arXiv++ Combinatorics

A proper conflict-free (PCF) $k$-coloring of a graph $G$ is a proper $k$-coloring such that there exists a color that appears exactly once in the neighborhood of every non-isolated vertex $v\in V(G)$. The PCF chromatic number, denoted by $χ_{pcf}(G)$, is the least integer $k$ such that there exists a PCF $k$-coloring of $G$. Given a graph $G$ and a positive integer $k$, PCF $k$-COLORABILITY is to decide whether $G$ admits a PCF $k$-coloring. Ahn et al. [Discrete Appl. Math. 377 (2025) 10-17] proved that PCF $k$-COLORABILITY is NP-complete for bipartite graphs. We strengthen this result by proving that PCF $k$-COLORABILITY is NP-complete for perfect elimination bipartite graphs, which is a proper subclass of bipartite graphs. We also show that the PCF chromatic number of a graph cannot be approximated within $O(n^{1-\varepsilon})$ unless P=NP, for any $\varepsilon>0$. On the positive side, we provide linear-time algorithms for PCF $k$-COLORABILITY in block graphs, proper interval graphs, chain graphs, and pseudo-split graphs. We show that $χ_{pcf}(G)\leq ω(G)+1$ for block graphs, proper interval graphs, and pseudo-split graphs (except $C_5$), and we characterize all graphs for which the equality holds.

For a graph $G$, let $Δ(G)$, $ω(G)$, and $χ(G)$ denote the maximum degree, clique number, and chromatic number of $G$, respectively. Let $P_n$ and $C_n$ denote the chordless path and chordless cycle on $n$ vertices, respectively. In this paper, we prove that every $(P_6,C_4)$-free graph $G$ with $Δ(G)\ge 9$ and $ω(G)<Δ(G)$ is $(Δ(G)-1)$-colorable.

A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $D \subseteq V(G)$ such that every vertex in $V(G) \setminus D$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $D$. A set $L\subseteq V(G)$ is a locating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V(G) \setminus L$ has pairwise distinct open neighborhoods in $L$. A set $D\subseteq V(G)$ is a locating-dominating set of $G$ if $D$ is a dominating set and a locating set of $G$. The location-domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ_{LD}(G)$, is the minimum cardinality among all locating-dominating sets of $G$. A well-known conjecture in the study of locating-dominating sets is that if $G$ is an isolate-free and twin-free graph of order $n$, then $γ_{LD}(G)\le \frac{n}{2}$. Recently, Bousquet et al. [Discrete Math. 348 (2025), 114297] proved that if $G$ is an isolate-free and twin-free graph of order $n$, then $γ_{LD}(G)\le \lceil\frac{5n}{8}\rceil$ and posed the question whether the vertex set of such a graph can be partitioned into two locating sets. We answer this question affirmatively for twin-free distance-hereditary graphs, maximal outerplanar graphs, split graphs, and co-bipartite graphs. In fact, we prove a stronger result that for any graph $G$ without isolated vertices and twin vertices, if $G$ is a distance-hereditary graph or a maximal outerplanar graph or a split graph or a co-bipartite graph, then the vertex set of $G$ can be partitioned into two locating-dominating sets. Consequently, this also confirms the original conjecture for these graph classes.

The game of cops and robber is a two-player turn-based game played on a graph where the cops try to capture the robber. The cop number of a graph $G$, denoted by $c(G)$ is the minimum number of cops required to capture the robber. For a given class of graphs ${\cal F}$, let $c({\cal F}):=\sup\{c(F)|F\in {\cal F}\}$, and let Forb$({\cal F})$ denote the class of ${\cal F}$-free graphs. We show that the complement of the Shrikhande graph is $(4K_1,C_{\ell}$)-free for any $\ell \geq 6$ and has the cop number~$3$. This provides a counterexample for the conjecture proposed by Sivaraman (arxiv, 2019) which states that if $G$ is $C_{\ell}$-free for all $\ell\ge 6$, then $c(G)\le 2$. This also gives a negative answer to the question posed by Turcotte (Discrete Math. 345:112660 (2022)) 112660. to check whether $c($Forb$(pK_1))=p-2$. Turcotte also posed the question to check whether $c($Forb$(pK_1+K_2))\leq p+1$, for $p\geq 3$. We prove that this result indeed holds. We also generalize this result for Forb$(pK_1+qK_2)$. Motivated by the results of Baird et al. (Contrib. Discrete Math. 9:70--84 (2014)) and Turcotte and Yvon (Discrete Appl. Math. 301:74--98 (2021)), we define the upper threshold degree and lower threshold degree for a particular class of graphs and show some computational advantage to find the cop number using these.

