arXiv++ Combinatorics

We present a simple nonadaptive randomized algorithm that estimates the number of edges in a simple, unweighted, undirected graph, possibly containing isolated vertices, using only degree and random edge queries. For an $n$-vertex graph, our method requires only $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ queries, achieving sublinear query complexity. The algorithm independently samples a set of vertices and queries their degrees, and also independently samples a set of edges, using the answers to these queries to estimate the total number of edges in the graph. We further prove a matching lower bound, establishing the optimality of our algorithm and resolving the non-adaptive query complexity of this problem with respect to degree and random-edge queries.

An infinite $(p,q)$-theorem, or an $(\aleph_0,q)$-theorem, involving two families $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ of sets, states that if in every infinite subset of $\mathcal{F}$, there are $q$ sets that are intersected by some set in $\mathcal{G}$, then there is a finite set $S_{\mathcal{F}}\subseteq\mathcal{G}$ such that for every $C\in\mathcal{F}$, there is a $B\in S_{\mathcal{F}}$ with $C\cap B\neq\emptyset$. We provide an example demonstrating that there is no $(\aleph_0,q)$-theorem for piercing compact convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^3$ with lines by constructing a family $\mathcal{F}$ of compact convex sets such that it does not have a finite line transversal, but for any $t\in\mathbb{N}$, every infinite subset of $\mathcal{F}$ contains $t$ sets that are pierced by a line.

Let $\mathbb{F}$ be a field, and consider the hypercube $\{ 0, 1 \}^{n}$ in $\mathbb{F}^{n}$. Sziklai and Weiner (Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 2022) showed that if a polynomial $P ( X_{1}, \dots, X_{n} ) \in \mathbb{F}[ X_{1}, \dots, X_{n}]$ vanishes on every point of the hypercube $\{0,1\}^{n}$ except those with at most $r$ many ones then the degree of the polynomial will be at least $n-r$. This is a generalization of Alon and Füredi's fundamental result (European Journal of Combinatorics 1993) about polynomials vanishing on every point of the hypercube except at the origin (point with all zero coordinates). Sziklai and Weiner proved their interesting result using Möbius inversion formula and the Zeilberger method for proving binomial equalities. In this short note, we show that a stronger version of Sziklai and Weiner's result can be derived directly from Alon and Füredi's result.

Given a drawing $D$ of a graph $G$, we define the crossing number between any two cycles $C_{1}$ and $C_{2}$ in $D$ to be the number of crossings that involve at least one edge from each of $C_1$ and $C_2$ except the crossings between edges that are common to both cycles. We show that if the crossing number between every two cycles in $G$ is even in a drawing of $G$ on the plane, then there is a planar drawing of $G$. This result can be extended to arbitrary surfaces. We also establish an equivalence between our result and a fundamental result due to Cairns-Nikolayevsky and Pelsmajer-Schaefer-Štefankovič, about drawing graphs on surfaces, and derive the Loebl-Masbaum theorem from it.

We provide a geometric proof of the $(\aleph_{0}, d+1)$-theorem for piercing compact connected sets by hyperplanes. Our argument uses only elementary properties of convex sets and clarifies the core geometric structure behind the theorem.

In this short note, we provide the necessary and sufficient condition for an infinite collection of axis-parallel boxes in $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ to be pierceable by finitely many axis-parallel $k$-flats, where $0 \leq k < d$. We also consider colorful generalizations of the above result and establish their feasibility. The problem considered in this paper is an infinite variant of the Hadwiger-Debrunner $(p, q)$-problem.

We prove a no-dimensional Helly theorem for affine spaces and convex sets using the unboundedness framework of Aronov, Goodman, and Pollack (Computational Geometry, 2002). This generalizes the fundamental result of Adiprasito, Bárány, Mustafa, and Terpai on the no-dimensional Helly theorem for points and convex sets (Discrete & Computational Geometry, 2020). Additionally, we establish the optimality of our result.

Alon and Füredi (European J. Combin. 1993) gave a tight bound for the following hyperplane covering problem: find the minimum number of hyperplanes required to cover all points of the n-dimensional hypercube {0,1}^n except the origin. Their proof is among the early instances of the polynomial method, which considers a natural polynomial (a product of linear factors) associated to the hyperplane arrangement, and gives a lower bound on its degree, whilst being oblivious to the (product) structure of the polynomial. Thus, their proof gives a lower bound for a weaker polynomial covering problem, and it turns out that this bound is tight for the stronger hyperplane covering problem. In a similar vein, solutions to some other hyperplane covering problems were obtained, via solutions of corresponding weaker polynomial covering problems, in some special cases in the works of the fourth author (Electron. J. Combin. 2022), and the first three authors (Discrete Math. 2023). In this work, we build on these and solve a hyperplane covering problem for general symmetric sets of the hypercube, where we consider hyperplane covers with higher multiplicities. We see that even in this generality, it is enough to solve the corresponding polynomial covering problem. Further, this seems to be the limit of this approach as far as covering symmetry preserving subsets of the hypercube is concerned. We gather evidence for this by considering the class of blockwise symmetric sets of the hypercube (which is a strictly larger class than symmetric sets), and note that the same proof technique seems to only solve the polynomial covering problem.

We prove an infinite $(p,q)$-theorem for piercing fat compact convex sets in $\RR^d$ with $k$-flats. Additionally, we develop a new framework through which infinite $(p,q)$-theorems concerning compact sets and $k$-flats can be extended to their 'colorful' variants. Further, we show that the existence of an infinite $(p,q)$-theorem does not necessarily imply the existence of the corresponding finite $(p,q)$-theorem.

