arXiv++ Combinatorics

A graph is called a $k$-planar unit distance graph if it can be drawn in the plane such that every edge is a unit line segment and is involved in at most $k$ crossings. We investigate $u_k(n)$, the maximum number of edges of such graphs on $n$ vertices. For $k=1$, we improve the best known upper bound, by showing that $u_1(n) \leq 3n - c\sqrt{n}$ for some constant $c>0$. This bound is tight up to the value of the constant $c$. For $k=2$, we establish the first non-trivial upper bound by proving that $u_2(n) \leq 4n - 8$. Regarding lower bounds we give a construction for $k=2$ that shows $u_2(n) \geq u_0(n) + c\sqrt{n}$ if $n$ is sufficiently large.

A {\it vertex-ordered} graph is a graph equipped with a linear ordering of its vertices. A pair of independent edges in an ordered graph can exhibit one of the following three patterns: separated, nested or crossing. We say a pair of independent edges is non-separated if it is either crossing or nested. Non-nested and non-crossing pairs are defined analogously. We are interested in the following Turán-type problems: for each of the aforementioned six patterns, determine the maximum number of edges of an $n$-vertex ordered graph that does not contain a $k$-matching such that every pair of edges exhibit the fixed pattern. Exact answers have already been obtained for four of the six cases. The main objective of this paper is to investigate the two remaining open cases, namely non-separated and non-nested matchings. We determine the exact maximum number of edges of an $n$-vertex ordered graph that does not contain a non-separated $k$-matching, which has the form $\frac{3}{2}(k-1)n+Θ(k^2)$. For the non-nested case, we show the maximum number of edges lies between $(k-1)n$ and $(k-1)n+\binom{k-1}{2}$. We also determine the exact maximum number of edges of an $n$-vertex ordered graph that does not contain an alternating path of given length. We discuss some related problems and raise several conjectures. Furthermore, our results and conjectures yield consequences to certain Ramsey-type problems for non-nested matchings and alternating paths.

The \emph{chromatic number} of a hypergraph is the smallest number of colors needed to color the vertices such that no edge of at least two vertices is monochromatic. Given a family of geometric objects $\mathcal{F}$ that covers a subset $S$ of the Euclidean space, we can associate it with a hypergraph whose vertex set is $\mathcal F$ and whose edges are those subsets ${\mathcal{F}'}\subset \mathcal F$ for which there exists a point $p\in S$ such that ${\mathcal F}'$ consists of precisely those elements of $\mathcal{F}$ that contain $p$. The question whether $\mathcal F$ can be split into 2 coverings is equivalent to asking whether the chromatic number of the hypergraph is equal to 2. There are a number of competing notions of the chromatic number that lead to deep combinatorial questions already for abstract hypergraphs. In this paper, we concentrate on \emph{geometrically defined} (in short, \emph{geometric}) hypergraphs, and survey many recent coloring results related to them. In particular, we study and survey the following problem, dual to the above covering question. Given a set of points $S$ in the Euclidean space and a family $\mathcal{F}$ of geometric objects of a fixed type, define a hypergraph ${\mathcal H}_m$ on the point set $S$, whose edges are the subsets of $S$ that can be obtained as the intersection of $S$ with a member of $\mathcal F$ and have at least $m$ elements. Is it true that if $m$ is large enough, then the chromatic number of ${\mathcal H}_m$ is equal to 2?

The crossing number of a graph is the minimum number of crossings over all of its drawings on the plane. The Crossing Lemma, proved more than 40 years ago, is a tight lower bound on the crossing number of a graph in terms of the number of vertices and edges. It is definitely the most important inequality on crossing numbers. We review some generalizations and applications of the Crossing Lemma.

A graph whose vertices are points in the plane and whose edges are noncrossing straight-line segments of unit length is called a \emph{matchstick graph}. We prove two somewhat counterintuitive results concerning the maximum number of edges of such graphs in two different scenarios. First, we show that there is a constant $c>0$ such that every triangle-free matchstick graph on $n$ vertices has at most $2n-c\sqrt{n}$ edges. This statement is not true for any $c>\sqrt2.$ We also prove that for every $r>0$, there is a constant $\varepsilon(r)>0$ with the property that every matchstick graph on $n$ vertices contained in a disk of radius $r$ has at most $(2-\varepsilon(r))n$ edges.

We study how many comparability subgraphs are needed to partition the edge set of a perfect graph. We show that many classes of perfect graphs can be partitioned into (at most) two comparability subgraphs and this holds for almost all perfect graphs. On the other hand, we prove that for interval graphs an arbitrarily large number of comparability subgraphs might be necessary.

