arXiv++ Combinatorics

We resolve the ENO--TV conjecture, a discrete coercivity problem in compactness theory for entropy-stable approximations of hyperbolic conservation laws. For order-$k$ essentially non-oscillatory (ENO) reconstruction from compactly supported cell averages, it asks whether the nonnegative ENO source times the $(k-1)$st power of the amplitude uniformly controls the $(k+1)$st absolute-jump moment. We prove a parity dichotomy: the estimate holds for odd $k\ge3$ and fails for even $k\ge4$; the known second-order case completes the classification. Localization gives a selection-independent finite-difference functional uniformly comparable to the source and reduces the conjecture to discrete interpolation. For odd orders, summation by parts reveals a hidden square; a discrete Gagliardo--Nirenberg inequality yields coercivity. For even orders, Euler-polynomial blocks from the functional's polynomial kernel yield counterexamples that persist under arbitrarily small perturbations making all affected ENO comparisons strict. We also prove two coercive estimates for every $k\ge2$: control of jumps larger than a fixed fraction of the amplitude and of local blocks modulo sampled polynomials of degree at most $k-2$. Via the Cayley--Sylvester decomposition, we compute the dimensions of homogeneous first-cohomology spaces for the lattice shift on polynomial jump profiles. At fourth order, for a cubic flux and a globally strictly convex entropy, a total-degree-seven component of a reduced entropy-flux mismatch represents a nonzero class on profiles of degree at most two and hence has no translation-invariant finite-stencil $C^7$ local primitive at the zero constant state. Odd-order coercivity persists on globally quasi-uniform meshes, whereas for each $k\ge2$ it fails on a fixed irregular mesh even though every interface contribution remains nonnegative. This failure is due to the mesh geometry.

Recently, Lafond and Luo [MFCS 2023] defined the $\mathcal{G}$-modular cardinality of a graph $G$ as the minimum size of a partition of $V(G)$ into modules that belong to a graph class $\mathcal{G}$. We analyze the complexity of calculating parameters that generalize interval graphs when parameterized by the $\mathcal{G}$-modular cardinality, where $\mathcal{G}$ corresponds either to the class of interval graphs or to the union of complete graphs. Namely, we analyze the complexity of computing the thinness and the simultaneous interval number of a graph. We present a linear kernel for the Thinness problem parameterized by the interval-modular cardinality and an FPT algorithm for Simultaneous Interval Number when parameterized by the cluster-modular cardinality plus the solution size. The interval-modular cardinality of a graph is not greater than the cluster-modular cardinality, which in turn generalizes the neighborhood diversity and the twin-cover number. Thus, our results imply a linear kernel for Thinness when parameterized by the neighborhood diversity of the input graph, FPT algorithms for Thinness when parameterized by the twin-cover number and vertex cover number, and FPT algorithms for Simultaneous Interval Number when parameterized by the neighborhood diversity plus the solution size, twin-cover number, and vertex cover number. To the best of our knowledge, prior to our work no parameterized algorithms (FPT or XP) for computing the thinness or the simultaneous interval number were known. On the negative side, we observe that Thinness and Simultaneous Interval Number parameterized by treewidth, pathwidth, bandwidth, (linear) mim-width, clique-width, modular-width, or even the thinness or simultaneous interval number themselves, admit no polynomial kernels assuming NP $\not\subseteq$ coNP/poly.

For a finite collection of connected graphs $\mathcal{F}$, the $\mathcal{F}$-MINOR-DELETION problem consists in, given a graph $G$ and an integer $\ell$, deciding whether $G$ contains a vertex set of size at most $\ell$ whose removal results in an $\mathcal{F}$-minor-free graph. We lift the existence of (approximate) polynomial kernels for $\mathcal{F}$-MINOR-DELETION by the solution size to (approximate) polynomial kernels parameterized by the vertex-deletion distance to graphs of bounded elimination distance to $\mathcal{F}$-minor-free graphs. This results in exact polynomial kernels for every family $\mathcal{F}$ that contains a planar graph, and an approximate polynomial kernel for PLANAR VERTEX DELETION. Moreover, combining our result with a previous lower bound, we obtain the following infinite set of dichotomies, assuming $NP \not\subseteq coNP/poly$: for any finite set $\mathcal{F}$ of biconnected graphs on at least three vertices containing a planar graph, and any minor-closed class of graphs $\mathcal{C}$, $\mathcal{F}$-MINOR-DELETION admits a polynomial kernel parameterized by the vertex-deletion distance to $\mathcal{C}$ if and only if $\mathcal{C}$ has bounded elimination distance to $\mathcal{F}$-minor-free graphs. For instance, this yields dichotomies for CACTUS VERTEX DELETION, OUTERPLANAR VERTEX DELETION, and TREEWIDTH-$t$ VERTEX DELETION for every integer $t \geq 0$. Prior to our work, such dichotomies were only known for the particular cases of VERTEX COVER and FEEDBACK VERTEX SET. Our approach builds on the techniques developed by Jansen and Pieterse [Theor. Comput. Sci. 2020] and also uses adaptations of some of the results by Jansen, de Kroon, and Wlodarczyk [STOC 2021].