We prove a colorful extension of a Helly-type theorem by Danzer and Grünbaum (Combinatorica, 1982) concerning two-piercing families of axis-parallel boxes in $\mathbb{R}^d$. We also show that our result is tight by constructing extremal families that achieve the bound. Related work includes a graph-theoretic proof of the original theorem by Pendavingh, Puite, and Woeginger (Discrete Applied Mathematics, 2008), and a two-piercing result for lower-dimensional boxes by Baños and Oliveros (Acta Mathematica Hungarica, 2018).

Given a hypercube $\mathcal{Q}^{n} := \{0,1\}^{n}$ in $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ and $k \in \{0, \dots, n\}$, the $k$-th layer $\mathcal{Q}^{n}_{k}$ of $\mathcal{Q}^{n}$ denotes the set of all points in $\mathcal{Q}^{n}$ whose coordinates contain exactly $k$ many ones. For a fixed $t \in \mathbb{N}$ and $k \in \{0, \dots, n\}$, let $P \in \mathbb{R}\left[x_{1}, \dots, x_{n}\right]$ be a polynomial that has zeroes of multiplicity at least $t$ at all points of $\mathcal{Q}^{n} \setminus \mathcal{Q}^{n}_{k}$, and $P$ has zeros of multiplicity exactly $t-1$ at all points of $\mathcal{Q}^{n}_{k}$. In this short note, we show that $$deg(P) \geq \max\left\{ k, n-k\right\}+2t-2.$$Matching the above lower bound we give an explicit construction of a family of hyperplanes $H_{1}, \dots, H_{m}$ in $\mathbb{R}^{n}$, where $m = \max\left\{ k, n-k\right\}+2t-2$, such that every point of $\mathcal{Q}^{n}_{k}$ will be covered exactly $t-1$ times, and every other point of $\mathcal{Q}^{n}$ will be covered at least $t$ times. Note that putting $k = 0$ and $t=1$, we recover the much celebrated covering result of Alon and Füredi (European Journal of Combinatorics, 1993). Using the above family of hyperplanes we disprove a conjecture of Venkitesh (The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 2022) on exactly covering symmetric subsets of hypercube $\mathcal{Q}^{n}$ with hyperplanes. To prove the above results we have introduced a new measure of complexity of a subset of the hypercube called index complexity which we believe will be of independent interest. We also study a new interesting variant of the restricted sumset problem motivated by the ideas behind the proof of the above result.

The study of parameterized streaming complexity on graph problems was initiated by Fafianie et al. (MFCS'14) and Chitnis et al. (SODA'15 and SODA'16). Simply put, the main goal is to design streaming algorithms for parameterized problems such that $O\left(f(k)\log^{O(1)}n\right)$ space is enough, where $f$ is an arbitrary computable function depending only on the parameter $k$. However, in the past few years, very few positive results have been established. Most of the graph problems that do have streaming algorithms of the above nature are ones where localized checking is required, like Vertex Cover or Maximum Matching parameterized by the size $k$ of the solution we are seeking. Many important parameterized problems that form the backbone of traditional parameterized complexity are known to require $Ω(n)$ bits for any streaming algorithm; e.g., Feedback Vertex Set, Even/Odd Cycle Transversal, Triangle Deletion or the more general ${\cal F}$-Subgraph Deletion when parameterized by solution size $k$. Our main conceptual contribution is to overcome the obstacles to efficient parameterized streaming algorithms by utilizing the power of parameterization. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work in parameterized streaming complexity that considers structural parameters instead of the solution size as a parameter. We focus on the vertex cover size $K$ as the parameter for the parameterized graph deletion problems we consider. At the same time, most of the previous work in parameterized streaming complexity was restricted to the EA (edge arrival) or DEA (dynamic edge arrival) models. In this work, we consider the above mentioned graph deletion problems in the four most well-studied streaming models, i.e., the EA, DEA, VA (vertex arrival) and AL (adjacency list) models.

We prove a size-sensitive version of Haussler's Packing lemma~\cite{Haussler92spherepacking} for set-systems with bounded primal shatter dimension, which have an additional {\em size-sensitive property}. This answers a question asked by Ezra~\cite{Ezra-sizesendisc-soda-14}. We also partially address another point raised by Ezra regarding overcounting of sets in her chaining procedure. As a consequence of these improvements, we get an improvement on the size-sensitive discrepancy bounds for set systems with the above property. Improved bounds on the discrepancy for these special set systems also imply an improvement in the sizes of {\em relative $(\varepsilon, δ)$-approximations} and $(ν, α)$-samples.

A subset $D \subseteq V $of a graph $G = (V, E)$ is a $(1, j)$-set if every vertex $v \in V \setminus D$ is adjacent to at least $1$ but not more than $j$ vertices in D. The cardinality of a minimum $(1, j)$-set of $G$, denoted as $γ_{(1,j)} (G)$, is called the $(1, j)$-domination number of $G$. Given a graph $G = (V, E)$ and an integer $k$, the decision version of the $(1, j)$-set problem is to decide whether $G$ has a $(1, j)$-set of cardinality at most $k$. In this paper, we first obtain an upper bound on $γ_{(1,j)} (G)$ using probabilistic methods, for bounded minimum and maximum degree graphs. Our bound is constructive, by the randomized algorithm of Moser and Tardos [MT10], We also show that the $(1, j)$- set problem is NP-complete for chordal graphs. Finally, we design two algorithms for finding $γ_{(1,j)} (G)$ of a tree and a split graph, for any fixed $j$, which answers an open question posed in [CHHM13].