arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let H be a 3-uniform hypergraph of order n with clique number k such that the intersection of all maximum cliques of H is empty. For fixed m=n-k, Szemerédi and Petruska conjectured the sharp bound $n\leq {m+2\choose 2}$. In this note the conjecture is verified for m=2,3 and 4.

Given $2k-1$ convex sets in $R^2$ such that no point of the plane is covered by more than $k$ of the sets, is it true that there are two among the convex sets whose union contains all $k$-covered points of the plane? This question due to Gy. Petruska has an obvious affirmative answer for $k=1,2,3$; we show here that the claim is also true for $k=4$, and we present a counterexample for $k=5$. We explain how Petruska's geometry question fits into the classical hypergraph extremal problems, called arrow problems, proposed by P. Erdős.

Consider a $3$-uniform hypergraph of order $n$ with clique number $k$ such that the intersection of all its $k$-cliques is empty. Szemerédi and Petruska proved $n\leq 8m^2+3m$, for fixed $m=n-k$, and they conjectured the sharp bound $n\leq{m+2\choose 2}$. Tuza proved the best known bound, $n\leq \frac{3}{4}m^2+m+1$, using the machinery of $τ$-critical hypergraphs. Here we propose an alternative approach, combining a decomposition process introduced by Szemerédi and Petruska with the skew version of Bollobás's theorem to prove $n\leq m^2 + 6m + 2$. While the bound obtained here is weaker than Tuza's bound, it is a proof-of-concept for a different approach and a call to apply dimension bounds from linear algebra.

A graph is an apex graph if it contains a vertex whose deletion leaves a planar graph. The family of apex graphs is minor-closed and so it is characterized by a finite list of minor-minimal non-members. The long-standing problem of determining this finite list of apex obstructions remains open. This paper determines the 133 minor-minimal, non-apex graphs that have connectivity two.

Let $G=P_6\Box P_6$ be the $6\times 6$ grid, the Cartesian product of two paths of six vertices. Let $T$ be the set of eight distinct vertices of $G$, called terminals, and assume that $T$ is partitioned into four terminal pairs $\{s_i,t_i\}$, $1\leq i\leq 4$. We prove that $G$ is $4$-path-pairable, that is, for every $T$ there exist in $G$ pairwise edge disjoint $s_i,t_i$-paths, $1\leq i\leq 4$.

Let $G$ be the Cartesian product of two finite paths, called a grid, and let $T$ be the set of eight distinct vertices of $G$, called terminals. Assume that $T$ is partitioned into four terminal pairs $\{s_i,t_i\}$, $1\leq i\leq 4$, to be linked in $G$ by using edge disjoint paths. To prove that such a linkage always exists we need a sequence of technical lemmas making possible for some terminals to `escape' from a $3\times 3$ corner of $Q\subset G$, called a `quadrant'. Here we state those lemmas, and give a proof for the cases when $Q$ contains at most $4$ terminals.

Let $Q$ be a finite subgraph of the integer grid $G$ in the plane, and let $T$ be a set of pairs of distinct vertices in $G$, called `terminal pairs'. Escaping a subset $X\subset T\cap Q$ from $Q$ means finding edge disjoint paths from the terminals in $X$ into distinct vertices of a set $L$ in the boundary of $Q$. Here we prove several lemmas for the cases where $Q$ is a $3\times 3$ grid, $L$ is the union of a vertical and horizontal boundary line of $Q$, furthermore, $T$ is a set of four terminal pairs in $G$ such that $|T\cap Q|\geq 5$. These lemmas are applied in [4] and complete the proof that the Cartesian product of two (one way) infinite paths has path-pairability number four.