arXiv++ Combinatorics

A drawing of a graph is {\em $x$-monotone} if every vertical line intersects each edge of the graph at most once. We present an $O(n^5)$ time algorithm for deciding whether a simple drawing of the complete graph $K_n$ is weakly isomorphic to an $x$-monotone drawing. We note that this algorithm can also decide whether a drawing of $K_n$ is strongly isomorphic to an $x$-monotone drawing.

We consider the problem of reconfiguring non-crossing spanning trees on point sets. For a set $P$ of $n$ points in general position in the plane, the flip graph $F(P)$ has a vertex for each non-crossing spanning tree on $P$ and an edge between any two spanning trees that can be transformed into each other by the exchange of a single edge. This flip graph has been intensively studied, lately with an emphasis on determining its diameter diam$(F(P))$ for sets $P$ of $n$ points in convex position. The current best bounds are $\frac{14}{9}n-O(1) \leq$ diam$(F(P))<\frac{15}{9}n-3$ [Bjerkevik, Kleist, Ueckerdt, and Vogtenhuber; SODA 2025]. The crucial tool for both the upper and lower bound are so-called *conflict graphs*, which the authors stated might be the key ingredient for determining the diameter (up to lower-order terms). In this paper, we pick up the concept of conflict graphs and show that this tool is even more versatile than previously hoped. As our first main result, we use conflict graphs to show that computing the flip distance between two non-crossing spanning trees is NP-hard, even for point sets in convex position. Interestingly, the result still holds for more constrained flip operations, concretely, compatible flips (where the removed and the added edge do not cross) and rotations (where the removed and the added edge share an endpoint). Extending the line of research from [BKUV SODA25], we present new insights on the diameter of the flip graph. Their lower bound is based on a constant-size pair of trees, one of which is *stacked*. We show that if one of the trees is stacked, then the lower bound is indeed optimal up to a constant term, that is, there exists a flip sequence of length at most $\frac{14}{9}(n-1)$ to any other tree. Lastly, we improve the lower bound on the diameter of the flip graph $F(P)$ for $n$ points in convex position to $\frac{11}{7}n-o(n)$.

We investigate a combinatorial reconfiguration problem on oriented graphs, where a reconfiguration step (edge-flip) is the inversion of the orientation of a single edge. A recently published conjecture that is relevant to the correctness of a Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampler for directed flag complexes states that any simple oriented graph admits a flip sequence that monotonically decreases the number of directed 3-cycles to zero, and is known to be true for complete oriented graphs. We show that, in general, this conjecture does not hold. As main tool for disproving the conjecture, we introduce the concept of FBD-graphs (fully blocked digraphs). An FBD-graph is a directed graph that does not contain any directed 1-, 2-, or 3-cycles, and for which any edge-flip creates a directed 3-cycle. We prove that the non-existence of FBD-graphs is a necessary condition for the conjecture to hold and succeed in constructing FBD-graphs. On the other hand, we show that complete graphs, as well as graphs in which every edge is incident to at most two triangles, cannot be fully blocked. In addition to being relevant for determining in which cases the above mentioned sampling process is correct, the concept of FBD-graphs might also be useful for other problems and yields interesting questions for further study.

For a finite set $P$ of points in the plane in general position, a \emph{crossing family} of size $k$ in $P$ is a collection of $k$ line segments with endpoints in $P$ that are pairwise crossing. It is a long-standing open problem to determine the largest size of a crossing family in any set of $n$ points in the plane in general position. It is widely believed that this size should be linear in $n$. Motivated by results from the theory of partitioning complete geometric graphs, we study a variant of this problem for point sets $P$ that do not contain a \emph{non-crossing family} of size $m$, which is a collection of 4 disjoint subsets $P_1$, $P_2$, $P_3$, and $P_4$ of $P$, each containing $m$ points of $P$, such that for every choice of 4 points $p_i \in P_i$, the set $\{p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4\}$ is such that $p_4$ is in the interior of the triangle formed by $p_1,p_2,p_3$. We prove that, for every $m \in \mathbb{N}$, each set $P$ of $n$ points in the plane in general position contains either a crossing family of size $n/2^{O(\sqrt{\log{m}})}$ or a non-crossing family of size $m$, by this strengthening a recent breakthrough result by Pach, Rubin, and Tardos (2021). Our proof is constructive and we show that these families can be obtained in expected time $O(nm^{1+o(1)})$. We also prove that a crossing family of size $Ω(n/m)$ or a non-crossing family of size $m$ in $P$ can be found in expected time $O(n)$.

