arXiv++ Combinatorics

The crossing number of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of edge crossings over all drawings of $G$ in the plane. A graph $G$ is $k$-crossing-critical if its crossing number is at least $k$, but if we remove any edge of $G$, its crossing number drops below $k$. There are examples of $k$-crossing-critical graphs that do not have drawings with exactly $k$ crossings. Richter and Thomassen proved in 1993 that if $G$ is $k$-crossing-critical, then its crossing number is at most $2.5k+16$. We improve this bound to $2k+6\sqrt{k}+44$.

Given $2k-1$ convex sets in $R^2$ such that no point of the plane is covered by more than $k$ of the sets, is it true that there are two among the convex sets whose union contains all $k$-covered points of the plane? This question due to Gy. Petruska has an obvious affirmative answer for $k=1,2,3$; we show here that the claim is also true for $k=4$, and we present a counterexample for $k=5$. We explain how Petruska's geometry question fits into the classical hypergraph extremal problems, called arrow problems, proposed by P. Erdős.

Let $G$ be a multigraph with $n$ vertices and $e>4n$ edges, drawn in the plane such that any two parallel edges form a simple closed curve with at least one vertex in its interior and at least one vertex in its exterior. Pach and Tóth (A Crossing Lemma for Multigraphs, SoCG 2018) extended the Crossing Lemma of Ajtai et al. (Crossing-free subgraphs, North-Holland Mathematics Studies, 1982) and Leighton (Complexity issues in VLSI, Foundations of computing series, 1983) by showing that if no two adjacent edges cross and every pair of nonadjacent edges cross at most once, then the number of edge crossings in $G$ is at least $αe^3/n^2$, for a suitable constant $α>0$. The situation turns out to be quite different if nonparallel edges are allowed to cross any number of times. It is proved that in this case the number of crossings in $G$ is at least $αe^{2.5}/n^{1.5}$. The order of magnitude of this bound cannot be improved.

Let $G$ be a drawing of a graph with $n$ vertices and $e>4n$ edges, in which no two adjacent edges cross and any pair of independent edges cross at most once. According to the celebrated Crossing Lemma of Ajtai, Chvátal, Newborn, Szemerédi and Leighton, the number of crossings in $G$ is at least $c{e^3\over n^2}$, for a suitable constant $c>0$. In a seminal paper, Székely generalized this result to multigraphs, establishing the lower bound $c{e^3\over mn^2}$, where $m$ denotes the maximum multiplicity of an edge in $G$. We get rid of the dependence on $m$ by showing that, as in the original Crossing Lemma, the number of crossings is at least $c'{e^3\over n^2}$ for some $c'>0$, provided that the "lens" enclosed by every pair of parallel edges in $G$ contains at least one vertex. This settles a conjecture of Kaufmann.

A convex polygon Q is circumscribed about a convex polygon P if every vertex of P lies on at least one side of Q. We present an algorithm for finding a maximum area convex polygon circumscribed about any given convex n-gon in O(n^3) time. As an application, we disprove a conjecture of Farris. Moreover, for the special case of regular n-gons we find an explicit solution.

Given $n$ continuous open curves in the plane, we say that a pair is touching if they have only one interior point in common and at this point the first curve does not get from one side of the second curve to its other side. Otherwise, if the two curves intersect, they are said to form a crossing pair. Let $t$ and $c$ denote the number of touching pairs and crossing pairs, respectively. We prove that $c \ge {1\over 10^5}{t^2\over n^2}$, provided that $t\ge 10n$. Apart from the values of the constants, this result is best possible.

The {\em disjointness graph} $G=G({\cal S})$ of a set of segments ${\cal S}$ in $R^d$, $d\ge 2,$ is a graph whose vertex set is ${\cal S}$ and two vertices are connected by an edge if and only if the corresponding segments are disjoint. We prove that the chromatic number of $G$ satisfies $χ(G)\le(ω(G))^4+(ω(G))^3$, where $ω(G)$ denotes the clique number of $G$. It follows, that $\cal S$ has $Ω(n^{1/5})$ pairwise intersecting or pairwise disjoint elements. Stronger bounds are established for lines in space, instead of segments. We show that computing $ω(G)$ and $χ(G)$ for disjointness graphs of lines in space are NP-hard tasks. However, we can design efficient algorithms to compute proper colorings of $G$ in which the number of colors satisfies the above upper bounds. One cannot expect similar results for sets of continuous arcs, instead of segments, even in the plane. We construct families of arcs whose disjointness graphs are triangle-free ($ω(G)=2$), but whose chromatic numbers are arbitrarily large.

A planar point set of $n$ points is called {\em $γ$-dense} if the ratio of the largest and smallest distances among the points is at most $γ\sqrt{n}$. We construct a dense set of $n$ points in the plane with $ne^{Ω\left({\sqrt{\log n}}\right)}$ halving lines. This improves the bound $Ω(n\log n)$ of Edelsbrunner, Valtr and Welzl from 1997. Our construction can be generalized to higher dimensions, for any $d$ we construct a dense point set of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with $n^{d-1}e^{Ω\left({\sqrt{\log n}}\right)}$ halving hyperplanes. Our lower bounds are asymptotically the same as the best known lower bounds for general point sets.