This paper continues the study of a new variant of graph coloring with a connectivity constraint recently introduced by Hsieh et al. [COCOON 2024]. A path in a vertex-colored graph is called conflict-free if there is a color that appears exactly once on its vertices. A connected graph is said to be strongly conflict-free vertex-connection $k$-colorable if it admits a (proper) vertex $k$-coloring such that any two distinct vertices are connected by a conflict-free shortest path. Among others, we show that deciding, for a given graph $G$ and an integer $k$, whether $G$ is strongly conflict-free $k$-colorable is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the vertex cover number. But under the standard complexity-theoretic assumption NP $\not\subseteq$ coNP/poly, deciding, for a given graph $G$, whether $G$ is strongly conflict-free $3$-colorable does not admit a polynomial kernel, even for bipartite graphs. This kernel lower bound is in stark contrast to the ordinal $k$-Coloring problem which is known to admit a polynomial kernel when parameterized by the vertex cover number.

Given an oriented graph $D$, the inversion of a subset $X$ of vertices consists in reversing the orientation of all arcs with both endpoints in $X$. When the subset $X$ is of size $p$ (resp. at most $p$), this operation is called an $(=p)$-inversion (resp. $(\leq p)$-inversion). Then, an oriented graph is $(=p)$-invertible if it can be made acyclic by a sequence of $p$-inversions. We observe that, for $n=|V(D)|$, deciding whether $D$ is $(=n-1)$-invertible is equivalent to deciding whether $D$ is acyclically pushable, and thus NP-complete. In all other cases, when $p \neq n-1$, we construct a polynomial-time algorithm to decide $(=p)$-invertibility. We then consider the $(= p)$-inversion number, $\text{inv}^{= p}(D)$ (resp. $(\leq p)$-inversion number, $\text{inv}^{\leq p}(D)$), defined as the minimum number of $(=p)$-inversions (resp. $(\leq p)$-inversions) rendering $D$ acyclic. We show that every $(=p)$-invertible digraph $D$ satisfies $\text{inv}^{= p}(D) \leq |A(D)|$ for every integer $p\geq 2$. When $p$ is even, we bound $\text{inv}^{= p}$ by a (linear) function of the feedback arc set number, and rule out the existence of any bounding function for odd $p$. Finally, we study the complexity of deciding whether the $(= p)$-inversion number, or the $(\leq p)$-inversion number, of a given oriented graph is at most a given integer $k$. For any fixed positive integer $p \geq 2$, when $k$ is part of the input, we show that both problems are NP-hard even in tournaments. In general oriented graphs, we prove $W[1]$-hardness for both problems when parameterized by $p$, even for $k=1$. In contrast, we exhibit polynomial kernels in $p + k$ for both problems in tournaments.

In a digraph $D$, an arc $e=(x,y) $ in $D$ is considered transitive if there is a path from $x$ to $y$ in $D- e$. A digraph is transitive-free if it does not contain any transitive arc. In the Transitive-free Vertex Deletion (TVD) problem, the goal is to find at most $k$ vertices $S$ such that $D-S$ has no transitive arcs. In our work, we study a more general version of the TVD problem, denoted by $\ell$-Relaxed Transitive-free Vertex Deletion ($\ell$-RTVD), where we look for at most $k$ vertices $S$ such that $D-S$ has no more than $\ell$ transitive arcs. We explore $\ell$-RTVD on various well-known graph classes of digraphs such as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), planar DAGs, $α$-bounded digraphs, tournaments, and their multiple generalizations such as in-tournaments, out-tournaments, local tournaments, acyclic local tournaments, and obtain the following results. Although the problem admits polynomial-time algorithms in tournaments, $α$-bounded digraphs, and acyclic local tournaments for fixed values of $\ell$, it remains NP-hard even in planar DAGs with maximum degree 6. In the parameterized realm, for $\ell$-RTVD on in-tournaments and out-tournaments, we obtain polynomial kernels parameterized by $k+\ell$ for bounded independence number. But the problem remains fixed-parameter intractable on DAGs when parameterized by $k$.