In a simple drawing of a graph, any two edges intersect in at most one point (either a common endpoint or a proper crossing). A simple drawing is generalized twisted if it fulfills certain rather specific constraints on how the edges are drawn. An abstract rotation system of a graph assigns to each vertex a cyclic order of its incident edges. A realizable rotation system is one that admits a simple drawing such that at each vertex, the edges emanate in that cyclic order, and a generalized twisted rotation system can be realized as a generalized twisted drawing. Generalized twisted drawings have initially been introduced to obtain improved bounds on the size of plane substructures in any simple drawing of $K_n$. They have since gained independent interest due to their surprising properties. However, the definition of generalized twisted drawings is very geometric and drawing-specific. In this paper, we develop characterizations of generalized twisted drawings that enable a purely combinatorial view on these drawings and lead to efficient recognition algorithms. Concretely, we show that for any $n \geq 7$, an abstract rotation system of $K_n$ is generalized twisted if and only if all subrotation systems induced by five vertices are generalized twisted. This implies a drawing-independent and concise characterization of generalized twistedness. Besides, the result yields a simple $O(n^5)$-time algorithm to decide whether an abstract rotation system is generalized twisted and sheds new light on the structural features of simple drawings. We further develop a characterization via the rotations of a pair of vertices in a drawing, which we then use to derive an $O(n^2)$-time algorithm to decide whether a realizable rotation system is generalized twisted.

A connected topological drawing of a graph divides the plane into a number of cells. The type of a cell $c$ is the cyclic sequence of crossings and vertices along the boundary walk of $c$. For example, all triangular cells with three incident crossings and no incident vertex share the same cell type. When a non-homotopic drawing of an $n$-vertex multigraph $G$ does not contain any such cells, Ackerman and Tardos [JCTA 2007] proved that $G$ has at most $8n-20$ edges, while Kaufmann, Klemz, Knorr, Reddy, Schröder, and Ueckerdt [GD 2024] showed that this bound is tight. In this paper, we initiate the in-depth study of non-homotopic drawings that do not contain one fixed cell type \celltype, and investigate the edge density of the corresponding multigraphs, i.e., the maximum possible number of edges. We consider non-homotopic as well as simple drawings, multigraphs as well as simple graphs, and every possible type of cell. For every combination of drawing style, graph type, and cell type, we give upper and lower bounds on the corresponding edge density. With the exception of the cell type with four incident crossings and no incident vertex, we show for every cell type \celltype that the edge density of $n$-vertex (multi)graphs with \celltype-free drawings is either linear in $n$ or superlinear in $n$. In most cases, our bounds are tight up to an additive constant. We further consider cell types that are not incident to any crossing in more detail and find that all connected simple graphs but a short list of exceptions admit a simple drawing that does not contain any such cells. Additionally, we improve the current lower bound on the edge density of simple graphs that admit a non-homotopic quasiplanar drawing from $7n-28$ to $7.5n-28$.

