arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a positive integer $n$, put $A_d=\{id:1\le i\le\lfloor n/d\rfloor\}$ for $1\le d\le n$ and $B_d=\{id:1\le i\le n\}$ for $d\in\mathbb{N}$. For $D\subseteq\{1,\ldots,n\}$, let $m_D(n)$ be the minimum length of an integer interval containing pairwise disjoint shifted copies of $A_d$ for all $d\in D$. For a finite set $E\subseteq\mathbb{N}$, define $M_E(n)$ analogously using $B_e$, $e\in E$. Let $\mathcal{P}(x)=\{p\le x:p\text{ is prime}\}$. We prove $m_{\mathcal{P}(\sqrt n)}(n)=\left(\frac43+o(1)\right)\frac{n^{3/2}}{\ln n}$ and $M_{\mathcal{P}(n)}(n)=\left(\frac16+o(1)\right)\frac{n^3}{\ln n}$ as $n\to\infty$. These asymptotic formulas attain the known lower bounds and settle two conjectures of Alon, Dębski, Grytczuk and Przybyło concerning prime differences. The proof combines a cyclic phase-selection principle with lattice covering estimates and a decomposition into regular blocks of primes.

Let $F$ be a function field over an algebraically closed field $K$ and $S$ a finite dimensional $K$-subspace of $F$. The square of $S$ is spanned by all products of pairs of elements in $S$. We conjecture that if $\dim S^2 \leq 3 \dim S - 4$, then $S^2$ must contain a Riemann--Roch space of dimension at least $2 \dim S - 1 + g$, where $g$ is the genus of $F$. This generalizes a theorem of Freiman from additive combinatorics, stating that small sumsets must contain long arithmetic progressions. We prove our conjecture in the case that $S$ is contained in a Riemann--Roch space of dimension at most $3/2\dim S + 1$. For the proof we study the annihilator of $S$ and introduce the notion of weight for linear forms.

Let $P=\{0,a,b\}$, where $0<a<b$ and $\gcd(a,b)=1$. For a finite set $A\subset\mathbb Z$, let $M_P^+(A)$ count the copies $x,x+ad,x+bd\in A$ with $d>0$, and let $M_P(A)$ count the copies with any $d\ne0$. We prove that every such three-point pattern other than the arithmetic progression $\{0,1,2\}$ satisfies \[ M_P^+(A)\le \frac{99}{400}|A|^2+O(|A|), \qquad M_P(A)\le \frac{13}{28}|A|^2+O_P(|A|). \] For the particular pattern $P=\{0,1,3\}$ -- the subject of a question raised by Ganguly and recorded as Problem 24 in Green's list of open problems -- we sharpen the bound allowing both signs of the dilation to \[ M_{\{0,1,3\}}(A)\le \frac{47}{122}|A|^2+O(|A|). \]

The van der Waerden number $w(k)$ is the smallest positive integer $N$ such that every two-coloring of $\{1,2,\ldots,N\}$ contains a monochromatic $k$-term arithmetic progression. We prove that $w(k) \geq (1-o(1))k2^{k-1}$ holds for all positive integers $k$. This verifies a conjecture of Erdős. In 1968, Berlekamp proved the same result when $k-1$ is prime. The coloring for general $k$ can be viewed as a product of Berlekamp's colorings for various primes. It was found by ChatGPT 5.6 Sol Pro.

Write $μ_t$ for all $t$-th roots of unity and $z^{\pm1}$ for $r$ free reciprocal pairs. We study $Φ_{t,r}(β)=s_λ(μ_t,z^{\pm1})$, $β=λ+δ$, and the question the companion paper left open after $r=1$: when does it vanish? We factor the evaluation into classical branching followed by a torsion filter, and the shape depends on the parity of $t$: the point lies in the orthogonal group with determinant $(-1)^{t+1}$. For odd $t$ it sits in the identity component: an ordinary restriction $SO_{2R'+1}\downarrow SO_{2m'+1}\times SO_{2r}$, the filter an odd orthogonal character at a principal element of order $h+1$. For even $t$ in the other: a twining, a virtual expansion, and a torsion element regular but not principal; there we prove the filter, with its sign. One description covers both: the filter is nonzero exactly when the shifted torsion point is regular semisimple in the group. Both are minimal-level fusion projections: the even of type $C$, the tensor sector of the odd of type $B$. Affine folding accounts for the values $0,\pm1$; what it does not survives as conjectures. The highest surviving weight is the dominant vertex of the numerator's Newton polytope minus the denominator's, the latter proved here, the former conditional on a single-orbit property; and the class there --- virtual for even $t$, a genuine multiplicity space for odd --- is conjecturally primitive, $\pm$ the generator of the rank-one quotient. For odd $t$ and one $Λ$ that numerator is a signed transversal count in $\{0,\pm1\}$ by the equal-rank character formula, leaving one division. We invert it in closed form, as a sum along an arithmetic progression of step $2t$; the quotient is $\pmε_t\det M$ for an explicit $0/{\pm}1$ matrix, so total unimodularity of $M$ would settle it. Two extremal statements remain. Everything unproved here is measured, in both parities.

