arXiv++ Combinatorics

We efficiently conflict-free color every planar graph with 4 colors. An (open-neighborhood) conflict-free coloring assigns colors to vertices in a way that every vertex v has a neighbor w such that the color of w is distinct from the colors of the other neighbors of v (i.e., the color of w is unique in the open neighborhood of v). A previous best upper bound on the conflict-free chromatic number of planar graphs was 5, and it is known that 4 colors are sometimes necessary. Deciding whether, e.g., a planar graph admits a conflict-free coloring with 3 colors is NP-complete. Our approach uses a refined variant of the classical Gallai-Edmonds decomposition and the Four Color Theorem. In fact, our result is equivalent to the Four Color Theorem.

Motivated by recently discovered connections between matroid depth measures and block-structured integer programming [ICALP 2020, 2022], we undertake a systematic study of recursive depth parameters for matrices and matroids, aiming to unify recently introduced and scattered concepts. We propose a general framework that naturally yields eight different depth measures for matroids, prove their fundamental properties and relationships, and relate them to two established notions in the field: matroid branch-depth and a newly introduced natural depth counterpart of matroid tree-width. In particular, we show that six of our eight measures are mutually functionally inequivalent, and among these, one is functionally equivalent to matroid branch-depth and another to matroid tree-depth. Importantly, we also prove that these depth measures coincide on matroids and on matrices over any field, which is (somehow surprisingly) not a trivial task. Finally, we provide a comparison between the matroid parameters and classical depth measures of graphs.

We introduce a two-way connection between FO transductions (first-order logical transformations) of planar graphs, and a certain variant of fan-crossing (fan-planar) drawings of graphs which for bounded-degree graphs essentially reduces to being k-planar for fixed k. For graph classes, this connection allows to derive non-transducibility results from nonexistence of the said drawings and, conversely, from nonexistence of a transduction to derive nonexistence of the said drawings. For example, the class of 3D-grids is not k-planar for any fixed k. We hope that this connection will help to draw a path to a possible proof that not all toroidal graphs are transducible from planar graphs. Our characterization can be extended to any fixed surface instead of the plane. The result is based on a very recent characterization of weakly sparse FO transductions of classes of bounded expansion by [Gajarský, Gładkowski, Jedelský, Pilipczuk and Toruńczyk, arXiv:2505.15655].

In a quest to thoroughly understand the first-order transduction hierarchy of hereditary graph classes, some questions in particular stand out; such as, what properties hold for graph classes that are first-order transductions of planar graphs (and of similar classes)? When addressing this (so-far wide open) question, we turn to the concept of a product structure - being a subgraph of the strong product of a path and a graph of bounded tree-width, introduced by Dujmovic et al. [JACM 2020]. Namely, we prove that any graph class which is a first-order transduction of a class admitting such product structure, up to perturbations also meets a structural description generalizing the concept of a product structure in a dense hereditary way - the latter concept being introduced just recently by Hlineny and Jedelsky under the name of H-clique-width [MFCS 2024]. Using this characterization, we show that the class of the 3D grids, as well as a class of certain modifications of 2D grids, are not first-order transducible from classes admitting a product structure, and in particular not from the class of planar graphs.

The basic (and traditional) crossing number problem is to determine the minimum number of crossings in a topological drawing of an input graph in the plane. We develop a unified framework that smoothly captures many generalized crossing number problems, and that yields fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms for them not only in the plane but also on surfaces. Our framework takes the following form. We fix a surface S, an integer r, and a map \k{appa} from the set of topological drawings of graphs in S to Z+\cup{\infty}, satisfying some natural monotonicity conditions, but essentially describing the allowed drawings and how we want to count the crossings in them. Then deciding whether an input graph G has an allowed drawing D on S with \k{appa}(D)<=r can be done in time quadratic in the size of G (and exponential in other parameters). More generally, we may take as input an edge-colored graph, and distinguish crossings by the colors of the involved edges; and we may allow to perform a bounded number of edge removals and vertex splits to G before drawing it. The proof is a reduction to the embeddability of a graph on a two-dimensional simplicial complex. This framework implies, in a unified way, quadratic FPT algorithms for many topological crossing number variants established in the graph drawing community. Some of these variants already had previously published FPT algorithms, mostly relying on Courcelle's metatheorem, but for many of those, we obtain an algorithm with a better runtime. Moreover, our framework extends, at no cost, to these crossing number variants in any fixed surface.