A flip in a plane spanning tree $T$ is the operation of removing one edge from $T$ and adding another edge such that the resulting structure is again a plane spanning tree. For trees on a set of points in convex position we study two classic types of constrained flips: (1)~Compatible flips are flips in which the removed and inserted edge do not cross each other. We relevantly improve the previous upper bound of $2n-O(\sqrt{n})$ on the diameter of the compatible flip graph to~$\frac{5n}{3}-O(1)$, by this matching the upper bound for unrestricted flips by Bjerkevik, Kleist, Ueckerdt, and Vogtenhuber [SODA~2025] up to an additive constant of $1$. We further show that no shortest compatible flip sequence removes an edge that is already in its target position. Using this so-called happy edge property, we derive a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm to compute the shortest compatible flip sequence between two given trees. (2)~Rotations are flips in which the removed and inserted edge share a common vertex. Besides showing that the happy edge property does not hold for rotations, we improve the previous upper bound of $2n-O(1)$ for the diameter of the rotation graph to~$\frac{7n}{4}-O(1)$.

We study the \emph{geometric $k$-colored crossing number} of complete graphs $\overline{\overline{\text{cr}}}_k(K_n)$, which is the smallest number of monochromatic crossings in any $k$-edge colored straight-line drawing of $K_n$. We substantially improve asymptotic upper bounds on $\overline{\overline{\text{cr}}}_k(K_n)$ for $k=2,\ldots, 10$ by developing a procedure for general $k$ that derives $k$-edge colored drawings of $K_n$ for arbitrarily large $n$ from initial drawings with a low number of monochromatic crossings. We obtain the latter by heuristic search, employing a \textsc{MAX-$k$-CUT}-formulation of a subproblem in the process.

For a set $P$ of $n$ points in general position in the plane, the flip graph $F(P)$ has a vertex for each non-crossing spanning tree on $P$ and an edge between any two spanning trees that can be transformed into each other by one edge flip. The diameter ${\rm diam}(F(P))$ of this graph is subject of intensive study. For points in general position, it is between $3n/2-5$ and $2n-4$, with no improvement for 25 years. For points in convex position, it lies between $3n/2 - 5$ and $\approx1.95n$, where the lower bound was conjectured to be tight up to an additive constant and the upper bound is a recent breakthrough improvement over several bounds of the form $2n-o(n)$. In this work, we provide new upper and lower bounds on ${\rm diam}(F(P))$, mainly focusing on points in convex position. We show $14n/9 - O(1) \le {\rm diam}(F(P)) \le 5n/3 - 3$, by this disproving the conjectured upper bound of $3n/2$ for convex position, and relevantly improving both the long-standing lower bound for general position and the recent new upper bound for convex position. We complement these by showing that if one of $T,T'$ has at most two boundary edges, then ${\rm dist}(T,T') \le 2d/2 < 3n/2$, where $d = |T-T'|$ is the number of edges in one tree that are not in the other. To prove both the upper and the lower bound, we introduce a new powerful tool. Specifically, we convert the flip distance problem for given $T,T'$ to the problem of a largest acyclic subset in an associated conflict graph $H(T,T')$. In fact, this method is powerful enough to give an equivalent formulation of the diameter of $F(P)$ for points $P$ in convex position up to lower-order terms. As such, conflict graphs are likely the key to a complete resolution of this and possibly also other reconfiguration problems.

Generalizing pseudospherical drawings, we introduce a new class of simple drawings, which we call separable drawings. In a separable drawing, every edge can be closed to a simple curve that intersects each other edge at most once. Curves of different edges might interact arbitrarily. Most notably, we show that (1) every separable drawing of any graph on $n$ vertices in the plane can be extended to a simple drawing of the complete graph $K_{n}$, (2) every separable drawing of $K_{n}$ contains a crossing-free Hamiltonian cycle and is plane Hamiltonian connected, and (3) every generalized convex drawing and every 2-page book drawing is separable. Further, the class of separable drawings is a proper superclass of the union of generalized convex and 2-page book drawings. Hence, our results on plane Hamiltonicity extend recent work on generalized convex drawings by Bergold et al. (SoCG 2024).