In Euclidean Ramsey Theory usually we are looking for monochromatic configurations in the Euclidean space, whose points are colored with a fixed number of colors. In the canonical version, the number of colors is arbitrary, and we are looking for an `unavoidable' set of colorings of a finite configuration, that is a set of colorings with the property that one of them always appears in any coloring of the space. This set definitely includes the monochromatic and the rainbow colorings. In the present paper, we prove the following two results of this type. First, for any acute triangle $T$, and any coloring of $\mathbb{R}^3$, there is either a monochromatic or a rainbow copy of $T$. Second, for every $m$, there exists a sufficiently large $n$ such that in any coloring of $\mathbb{R}^n$, there exists either a monochromatic or a rainbow $m$-dimensional unit hypercube. In the maximum norm, $\ell_{\infty}$, we have a much stronger statement. For every finite $M$, there exits an $n$ such that in any coloring of $\mathbb{R}_\infty^n$, there is either a monochromatic or a rainbow isometric copy of $M$.

Conlon and Wu showed that there is a red/blue-coloring of $\mathbb{E}^n$ that does not contain $3$ red collinear points separated by unit distance and $m=10^{50}$ blue collinear points separated by unit distance. We prove that the statement holds with $m=1177$. We show similar results with different distances between the points.

We consider partitions of a point set into two parts, and the lengths of the minimum spanning trees of the original set and of the two parts. If $w(P)$ denotes the length of a minimum spanning tree of $P$, we show that every set $P$ of $n \geq 12$ points admits a bipartition $P= R \cup B$ for which the ratio $\frac{w(R)+w(B)}{w(P)}$ is strictly larger than $1$; and that $1$ is the largest number with this property. Furthermore, we provide a very fast algorithm that computes such a bipartition in $O(1)$ time and one that computes the corresponding ratio in $O(n \log{n})$ time. In certain settings, a ratio larger than $1$ can be expected and sometimes guaranteed. For example, if $P$ is a set of $n$ random points uniformly distributed in $[0,1]^2$ ($n \to \infty$), then for any $\eps>0$, the above ratio in a maximizing partition is at least $\sqrt2 -\eps$ with probability tending to $1$. As another example, if $P$ is a set of $n$ points with spread at most $α\sqrt{n}$, for some constant $α>0$, then the aforementioned ratio in a maximizing partition is $1 + Ω(α^{-2})$. All our results and techniques are extendable to higher dimensions.

A matchstick graph is a plane graph with edges drawn as unit distance line segments. This class of graphs was introduced by Harborth who conjectured that a matchstick graph on $n$ vertices can have at most $\lfloor 3n - \sqrt{12n - 3}\rfloor$ edges. Recently, his conjecture was settled by Lavollée and Swanepoel. In this paper we consider $1$-planar unit distance graphs. We say that a graph is a $1$-planar unit distance graph if it can be drawn in the plane such that all edges are drawn as unit distance line segments while each of them are involved in at most one crossing. We show that such graphs on $n$ vertices can have at most $3n-\sqrt[4]{n}/15$ edges, which is almost tight. We also investigate some generalizations, namely $k$-planar and $k$-quasiplanar unit distance graphs.

We prove that for any $\ell_p$-norm in the plane with $1<p<\infty$ and for every infinite $\mathcal{M} \subset \mathbb{R}^2$, there exists a two-colouring of the plane such that no isometric copy of $\mathcal{M}$ is monochromatic. On the contrary, we show that for every polygonal norm (that is, the unit ball is a polygon) in the plane, there exists an infinite $\mathcal{M} \subset \mathbb{R}^2$ such that for every two-colouring of the plane there exists a monochromatic isometric copy of $\mathcal{M}$.

Given a set of $n$ labeled points in general position in the plane, we remove all of its points one by one. At each step, one point from the convex hull of the remaining set is erased. In how many ways can the process be carried out? The answer obviously depends on the point set. If the points are in convex position, there are exactly $n!$ ways, which is the maximum number of ways for $n$ points. But what is the minimum number? It is shown that this number is (roughly) at least $3^n$ and at most $12.29^n$.

Two independent edges in ordered graphs can be nested, crossing or separated. These relations define six types of subgraphs, depending on which relations are forbidden. We refine a remark by Erdős and Rado that every 2-coloring of the edges of a complete graph contains a monochromatic spanning tree. We show that forbidding one relation we always have a monochromatic (non-nested, non-crossing, non-separated) spanning tree in a 2-edge-colored ordered complete graph. On the other hand, if two relations are forbidden, then it is possible that we have monochromatic (nested, separated, crossing) subtrees of size only half the number of vertices. The existence of a monochromatic non-nested spanning tree in 2-colorings of ordered complete graphs verifies a more general conjecture for twisted drawings. Our second subject is to refine the Ramsey number of matchings for ordered complete graphs. Cockayne and Lorimer proved that for given positive integers t, n, m=(t-1)(n-1)+2n is the smallest integer with the following property: every t-coloring of the edges of a complete graph Km contains a monochromatic matching with n edges. We conjecture a strengthening: t-colored ordered complete graphs on m vertices contain monochromatic non-nested and also non-separated matchings with n edges. We prove this conjecture for some special cases. (i) Every t-colored ordered complete graph on t+3 vertices contains a monochromatic non-nested matching of size two. (ii) Every 2-colored ordered complete graph on 3n-1 vertices contains a monochromatic non-separated matching of size n. For nested, separated, and crossing matchings the situation is different. The smallest m ensuring a monochromatic matching of size n in every t-coloring is 2(t(n-1))+1) in the first two cases and one less in the third case.