For $X\in\{\mathbb{N},\mathbb{Z}\}$, let $α_X(\ell)$ and $β_X(\ell)$ denote the supremal upper and lower densities of subsets of $X$ admitting $ω$-permutations without monotone $\ell$-term arithmetic progressions. We strengthen the published lower bounds for the three-term upper-density parameters by proving \[ α_{\mathbb{N}}(3)\geq\frac23,\qquad α_{\mathbb{Z}}(3)\geq\frac23. \] We also prove $β_{\mathbb{Z}}(4)=1$ by constructing four-permutable subsets of the integers whose lower symmetric densities approach one.

An \emph{$n$-divisor set} is a finite set of positive integers containing a multiple of every integer from $1$ through $n$. Umans and Wang proposed, as the arithmetic-progression version of their Strong $(α,β)$-Divisor Conjecture, an $n$-divisor arithmetic progression having at most $n^{2β}$ terms, each of magnitude at most $\exp(n^α)$. We prove unconditionally that an $n$-divisor arithmetic progression of height $H$ with $\log H=o(\sqrt n)$ must have length \[ L\ge \left(\sqrt{\frac{8}{27}}-o(1)\right) \frac{n^{3/4}}{\sqrt{\log n}}. \] Consequently, the arithmetic-progression version is false whenever $α<1/2$ and $β<3/8$. In particular, it is false at the proposed point $(α,β)=(1/3,1/3)$, even if both bounds are relaxed by $n^{o(1)}$ at the exponent level. The proof uses primes in a fixed band below $\sqrt n$ to turn semiprime divisibility into a finite incidence structure. An elementary bounded-degree linear-space estimate then gives the result. This theorem concerns the one-dimensional arithmetic-progression version only; it does not disprove the higher-rank Strong Divisor Conjecture.

For a positive integer n, let M_n be the set of distinct values of n!/(p_1! ... p_t!), where (p_1,...,p_t) ranges over the integer partitions of n. We study the maximum cardinality s(n) of a Sidon subset of M_n. The sets M_n satisfy a product embedding that yields the elementary lifting inequality s(n) >= s(r) + n - r. By combining a one-third extraction lemma for strongly Sidon subsets with general results on Sidon subsets and unrestricted prime partitions, we prove liminf_{n -> infinity} log(s(n)/n) log log n / sqrt(log n) >= pi/sqrt(3). In particular, s(n) = Omega(n log n). In the opposite direction, we construct many pairwise disjoint arithmetic progressions in M_n. Let M(n)=|M_n|. Then liminf_{n -> infinity} (M(n)-s(n))/(n^(3/2) sqrt(log n)) >= 2/(3 sqrt(3)). We also report exact values of s(n) for 1 <= n <= 16, obtained by an exhaustive SAT computation. The complete Maple source code, console output for n=14,15,16, and a description of the encoding are supplied as supplementary material.

Let $q=p^f$, and let $A\leq\mathbb{F}_q^\times$ be a multiplicative subgroup with $\mathbb{F}_p(A)=\mathbb{F}_q$. We prove that a proper subgroup $A$ is a generalized arithmetic progression (GAP) if and only if $|A| \in \{1, 2, 4\}$, and we determine when the full group $\mathbb{F}_q^\times$ is a GAP. For certain families of subgroups, we obtain the stronger conclusion that $A$ is additively irreducible. In particular, if $|A|>4$ and $p^e\equiv-1\pmod{|A|}$ for some $e\ge1$, then $A$ admits no nontrivial sumset decomposition. We also prove that every $c \neq 0$ has fewer than $|A|/2$ representations as a sum (or difference) of two elements of $A$ whenever $[\mathbb{F}_q^\times:A] \ge3$ and $|A| \ge 5$, which may be of independent interest.

