arXiv++ Combinatorics

We consider the problem of reconfiguring non-crossing spanning trees on point sets. For a set $P$ of $n$ points in general position in the plane, the flip graph $F(P)$ has a vertex for each non-crossing spanning tree on $P$ and an edge between any two spanning trees that can be transformed into each other by the exchange of a single edge. This flip graph has been intensively studied, lately with an emphasis on determining its diameter diam$(F(P))$ for sets $P$ of $n$ points in convex position. The current best bounds are $\frac{14}{9}n-O(1) \leq$ diam$(F(P))<\frac{15}{9}n-3$ [Bjerkevik, Kleist, Ueckerdt, and Vogtenhuber; SODA 2025]. The crucial tool for both the upper and lower bound are so-called *conflict graphs*, which the authors stated might be the key ingredient for determining the diameter (up to lower-order terms). In this paper, we pick up the concept of conflict graphs and show that this tool is even more versatile than previously hoped. As our first main result, we use conflict graphs to show that computing the flip distance between two non-crossing spanning trees is NP-hard, even for point sets in convex position. Interestingly, the result still holds for more constrained flip operations, concretely, compatible flips (where the removed and the added edge do not cross) and rotations (where the removed and the added edge share an endpoint). Extending the line of research from [BKUV SODA25], we present new insights on the diameter of the flip graph. Their lower bound is based on a constant-size pair of trees, one of which is *stacked*. We show that if one of the trees is stacked, then the lower bound is indeed optimal up to a constant term, that is, there exists a flip sequence of length at most $\frac{14}{9}(n-1)$ to any other tree. Lastly, we improve the lower bound on the diameter of the flip graph $F(P)$ for $n$ points in convex position to $\frac{11}{7}n-o(n)$.

Chernyshev, Rauch and Rautenbach [Discrete Math., 2025] introduce forest cuts, i.e., vertex separators that induce a forest. They conjecture that, similar to a result by Chen and Yu [Discrete Math., 2002], every $n$-vertex graph with less than $3n-6$ edges has a forest cut. As an intermediate goal they ask how many edges an $n$-vertex $3$-connected graph must have such that the neighborhood of every vertex contains a cycle. Li, Tang and Zhan [arXiv, 2024] resolve this problem by showing that every such graph has at least $15n/8$ edges, while there are examples of such graphs with exactly $15n/8$ edges. We give a much shorter proof for this.

A connected topological drawing of a graph divides the plane into a number of cells. The type of a cell $c$ is the cyclic sequence of crossings and vertices along the boundary walk of $c$. For example, all triangular cells with three incident crossings and no incident vertex share the same cell type. When a non-homotopic drawing of an $n$-vertex multigraph $G$ does not contain any such cells, Ackerman and Tardos [JCTA 2007] proved that $G$ has at most $8n-20$ edges, while Kaufmann, Klemz, Knorr, Reddy, Schröder, and Ueckerdt [GD 2024] showed that this bound is tight. In this paper, we initiate the in-depth study of non-homotopic drawings that do not contain one fixed cell type \celltype, and investigate the edge density of the corresponding multigraphs, i.e., the maximum possible number of edges. We consider non-homotopic as well as simple drawings, multigraphs as well as simple graphs, and every possible type of cell. For every combination of drawing style, graph type, and cell type, we give upper and lower bounds on the corresponding edge density. With the exception of the cell type with four incident crossings and no incident vertex, we show for every cell type \celltype that the edge density of $n$-vertex (multi)graphs with \celltype-free drawings is either linear in $n$ or superlinear in $n$. In most cases, our bounds are tight up to an additive constant. We further consider cell types that are not incident to any crossing in more detail and find that all connected simple graphs but a short list of exceptions admit a simple drawing that does not contain any such cells. Additionally, we improve the current lower bound on the edge density of simple graphs that admit a non-homotopic quasiplanar drawing from $7n-28$ to $7.5n-28$.

