arXiv++ Combinatorics

In a recent paper, Antić et al.~studied collections of planar orthogonal drawings of a graph where every edge is unbent in at least one drawing. This paper generalizes this concept to non-planar drawings, and shows that then two drawings always suffice (for planar drawings three drawings are sometimes needed). The results can also be generalized to $s$-grid drawings for $s\geq 3$.

The class of terminal planar networks was recently introduced from a biological perspective in relation to the visualization of phylogenetic networks, and its connection to upward planar networks has been established. We provide a Kuratowski-type theorem that characterizes terminal planar networks by a finite set of forbidden structures, defined via six families of 0/1-labeled graphs. Another characterization based on planarity of supergraphs yields linear-time algorithms for testing terminal planarity and for computing such planar drawings. We describe an application that is potentially relevant in broader, non-phylogenetic settings. We also discuss a connection of our main result to an open problem on the forbidden structures of single-source upward planar networks.

A drawing of a graph is 1-planar if each edge participates in at most one crossing and adjacent edges do not cross. Up to symmetry, each crossing in a 1-planar drawing belongs to one out of six possible crossing types, where a type characterizes the subgraph induced by the four vertices of the crossing edges. Each of the 63 possible nonempty subsets $\mathcal{S}$ of crossing types gives a recognition problem: does a given graph admit an $\mathcal{S}$-restricted drawing, that is, a 1-planar drawing where the crossing type of each crossing is in $\mathcal{S}$? We show that there is a set $\mathcal{S}_{\rm bad}$ with three crossing types and the following properties: If $\mathcal{S}$ contains no crossing type from $\mathcal{S}_{\rm bad}$, then the recognition of graphs that admit an $\mathcal{S}$-restricted drawing is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the treewidth of the input graph. If $\mathcal{S}$ contains any crossing type from $\mathcal{S}_{\rm bad}$, then it is NP-hard to decide whether a graph has an $\mathcal{S}$-restricted drawing, even when considering graphs of constant pathwidth. We also extend this characterization of crossing types to 1-planar straight-line drawings and show the same complexity behaviour parameterized by treewidth.

A drawing of a graph in the plane is called 1-planar if each edge is crossed at most once. A graph together with a 1-planar drawing is a 1-plane graph. A 1-plane graph $G$ with exactly $4|V (G)|-8$ edges is called optimal. The crossing number $cr(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of crossings over all drawings of $G$. Czap and Hudák proved that $cr(G)\le |V(G)|-2$ for any 1-plane graph $G$ and equality holds if $G$ is an optimal 1-plane graph [The Electronic J. Comb}., 20(2),#P54 (2013)]. This paper aims to characterize maximal 1-plane graphs $G$ achieving the maximum crossing number $|V(G)|-2$. We first introduce a class of quasi-optimal 1-plane graphs as a generalization of optimal 1-plane graphs, and then prove that for any maximal 1-plane graph $G$, $cr(G)=|V(G)|-2$ holds if and only if $G$ is a quasi-optimal 1-plane graph. Moreover, we prove that every quasi-optimal 1-plane graph is maximal 1-planar (not merely drawing-saturated). Finally, we present some applications of our main results, including a disproof of an upper bound on the crossing number of maximal 1-planar graphs with odd-degree vertices.

A graph is 1-planar if it admits a drawing in the plane such that each edge is crossed at most once. Let G be a bipartite 1-planar graph with partite sets X and Y. A 1-disk OX drawing of G is a 1-planar drawing such that all vertices of X lie on the boundary of O and all vertices of Y and all edges of G locate in the interior of O, where O is a disk on the plane. The concept was first proposed by Huang, Ouyang and Dong when they solved a conjecture about the edge density of bipartite 1-planar graphs. Additionally, they presented a problem of determining the maximum number of edges in a bipartite graph with a 1-disk OX drawing. In this paper, we solve this problem and prove that every bipartite graph G which has a 1-disk OX drawing has at most 2|V(G)|+|X|-6 edges. Moreover, we demonstrate that this upper bound is tight.

The crossing number of a graph $G$ denotes the minimum number of crossings in any planar drawing of $G$. In this short note, we confirm a long-standing conjecture posed by Pach, Spencer, and Tóth over 25 years ago, establishing an optimal lower bound on the crossing number of graphs that satisfy some monotone properties. Furthermore, we address a related open problem introduced by Pach and Tóth in 2000, which explores the interplay between the crossing number of a graph, its degree sequence, and its bisection width.

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

Given a drawing $D$ of a graph $G$, we define the crossing number between any two cycles $C_{1}$ and $C_{2}$ in $D$ to be the number of crossings that involve at least one edge from each of $C_1$ and $C_2$ except the crossings between edges that are common to both cycles. We show that if the crossing number between every two cycles in $G$ is even in a drawing of $G$ on the plane, then there is a planar drawing of $G$. This result can be extended to arbitrary surfaces. We also establish an equivalence between our result and a fundamental result due to Cairns-Nikolayevsky and Pelsmajer-Schaefer-Štefankovič, about drawing graphs on surfaces, and derive the Loebl-Masbaum theorem from it.

