCN chromatic number (denoted by $χ_{CN}(G)$). The notion of conflict-free coloring was introduced in 2002, and has since received considerable attention. In this paper, we study some extremal questions related to CFON and CFCN coloring.

An \emph{odd $c$-coloring} of a graph is a proper $c$-coloring such that each non-isolated vertex has a color appearing an odd number of times within its open neighborhood. A \emph{proper conflict-free $c$-coloring} of a graph is a proper $c$-coloring such that each non-isolated vertex has a color appearing exactly once within its neighborhood. Clearly, every proper conflict-free $c$-coloring is also an odd $c$-coloring. Cranston conjectured that every graph $G$ with maximum average degree $\text{mad}(G) < \frac{4c}{c+2}$ (where $c \geq 4$) has an odd $c$-coloring, and he proved this conjecture for $c \in \{5, 6\}$. Note that the bound $\frac{4c}{c+2}$ is best possible. Cho et al. solved Cranston's conjecture for $c \geq 5$, strengthening the result by transitioning from odd $c$-coloring to proper conflict-free $c$-coloring. However, they did not provide all the extremal non-colorable graphs $G$ with $\text{mad}(G) = \frac{4c}{c+2}$, which remains an open question of interest. In this paper, we tackle this intriguing extremal problem. We aim to characterize all non-proper conflict-free $c$-colorable graphs $G$ with $\text{mad}(G) = \frac{4c}{c+2}$. For the case of $c=4$, Cranston's conjecture is not true, as evidenced by the existence of a counterexample: a graph whose every block is a $5$-cycle. Cho et al.\ proved that a graph $G$ with $\text{mad}(G) < \frac{22}{9}$ and no induced $5$-cycles has an odd $4$-coloring. We improve this result by proving that a graph $G$ with $\text{mad}(G) \leq \frac{22}{9}$ (with equality allowed) is not odd $4$-colorable if and only if $G$ belongs to a specific class of graphs. On the other hand, Cho et al.\ established that a planar graph with girth at least $5$ has an odd $6$-coloring; we improve it by proving that a planar graph without $4^{-}$-cycles adjacent to $7^{-}$-cycles also has an odd $6$-coloring.

A proper coloring of a graph is \emph{conflict-free} if, for every non-isolated vertex, some color is used exactly once on its neighborhood. Caro, Petruševski, and Škrekovski proved that every graph $G$ has a proper conflict-free coloring with at most $5Δ(G)/2$ colors and conjectured that $Δ(G)+1$ colors suffice for every connected graph $G$ with $Δ(G)\ge 3$. Our first main result is that even for list-coloring, $\left\lceil 1.6550826Δ(G)+\sqrt{Δ(G)}\right\rceil$ colors suffice for every graph $G$ with $Δ(G)\ge 10^{8}$; we also prove slightly weaker bounds for all graphs with $Δ(G)\ge 750$. These results follow from our more general framework on proper conflict-free list-coloring of a pair consisting of a graph $G$ and a "conflict" hypergraph ${\mathcal H}$. As another corollary of our results in this general framework, every graph has a proper $(\sqrt{30}+o(1))Δ(G)^{1.5}$-list-coloring such that every bi-chromatic component is a path on at most three vertices, where the number of colors is optimal up to a constant factor. Our proof uses a fairly new type of recursive counting argument called Rosenfeld counting, which is a variant of the Lovász Local Lemma or entropy compression. We also prove an asymptotically optimal result for a fractional analogue of our general framework for proper conflict-free coloring for pairs of a graph and a conflict hypergraph. A corollary states that every graph $G$ has a fractional $(1+o(1))Δ(G)$-coloring such that every fractionally bi-chromatic component has at most two vertices. In particular, it implies that the fractional analogue of the conjecture of Caro et al.\ holds asymptotically in a strong sense.