A disjunctive dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $D \subseteq V(G)$ such that every vertex in $V(G)\setminus D$ has a neighbor in $D$ or has at least two vertices in $D$ at distance $2$ from it. The disjunctive domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ_2^d(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a disjunctive dominating set of $G$. In this paper, we show that if $G$ is a maximal outerplanar graph of order $n \ge 7$ with $k$ vertices of degree $2$, then $γ_2^d(G)\le \lfloor\frac{2}{9}(n+k)\rfloor$, and this bound is sharp.

A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ such that every vertex in $V(G) \setminus S$ has a neighbor in $S$, where two vertices are neighbors if they are adjacent. A secure dominating set of $G$ is a dominating set $S$ of $G$ with the additional property that for every vertex $v \in V(G) \setminus S$, there exists a neighbor $u$ of $v$ in $S$ such that $(S \setminus \{u\}) \cup \{v\}$ is a dominating set of $G$. The secure domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ_s(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a secure dominating set of $G$. We prove that if $G$ is a $P_5$-free graph, then $γ_s(G) \le \frac{3}{2}α(G)$, where $α(G)$ denotes the independence number of $G$. We further show that if $G$ is a connected $(P_5, H)$-free graph for some $H \in \{ P_3 \cup P_1, K_2 \cup 2K_1, ~\text{paw},~ C_4\}$, then $γ_s(G)\le \max\{3,α(G)\}$. We also show that if $G$ is a $(P_3 \cup P_2)$-free graph, then $γ_s(G)\le α(G)+1$.

Let $G$ be graph with vertex set $V$ and order $n=|V|$. A coalition in $G$ is a combination of two distinct sets, $A\subseteq V$ and $B\subseteq V$, which are disjoint and are not dominating sets of $G$, but $A\cup B$ is a dominating set of $G$. A coalition partition of $G$ is a partition $\mathcal{P}=\{S_1,\ldots,S_k\}$ of its vertex set $V$, where each set $S_i\in \mathcal{P}$ is either a dominating set of $G$ with only one vertex, or it is not a dominating set but forms a coalition with some other set $S_j \in \mathcal{P}$. The coalition number $C(G)$ is the maximum cardinality of a coalition partition of $G$. To represent a coalition partition $\mathcal{P}$ of $G$, a coalition graph $\CG(G, \mathcal{P})$ is created, where each vertex of the graph corresponds to a member of $\mathcal{P}$ and two vertices are adjacent if and only if their corresponding sets form a coalition in $G$. A coalition partition $\mathcal{P}$ of $G$ is a singleton coalition partition if every set in $\mathcal{P}$ consists of a single vertex. If a graph $G$ has a singleton coalition partition, then $G$ is referred to as a singleton-partition graph. A graph $H$ is called a singleton coalition graph of a graph $G$ if there exists a singleton coalition partition $\mathcal{P}$ of $G$ such that the coalition graph $\CG(G,\mathcal{P})$ is isomorphic to $H$. A singleton coalition graph chain with an initial graph $G_1$ is defined as the sequence $G_1\rightarrow G_2\rightarrow G_3\rightarrow\cdots$ where all graphs $G_i$ are singleton-partition graphs, and $\CG(G_i,Γ_1)=G_{i+1}$, where $Γ_1$ represents a singleton coalition partition of $G_i$. In this paper, we address two open problems posed by Haynes et al. We characterize all graphs $G$ of order $n$ and minimum degree $δ(G)=2$ such that $C(G)=n$ and investigate the singleton coalition graph chain starting with graphs $G$ where $δ(G)\le 2$.