The k-planar graphs, which are (usually with small values of k such as 1, 2, 3) subject to recent intense research, admit a drawing in which edges are allowed to cross, but each one edge is allowed to carry at most k crossings. In recently introduced [Binucci et al., GD 2023] min-k-planar drawings of graphs, edges may possibly carry more than k crossings, but in any two crossing edges, at least one of the two must have at most k crossings. In both concepts, one may consider general drawings or a popular restricted concept of drawings called simple. In a simple drawing, every two edges are allowed to cross at most once, and any two edges which share a vertex are forbidden to cross. While, regarding the former concept, it is for k<=3 known (but perhaps not widely known) that every general k-planar graph admits a simple k-planar drawing and this ceases to be true for any k>=4, the difference between general and simple drawings in the latter concept is more striking. We prove that there exist graphs with a min-2-planar drawing, or with a min-3-planar drawing avoiding crossings of adjacent edges, which have no simple min-k-planar drawings for arbitrarily large fixed k.

We study geometric and topological properties of infinite graphs that are quasi-isometric to a planar graph of bounded degree. We prove that every locally finite quasi-transitive graph excluding a minor is quasi-isometric to a planar graph of bounded degree. We use the result to give a simple proof of the result that finitely generated minor-excluded groups have Assouad-Nagata dimension at most 2 (this is known to hold in greater generality, but all known proofs use significantly deeper tools). We also prove that every locally finite quasi-transitive graph that is quasi-isometric to a planar graph is $k$-planar for some $k$ (i.e. it has a planar drawing with at most $k$ crossings per edge), and discuss a possible approach to prove the converse statement.

A graph is outerplanar if it has a planar drawing for which all vertices belong to the outer face of the drawing. Let $H$ be a graph. The outerplanar Turán number of $H$, denoted by $ex_\mathcal{OP}(n,H)$, is the maximum number of edges in an $n$-vertex outerplanar graph which does not contain $H$ as a subgraph. In 2021, L. Fang et al. determined the outerplanar Turán number of cycles and paths. In this paper, we use techniques of dual graph to give a shorter proof for the sharp upperbound of $ex_\mathcal{OP}(n,C_k)\leq \frac{(2k - 5)(kn - k - 1)}{k^2 - 2k - 1}$.

It is well-known that every maximal planar graph has a matching of size at least $\tfrac{n+8}{3}$ if $n\geq 14$. In this paper, we investigate similar matching-bounds for maximal \emph{1-planar} graphs, i.e., graphs that can be drawn such that every edge has at most one crossing. In particular we show that every 3-connected simple-maximal 1-planar graph has a matching of size at least $\tfrac{2n+6}{5}$; the bound decreases to $\tfrac{3n+14}{10}$ if the graph need not be 3-connected. We also give (weaker) bounds when the graph comes with a fixed 1-planar drawing or is not simple. All our bounds are tight in the sense that some graph that satisfies the restrictions has no bigger matching.

Consider a weighted directed acyclic graph $G$ having an upward planar drawing. We give a formula for the total weight of the families of non-intersecting paths on $G$ with any given starting and ending points. While the Lindström-Gessel-Viennot theorem gives the signed enumeration of these weights (according to the connection type), our result provides the straight count, expressing it as a determinant whose entries are signed counts of lattice paths with given starting and ending points.

A drawing of a graph is $k$-plane if every edge contains at most $k$ crossings. A $k$-plane drawing is saturated if we cannot add any edge so that the drawing remains $k$-plane. It is well-known that saturated $0$-plane drawings, that is, maximal plane graphs, of $n$ vertices have exactly $3n-6$ edges. For $k>0$, the number of edges of saturated $n$-vertex $k$-plane graphs can take many different values. In this note, we establish some bounds on the minimum number of edges of saturated $2$-plane graphs under different conditions. If two edges can cross at most once, then such a graph has at least $n-1$ edges. If two edges can cross many times, then we show the tight bound of $\lfloor2n/3\rfloor$ for the number of edges.