Visualizing a graph $G$ in the plane nicely, for example, without crossings, is unfortunately not always possible. To address this problem, Masařík and Hliněný [GD 2023] recently asked for each edge of $G$ to be drawn without crossings while allowing multiple different drawings of $G$. More formally, a collection $\mathcal{D}$ of drawings of $G$ is uncrossed if, for each edge $e$ of $G$, there is a drawing in $\mathcal{D}$ such that $e$ is uncrossed. The uncrossed number $\mathrm{unc}(G)$ of $G$ is then the minimum number of drawings in some uncrossed collection of $G$. No exact values of the uncrossed numbers have been determined yet, not even for simple graph classes. In this paper, we provide the exact values for uncrossed numbers of complete and complete bipartite graphs, partly confirming and partly refuting a conjecture posed by Hliněný and Masařík. We also present a strong general lower bound on $\mathrm{unc}(G)$ in terms of the number of vertices and edges of $G$. Moreover, we prove NP-hardness of the related problem of determining the edge crossing number of a graph $G$, which is the smallest number of edges of $G$ taken over all drawings of $G$ that participate in a crossing. This problem was posed as open by Schaefer in his book [Crossing Numbers of Graphs 2018].

We prove that the celebrated Planar Product Structure Theorem by Dujmovic et al, and also related graph product structure results, can be formulated with the induced subgraph containment relation. Precisely, we prove that if a graph G is a subgraph of the strong product of a graph Q of bounded maximum degree (such as a path) and a graph M of bounded tree-width, then G is an induced subgraph of the strong product of Q and a graph M' of bounded tree-width being at most exponential in the maximum degree of Q and the tree-width of M. In particular, if G is planar, we show that G is an induced subgraph of the strong product of a path and a graph of tree-width 39. In the course of proving this result, we introduce and study H-clique-width, a new single structural measure that captures a hereditary analogue of the traditional product structure (where, informally, the strong product has one factor from the graph class H and one factor of bounded clique-width).

The k-planar graphs, which are (usually with small values of k such as 1, 2, 3) subject to recent intense research, admit a drawing in which edges are allowed to cross, but each one edge is allowed to carry at most k crossings. In recently introduced [Binucci et al., GD 2023] min-k-planar drawings of graphs, edges may possibly carry more than k crossings, but in any two crossing edges, at least one of the two must have at most k crossings. In both concepts, one may consider general drawings or a popular restricted concept of drawings called simple. In a simple drawing, every two edges are allowed to cross at most once, and any two edges which share a vertex are forbidden to cross. While, regarding the former concept, it is for k<=3 known (but perhaps not widely known) that every general k-planar graph admits a simple k-planar drawing and this ceases to be true for any k>=4, the difference between general and simple drawings in the latter concept is more striking. We prove that there exist graphs with a min-2-planar drawing, or with a min-3-planar drawing avoiding crossings of adjacent edges, which have no simple min-k-planar drawings for arbitrarily large fixed k.

Twin-width is a structural width parameter introduced by Bonnet, Kim, Thomassé and Watrigant [FOCS 2020]. Very briefly, its essence is a gradual reduction (a contraction sequence) of the given graph down to a single vertex while maintaining limited difference of neighbourhoods of the vertices, and it can be seen as widely generalizing several other traditional structural parameters. Having such a sequence at hand allows to solve many otherwise hard problems efficiently. Our paper focuses on a comparison of twin-width to the more traditional tree-width on sparse graphs. Namely, we prove that if a graph $G$ of twin-width at most $2$ contains no $K_{t,t}$ subgraph for some integer $t$, then the tree-width of $G$ is bounded by a polynomial function of $t$. As a consequence, for any sparse graph class $\mathcal{C}$ we obtain a polynomial time algorithm which for any input graph $G \in \mathcal{C}$ either outputs a contraction sequence of width at most $c$ (where $c$ depends only on $\mathcal{C}$), or correctly outputs that $G$ has twin-width more than $2$. On the other hand, we present an easy example of a graph class of twin-width $3$ with unbounded tree-width, showing that our result cannot be extended to higher values of twin-width.

In this paper, we introduce the following new concept in graph drawing. Our task is to find a small collection of drawings such that they all together satisfy some property that is useful for graph visualization. We propose investigating a property where each edge is not crossed in at least one drawing in the collection. We call such collection uncrossed. This property is motivated by a quintessential problem of the crossing number, where one asks for a drawing where the number of edge crossings is minimum. Indeed, if we are allowed to visualize only one drawing, then the one which minimizes the number of crossings is probably the neatest for the first orientation. However, a collection of drawings where each highlights a different aspect of a graph without any crossings could shed even more light on the graph's structure. We propose two definitions. First, the uncrossed number, minimizes the number of graph drawings in a collection, satisfying the uncrossed property. Second, the uncrossed crossing number, minimizes the total number of crossings in the collection that satisfy the uncrossed property. For both definitions, we establish initial results. We prove that the uncrossed crossing number is NP-hard, but there is an FPT algorithm parameterized by the solution size.