In the Subset Feedback Arc Set in Tournaments, Subset-FAST problem we are given as input a tournament $T$ with a vertex set $V(T)$ and an arc set $A(T)$, along with a terminal set $S \subseteq V(T)$, and an integer $ k$. The objective is to determine whether there exists a set $ F \subseteq A(T) $ with $|F| \leq k$ such that the resulting graph $T-F $ contains no cycle that includes any vertex of $S$. When $S=V(T)$ this is the classic Feedback Arc Set in Tournaments (FAST) problem. We obtain the first polynomial kernel for this problem parameterized by the solution size. More precisely, we obtain an algorithm that, given an input instance $(T, S, k)$, produces an equivalent instance $(T',S',k')$ with $k'\leq k$ and $V(T')=O(k^2)$. It was known that FAST admits a simple quadratic vertex kernel and a non-trivial linear vertex kernel. However, no such kernel was previously known for Subset-FAST. Our kernel employs variants of the most well-known reduction rules for FAST and introduces two new reduction rules to identify irrelevant vertices. As a result of our kernelization, we also obtain the first sub-exponential time FPT algorithm for Subset-FAST.

Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, a function $f:V\to \{0,1,2\}$ is said to be a \emph{Roman Dominating function} (RDF) if for every $v\in V$ with $f(v)=0$, there exists a vertex $u\in N(v)$ such that $f(u)=2$. A Roman Dominating function $f$ is said to be an \emph{Independent Roman Dominating function} (IRDF), if $V_1\cup V_2$ forms an independent set, where $V_i=\{v\in V~\vert~f(v)=i\}$, for $i\in \{0,1,2\}$. The total weight of $f$ is equal to $\sum_{v\in V} f(v)$, and is denoted as $w(f)$. The \emph{Roman Domination Number} (resp. \emph{Independent Roman Domination Number}) of $G$, denoted by $γ_R(G)$ (resp. $i_R(G)$), is defined as min$\{w(f)~\vert~f$ is an RDF (resp. IRDF) of $G\}$. For a given graph $G$, the problem of computing $γ_R(G)$ (resp. $i_R(G)$) is defined as the \emph{Roman Domination problem} (resp. \emph{Independent Roman Domination problem}). In this paper, we examine structural parameterizations of the (Independent) Roman Domination problem. We propose fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms for the (Independent) Roman Domination problem in graphs that are $k$ vertices away from a cluster graph. These graphs have a set of $k$ vertices whose removal results in a cluster graph. We refer to $k$ as the distance to the cluster graph. Specifically, we prove the following results when parameterized by the deletion distance $k$ to cluster graphs: we can find the Roman Domination Number (and Independent Roman Domination Number) in time $4^kn^{O(1)}$. In terms of lower bounds, we show that the Roman Domination number can not be computed in time $2^{εk}n^{O(1)}$, for any $0<ε<1$ unless a well-known conjecture, SETH fails. In addition, we also show that the Roman Domination problem parameterized by distance to cluster, does not admit a polynomial kernel unless NP $\subseteq$ coNP$/$poly.

For a fixed graph $H$, the $H$-SUBGRAPH HITTING problem consists in deleting the minimum number of vertices from an input graph to obtain a graph without any occurrence of $H$ as a subgraph. This problem can be seen as a generalization of VERTEX COVER, which corresponds to the case $H = K_2$. We initiate a study of $H$-SUBGRAPH HITTING from the point of view of characterizing structural parameterizations that allow for polynomial kernels, within the recently active framework of taking as the parameter the number of vertex deletions to obtain a graph in a "simple" class $C$. Our main contribution is to identify graph parameters that, when $H$-SUBGRAPH HITTING is parameterized by the vertex-deletion distance to a class $C$ where any of these parameters is bounded, and assuming standard complexity assumptions and that $H$ is biconnected, allow us to prove the following sharp dichotomy: the problem admits a polynomial kernel if and only if $H$ is a clique. These new graph parameters are inspired by the notion of $C$-elimination distance introduced by Bulian and Dawar [Algorithmica 2016], and generalize it in two directions. Our results also apply to the version of the problem where one wants to hit $H$ as an induced subgraph, and imply in particular, that the problems of hitting minors and hitting (induced) subgraphs have a substantially different behavior with respect to the existence of polynomial kernels under structural parameterizations.