We prove that any class of graphs with linear neighborhood complexity has bounded improper odd chromatic number. As a result, if $\mathcal{G}$ is the class of all circle graphs, or if $\mathcal{G}$ is any class with bounded twin-width, bounded merge-width, or a forbidden vertex-minor, then $\mathcal{G}$ is $χ_{\mathrm{o}}$-bounded.

We show that the strong odd chromatic number on any proper minor-closed graph class is bounded by a constant. We almost determine the smallest such constant for outerplanar graphs.

We prove a conjecture of Geelen, Gerards, and Whittle that for any finite field $GF(q)$ and any integer $t$, every cosimple $GF(q)$-representable matroid with sufficiently large girth contains either $M(K_t)$ or $M(K_t)^*$ as a minor.

We investigate two recently introduced graph parameters, both of which measure the complexity of the tree decompositions of a given graph. Recall that the treewidth ${\rm tw}(G)$ of a graph $G$ measures the largest number of vertices required in a bag of every tree decomposition of $G$. Similarly, the tree-independence number ${\rm tree\textnormal{-}}α(G)$ and the tree-chromatic number ${\rm tree\textnormal{-}}χ(G)$ measure the largest independence number, respectively the largest chromatic number, required in a bag of every tree decomposition of $G$. Recently, Dallard, Milanič, and Štorgel asked (JCTB, 2024) whether for all graphs $G$ it holds that ${\rm tw}(G)+1 \leq {\rm tree\textnormal{-}}α(G) \cdot {\rm tree\textnormal{-}}χ(G)$. We provide a negative answer for this question in a strong form: for every function $f\colon {\mathbb N} \rightarrow {\mathbb N}$, there exists a graph $G$ such that ${\rm tw}(G) > {\rm tree\textnormal{-}}α(G) \cdot f({\rm tree\textnormal{-}}χ(G))$. On the other hand, we complement this result with an upper bound, by showing that ${\rm tw}(G)+1 \leq {\rm tree\textnormal{-}}α(G)^2 \cdot {\rm tree\textnormal{-}}χ(G)$ for every graph $G$.

For a graph class $\mathcal G$ and a graph $H$, the four $\mathcal G$-covering numbers of $H$, namely global ${\rm cn}_{g}^{\mathcal{G}}(H)$, union ${\rm cn}_{u}^{\mathcal{G}}(H)$, local ${\rm cn}_{l}^{\mathcal{G}}(H)$, and folded ${\rm cn}_{f}^{\mathcal{G}}(H)$, each measure in a slightly different way how well $H$ can be covered with graphs from $\mathcal G$. For every $\mathcal G$ and $H$ it holds \[ {\rm cn}_{g}^{\mathcal{G}}(H) \geq {\rm cn}_{u}^{\mathcal{G}}(H) \geq {\rm cn}_{l}^{\mathcal{G}}(H) \geq {\rm cn}_{f}^{\mathcal{G}}(H) \] and in general each inequality can be arbitrarily far apart. We investigate structural properties of graph classes $\mathcal G$ and $\mathcal H$ such that for all graphs $H \in \mathcal{H}$, a larger $\mathcal G$-covering number of $H$ can be bounded in terms of a smaller $\mathcal G$-covering number of $H$. For example, we prove that if $\mathcal G$ is hereditary and the chromatic number of graphs in $\mathcal H$ is bounded, then there exists a function $f$ (called a binding function) such that for all $H \in \mathcal{H}$ it holds ${\rm cn}_{u}^{\mathcal{G}}(H) \leq f({\rm cn}_{g}^{\mathcal{G}}(H))$. For $\mathcal G$ we consider graph classes that are component-closed, hereditary, monotone, sparse, or of bounded chromatic number. For $\mathcal H$ we consider graph classes that are sparse, $M$-minor-free, of bounded chromatic number, or of bounded treewidth. For each combination and every pair of $\mathcal G$-covering numbers, we either give a binding function $f$ or provide an example of such $\mathcal{G},\mathcal{H}$ for which no binding function exists.

