arXiv++ Combinatorics

A queue layout of a graph consists of a linear order of the vertices and a partition of the edges into queues so that no two edges in a single queue are nested. The minimum number of queues needed in a queue layout of a graph is called its queue number. The planar product structure theorem states that every planar graph is a subgraph of the strong product of a graph of simple treewidth at most $3$, a clique $K_3$, and a path. Such a strong product admits a queue layout with $49$ queues (Wood, 2005), which implies that the queue number of planar graphs is at most $49$. Recently, Bekos, Gronemann, and Raftopoulou (Algorithmica, 2023) investigated how the general approach based on the product structure can be optimized for planar graphs. They claim that by appropriately reordering the three vertices in each bag arising from a tripod, it is possible to reduce the queue number of planar graphs to~$42$. In this note we highlight a gap in their queue layout algorithm: one of the choices required by the algorithm is not guaranteed to exist. Hence the claimed upper bound of $42$ queues is not established by the published proof.

An ordered graph is a graph with a total order over its vertices. A linear layout of an ordered graph is a partition of the edges into sets of either non-crossing edges, called stacks, or non-nesting edges, called queues. The stack (queue) number of an ordered graph is the minimum number of required stacks (queues). Mixed linear layouts combine these layouts by allowing each set of edges to form either a stack or a queue. The minimum number of stacks plus queues is called the mixed page number. It is well known that ordered graphs with small stack number are characterized, up to a function, by the absence of large twists (that is, pairwise crossing edges). Similarly, ordered graphs with small queue number are characterized by the absence of large rainbows (that is, pairwise nesting edges). However, no such characterization via forbidden patterns is known for mixed linear layouts. We address this gap by introducing patterns similar to twists and rainbows, which we call thick patterns; such patterns allow a characterization, again up to a function, of mixed linear layouts of bounded-degree graphs. That is, we show that a family of ordered graphs with bounded maximum degree has bounded mixed page number if and only if the size of the largest thick pattern is bounded. In addition, we investigate an exact characterization of ordered graphs whose mixed page number equals a fixed integer $ k $ via a finite set of forbidden patterns. We show that for every $ k \ge 2 $, there is no such characterization, which supports the nature of our first result.

Some of the most important open problems for linear layouts of graphs ask for the relation between a graph's queue number and its stack number or mixed number. In such, we seek a vertex order and edge partition of $G$ into parts with pairwise non-crossing edges (a stack) or with pairwise non-nesting edges (a queue). Allowing only stacks, only queues, or both, the minimum number of required parts is the graph's stack number $sn(G)$, queue number $qn(G)$, and mixed number $mn(G)$, respectively. Already in 1992, Heath and Rosenberg asked whether $qn(G)$ is bounded in terms of $sn(G)$, that is, whether stacks "can be transformed into" queues. This is equivalent to bipartite $3$-stack graphs having bounded queue number (Dujmović and Wood, 2005). Recently, Alam et al. asked whether $qn(G)$ is bounded in terms of $mn(G)$, which we show to also be equivalent to the previous questions. We approach the problem by considering separated linear layouts of bipartite graphs. In this natural setting all vertices of one part must precede all vertices of the other part. Separated stack and queue numbers coincide, and for fixed vertex orders, graphs with bounded separated stack/queue number can be characterized and efficiently recognized, whereas the separated mixed layouts are more challenging. In this work, we thoroughly investigate the relationship between separated and non-separated, mixed and pure linear layouts.