A proper coloring of a graph is \emph{proper conflict-free} if every non-isolated vertex $v$ has a neighbor whose color is unique in the neighborhood of $v$. A proper coloring of a graph is \emph{odd} if for every non-isolated vertex $v$, there is a color appearing an odd number of times in the neighborhood of $v$. For an integer $k$, the \textsc{PCF $k$-Coloring} problem asks whether an input graph admits a proper conflict-free $k$-coloring and the \textsc{Odd $k$-Coloring} asks whether an input graph admits an odd $k$-coloring. We show that for every integer $k\geq3$, both problems are NP-complete, even if the input graph is bipartite. Furthermore, we show that the \textsc{PCF $4$-Coloring} problem is NP-complete when the input graph is planar.

A {\it proper conflict-free $c$-coloring} of a graph is a proper $c$-coloring such that each non-isolated vertex has a color appearing exactly once on its neighborhood. This notion was formally introduced by Fabrici et al., who proved that planar graphs have a proper conflict-free 8-coloring and constructed a planar graph with no proper conflict-free 5-coloring. Caro, Petruševski, and Škrekovski investigated this coloring concept further, and in particular studied upper bounds on the maximum average degree that guarantees a proper conflict-free $c$-coloring for $c\in\{4,5,6\}$. Along these lines, we completely determine the threshold on the maximum average degree of a graph $G$, denoted $mad(G)$, that guarantees a proper conflict-free $c$-coloring for all $c$ and also provide tightness examples. Namely, for $c\geq 5$ we prove that a graph $G$ with $mad(G)\leq \frac{4c}{c+2}$ has a proper conflict-free $c$-coloring, unless $G$ contains a $1$-subdivision of the complete graph on $c+1$ vertices. When $c=4$, we show that a graph $G$ with $mad(G)<\frac{12}{5}$ has a proper conflict-free $4$-coloring, unless $G$ contains an induced $5$-cycle. In addition, we show that a planar graph with girth at least 5 has a proper conflict-free $7$-coloring.

Proper conflict-free coloring is an intermediate notion between proper coloring of a graph and proper coloring of its square. It is a proper coloring such that for every non-isolated vertex, there exists a color appearing exactly once in its (open) neighborhood. Typical examples of graphs with large proper conflict-free chromatic number include graphs with large chromatic number and bipartite graphs isomorphic to the $1$-subdivision of graphs with large chromatic number. In this paper, we prove two rough converse statements that hold even in the list-coloring setting. The first is for sparse graphs: for every graph $H$, there exists an integer $c_H$ such that every graph with no subdivision of $H$ is (properly) conflict-free $c_H$-choosable. The second applies to dense graphs: every graph with large conflict-free choice number either contains a large complete graph as an odd minor or contains a bipartite induced subgraph that has large conflict-free choice number. These give two incomparable (partial) answers of a question of Caro, Petruševski and Škrekovski. We also prove quantitatively better bounds for minor-closed families, implying some known results about proper conflict-free coloring and odd coloring in the literature. Moreover, we prove that every graph with layered treewidth at most $w$ is (properly) conflict-free $(8w-1)$-choosable. This result applies to $(g,k)$-planar graphs, which are graphs whose coloring problems have attracted attention recently.

A vertex coloring of a graph is said to be \textit{conflict-free} with respect to neighborhoods if for every non-isolated vertex there is a color appearing exactly once in its (open) neighborhood. As defined in [Fabrici et al., \textit{Proper Conflict-free and Unique-maximum Colorings of Planar Graphs with Respect to Neighborhoods}, arXiv preprint], the minimum number of colors in any such proper coloring of graph $G$ is the PCF chromatic number of $G$, denoted $χ_{\mathrm{pcf}}(G)$. In this paper, we determine the value of this graph parameter for several basic graph classes including trees, cycles, hypercubes and subdivisions of complete graphs. We also give upper bounds on $χ_{\mathrm{pcf}}(G)$ in terms of other graph parameters. In particular, we show that $χ_{\mathrm{pcf}}(G) \leq5Δ(G)/2$ and characterize equality. Several sufficient conditions for PCF $k$-colorability of graphs are established for $4\le k\le 6$. The paper concludes with few open problems.