Let $H$ be a complete $r$-uniform hypergraph such that two vertices are marked in each edge as its `boundary' vertices. A linear ordering of the vertex set of $H$ is called an {\em agreeing linear order}, provided all vertices of each edge of $H$ lie between its two boundary vertices. We prove the following Helly-type theorem: if there is an {agreeing linear order} on the vertex set of every subhypergraph of $H$ with at most $2r-2$ vertices, then there is an agreeing linear order on the vertex set of $H$. We also show that the constant $2r-2$ cannot be reduced in the theorem. The case $r=3$ of the theorem has particular interest in the axiomatic theory of betweenness. Similar results are obtained for further $r$-uniform hypergraphs ($r\geq 3$), where one or two vertices are marked in each edge, and the linear orders need to satisfy various rules of agreement. In one of the cases we prove that no such Helly-type statement holds.

A graph is $1$-planar, if it can be drawn in the plane such that there is at most one crossing on every edge. It is known, that $1$-planar graphs have at most $4n-8$ edges. We prove the following odd-even generalization. If a graph can be drawn in the plane such that every edge is crossed by at most one other edge {\em an odd number of times}, then it is called 1-odd-planar and it has at most $5n-9$ edges. As a consequence, we improve the constant in the Crossing Lemma for the odd-crossing number, if adjacent edges cross an even number of times. We also give upper bound for the number of edges of $k$-odd-planar graphs.

The {\em disjointness graph} of a set system is a graph whose vertices are the sets, two being connected by an edge if and only if they are disjoint. It is known that the disjointness graph $G$ of any system of segments in the plane is {\em $χ$-bounded}, that is, its chromatic number $χ(G)$ is upper bounded by a function of its clique number $ω(G)$. Here we show that this statement does not remain true for systems of polygonal chains of length $2$. We also construct systems of polygonal chains of length $3$ such that their disjointness graphs have arbitrarily large girth and chromatic number. In the opposite direction, we show that the class of disjointness graphs of (possibly self-intersecting) \emph{$2$-way infinite} polygonal chains of length $3$ is $χ$-bounded: for every such graph $G$, we have $χ(G)\le(ω(G))^3+ω(G).$

A drawing of a graph is $k$-plane if every edge contains at most $k$ crossings. A $k$-plane drawing is saturated if we cannot add any edge so that the drawing remains $k$-plane. It is well-known that saturated $0$-plane drawings, that is, maximal plane graphs, of $n$ vertices have exactly $3n-6$ edges. For $k>0$, the number of edges of saturated $n$-vertex $k$-plane graphs can take many different values. In this note, we establish some bounds on the minimum number of edges of saturated $2$-plane graphs under different conditions. If two edges can cross at most once, then such a graph has at least $n-1$ edges. If two edges can cross many times, then we show the tight bound of $\lfloor2n/3\rfloor$ for the number of edges.

For $n\leq d$, a family ${\cal F}=\{C_0,C_1,\ldots, C_n\}$ of compact convex sets in $R^d$ is called an $n$-critical family provided any $n$ members of ${\cal F}$ have a non-empty intersection, but $\bigcap_{i=0}^n C_i=\varnothing$. If $n=d$ then a lemma on the intersection of convex sets due to Klee implies that the $d+1$ members of the $d$-critical family enclose a `hollow' in $R^d$, a bounded connected component of $R^d\setminus\bigcup_{i=0}^n C_i.$ Here we prove that the closure of the convex hull of a hollow in $R^d$ is a $d$-simplex.

The crossing number of a graph $G$, ${\mbox{cr}}(G)$, is the minimum number of crossings, the pair-crossing number, ${\mbox{pcr}}(G)$, is the minimum number of pairs of crossing edges over all drawings of $G$. In this note we show that ${\mbox{cr}}(G)=O({\mbox{pcr}}(G)^{3/2}\log{\mbox{pcr}}(G))$, which is an improvement of the result of Matoušek, by a log factor.

We call a multigraph {\em non-homotopic} if it can be drawn in the plane in such a way that no two edges connecting the same pair of vertices can be continuously transformed into each other without passing through a vertex, and no loop can be shrunk to its end-vertex in the same way. It is easy to see that a non-homotopic multigraph on $n>1$ vertices can have arbitrarily many edges. We prove that the number of crossings between the edges of a non-homotopic multigraph with $n$ vertices and $m>4n$ edges is larger than $c\frac{m^2}{n}$ for some constant $c>0$, and that this bound is tight up to a polylogarithmic factor. We also show that the lower bound is not asymptotically sharp as $n$ is fixed and $m$ tends to infinity.