A long-standing question of the mutual relation between the stack and queue numbers of a graph, explicitly emphasized by Dujmović and Wood in 2005, was "half-answered" by Dujmović, Eppstein, Hickingbotham, Morin and Wood in 2022; they proved the existence of a graph family with the queue number at most 4 but unbounded stack number. We give an alternative very short, and still elementary, proof of the same fact.

The fascinating question of the maximum value of twin-width on planar graphs is nowadays not far from the final resolution; there is a lower bound of 7 coming from a construction by Král' and Lamaison [arXiv, September 2022], and an upper bound of 8 by Hliněný and Jedelský [arXiv, October 2022]. The upper bound (currently best) of 8, however, is rather complicated and involved. In the paper we give a short and simple self-contained proof that the twin-width of planar graphs is at most 11. We believe that this short proof can also shed more light on the topic of upper bound(s) on the twin-width of planar and beyond-planar graphs in general.

Twin-width is a structural width parameter introduced by Bonnet, Kim, Thomassé and Watrigant [FOCS 2020], and has interesting applications in the areas of logic on graphs and in parameterized algorithmics. Very briefly, the essence of twin-width is in a gradual reduction (a contraction sequence) of the given graph down to a single vertex while maintaining limited difference of neighbourhoods of the vertices, and it can be seen as widely generalizing several other traditional structural parameters. While for many natural graph classes it is known that their twin-width is bounded, published upper bounds on the twin-width in non-trivial cases are very often "astronomically large". We focus on planar graphs, which are known to have bounded twin-width already since the introduction of it, but it took some time for the first explicit "non-astronomical" upper bounds to come. Namely, in the order of preprint appearance, it was the bound of at most 183 by Jacob and Pilipczuk [arXiv, January 2022], and 583 by Bonnet, Kwon and Wood [arXiv, February 2022]. Subsequent arXiv manuscripts in 2022 improved the bound down to 37 (Bekos et al.), 11 and 9 (both by Hliněný). We further elaborate on the approach used in the latter manuscripts, proving that the twin-width of every planar graph is at most 8, and construct a witnessing contraction sequence in linear time. Note that the currently best lower-bound planar example is of twin-width 7, by Král and Lamaison [arXiv, September 2022]. We also prove small explicit upper bounds on the twin-width of bipartite planar and 1-planar graphs (6 and 16), and of map graphs (38). The common denominator of all these results is the use of a novel specially crafted recursive decomposition of planar graphs, which may be found useful also in other areas.

The structural parameter twin-width was introduced by Bonnet et al. in [FOCS 2020], and already this first paper included an asymptotic argument bounding the twin-width of planar graphs by a non-explicit constant. Quite recently, we have seen first small explicit upper bounds of 183 by Jacob and Pilipczuk [arXiv, January 2022], 583 by Bonnet et al. [arXiv, February 2022], and of 37 by Bekos et al. [arXiv, April 2022]. We prove that the twin-width of planar graphs is at most 9. Furthermore, if a planar graph is also bipartite, then its twin-width is at most 6.

Graph product structure theory expresses certain graphs as subgraphs of the strong product of much simpler graphs. In particular, an elegant formulation for the corresponding structural theorems involves the strong product of a path and of a bounded treewidth graph, and allows to lift combinatorial results for bounded treewidth graphs to graph classes for which the product structure holds, such as to planar graphs [Dujmović et al., J. ACM, 67(4), 22:1-38, 2020]. In this paper, we join the search for extensions of this powerful tool beyond planarity by considering the h-framed graphs, a graph class that includes 1-planar, optimal 2-planar, and k-map graphs (for appropriate values of h). We establish a graph product structure theorem for h-framed graphs stating that the graphs in this class are subgraphs of the strong product of a path, of a planar graph of treewidth at most 3, and of a clique of size $3\lfloor h/2 \rfloor +\lfloor h/3 \rfloor -1$. This allows us to improve over the previous structural theorems for 1-planar and k-map graphs. Our results constitute significant progress over the previous bounds on the queue number, non-repetitive chromatic number, and p-centered chromatic number of these graph classes, e.g., we lower the currently best upper bound on the queue number of 1-planar graphs and k-map graphs from 495 to 81 and from 32225k(k-3) to 61k, respectively. We also employ the product structure machinery to improve the current upper bounds of twin-width of planar and 1-planar graphs from 183 to 37, and from O(1) to 80, respectively. All our structural results are constructive and yield efficient algorithms to obtain the corresponding decompositions.