A linear layout of a graph $ G $ consists of a linear order $\prec$ of the vertices and a partition of the edges. A part is called a queue (stack) if no two edges nest (cross), that is, two edges $ (v,w) $ and $ (x,y) $ with $ v \prec x \prec y \prec w $ ($ v \prec x \prec w \prec y $) may not be in the same queue (stack). The best known lower and upper bounds for the number of queues needed for planar graphs are 4 [Alam et al., Algorithmica 2020] and 42 [Bekos et al., Algorithmica 2022], respectively. While queue layouts of special classes of planar graphs have received increased attention following the breakthrough result of [Dujmović et al., J. ACM 2020], the meaningful class of bipartite planar graphs has remained elusive so far, explicitly asked for by Bekos et al. In this paper we investigate bipartite planar graphs and give an improved upper bound of 28 by refining existing techniques. In contrast, we show that two queues or one queue together with one stack do not suffice; the latter answers an open question by Pupyrev [GD 2018]. We further investigate subclasses of bipartite planar graphs and give improved upper bounds; in particular we construct 5-queue layouts for 2-degenerate quadrangulations.

The queue number of a poset is the queue number of its cover graph when the vertex order is a linear extension of the poset. Heath and Pemmaraju conjectured that every poset of width $w$ has queue number at most $w$. The conjecture has been confirmed for posets of width $w=2$ and for planar posets with $0$ and $1$. In contrast, the conjecture has been refused by a family of general (non-planar) posets of width $w>2$. In this paper, we study queue layouts of two-dimensional posets. First, we construct a two-dimensional poset of width $w > 2$ with queue number $2(w - 1)$, thereby disproving the conjecture for two-dimensional posets. Second, we show an upper bound of $w(w+1)/2$ on the queue number of such posets, thus improving the previously best-known bound of $(w-1)^2+1$ for every $w > 3$.

A $k$-stack layout (or $k$-page book embedding) of a graph consists of a total order of the vertices, and a partition of the edges into $k$ sets of non-crossing edges with respect to the vertex order. The stack number of a graph is the minimum $k$ such that it admits a $k$-stack layout. In this paper we study a long-standing problem regarding the stack number of planar directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), for which the vertex order has to respect the orientation of the edges. We investigate upper and lower bounds on the stack number of several families of planar graphs: We improve the constant upper bounds on the stack number of single-source and monotone outerplanar DAGs and of outerpath DAGs, and improve the constant upper bound for upward planar 3-trees. Further, we provide computer-aided lower bounds for upward (outer-) planar DAGs.

A linear layout of a graph typically consists of a total vertex order, and a partition of the edges into sets of either non-crossing edges, called stacks, or non-nested edges, called queues. The stack (queue) number of a graph is the minimum number of required stacks (queues) in a linear layout. Mixed linear layouts combine these layouts by allowing each set of edges to form either a stack or a queue. In this work we initiate the study of the mixed page number of a graph which corresponds to the minimum number of such sets. First, we study the edge density of graphs with bounded mixed page number. Then, we focus on complete and complete bipartite graphs, for which we derive lower and upper bounds on their mixed page number. Our findings indicate that combining stacks and queues is more powerful in various ways compared to the two traditional layouts.

A $k$-stack layout (also called a $k$-page book embedding) of a graph consists of a total order of the vertices, and a partition of the edges into $k$ sets of non-crossing edges with respect to the vertex order. The stack number (book thickness, page number) of a graph is the minimum $k$ such that it admits a $k$-stack layout. A $k$-queue layout is defined similarly, except that no two edges in a single set may be nested. It was recently proved that graphs of various non-minor-closed classes are subgraphs of the strong product of a path and a graph with bounded treewidth. Motivated by this decomposition result, we explore stack layouts of graph products. We show that the stack number is bounded for the strong product of a path and (i) a graph of bounded pathwidth or (ii) a bipartite graph of bounded treewidth and bounded degree. The results are obtained via a novel concept of simultaneous stack-queue layouts, which may be of independent interest.

An embedding of a graph in a book consists of a linear order of its vertices along the spine of the book and of an assignment of its edges to the pages of the book, so that no two edges on the same page cross. The book thickness of a graph is the minimum number of pages over all its book embeddings. Accordingly, the book thickness of a class of graphs is the maximum book thickness over all its members. In this paper, we address a long-standing open problem regarding the exact book thickness of the class of planar graphs, which previously was known to be either three or four. We settle this problem by demonstrating planar graphs that require four pages in any of their book embeddings, thus establishing that the book thickness of the class of planar graphs is four.