A proper Helly circular-arc graph is an intersection graph of a set of arcs on a circle such that none of the arcs properly contains any other arc and every set of pairwise intersecting arcs has a common intersection. The Proper Helly Circular-arc Vertex Deletion problem takes as input a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, and the goal is to check if we can remove at most $k$ vertices from the graph to obtain a proper Helly circular-arc graph; the parameter is $k$. Recently, Cao et al.~[MFCS 2023] obtained an FPT algorithm for this (and related) problem. In this work, we obtain a polynomial kernel for the problem.

Genome rearrangements are events where large blocks of DNA exchange places during evolution. The analysis of these events is a promising tool for understanding evolutionary genomics, providing data for phylogenetic reconstruction based on genome rearrangement measures. Many pairwise rearrangement distances have been proposed, based on finding the minimum number of rearrangement events to transform one genome into the other, using some predefined operation. When more than two genomes are considered, we have the more challenging problem of rearrangement-based phylogeny reconstruction. Given a set of genomes and a distance notion, there are at least two natural ways to define the "target" genome. On the one hand, finding a genome that minimizes the sum of the distances from this to any other, called the median genome. Finding a genome that minimizes the maximum distance to any other, called the closest genome. Considering genomes as permutations, some distance metrics have been extensively studied. We investigate median and closest problems on permutations over the metrics: breakpoint, swap, block-interchange, short-block-move, and transposition. In biological matters some values are usually small, such as the solution value d or the number k of input permutations. For each of these metrics and parameters d or k, we analyze the closest and the median problems from the viewpoint of parameterized complexity. We obtain the following results: NP-hardness for finding the median/closest permutation for some metrics, even for k = 3; Polynomial kernels for the problems of finding the median permutation of all studied metrics, considering the target distance d as parameter; NP-hardness result for finding the closest permutation by short-block-moves; FPT algorithms and infeasibility of polynomial kernels for finding the closest permutation for some metrics parameterized by the target distance d.

This paper focuses on kernelization algorithms for the fundamental Knapsack problem. A kernelization algorithm (or kernel) is a polynomial-time reduction from a problem onto itself, where the output size is bounded by a function of some problem-specific parameter. Such algorithms provide a theoretical model for data reduction and preprocessing and are central in the area of parameterized complexity. In this way, a kernel for Knapsack for some parameter $k$ reduces any instance of Knapsack to an equivalent instance of size at most $f(k)$ in polynomial time, for some computable function $f(\cdot)$. When $f(k)=k^{O(1)}$ then we call such a reduction a polynomial kernel. Our study focuses on two natural parameters for Knapsack: The number of different item weights $w_{\#}$, and the number of different item profits $p_{\#}$. Our main technical contribution is a proof showing that Knapsack does not admit a polynomial kernel for any of these two parameters under standard complexity-theoretic assumptions. Our proof discovers an elaborate application of the standard kernelization lower bound framework, and develops along the way novel ideas that should be useful for other problems as well. We complement our lower bounds by showing the Knapsack admits a polynomial kernel for the combined parameter $w_{\#}+p_{\#}$.

We study the problem of reconfiguring one minimum $s$-$t$-separator $A$ into another minimum $s$-$t$-separator $B$ in some $n$-vertex graph $G$ containing two non-adjacent vertices $s$ and $t$. We consider several variants of the problem as we focus on both the token sliding and token jumping models. Our first contribution is a polynomial-time algorithm that computes (if one exists) a minimum-length sequence of slides transforming $A$ into $B$. We additionally establish that the existence of a sequence of jumps (which need not be of minimum length) can be decided in polynomial time (by an algorithm that also outputs a witnessing sequence when one exists). In contrast, and somewhat surprisingly, we show that deciding if a sequence of at most $\ell$ jumps can transform $A$ into $B$ is an $\textsf{NP}$-complete problem. To complement this negative result, we investigate the parameterized complexity of what we believe to be the two most natural parameterized counterparts of the latter problem; in particular, we study the problem of computing a minimum-length sequence of jumps when parameterized by the size $k$ of the minimum \stseps and when parameterized by the number of jumps $\ell$. For the first parameterization, we show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable, but does not admit a polynomial kernel unless $\textsf{NP} \subseteq \textsf{coNP/poly}$. We complete the picture by designing a kernel with $\mathcal{O}(\ell^2)$ vertices and edges for the length $\ell$ of the sequence as a parameter.

