arXiv++ Combinatorics

Phylogenetic networks are graphs that represent the evolutionary history of species. Recently, the class of orchard phylogenetic networks, which can be reduced by so-called cherry-picking sequences, has gained attention for its computational and biological aspects. In this paper, we study a fundamental question on orchards and their cherry-picking sequences by considering the CoveringNumber problem: given an orchard network $N$, how many cherry-picking sequences are needed to reduce all subnetworks of $N$? We initiate this study by considering the problem for trees. We then show that the covering number can be computed for binary trees recursively using a similar but more fine-grained notion of survival covering number. We also give a recursive formula for the survival covering number of non-binary trees. However, computing the covering number for non-binary trees appears to be considerably more challenging. For this case, we show that the covering number of star trees (whose root is adjacent to all leaves) is equivalent to the so-called SubsetConnectivity problem, which we introduce in this paper. Finally, we show that if there is no restriction on the sequence length, a single sequence of minimum length $\binom{n}{2}$ suffices to reduce all subtrees of a tree on $n$ leaves.

The class of terminal planar networks was recently introduced from a biological perspective in relation to the visualization of phylogenetic networks, and its connection to upward planar networks has been established. We provide a Kuratowski-type theorem that characterizes terminal planar networks by a finite set of forbidden structures, defined via six families of 0/1-labeled graphs. Another characterization based on planarity of supergraphs yields linear-time algorithms for testing terminal planarity and for computing such planar drawings. We describe an application that is potentially relevant in broader, non-phylogenetic settings. We also discuss a connection of our main result to an open problem on the forbidden structures of single-source upward planar networks.

Reticulate evolution gives rise to complex phylogenetic networks, making their interpretation challenging. A typical approach is to extract trees within such networks. Since Francis and Steel's seminal paper, "Which Phylogenetic Networks are Merely Trees with Additional Arcs?" (2015), tree-based phylogenetic networks and their support trees (spanning trees with the same root and leaf set as a given network) have been extensively studied. However, not all phylogenetic networks are tree-based, and for the study of reticulate evolution, it is often more biologically relevant to identify support networks rather than trees. This study generalizes Hayamizu's structure theorem for rooted binary phylogenetic networks, which yielded optimal algorithms for various computational problems on support trees, to extend the theoretical framework for support trees to support networks. This allows us to obtain a direct-product characterization of each of three sets: all, minimal, and minimum support networks, for a given network. Each characterization yields optimal algorithms for counting and generating the support networks of each type. Applications include a linear-time algorithm for finding a support network with the fewest reticulations (i.e., the minimum tier). We also provide exact and heuristic algorithms for finding a support network with the minimum level, both running in exponential time but practical across a reasonably wide range of reticulation numbers.

Phylogenetic networks are a flexible model of evolution that can represent reticulate evolution and handle complex data. Tree-based networks, which are phylogenetic networks that have a spanning tree with the same root and leaf-set as the network itself, have been well studied. However, not all networks are tree-based. Francis-Semple-Steel (2018) thus introduced several indices to measure the deviation of rooted binary phylogenetic networks $N$ from being tree-based, such as the minimum number $δ^\ast(N)$ of additional leaves needed to make $N$ tree-based, and the minimum difference $η^\ast(N)$ between the number of vertices of $N$ and the number of vertices of a subtree of $N$ that shares the root and leaf set with $N$. Hayamizu (2021) has established a canonical decomposition of almost-binary phylogenetic networks of $N$, called the maximal zig-zag trail decomposition, which has many implications including a linear time algorithm for computing $δ^\ast(N)$. The Maximum Covering Subtree Problem (MCSP) is the problem of computing $η^\ast(N)$, and Davidov et al. (2022) showed that this can be solved in polynomial time (in cubic time when $N$ is binary) by an algorithm for the minimum cost flow problem. In this paper, under the assumption that $N$ is almost-binary (i.e. each internal vertex has in-degree and out-degree at most two), we show that $δ^\ast(N)\leq η^\ast (N)$ holds, which is tight, and give a characterisation of such phylogenetic networks $N$ that satisfy $δ^\ast(N)=η^\ast(N)$. Our approach uses the canonical decomposition of $N$ and focuses on how the maximal W-fences (i.e. the forbidden subgraphs of tree-based networks) are connected to maximal M-fences in the network $N$. Our results introduce a new class of phylogenetic networks for which MCSP can be solved in linear time, which can be seen as a generalisation of tree-based networks.