A list assignment $L$ of a graph $G$ is a function that assigns to every vertex $v$ of $G$ a set $L(v)$ of colors. A proper coloring $α$ of $G$ is called an $L$-coloring of $G$ if $α(v)\in L(v)$ for every $v\in V(G)$. For a list assignment $L$ of $G$, the $L$-recoloring graph $\mathcal{G}(G,L)$ of $G$ is a graph whose vertices correspond to the $L$-colorings of $G$ and two vertices of $\mathcal{G}(G,L)$ are adjacent if their corresponding $L$-colorings differ at exactly one vertex of $G$. A $d$-face in a plane graph is a face of length $d$. Dvořák and Feghali conjectured for a planar graph $G$ and a list assignment $L$ of $G$, that: (i) If $|L(v)|\geq 10$ for every $v\in V(G)$, then the diameter of $\mathcal{G}(G,L)$ is $O(|V(G)|)$. (ii) If $G$ is triangle-free and $|L(v)|\geq 7$ for every $v\in V(G)$, then the diameter of $\mathcal{G}(G,L)$ is $O(|V(G)|)$. In a recent paper, Cranston (European J. Combin. (2022)) has proved (ii). In this paper, we prove the following results. Let $G$ be a plane graph and $L$ be a list assignment of $G$. $\bullet$ If for every $3$-face of $G$, there are at most two $3$-faces adjacent to it and $|L(v)|\geq 10$ for every $v\in V(G)$, then the diameter of $\mathcal{G}(G,L)$ is at most $190|V(G)|$. $\bullet$ If for every $3$-face of $G$, there is at most one $3$-face adjacent to it and $|L(v)|\geq 9$ for every $v\in V(G)$, then the diameter of $\mathcal{G}(G,L)$ is at most $13|V(G)|$. $\bullet$ If the faces adjacent to any $3$-face have length at least $6$ and $|L(v)|\geq 7$ for every $v\in V(G)$, then the diameter of $\mathcal{G}(G,L)$ is at most $242|V(G)|$. This result strengthens the Cranston's result on (ii).

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V$ and of order $n = |V|$, and let $δ(G)$ and $Δ(G)$ be the minimum and maximum degree of $G$, respectively. Two disjoint sets $V_1, V_2 \subseteq V$ form a coalition in $G$ if none of them is a dominating set of $G$ but their union $V_1\cup V_2$ is. A vertex partition $Ψ=\{V_1,\ldots, V_k\}$ of $V$ is a coalition partition of $G$ if every set $V_i\in Ψ$ is either a dominating set of $G$ with the cardinality $|V_i|=1$, or is not a dominating set but for some $V_j\in Ψ$, $V_i$ and $V_j$ form a coalition. The maximum cardinality of a coalition partition of $G$ is the coalition number $\mathcal{C}(G)$ of $G$. Given a coalition partition $Ψ= \{V_1, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$, a coalition graph $\CG(G, Ψ)$ is associated on $Ψ$ such that there is a one-to-one correspondence between its vertices and the members of $Ψ$, where two vertices of $\CG(G, Ψ)$ are adjacent if and only if the corresponding sets form a coalition in $G$. In this paper, we partially solve one of the open problems posed in Haynes et al. \cite{coal0} and we solve two open problems posed by Haynes et al. \cite{coal1}. We characterize all graphs $G$ with $δ(G) \le 1$ and $\mathcal{C}(G)=n$, and we characterize all trees $T$ with $\mathcal{C}(T)=n-1$. We determine the number of coalition graphs that can be defined by all coalition partitions of a given path. Furthermore, we show that there is no universal coalition path, a path whose coalition partitions defines all possible coalition graphs.

The game of cops and robber is a turn based vertex pursuit game played on a connected graph between a team of cops and a single robber. The cops and the robber move alternately along the edges of the graph. We say the team of cops win the game if a cop and the robber are at the same vertex of the graph. The minimum number of cops required to win in each component of a graph is called the cop number of the graph. Sivaraman [Discrete Math. 342(2019), pp. 2306-2307] conjectured that for every $t\geq 5$, the cop number of a connected $P_t$-free graph is at most $t-3$, where $P_t$ denotes a path on $t$~vertices. Turcotte [Discrete Math. 345 (2022), pp. 112660] showed that the cop number of any $2K_2$-free graph is at most $2$, which was earlier conjectured by Sivaraman and Testa. Note that if a connected graph is $2K_2$-free, then it is also $P_5$-free. Liu showed that the cop number of a connected ($P_t$, $H$)-free graph is at most $t-3$, where $H$ is a cycle of length at most $t$ or a claw. So the conjecture of Sivaraman is true for ($P_5$, $H$)-free graphs, where $H$ is a cycle of length at most $5$ or a claw. In this paper, we show that the cop number of a connected ($P_5,H$)-free graph is at most $2$, where $H\in \{C_4$, $C_5$, diamond, paw, $K_4$, $2K_1\cup K_2$, $K_3\cup K_1$, $P_3\cup P_1\}$.