A matching $M$ in a graph $G$ is an \emph{acyclic matching} if the subgraph of $G$ induced by the endpoints of the edges of $M$ is a forest. Given a graph $G$ and a positive integer $\ell$, Acyclic Matching asks whether $G$ has an acyclic matching of size (i.e., the number of edges) at least $\ell$. In this paper, we first prove that assuming $\mathsf{W[1]\nsubseteq FPT}$, there does not exist any $\mathsf{FPT}$-approximation algorithm for Acyclic Matching that approximates it within a constant factor when the parameter is the size of the matching. Our reduction is general in the sense that it also asserts $\mathsf{FPT}$-inapproximability for Induced Matching and Uniquely Restricted Matching as well. We also consider three below-guarantee parameters for Acyclic Matching, viz. $\frac{n}{2}-\ell$, $\mathsf{MM(G)}-\ell$, and $\mathsf{IS(G)}-\ell$, where $n$ is the number of vertices in $G$, $\mathsf{MM(G)}$ is the matching number of $G$, and $\mathsf{IS(G)}$ is the independence number of $G$. Furthermore, we show that Acyclic Matching does not exhibit a polynomial kernel with respect to vertex cover number (or vertex deletion distance to clique) plus the size of the matching unless $\mathsf{NP}\subseteq\mathsf{coNP}\slash\mathsf{poly}$.

For many problems, the important instances from practice possess certain structure that one should reflect in the design of specific algorithms. As data reduction is an important and inextricable part of today's computation, we employ one of the most successful models of such precomputation -- the kernelization. Within this framework, we focus on Traveling Salesperson Problem (TSP) and some of its generalizations. We provide a kernel for TSP with size polynomial in either the feedback edge set number or the size of a modulator to constant-sized components. For its generalizations, we also consider other structural parameters such as the vertex cover number and the size of a modulator to constant-sized paths. We complement our results from the negative side by showing that the existence of a polynomial-sized kernel with respect to the fractioning number, the combined parameter maximum degree and treewidth, and, in the case of Subset-TSP, modulator to disjoint cycles (i.e., the treewidth two graphs) is unlikely.

Nowhere dense classes of graphs are classes of sparse graphs with rich structural and algorithmic properties, however, they fail to capture even simple classes of dense graphs. Monadically stable classes, originating from model theory, generalize nowhere dense classes and close them under transductions, i.e. transformations defined by colorings and simple first-order interpretations. In this work we aim to extend some combinatorial and algorithmic properties of nowhere dense classes to monadically stable classes of finite graphs. We prove the following results. - In monadically stable classes the Ramsey numbers $R(s,t)$ are bounded from above by $\mathcal{O}(t^{s-1-δ})$ for some $δ>0$, improving the bound $R(s,t)\in \mathcal{O}(t^{s-1}/(\log t)^{s-1})$ known for general graphs and the bounds known for $k$-stable graphs when $s\leq k$. - For every monadically stable class $\mathcal{C}$ and every integer $r$, there exists $δ> 0$ such that every graph $G \in \mathcal{C}$ that contains an $r$-subdivision of the biclique $K_{t,t}$ as a subgraph also contains $K_{t^δ,t^δ}$ as a subgraph. This generalizes earlier results for nowhere dense graph classes. - We obtain a stronger regularity lemma for monadically stable classes of graphs. - Finally, we show that we can compute polynomial kernels for the independent set and dominating set problems in powers of nowhere dense classes. Formerly, only fixed-parameter tractable algorithms were known for these problems on powers of nowhere dense classes.

We study the existence of polynomial kernels, for parameterized problems without a polynomial kernel on general graphs, when restricted to graphs of bounded twin-width. Our main result is that a polynomial kernel for $k$-Dominating Set on graphs of twin-width at most 4 would contradict a standard complexity-theoretic assumption. The reduction is quite involved, especially to get the twin-width upper bound down to 4, and can be tweaked to work for Connected $k$-Dominating Set and Total $k$-Dominating Set (albeit with a worse upper bound on the twin-width). The $k$-Independent Set problem admits the same lower bound by a much simpler argument, previously observed [ICALP '21], which extends to $k$-Independent Dominating Set, $k$-Path, $k$-Induced Path, $k$-Induced Matching, etc. On the positive side, we obtain a simple quadratic vertex kernel for Connected $k$-Vertex Cover and Capacitated $k$-Vertex Cover on graphs of bounded twin-width. Interestingly the kernel applies to graphs of Vapnik-Chervonenkis density 1, and does not require a witness sequence. We also present a more intricate $O(k^{1.5})$ vertex kernel for Connected $k$-Vertex Cover. Finally we show that deciding if a graph has twin-width at most 1 can be done in polynomial time, and observe that most optimization/decision graph problems can be solved in polynomial time on graphs of twin-width at most 1.