Let $t(N)$ be the largest $t$ for which there exist distinct sets $A_1,\dots,A_t \subseteq \{1,\dots,N\}$ such that $A_i \cap A_j$ is a nonempty arithmetic progression for all $i \neq j$ (Erdos Problem #272). Simonovits and Sos proved $t(N)=O(N^2)$ and conjectured $\binom{N}{2}+1$ is best possible; Szabo disproved this by a construction giving $t(N) \geq \binom{N}{2}+1+\lfloor(N-1)/4\rfloor$, proved the asymptotics $t(N)=N^2/2+O(N^{5/3}(\log N)^3)$, and asked whether $t(N)=\binom{N}{2}+O(N)$ and whether some element lies in all sets of any extremal family (the kernel question). We determine $t(N)$ exactly for all $3 \leq N \leq 12$ by exhaustive computation: in this entire range Szabo's lower bound is exact, and we conjecture that $t(N)=\binom{N}{2}+1+\lfloor(N-1)/4\rfloor$ for every $N$. Towards the matching upper bound we prove, for every $N$, that Szabo's bound is the exact maximum over all families with a common element (starred families). The proof combines a self-contained ``defect-one'' counting inequality for staircase regions with a new structural theorem: every non-progression member of such a family contains a bad pair that no other member can share. Consequently the sharpened conjecture reduces to a single remaining statement, namely Szabo's kernel conjecture that some element lies in all sets of an extremal family, and we prove first structural constraints on putative non-starred extremal families.

Given a numerical semigroup $S$ and a positive integer $p$, the quotient $\frac{S}{p}=\{n\in \mathbb{N} \mid pn\in S\}$ also forms a numerical semigroup. When $S=\langle a,b\rangle$ with $\gcd(a,b)=1$, a well-known open problem is to find a closed-form formula for the Frobenius number $g\!\left(\frac{\langle a,b\rangle}{p}\right)$, which remains open even in the special case $b=a+1$. Inspired by Curtis's theorem on the non-existence of polynomial formulas for the Frobenius number $g(\langle s_1,s_2,s_3\rangle)$, we provide a negative answer to this open problem in a certain sense. Concretely, we obtain the following three main results. (i): The Frobenius number $g\!\left(\frac{\langle a,b\rangle}{p}\right)$ cannot be represented, uniformly in $a,b,p$, by any finite collection of polynomial (or rational) formulas. (ii): For each fixed $p$, the function $a\mapsto g\!\left(\frac{\langle a,a+1\rangle}{p}\right)$ is a quadratic quasi-polynomial with period dividing $p$. (iii): There is no nonzero polynomial $F\in \mathbb{C}[X_1,X_2,X_3]$ satisfying $F\left(a,p,g\!\left(\frac{\langle a,a+1\rangle}{p}\right)\right)=0$ for all primes $a,p$ with $2<p<a$; the same conclusion already holds if only $p$ is required to be prime and $a$ ranges over all integers greater than $p$. While (iii) is stronger than (i), the proofs of the two results reveal different insights. Dirichlet's theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions plays a crucial role in our arguments.

Consider the tree obtained by attaching a leaf to the third vertex of a path with n-1 vertices. In this note, we prove that the characteristic polynomial of this tree is irreducible when n belongs to certain arithmetic progressions modulo 30. As a result there are infinitely many pairwise non-isomorphic trees with an irreducible the characteristic polynomial. Our proof combines several number-theoretic arguments with a result of Gross, Hironaka, and McMullen [GHM09] concerning the cyclotomic factors of the Coxeter polynomials associated with the diagrams En. This resolves affirmatively a conjecture of Akbari, Kumar, Mohar and Pragada.

A restricted-budget version of the random graph process, introduced by Frieze, Krivelevich, and Michaeli in 2025, studies the construction of structures by an online player who can purchase only a limited number of random edges. In this paper, we transfer this framework from random graphs to random subsets of integers, focusing on the construction of $k$-term arithmetic progressions. A player, Builder, is presented with a sequence of $t$ integers drawn uniformly at random from $[n]$. As the elements are revealed one by one, Builder must immediately and irrevocably decide whether to select the current integer, subject to a maximum budget of $b$ selected elements in total. We establish the optimal thresholds for this process, proving that for $t = ω(n^{1-2/k})$, a budget of $b = Θ((n/t)^{\frac{k-2}{2}})$ is both necessary and sufficient for Builder to successfully construct a $k$-term arithmetic progression with high probability.