For a class $\mathcal{D}$ of drawings of loopless (multi-)graphs in the plane, a drawing $D \in \mathcal{D}$ is \emph{saturated} when the addition of any edge to $D$ results in $D' \notin \mathcal{D}$ - this is analogous to saturated graphs in a graph class as introduced by Turán (1941) and Erdős, Hajnal, and Moon (1964). We focus on $k$-planar drawings, that is, graphs drawn in the plane where each edge is crossed at most $k$ times, and the classes $\mathcal{D}$ of all $k$-planar drawings obeying a number of restrictions, such as having no crossing incident edges, no pair of edges crossing more than once, or no edge crossing itself. While saturated $k$-planar drawings are the focus of several prior works, tight bounds on how sparse these can be are not well understood. We establish a generic framework to determine the minimum number of edges among all $n$-vertex saturated $k$-planar drawings in many natural classes. For example, when incident crossings, multicrossings and selfcrossings are all allowed, the sparsest $n$-vertex saturated $k$-planar drawings have $\frac{2}{k - (k \bmod 2)} (n-1)$ edges for any $k \geq 4$, while if all that is forbidden, the sparsest such drawings have $\frac{2(k+1)}{k(k-1)}(n-1)$ edges for any $k \geq 6$.

The notion of an upward plane graph in graph theory and that of a progressive plane graph (or plane string diagram) in category theory are essentially the same thing. In this paper, we combine the ideas in graph theory and category theory to explain why and in what sense upward planarity is a topological property. The main result is that two upward planar drawings of an acyclic directed graph are equivalent (connected by a deformation) if and only if they are connected by a planar isotopy which preserves the orientation and polarization of $G$. This result gives a positive answer to Selinger's conjectue, whose strategy is different from the solution recently given by Delpeuch and Vicary.

It is well-known that every planar 4-connected graph has a Hamiltonian cycle. In this paper, we study the question whether every 1-planar 4-connected graph has a Hamiltonian cycle. We show that this is false in general, even for 5-connected graphs, but true if the graph has a 1-planar drawing where every region is a triangle.

An L-shaped embedding of a tree in a point set is a planar drawing of the tree where the vertices are mapped to distinct points and every edge is drawn as a sequence of two axis-aligned line segments. There has been considerable work on establishing upper bounds on the minimum cardinality of a point set to guarantee that any tree of the same size with maximum degree 4 admits an L-shaped embedding on the point set. However, no non-trivial lower bound is known to this date, i.e., no known $n$-vertex tree requires more than $n$ points to be embedded. In this paper, we present the first examples of $n$-vertex trees for $n\in\{13,14,16,17,18,19,20\}$ that require strictly more points than vertices to admit an L-shaped embedding. Moreover, using computer help, we show that every tree on $n\leq 12$ vertices admits an L-shaped embedding in every set of $n$ points. We also consider embedding ordered trees, where the cyclic order of the neighbors of each vertex in the embedding is prescribed. For this setting, we determine the smallest non-embeddable ordered tree on $n=10$ vertices, and we show that every ordered tree on $n\leq 9$ or $n=11$ vertices admits an L-shaped embedding in every set of $n$ points. We also construct an infinite family of ordered trees which do not always admit an L-shaped embedding, answering a question raised by Biedl, Chan, Derka, Jain, and Lubiw.

The number $Z(n):=\lfloor n/2\rfloor\lfloor (n-1)/2\rfloor$ is the smallest number of crossings in a simple planar drawing of $K_{2,n}$ in which both vertices on the 2-side have the same clockwise rotation. For two vertices $u,v$ on the $q$-side of a simple drawing of $K_{p,q}$, let $\operatorname{cr}_D(u,v)$ denote the total number of crossings that edges incident with $u$ have with edges incident with $v$. We show that in any simple drawing $D$ of $K_{p,q}$ in a surface $Σ$ the number of pairs of vertices on the $q$-side of $K_{p,q}$ having $\operatorname{cr}_D(u,v)<Z(p)$ is bounded as a function of $p$ and $Σ$. As a consequence, we also show that, for a fixed integer $p$ and surface $Σ$, there exists a finite set of drawings $\mathcal{D}(p,Σ)$ of complete bipartite graphs such that, for each $q$, a crossing-minimal drawing of $K_{p,q}$ can be obtained by "duplicating vertices" in some drawing from $\mathcal D(p,Σ)$.

Given a fixed positive integer $k$, the $k$-planar local crossing number of a graph $G$, denoted by $\text{LCR}_k(G)$, is the minimum positive integer $L$ such that $G$ can be decomposed into $k$ subgraphs, each of which can be drawn in a plane such that no edge is crossed more than $L$ times. In this note, we show that under certain natural restrictions, the ratio $\text{LCR}_k(G)/\text{LCR}_1(G)$ is of order $1/k^2$, which is analogous to a recent result of Pach et al. for the $k$-planar crossing number (defined as the minimum positive integer $C$ for which there is a $k$-planar drawing of $G$ with $C$ total edge crossings). As a corollary of our proof we show that, under similar restrictions, one may obtain a $k$-planar drawing of $G$ with \emph{both} the total number of edge crossings as well as the maximum number of times any edge is crossed essentially matching the best known bounds. Our proof relies on the crossing number inequality and several probabilistic tools such as concentration of measure and the Lovász local lemma.