In a dispersable book embedding, the vertices of a given graph $G$ must be ordered along a line l, called spine, and the edges of G must be drawn at different half-planes bounded by l, called pages of the book, such that: (i) no two edges of the same page cross, and (ii) the graphs induced by the edges of each page are 1-regular. The minimum number of pages needed by any dispersable book embedding of $G$ is referred to as the dispersable book thickness $dbt(G)$ of $G$. Graph $G$ is called dispersable if $dbt(G) = Δ(G)$ holds (note that $Δ(G) \leq dbt(G)$ always holds). Back in 1979, Bernhart and Kainen conjectured that any $k$-regular bipartite graph $G$ is dispersable, i.e., $dbt(G)=k$. In this paper, we disprove this conjecture for the cases $k=3$ (with a computer-aided proof), and $k=4$ (with a purely combinatorial proof). In particular, we show that the Gray graph, which is 3-regular and bipartite, has dispersable book thickness four, while the Folkman graph, which is 4-regular and bipartite, has dispersable book thickness five. On the positive side, we prove that 3-connected 3-regular bipartite planar graphs are dispersable, and conjecture that this property holds, even if 3-connectivity is relaxed.

Consider a finite sequence of permutations of the elements 1,...,n, with the property that each element changes its position by at most 1 from any permutation to the next. We call such a sequence a tangle, and we define a move of element i to be a maximal subsequence of at least two consecutive permutations during which its positions form an arithmetic progression of common difference +1 or -1. We prove that for any initial and final permutations, there is a tangle connecting them in which each element makes at most 5 moves, and another in which the total number of moves is at most 4n. On the other hand, there exist permutations that require at least 3 moves for some element, and at least 2n-2 moves in total. If we further require that every pair of elements exchange positions at most once, then any two permutations can be connected by a tangle with at most O(log n) moves per element, but we do not know whether this can be reduced to O(1) per element, or to O(n) in total. A key tool is the introduction of certain restricted classes of tangle that perform pattern-avoiding permutations.

We study a variant of intersection representations with unit balls, that is, unit disks in the plane and unit intervals on the line. Given a planar graph and a bipartition of the edges of the graph into near and far sets, the goal is to represent the vertices of the graph by unit balls so that the balls representing two adjacent vertices intersect if and only if the corresponding edge is near. We consider the problem in the plane and prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether such a representation exists for a given edge-partition. On the other hand, every series-parallel graph admits such a representation with unit disks for any near/far labeling of the edges. We also show that the representation problem on the line is equivalent to a variant of a graph coloring. We give examples of girth-4 planar and girth-3 outerplanar graphs that have no such representation with unit intervals. On the other hand, all triangle-free outerplanar graphs and all graphs with maximum average degree less than 26/11 can always be represented. In particular, this gives a simple proof of representability of all planar graphs with large girth.

A permutation may be represented by a collection of paths in the plane. We consider a natural class of such representations, which we call tangles, in which the paths consist of straight segments at 45 degree angles, and the permutation is decomposed into nearest-neighbour transpositions. We address the problem of minimizing the number of crossings together with the number of corners of the paths, focusing on classes of permutations in which both can be minimized simultaneously. We give algorithms for computing such tangles for several classes of permutations.

In this paper we study threshold coloring of graphs, where the vertex colors represented by integers are used to describe any spanning subgraph of the given graph as follows. Pairs of vertices with near colors imply the edge between them is present and pairs of vertices with far colors imply the edge is absent. Not all planar graphs are threshold-colorable, but several subclasses, such as trees, some planar grids, and planar graphs without short cycles can always be threshold-colored. Using these results we obtain unit-cube contact representation of several subclasses of planar graphs. Variants of the threshold coloring problem are related to well-known graph coloring and other graph-theoretic problems. Using these relations we show the NP-completeness for two of these variants, and describe a polynomial-time algorithm for another.