We study 3-plane drawings, that is, drawings of graphs in which every edge has at most three crossings. We show how the recently developed Density Formula for topological drawings of graphs (KKKRSU GD 2024) can be used to count the crossings in terms of the number $n$ of vertices. As a main result, we show that every 3-plane drawing has at most $5.5(n-2)$ crossings, which is tight. In particular, it follows that every 3-planar graph on $n$ vertices has crossing number at most $5.5n$, which improves upon a recent bound (BBBDHKMOW GD 2024) of $6.6n$. To apply the Density Formula, we carefully analyze the interplay between certain configurations of cells in a 3-plane drawing. As a by-product, we also obtain an alternative proof for the known statement that every 3-planar graph has at most $5.5(n-2)$ edges.

A proper vertex-coloring of a graph is $r$-dynamic if the neighbors of each vertex $v$ receive at least $\min(r, \mathrm{deg}(v))$ different colors. In this note, we prove that if $G$ has a strong $2$-coloring number at most $k$, then $G$ admits an $r$-dynamic coloring with no more than $(k-1)r+1$ colors. As a consequence, for every class of graphs of bounded expansion, the $r$-dynamic chromatic number is bounded by a linear function in $r$. We give a concrete upper bound for graphs of bounded row-treewidth, which includes for example all planar graphs.

For a set $P$ of $n$ points in general position in the plane, the flip graph $F(P)$ has a vertex for each non-crossing spanning tree on $P$ and an edge between any two spanning trees that can be transformed into each other by one edge flip. The diameter ${\rm diam}(F(P))$ of this graph is subject of intensive study. For points in general position, it is between $3n/2-5$ and $2n-4$, with no improvement for 25 years. For points in convex position, it lies between $3n/2 - 5$ and $\approx1.95n$, where the lower bound was conjectured to be tight up to an additive constant and the upper bound is a recent breakthrough improvement over several bounds of the form $2n-o(n)$. In this work, we provide new upper and lower bounds on ${\rm diam}(F(P))$, mainly focusing on points in convex position. We show $14n/9 - O(1) \le {\rm diam}(F(P)) \le 5n/3 - 3$, by this disproving the conjectured upper bound of $3n/2$ for convex position, and relevantly improving both the long-standing lower bound for general position and the recent new upper bound for convex position. We complement these by showing that if one of $T,T'$ has at most two boundary edges, then ${\rm dist}(T,T') \le 2d/2 < 3n/2$, where $d = |T-T'|$ is the number of edges in one tree that are not in the other. To prove both the upper and the lower bound, we introduce a new powerful tool. Specifically, we convert the flip distance problem for given $T,T'$ to the problem of a largest acyclic subset in an associated conflict graph $H(T,T')$. In fact, this method is powerful enough to give an equivalent formulation of the diameter of $F(P)$ for points $P$ in convex position up to lower-order terms. As such, conflict graphs are likely the key to a complete resolution of this and possibly also other reconfiguration problems.

Some of the most important open problems for linear layouts of graphs ask for the relation between a graph's queue number and its stack number or mixed number. In such, we seek a vertex order and edge partition of $G$ into parts with pairwise non-crossing edges (a stack) or with pairwise non-nesting edges (a queue). Allowing only stacks, only queues, or both, the minimum number of required parts is the graph's stack number $sn(G)$, queue number $qn(G)$, and mixed number $mn(G)$, respectively. Already in 1992, Heath and Rosenberg asked whether $qn(G)$ is bounded in terms of $sn(G)$, that is, whether stacks "can be transformed into" queues. This is equivalent to bipartite $3$-stack graphs having bounded queue number (Dujmović and Wood, 2005). Recently, Alam et al. asked whether $qn(G)$ is bounded in terms of $mn(G)$, which we show to also be equivalent to the previous questions. We approach the problem by considering separated linear layouts of bipartite graphs. In this natural setting all vertices of one part must precede all vertices of the other part. Separated stack and queue numbers coincide, and for fixed vertex orders, graphs with bounded separated stack/queue number can be characterized and efficiently recognized, whereas the separated mixed layouts are more challenging. In this work, we thoroughly investigate the relationship between separated and non-separated, mixed and pure linear layouts.

