arXiv++ Combinatorics

An additive coloring assigns positive integer labels to the vertices of a graph so that adjacent vertices have different sums of their neighbors' labels. The additive chromatic number $η(G)$ is the least $k$ for which labels from $[k]$ suffice. We give an elementary orientation argument proving that every finite simple graph $G$ satisfies $η(G) \leq Δ(G) + 1$. This argument yields a $(Δ(G) + 1)$-additive-coloring in polynomial time and improves upon the current best bound of $η(G) \leq Δ(G)^{2} - Δ(G) + 1$, valid for $Δ(G) \geq 2$, from Akbari, Ghanbari, Manaviyat, and Zare.

We investigate two recently introduced graph parameters, both of which measure the complexity of the tree decompositions of a given graph. Recall that the treewidth ${\rm tw}(G)$ of a graph $G$ measures the largest number of vertices required in a bag of every tree decomposition of $G$. Similarly, the tree-independence number ${\rm tree\textnormal{-}}α(G)$ and the tree-chromatic number ${\rm tree\textnormal{-}}χ(G)$ measure the largest independence number, respectively the largest chromatic number, required in a bag of every tree decomposition of $G$. Recently, Dallard, Milanič, and Štorgel asked (JCTB, 2024) whether for all graphs $G$ it holds that ${\rm tw}(G)+1 \leq {\rm tree\textnormal{-}}α(G) \cdot {\rm tree\textnormal{-}}χ(G)$. We provide a negative answer for this question in a strong form: for every function $f\colon {\mathbb N} \rightarrow {\mathbb N}$, there exists a graph $G$ such that ${\rm tw}(G) > {\rm tree\textnormal{-}}α(G) \cdot f({\rm tree\textnormal{-}}χ(G))$. On the other hand, we complement this result with an upper bound, by showing that ${\rm tw}(G)+1 \leq {\rm tree\textnormal{-}}α(G)^2 \cdot {\rm tree\textnormal{-}}χ(G)$ for every graph $G$.