The new graph parameter twin-width, introduced by Bonnet, Kim, Thomass e and Watrigant in 2020, allows for an FPT algorithm for testing all FO properties of graphs. This makes classes of efficiently bounded twin-width attractive from the algorithmic point of view. In particular, classes of efficiently bounded twin-width include proper interval graphs, and (as digraphs) posets of width k. Inspired by an existing generalization of interval graphs into so-called k-thin graphs, we define a new class of proper k-mixed-thin graphs which largely generalizes proper interval graphs. We prove that proper k-mixed-thin graphs have twin-width linear in k, and that a slight subclass of k-mixed-thin graphs is transduction-equivalent to posets of width k' such that there is a quadratic-polynomial relation between k and k'. In addition to that, we also give an abstract overview of the so-called red potential method which we use to prove our twin-width bounds.

We consider the following problem closely related to graph isomorphism. In a simplified version, the task is to compute the automorphism group of a given set family (or a hypergraph), that is, the group of all automorphisms of the given sets which are compatible with some permutation of their elements. In a general setting, the set family in question is a collection of cliques (called marked cliques) of a given interval graph, and the task is to compute the group of all permutations of the cliques which result from some automorpism of the underlying interval graph. This problem is obviously at least as hard as the graph isomorphism (GI-hard) already in the simplified version -- consider the set family of edges of a graph, and we give an FPT-time algorithm parameterized by the maximum number of sets in the family which are incomparable by inclusion (its antichain size). To our best knowledge, the general version of the problem has not been formulated in the literature so far. The problem has been inspired by the research of special cases of the isomorphism problem of chordal graphs; namely, the simplified set-family version is the core of our FPT algorithm for the isomorphism of so-called Sd-graphs [MFCS 2021], and the general version extends and improves a cumbersome technical step in our FPT algorithm for the isomorphism of chordal graphs of bounded leafage [WALCOM 2022]. The new algorithm combines two classical tools -- PQ-trees of interval graphs and Babai's tower-of-groups, in a nontrivial way.

Twin-width is a new parameter informally measuring how diverse are the neighbourhoods of the graph vertices, and it extends also to other binary relational structures, e.g. to digraphs and posets. It was introduced just very recently, in 2020 by Bonnet, Kim, Thomasse and Watrigant. One of the core results of these authors is that FO model checking on graph classes of bounded twin-width is in FPT. With that result, they also claimed that posets of bounded width have bounded twin-width, thus capturing prior result on FO model checking of posets of bounded width in FPT. However, their translation from poset width to twin-width was indirect and giving only a very loose double-exponential bound. We prove that posets of width d have twin-width at most 9d with a direct and elegant argument, and show that this bound is asymptotically tight. Specially, for posets of width 2 we prove that in the worst case their twin-width is also equal 2. These two theoretical results are complemented with straightforward algorithms to construct the respective contraction sequence for a given poset.

A recent result of Bokal et al. [Combinatorica, 2022] proved that the exact minimum value of c such that c-crossing-critical graphs do not have bounded maximum degree is c=13. The key to that result is an inductive construction of a family of 13-crossing-critical graphs with many vertices of arbitrarily high degrees. While the inductive part of the construction is rather easy, it all relies on the fact that a certain 17-vertex base graph has the crossing number 13, which was originally verified only by a machine-readable computer proof. We provide a relatively short self-contained computer-free proof of the latter fact. Furthermore, we subsequently generalize the critical construction in order to provide a definitive answer to a remaining open question of this research area; we prove that for every c>=13 and integers d,q, there exists a c-crossing-critical graph with more than q vertices of each of the degrees 3,4,...,d.

We initiate the study of computational complexity of graph coverings, aka locally bijective graph homomorphisms, for {\em graphs with semi-edges}. The notion of graph covering is a discretization of coverings between surfaces or topological spaces, a notion well known and deeply studied in classical topology. Graph covers have found applications in discrete mathematics for constructing highly symmetric graphs, and in computer science in the theory of local computations. In 1991, Abello, Fellows, and Stillwell asked for a classification of the computational complexity of deciding if an input graph covers a fixed target graph, in the ordinary setting (of graphs with only edges). Although many general results are known, the full classification is still open. In spite of that, we propose to study the more general case of covering graphs composed of normal edges (including multiedges and loops) and so-called semi-edges. Semi-edges are becoming increasingly popular in modern topological graph theory, as well as in mathematical physics. They also naturally occur in the local computation setting, since they are lifted to matchings in the covering graph. We show some solvable cases and, in particular, completely characterize the complexity of the already very nontrivial problem of covering one- and two-vertex (multi)graphs with semi-edges. Our NP-hardness results are proven for simple input graphs, and in the case of regular two-vertex target graphs, even for bipartite ones. We remark that our new characterization results also strengthen previously known results for covering graphs without semi-edges, and they in turn apply to an infinite class of simple target graphs with at most two vertices of degree more than two. Some of the results are moreover proven in a more general setting (e.g., finding $k$-tuples of pairwise disjoint perfect matchings in regular graphs).