A graph class $\mathcal{G}$ admits product structure if there exists a constant $k$ such that every $G \in \mathcal{G}$ is a subgraph of $H \boxtimes P$ for a path $P$ and some graph $H$ of treewidth $k$. Famously, the class of planar graphs, as well as many beyond-planar graph classes are known to admit product structure. However, we have only few tools to prove the absence of product structure, and hence know of only a few interesting examples of classes. Motivated by the transition between product structure and no product structure, we investigate subclasses of intersection graphs in the plane (e.g., disk intersection graphs) and present necessary and sufficient conditions for these to admit product structure. Specifically, for a set $S \subset \mathbb{R}^2$ (e.g., a disk) and a real number $α\in [0,1]$, we consider intersection graphs of $α$-free homothetic copies of $S$. That is, each vertex $v$ is a homothetic copy of $S$ of which at least an $α$-portion is not covered by other vertices, and there is an edge between $u$ and $v$ if and only if $u \cap v \neq \emptyset$. For $α= 1$ we have contact graphs, which are in most cases planar, and hence admit product structure. For $α= 0$ we have (among others) all complete graphs, and hence no product structure. In general, there is a threshold value $α^*(S) \in [0,1]$ such that $α$-free homothetic copies of $S$ admit product structure for all $α> α^*(S)$ and do not admit product structure for all $α< α^*(S)$. We show for a large family of sets $S$, including all triangles and all trapezoids, that it holds $α^*(S) = 1$, i.e., we have no product structure, except for the contact graphs (when $α= 1$). For other sets $S$, including regular $n$-gons for infinitely many values of $n$, we show that $0 < α^*(S) < 1$ by proving upper and lower bounds.

We popularize the question whether, for $m$ large enough, all $m$-uniform shift-chain hypergraphs are properly $2$-colorable. On the other hand, we show that for every $m$ some $m$-uniform shift-chains are not polychromatic $3$-colorable.

We show that the vertices of every planar graph can be partitioned into two sets, each inducing a so-called triangle-forest, i.e., a graph with no cycles of length more than three. We further discuss extensions to locally planar graphs. After finishing the paper we noticed that our main result was already proved much earlier by Carsten Thomassen [Decomposing a Planar Graph into Degenerate Graphs, JCTB 1995].

We study the recognition complexity of subgraphs of k-connected planar cubic graphs for k = 1, 2, 3. We present polynomial-time algorithms to recognize subgraphs of 1- and 2-connected planar cubic graphs, both in the variable and fixed embedding setting. The main tools involve the Generalized (Anti)factor-problem for the fixed embedding case, and SPQR-trees for the variable embedding case. Secondly, we prove NP-hardness of recognizing subgraphs of 3-connected planar cubic graphs in the variable embedding setting.

We introduce the Density Formula for (topological) drawings of graphs in the plane or on the sphere, which relates the number of edges, vertices, crossings, and sizes of cells in the drawing. We demonstrate its capability by providing several applications: we prove tight upper bounds on the edge density of various beyond-planar graph classes, including so-called $k$-planar graphs with $k=1,2$, fan-crossing / fan-planar graphs, $k$-bend RAC-graphs with $k=0,1,2$, quasiplanar graphs, and $k^+$-real face graphs. In some cases ($1$-bend and $2$-bend RAC-graphs and fan-crossing / fan-planar graphs), we thereby obtain the first tight upper bounds on the edge density of the respective graph classes. In other cases, we give new streamlined and significantly shorter proofs for bounds that were already known in the literature. Thanks to the Density Formula, all of our proofs are mostly elementary counting and mostly circumvent the typical intricate case analysis found in earlier proofs. Further, in some cases (simple and non-homotopic quasiplanar graphs), our alternative proofs using the Density Formula lead to the first tight lower bound examples.