An orientation $D$ of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a digraph obtained from $G$ by replacing each edge by exactly one of the two possible arcs with the same end vertices. For each $v \in V(G)$, the indegree of $v$ in $D$, denoted by $d^-_D(v)$, is the number of arcs with head $v$ in $D$. An orientation $D$ of $G$ is proper if $d^-_D(u)\neq d^-_D(v)$, for all $uv\in E(G)$. An orientation with maximum indegree at most $k$ is called a $k$-orientation. The proper orientation number of $G$, denoted by $\overrightarrowχ(G)$, is the minimum integer $k$ such that $G$ admits a proper $k$-orientation. We prove that determining whether $\overrightarrowχ(G) \leq k$ is NP-complete for chordal graphs of bounded diameter, but can be solved in linear-time in the subclass of quasi-threshold graphs. When parameterizing by $k$, we argue that this problem is FPT for chordal graphs and argue that no polynomial kernel exists, unless $NP\subseteq coNP/\ poly$. We present a better kernel to the subclass of split graphs and a linear kernel to the class of cobipartite graphs. Concerning bounds, we prove tight upper bounds for subclasses of block graphs. We also present new families of trees having proper orientation number at most 2 and at most 3. Actually, we prove a general bound stating that any graph $G$ having no adjacent vertices of degree at least $c+1$ have proper orientation number at most $c$. This implies new classes of (outer)planar graphs with bounded proper orientation number. We also prove that maximal outerplanar graphs $G$ whose weak-dual is a path satisfy $\overrightarrowχ(G)\leq 13$. Finally, we present simple bounds to the classes of chordal claw-free graphs and cographs.

We study the kernelization complexity of structural parameterizations of the Vertex Cover problem. Here, the goal is to find a polynomial-time preprocessing algorithm that can reduce any instance $(G,k)$ of the Vertex Cover problem to an equivalent one, whose size is polynomial in the size of a pre-determined complexity parameter of $G$. A long line of previous research deals with parameterizations based on the number of vertex deletions needed to reduce $G$ to a member of a simple graph class $\mathcal{F}$, such as forests, graphs of bounded tree-depth, and graphs of maximum degree two. We set out to find the most general graph classes $\mathcal{F}$ for which Vertex Cover parameterized by the vertex-deletion distance of the input graph to $\mathcal{F}$, admits a polynomial kernelization. We give a complete characterization of the minor-closed graph families $\mathcal{F}$ for which such a kernelization exists. We introduce a new graph parameter called bridge-depth, and prove that a polynomial kernelization exists if and only if $\mathcal{F}$ has bounded bridge-depth. The proof is based on an interesting connection between bridge-depth and the size of minimal blocking sets in graphs, which are vertex sets whose removal decreases the independence number.

We consider the $Π$-free Deletion problem parameterized by the size of a vertex cover, for a range of graph properties $Π$. Given an input graph $G$, this problem asks whether there is a subset of at most $k$ vertices whose removal ensures the resulting graph does not contain a graph from $Π$ as induced subgraph. Many vertex-deletion problems such as Perfect Deletion, Wheel-free Deletion, and Interval Deletion fit into this framework. We introduce the concept of characterizing a graph property $Π$ by low-rank adjacencies, and use it as the cornerstone of a general kernelization theorem for $Π$-Free Deletion parameterized by the size of a vertex cover. The resulting framework captures problems such as AT-Free Deletion, Wheel-free Deletion, and Interval Deletion. Moreover, our new framework shows that the vertex-deletion problem to perfect graphs has a polynomial kernel when parameterized by vertex cover, thereby resolving an open question by Fomin et al. [JCSS 2014]. Our main technical contribution shows how linear-algebraic dependence of suitably defined vectors over $\mathbb{F}_2$ implies graph-theoretic statements about the presence of forbidden induced subgraphs.