Given a coloring $c$ and an even $k\ge 4$, a nontrivial $k$-term arithmetic progression~($k$-AP) $a,a+d,\ldots,a+(k-1)d$ is called symmetrically colored if $c(a+(i-1)d)=c(a+(k-i)d)$, $\forall i\in[k/2]$. Deng, Tidor, and Zhao asked whether $[N]$ admits a coloring with $N^{o(1)}$ colors and no such 4-APs, and gave an $O(N^{\log_{22}3})$-coloring of $[N]$. We give an $O_k(p)$-coloring of $\mathbb Z/p^{k^2/4}\mathbb Z$ without such $k$-APs for every even $k\ge 4$ and every prime $p>k$, and hence an $O(N^{4/k^2})$-coloring of $[N]$, improving the exponent in the upper bound for $4$-APs from $\log_{22}3$ to $1/4$. The construction combines a carry-control coloring of base-$p$ digits with a layered field norm mapping. Together with Behrend-style product colorings, our result for $4$-APs gives $h(N)\leq N^{1/4+o(1)}$ in Erdős's Problem~160 on coloring every nontrivial 4-AP with at least three colors. This result also yields $ρ_4(α)=O_\varepsilon(α^{5-\varepsilon})$ for every $\varepsilon>0$, improving the bound toward Ruzsa's question. Our result for $k$-APs disproves Gowers' conjectured lower bound for all even $k\ge6$ for the first time.

Cameron and Erdős asked if the number of sets free of arithmetic progressions of length $k$ is $2^{r_k(n)(1+o(1))}$, where $r_k(n)$ is the maximum cardinality of a $k$-AP-free subset of $\{1, \dots, n\}$. Balogh, Liu and Sharifzadeh made significant progress on this question showing that it is $2^{O(r_k(n))}$ for an infinite sequence of $n$. We improve their result in two ways. On the one hand, we prove that, for $k\geq 5$, the number of $k$-AP-free sets in $[n]$ is $2^{r_k(n)(1+o(1))}$ for an infinite sequence of $n$, solving the question of Cameron and Erdős for infinitely many values. On the other hand, we also prove that for $k \geq 3$ and all $n$ the number of $k$-AP-free sets in $[n]$ is $2^{O(r_k(n))}$. These results are in fact special cases of a general framework that we develop to count families of sets excluding certain arithmetic patterns, which applies as long as the corresponding extremal threshold satisfies certain Behrend-type lower bounds. As further examples, we get analogous results for solution sets to almost all systems of linear equations as well as counting versions of the multidimensional Szemerédi theorem.

Let $T_k$ be the minimum positive integer $t$ such that, for every positive integer $n$, every equinumerous $t$-coloring of $[tn]$ contains a rainbow $k$-term arithmetic progression. Jungić, Licht, Mahdian, Nešetřil and Radoičić conjectured that $T_k=Θ(k^2)$, while Conlon, Fox and Sudakov proved that $T_k=O(k^2\log k)$. We prove the matching lower bound $T_k=Ω(k^2\log k)$, and hence $T_k=Θ(k^2\log k)$.

Green's popular difference theorem says that for every \(\varepsilon>0\), all sufficiently large primes \(p\), and every set \(A\subseteq\mathbb F_p\) of density \(α\), there exists a nonzero \(d\in\mathbb F_p\) such that \[ \mathbb E_{x\in\mathbb F_p} 1_A(x)1_A(x+d)1_A(x+2d) \geq α^3-\varepsilon. \] We show that a stronger simultaneous popular difference phenomenon holds for polynomial configurations. Namely, if $\mathcal P=\{P_1,\dots,P_k\} \subset \mathbb Z[t]$ is a fixed collection of linearly independent polynomials with zero constant terms, we show that for every \(\varepsilon>0\), all sufficiently large primes \(p\), and every set \(A\subseteq\mathbb F_p\) of density \(α\), there exists a nonzero \(d\in\mathbb F_p\) such that \[ \mathbb E_{x\in\mathbb F_p} 1_A(x) \prod_{i=1}^k 1_A\bigl(x+P_i(d)\bigr)^{ω_i} \geq α^{1+\sum_iω_i}-\varepsilon \] simultaneously for every \(ω=(ω_1,\dots,ω_k)\in\{0,1\}^k\). We also show that such simultaneous popular difference phenomena have sharp limitations by proving that for every sufficiently large prime \(p\), there is a constant \(c>0\) such that, for all sufficiently large \(n\), one can find a set \(A\subseteq\mathbb F_p^n\) of density \(1/2+o_n(1)\) satisfying \[ \max_{d\neq 0} \min\left\{ \mathbb E_{x\in\mathbb F_p^n} 1_A(x)1_A(x+d)1_A(x+2d), \mathbb E_{x\in\mathbb F_p^n} 1_A(x)1_A(x+2d)1_A(x+4d) \right\} \leq \frac18-c. \] That is, the strengthening of Green's result, in this case over $\mathbb F_p^n$ for $p$ fixed and $n$ tending to infinity, requiring that both \(d\) and \(2d\) are simultaneously popular differences for three-term arithmetic progressions is false.

