arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Márton Marits

3 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2026-07-14
Cover numbers by graph families bounded by certain graph parameters
The cover number of a graph by a graph class $\mathcal P$ is the least number of $\mathcal P$-graphs necessary to cover its edges. A classical theorem of Harary, Hsu and Miller gives an exact formula for the cover number by the class of graphs with chromatic number at most $k$. We investigate analogous questions for the case of the fractional chromatic number $χ_f$ and the local chromatic number $ψ$. We prove that an analogous formula cannot hold in the case of the cover number by graphs of fractional chromatic number at most $β$, and find a lower and an upper bound, that gives rise to interesting asymptotic questions. We also investigate this cover number for small specific graphs. In the case of the cover number by graphs with local chromatic number at most $k$, we find an upper bound in terms of $ψ$, and a lower bound in terms of $ω$.
2024-12-12 v2
Cover numbers by certain graph families
We define the cover number of a graph $G$ by a graph class $\mathcal P$ as the minimum number of graphs of class $\mathcal P$ required to cover the edge set of $G$. Taking inspiration from a paper by Harary, Hsu and Miller, we find an exact formula for the cover number by the graph classes $\{ G \mid χ(G) \leq f(ω(G))\}$ for an arbitrary non-decreasing function $f$. After this, we establish a chain of inequalities with five cover numbers, the one by the class $\{ G \mid χ(G) = ω(G)\}$, by the class of perfect graphs, generalized split graphs, co-unipolar graphs and finally by bipartite graphs. We prove that at each inequality, the difference between the two sides can grow arbitrarily large. We also prove that the cover number by unipolar graphs cannot be expressed in terms of the chromatic or the clique number.
2024-08-24
Partitioning perfect graphs into comparability graphs
We study how many comparability subgraphs are needed to partition the edge set of a perfect graph. We show that many classes of perfect graphs can be partitioned into (at most) two comparability subgraphs and this holds for almost all perfect graphs. On the other hand, we prove that for interval graphs an arbitrarily large number of comparability subgraphs might be necessary.