The crossing number $cr(G)$ of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is the smallest number of edge crossings over all drawings of $G$ in the plane. For any $k\ge 1$, the $k$-planar crossing number of $G$, $cr_k(G)$, is defined as the minimum of $cr(G_0)+cr(G_1)+\ldots+cr(G_{k-1})$ over all graphs $G_0, G_1,\ldots, G_{k-1}$ with $\cup_{i=0}^{k-1}G_i=G$. It is shown that for every $k\ge 1$, we have $cr_k(G)\le \left(\frac{2}{k^2}-\frac1{k^3}\right)cr(G)$. This bound does not remain true if we replace the constant $\frac{2}{k^2}-\frac1{k^3}$ by any number smaller than $\frac1{k^2}$. Some of the results extend to the rectilinear variants of the $k$-planar crossing number.

A graph is 1-planar if it can be drawn in the plane such that each edge is crossed at most once. A graph, together with a 1-planar drawing is called 1-plane. Brandenburg et al. showed that there are maximal 1-planar graphs with only $\frac{45}{17}n + O(1)\approx 2.647n$ edges and maximal 1-plane graphs with only $\frac{7}{3}n+O(1)\approx 2.33n$ edges. On the other hand, they showed that a maximal 1-planar graph has at least $\frac{28}{13}n-O(1)\approx 2.15n-O(1)$ edges, and a maximal 1-plane graph has at least $2.1n-O(1)$ edges. We improve both lower bounds to $\frac{20n}{9}\approx 2.22n$.

Given a finite $n$-element set $X$, a family of subsets ${\mathcal F}\subset 2^X$ is said to separate $X$ if any two elements of $X$ are separated by at least one member of $\mathcal F$. It is shown that if $|\mathcal F|>2^{n-1}$, then one can select $\lceil\log n\rceil+1$ members of $\mathcal F$ that separate $X$. If $|\mathcal F|\ge α2^n$ for some $0<α<1/2$, then $\log n+O(\log\frac1α\log\log\frac1α)$ members of $\mathcal F$ are always sufficient to separate all pairs of elements of $X$ that are separated by some member of $\mathcal F$. This result is generalized to simultaneous separation in several sets. Analogous questions on separation by families of bounded Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension and separation of point sets in ${\mathbb{R}}^d$ by convex sets are also considered.

A planar set $P$ is said to be cover-decomposable if there is a constant $k=k(P)$ such that every $k$-fold covering of the plane with translates of $P$ can be decomposed into two coverings. It is known that open convex polygons are cover-decomposable. Here we show that closed, centrally symmetric convex polygons are also cover-decomposable. We also show that an infinite-fold covering of the plane with translates of $P$ can be decomposed into two infinite-fold coverings. Both results hold for coverings of any subset of the plane.

A simple topological graph $G$ is a graph drawn in the plane so that any pair of edges have at most one point in common, which is either an endpoint or a proper crossing. $G$ is called saturated if no further edge can be added without violating this condition. We construct saturated simple topological graphs with $n$ vertices and $O(n)$ edges. For every $k>1$, we give similar constructions for $k$-simple topological graphs, that is, for graphs drawn in the plane so that any two edges have at most $k$ points in common. We show that in any $k$-simple topological graph, any two independent vertices can be connected by a curve that crosses each of the original edges at most $2k$ times. Another construction shows that the bound $2k$ cannot be improved. Several other related problems are also considered.

According to the Erdős-Szekeres theorem, for every $n$, a sufficiently large set of points in general position in the plane contains $n$ in convex position. In this note we investigate the line version of this result, that is, we want to find $n$ lines in convex position in a sufficiently large set of lines that are in general position. We prove almost matching upper and lower bounds for the minimum size of the set of lines in general position that always contains $n$ in convex position. This is quite unexpected, since in the case of points, the best known bounds are very far from each other. We also establish the dual versions of many variants and generalizations of the Erd\H os-Szekeres theorem.

We prove that the crossing number of a graph decays in a continuous fashion in the following sense. For any epsilon>0 there is a delta>0 such that for a sufficiently large n, every graph G with n vertices and m > n^{1+epsilon} edges, has a subgraph G' of at most (1-delta)m edges and crossing number at least (1-epsilon)cr(G). This generalizes the result of J. Fox and Cs. Toth.

Let G be a graph drawn in the plane so that its edges are represented by x-monotone curves, any pair of which cross an even number of times. We show that G can be redrawn in such a way that the x-coordinates of the vertices remain unchanged and the edges become non-crossing straight-line segments.

Albertson conjectured that if a graph $G$ has chromatic number $r$ then its crossing number is at least as much as the crossing number of $K_r$. Albertson, Cranston, and Fox verified the conjecture for $r\le 12$. We prove the statement for $r\le 16$.