Fix a positive integer $n$, and put $B_d=\{d,2d,\ldots,nd\}$. Let $M_k(n)$ be the least integer $m$ for which one translate of each of $B_1,\ldots,B_k$ can be placed pairwise disjointly in $[m]$. We prove that, for every $\eps\in(0,1)$ and all sufficiently large $k$, one has $M_k(n)\le n\lceil(1+\eps)k\rceil$. Since the trivial counting bound gives $M_k(n)\ge nk$, it follows that $M_k(n)=(1+o(1))nk$ for every fixed $n$. This confirms a conjecture of Alon, Dębski, Grytczuk and Przybyło on prescribed-difference packings of fixed-cardinality arithmetic progressions.

A classical extremal problem on progression free sets is to determine the maximum size of a $3$-term arithmetic progression free set in algebraic structures, for instance in intervals of integers or in finite vector spaces. To determine the minimum size of a complete $3$-term arithmetic progression free set is a lower-end analogue of this problem. It is also closely related to complete caps and saturating sets in finite geometry. A simple counting argument shows that the order of magnitude of the minimum size is at least the square root of the cardinality of the structure. Addressing two open problems, we show that this lower bound is essentially tight. First, for every cyclic group $\mathbb{Z}_m$, we give explicit constructions of complete $3$-AP-free sets whose size is less than $2\sqrt m$. For $m\ge81$ the constructed sets satisfy the stronger, so-called complete $(2,-1)$-avoiding property; the remaining cases $m<81$ are covered by a finite verification. Second, we resolve the vector space variant in a weaker sense by showing that for every fixed odd prime $p$ and $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant $C_{p, \varepsilon}$ such that \[ a(3\text{-}\mathrm{AP},\mathbb{F}_p^n)\le C_{p, \varepsilon}\,n^{1+\varepsilon}\,p^{n/2} =p^{n/2+o(n)} \] holds for the minimum size $a(3\text{-}\mathrm{AP},\mathbb{F}_p^n)$ of a complete 3-AP-free subset of $\mathbb{F}_p^n$, for all $n\ge1$.

For a finite set $A$ of positive integers, let $H(A)$ be its set of subset sums, including the empty sum, and let $g_k(n)$ be the least $N$ for which some $n$-element set $A\subseteq[N]$ has $H(A)$ free of nonconstant $k$-term arithmetic progressions. The problem of determining $g_k(n)$ was posed by Erdős and Sárkőzy. In the three-term case, we prove a lower bound equal to the exact bandwidth of the ternary grid. If $T_m=[x^m](1+x+x^2)^m$ is the central trinomial coefficient, then \[ g_3(n)\ge \frac{T_n-1}{2}+\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}T_j =\left(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2\sqrtπ}+o(1)\right)\frac{3^n}{\sqrt{n}}. \] For general $k \ge 4$ we show \[ g_k(n)\gg_k \left(\frac{k-1}{k-2}\right)^n n^{-\log_2((k-1)/(k-2))} \] In the opposite direction, a carry-free digit construction based on nearly-regular graphs gives \[ \limsup_{n\to\infty}g_k(n)^{1/n} \le \min_{p\ \mathrm{prime},\ p\ge3}p^{2/(\min\{p,k\}-1)}. \] Consequently, as $k\to\infty$, the logarithm of the lower exponential rate is at least $(1+o(1))/k$, while the logarithm of the upper exponential rate is at most $(2+o(1))\log k/k$.