Visualizing a graph $G$ in the plane nicely, for example, without crossings, is unfortunately not always possible. To address this problem, Masařík and Hliněný [GD 2023] recently asked for each edge of $G$ to be drawn without crossings while allowing multiple different drawings of $G$. More formally, a collection $\mathcal{D}$ of drawings of $G$ is uncrossed if, for each edge $e$ of $G$, there is a drawing in $\mathcal{D}$ such that $e$ is uncrossed. The uncrossed number $\mathrm{unc}(G)$ of $G$ is then the minimum number of drawings in some uncrossed collection of $G$. No exact values of the uncrossed numbers have been determined yet, not even for simple graph classes. In this paper, we provide the exact values for uncrossed numbers of complete and complete bipartite graphs, partly confirming and partly refuting a conjecture posed by Hliněný and Masařík. We also present a strong general lower bound on $\mathrm{unc}(G)$ in terms of the number of vertices and edges of $G$. Moreover, we prove NP-hardness of the related problem of determining the edge crossing number of a graph $G$, which is the smallest number of edges of $G$ taken over all drawings of $G$ that participate in a crossing. This problem was posed as open by Schaefer in his book [Crossing Numbers of Graphs 2018].

Flip graphs of combinatorial and geometric objects are at the heart of many deep structural insights and connections between different branches of discrete mathematics and computer science. They also provide a natural framework for the study of reconfiguration problems. We study flip graphs of arrangements of pseudolines and of arrangements of pseudocircles, which are combinatorial generalizations of lines and circles, respectively. In both cases we consider triangle flips as local transformation and prove conjectures regarding their connectivity. In the case of $n$ pseudolines we show that the connectivity of the flip graph equals its minimum degree, which is exactly $n-2$. For the proof we introduce the class of shellable line arrangements, which serve as reference objects for the construction of disjoint paths. In fact, shellable arrangements are elements of a flip graph of line arrangements which are vertices of a polytope (Felsner and Ziegler; DM 241 (2001), 301--312). This polytope forms a cluster of good connectivity in the flip graph of pseudolines. In the case of pseudocircles we show that triangle flips induce a connected flip graph on \emph{intersecting} arrangements and also on cylindrical intersecting arrangements. The result for cylindrical arrangements is used in the proof for intersecting arrangements. We also show that in both settings the diameter of the flip graph is in $Θ(n^3)$. Our constructions make essential use of variants of the sweeping lemma for pseudocircle arrangements (Snoeyink and Hershberger; Proc.\ SoCG 1989: 354--363). We finally study cylindrical arrangements in their own right and provide new combinatorial characterizations of this class.

We consider bichromatic point sets with $n$ red and $n$ blue points and study straight-line bichromatic perfect matchings on them. We show that every such point set in convex position admits a matching with at least $\frac{3n^2}{8}-\frac{n}{2}+c$ crossings, for some $ -\frac{1}{2} \leq c \leq \frac{1}{8}$. This bound is tight since for any $k> \frac{3n^2}{8} -\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{8}$ there exist bichromatic point sets that do not admit any perfect matching with $k$ crossings.

It is a longstanding conjecture that every simple drawing of a complete graph on $n \geq 3$ vertices contains a crossing-free Hamiltonian cycle. We strengthen this conjecture to "there exists a crossing-free Hamiltonian path between each pair of vertices" and show that this stronger conjecture holds for several classes of simple drawings, including strongly c-monotone drawings and cylindrical drawings. As a second main contribution, we give an overview on different classes of simple drawings and investigate inclusion relations between them up to weak isomorphism.

Simple drawings are drawings of graphs in which two edges have at most one common point (either a common endpoint, or a proper crossing). It has been an open question whether every simple drawing of a complete bipartite graph $K_{m,n}$ contains a plane spanning tree as a subdrawing. We answer this question to the positive by showing that for every simple drawing of $K_{m,n}$ and for every vertex $v$ in that drawing, the drawing contains a shooting star rooted at $v$, that is, a plane spanning tree containing all edges incident to $v$.