A range family $\mathcal{R}$ is a family of subsets of $\mathbb{R}^d$, like all halfplanes, or all unit disks. Given a range family $\mathcal{R}$, we consider the $m$-uniform range capturing hypergraphs $\mathcal{H}(V,\mathcal{R},m)$ whose vertex-sets $V$ are finite sets of points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with any $m$ vertices forming a hyperedge $e$ whenever $e = V \cap R$ for some $R \in \mathcal{R}$. Given additionally an integer $k \geq 2$, we seek to find the minimum $m = m_{\mathcal{R}}(k)$ such that every $\mathcal{H}(V,\mathcal{R},m)$ admits a polychromatic $k$-coloring of its vertices, that is, where every hyperedge contains at least one point of each color. Clearly, $m_{\mathcal{R}}(k) \geq k$ and the gold standard is an upper bound $m_{\mathcal{R}}(k) = O(k)$ that is linear in $k$. A $t$-shallow hitting set in $\mathcal{H}(V,\mathcal{R},m)$ is a subset $S \subseteq V$ such that $1 \leq |e \cap S| \leq t$ for each hyperedge $e$; i.e., every hyperedge is hit at least once but at most $t$ times by $S$. We show for several range families $\mathcal{R}$ the existence of $t$-shallow hitting sets in every $\mathcal{H}(V,\mathcal{R},m)$ with $t$ being a constant only depending on $\mathcal{R}$. This in particular proves that $m_{\mathcal{R}}(k) \leq tk = O(k)$ in such cases, improving previous polynomial bounds in $k$. Particularly, we prove this for the range families of all axis-aligned strips in $\mathbb{R}^d$, all bottomless and topless rectangles in $\mathbb{R}^2$, and for all unit-height axis-aligned rectangles in $\mathbb{R}^2$.

A subset $M$ of the edges of a graph or hypergraph is hitting if $M$ covers each vertex of $H$ at least once, and $M$ is $t$-shallow if it covers each vertex of $H$ at most $t$ times. We consider the existence of shallow hitting edge sets and the maximum size of shallow edge sets in $r$-uniform hypergraph $H$ that are regular or have a large minimum degree. Specifically, we show the following. Every $r$-uniform regular hypergraph has a $t$-shallow hitting edge set with $t = O(r)$. Every $r$-uniform regular hypergraph with $n$ vertices has a $t$-shallow edge set of size $Ω(nt/r^{1+1/t})$. Every $r$-uniform hypergraph with $n$ vertices and minimum degree $δ_{r-1}(H) \geq n/((r-1)t+1)$ has a $t$-shallow hitting edge set. Every $r$-uniform $r$-partite hypergraph with $n$ vertices in each part and minimum degree $δ'_{r-1}(H) \geq n/((r-1)t+1) +1$ has a $t$-shallow hitting edge set. We complement our results with constructions of $r$-uniform hypergraphs that show that most of our obtained bounds are best-possible.

A set $S\subseteq V$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a \emph{$c$-clustered set} if it induces a subgraph with components of order at most $c$ each, and $α_c(G)$ denotes the size of a largest $c$-clustered set. For any graph $G$ on $n$ vertices and treewidth $k$, we show that $α_c(G) \geq \frac{c}{c+k+1}n$, which improves a result of Wood [arXiv:2208.10074, August 2022], while we construct $n$-vertex graphs $G$ of treewidth~$k$ with $α_c(G)\leq \frac{c}{c+k}n$. In the case $c\leq 2$ or $k=1$ we prove the better lower bound $α_c(G) \geq \frac{c}{c+k}n$, which settles a conjecture of Chappell and Pelsmajer [Electron.\ J.\ Comb., 2013] and is best-possible. Finally, in the case $c=3$ and $k=2$, we show $α_c(G) \geq \frac{5}{9}n$ and which is best-possible.