For a simple drawing $D$ of the complete graph $K_n$, two (plane) subdrawings are compatible if their union is plane. Let $\mathcal{T}_D$ be the set of all plane spanning trees on $D$ and $\mathcal{F}(\mathcal{T}_D)$ be the compatibility graph that has a vertex for each element in $\mathcal{T}_D$ and two vertices are adjacent if and only if the corresponding trees are compatible. We show, on the one hand, that $\mathcal{F}(\mathcal{T}_D)$ is connected if $D$ is a cylindrical, monotone, or strongly c-monotone drawing. On the other hand, we show that the subgraph of $\mathcal{F}(\mathcal{T}_D)$ induced by stars, double stars, and twin stars is also connected. In all cases the diameter of the corresponding compatibility graph is at most linear in $n$.

Felsner, Hurtado, Noy and Streinu (2000) conjectured that arrangement graphs of simple great-circle arrangements have chromatic number at most $3$. Motivated by this conjecture, we study the colorability of arrangement graphs for different classes of arrangements of (pseudo-)circles. In this paper the conjecture is verified for $\triangle$-saturated pseudocircle arrangements, i.e., for arrangements where one color class of the 2-coloring of faces consists of triangles only, as well as for further classes of (pseudo-)circle arrangements. These results are complemented by a construction which maps $\triangle$-saturated arrangements with a pentagonal face to arrangements with 4-chromatic 4-regular arrangement graphs. This "corona" construction has similarities with the crowning construction introduced by Koester (1985). Based on exhaustive experiments with small arrangements we propose three strengthenings of the original conjecture. We also investigate fractional colorings. It is shown that the arrangement graph of every arrangement $\mathcal{A}$ of pairwise intersecting pseudocircles is "close" to being $3$-colorable. More precisely, the fractional chromatic number $χ_f(\mathcal{A})$ of the arrangement graph is bounded from above by $χ_f(\mathcal{A}) \le 3+O(\frac{1}{n})$, where $n$ is the number of pseudocircles of $\mathcal{A}$. Furthermore, we construct an infinite family of $4$-edge-critical $4$-regular planar graphs which are fractionally $3$-colorable. This disproves a conjecture of Gimbel, Kündgen, Li, and Thomassen (2019).

Recently, the second and third author showed that complete geometric graphs on $2n$ vertices in general cannot be partitioned into $n$ plane spanning trees. Building up on this work, in this paper, we initiate the study of partitioning into beyond planar subgraphs, namely into $k$-planar and $k$-quasi-planar subgraphs and obtain first bounds on the number of subgraphs required in this setting.

A $k$-crossing family in a point set $S$ in general position is a set of $k$ segments spanned by points of $S$ such that all $k$ segments mutually cross. In this short note we present two statements on crossing families which are based on sets of small cardinality: (1) Any set of at least 15 points contains a crossing family of size 4. (2) There are sets of $n$ points which do not contain a crossing family of size larger than $8\lceil \frac{n}{41} \rceil$. Both results improve the previously best known bounds.

Given a colored point set in the plane, a perfect rainbow polygon is a simple polygon that contains exactly one point of each color, either in its interior or on its boundary. Let $\operatorname{rb-index}(S)$ denote the smallest size of a perfect rainbow polygon for a colored point set $S$, and let $\operatorname{rb-index}(k)$ be the maximum of $\operatorname{rb-index}(S)$ over all $k$-colored point sets in general position; that is, every $k$-colored point set $S$ has a perfect rainbow polygon with at most $\operatorname{rb-index}(k)$ vertices. In this paper, we determine the values of $\operatorname{rb-index}(k)$ up to $k=7$, which is the first case where $\operatorname{rb-index}(k)\neq k$, and we prove that for $k\ge 5$, \[ \frac{40\lfloor (k-1)/2 \rfloor -8}{19} %Birgit: \leq\operatorname{rb-index}(k)\leq 10 \bigg\lfloor\frac{k}{7}\bigg\rfloor + 11. \] Furthermore, for a $k$-colored set of $n$ points in the plane in general position, a perfect rainbow polygon with at most $10 \lfloor\frac{k}{7}\rfloor + 11$ vertices can be computed in $O(n\log n)$ time.