arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Gautam K. Das

7 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2026-08-05
Maximum Edge Open Packing in Permutation, Interval, and Well-Partitioned Chordal Graphs
Edge open packing is a relaxation of induced matching in which the selected edges may induce disjoint stars. We study the \textsc{Maximum Edge Open Packing} problem on permutation graphs, interval graphs, and well-partitioned chordal graphs. For the first two classes, we introduce an oriented star-conflict graph whose vertices are ordered edges. We prove that its compatibility graph admits a natural transitive orientation: a product-order orientation for permutation graphs and a left-to-right orientation for interval graphs. In each case, a maximum edge open packing is obtained from a maximum clique, equivalently a longest directed path, in the compatibility graph. Given the corresponding representation, both algorithms run in \(O(n^2+m^2)\leq O(n^4)\) time, where \(n=|V(G)|\) and \(m=|E(G)|\). For well-partitioned chordal graphs, we give a dynamic program over a partition tree. Its states use the fact that the endpoint set of an edge open packing meets each clique bag in at most two vertices. Given a partition-tree representation, the edge open packing number is computed in \(O(n^4)\) time, and an optimal packing can be reconstructed within the same time bound.
2026-07-16
Roman-Type Domination on Convex and Chordal Bipartite Graphs: Algorithms and Hardness
Roman domination and its variants form an important family of domination-type graph parameters motivated by protection, fault tolerance, and resource allocation. A Roman dominating function of a graph \(G\) is a function \(f:V(G)\rightarrow\{0,1,2\}\) such that every vertex \(v\) with \(f(v)=0\) has a neighbour \(u\) with \(f(u)=2\). The weight of \(f\) is \(w(f)=\sum_{v\in V(G)}f(v)\), and the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function of \(G\) is the Roman domination number, denoted by \(γ_R(G)\). In this paper, we study four variants of Roman domination on two natural subclasses of bipartite graphs, namely convex bipartite graphs and chordal bipartite graphs. On the positive side, we develop a unified left-to-right dynamic programming framework for Roman-\(\{2\}\) domination, double Roman domination, perfect Roman domination, and unique response Roman domination on convex bipartite graphs. The algorithms exploit the interval structure of one bipartition class and represent all unfinished requirements using a constant number of boundary indices. Consequently, each of the four parameters can be computed in \(O(n^6)\) time, where \(n=|V(G)|\). On the negative side, we prove that Roman-\(\{2\}\) domination, perfect Roman domination, and unique response Roman domination remain NP-complete on chordal bipartite graphs. These results establish a clear algorithmic separation between convex bipartite graphs, where the interval ordering yields polynomial-time solvability, and the broader class of chordal bipartite graphs, where several Roman-type domination problems remain computationally intractable.
2026-07-09
Roman domination on subclasses of bipartite graphs
The Roman Domination Problem (RDP) on a simple, finite, undirected graph \(G=(V,E)\) asks for a labeling function \(f:V\rightarrow\{0,1,2\}\) such that every vertex assigned value \(0\) is adjacent to at least one vertex assigned value \(2\). The objective is to minimize the total weight \(\sum_{v\in V} f(v)\), and this minimum value is called the Roman domination number of \(G\), denoted by \(γ_R(G)\). Since the RDP is NP-complete for bipartite graphs, a natural direction is to study its complexity on restricted subclasses of bipartite graphs. The problem remains NP-complete even under strong structural restrictions, such as star-convex and comb-convex bipartite graphs. Therefore, identifying the borderline subclasses where the problem changes from NP-complete to polynomial-time solvable remains an important challenge. In this paper, we investigate the RDP on convex bipartite graphs and on their superclass, chordal bipartite graphs. First, we present a dynamic programming algorithm for convex bipartite graphs. The algorithm uses the interval ordering of one bipartition class and keeps a compact boundary state, which is sufficient to control the domination requirements of both processed and future vertices. This gives an \(O(n^3)\)-time algorithm for computing \(γ_R(G)\) on an \(n\) vertex convex bipartite graph. In contrast, we prove that the decision version of the RDP is NP-complete on chordal bipartite graphs by a polynomial reduction from \textsc{Dominating Set} on chordal bipartite graphs. Thus, our results show a clear separation between the tractability of convex bipartite graphs and the hardness of the larger chordal bipartite class.
Algorithms for the Maximum Edge Open Packing Problem
Packing problems form a central theme in graph theory, owing to their relevance in modeling conflict-free resource allocation, network design, and communication constraints. Motivated by applications in wireless networks where each device can participate in at most one communication at a time and simultaneous links must avoid interference we consider a generalization of induced matching known as \emph{edge open packing}. Two edges of a graph are said to conflict if a third edge connects one endpoint of each; an \emph{edge open packing set} is a set of edges containing no such conflicting pair. The largest cardinality of such a set is the \emph{edge open packing number} of a graph. In this work, we study the computational complexity of the Maximum Edge Open Packing Problem. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for the problem in \emph{distance-hereditary graphs}, exploiting their canonical decomposition via twin-set interactions. We further show that the problem remains polynomial-time solvable on \emph{biconvex bipartite graphs}, thereby identifying a tractable subclass within bipartite graphs, in contrast to the known NP-hardness of the problem on Eulerian bipartite graphs. Finally, we initiate the parameterized complexity study of the problem and present a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm for \emph{chordal graphs}, parameterized by the clique number $ω$, running in $O(2^ω\cdot\mathrm{poly}(n))$ time.
(Independent) Roman Domination Parameterized by Distance to Cluster
Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, a function $f:V\to \{0,1,2\}$ is said to be a \emph{Roman Dominating function} (RDF) if for every $v\in V$ with $f(v)=0$, there exists a vertex $u\in N(v)$ such that $f(u)=2$. A Roman Dominating function $f$ is said to be an \emph{Independent Roman Dominating function} (IRDF), if $V_1\cup V_2$ forms an independent set, where $V_i=\{v\in V~\vert~f(v)=i\}$, for $i\in \{0,1,2\}$. The total weight of $f$ is equal to $\sum_{v\in V} f(v)$, and is denoted as $w(f)$. The \emph{Roman Domination Number} (resp. \emph{Independent Roman Domination Number}) of $G$, denoted by $γ_R(G)$ (resp. $i_R(G)$), is defined as min$\{w(f)~\vert~f$ is an RDF (resp. IRDF) of $G\}$. For a given graph $G$, the problem of computing $γ_R(G)$ (resp. $i_R(G)$) is defined as the \emph{Roman Domination problem} (resp. \emph{Independent Roman Domination problem}). In this paper, we examine structural parameterizations of the (Independent) Roman Domination problem. We propose fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms for the (Independent) Roman Domination problem in graphs that are $k$ vertices away from a cluster graph. These graphs have a set of $k$ vertices whose removal results in a cluster graph. We refer to $k$ as the distance to the cluster graph. Specifically, we prove the following results when parameterized by the deletion distance $k$ to cluster graphs: we can find the Roman Domination Number (and Independent Roman Domination Number) in time $4^kn^{O(1)}$. In terms of lower bounds, we show that the Roman Domination number can not be computed in time $2^{εk}n^{O(1)}$, for any $0<ε<1$ unless a well-known conjecture, SETH fails. In addition, we also show that the Roman Domination problem parameterized by distance to cluster, does not admit a polynomial kernel unless NP $\subseteq$ coNP$/$poly.
2021-11-17
Roman Domination in Convex Bipartite Graphs
In the Roman domination problem, an undirected simple graph $G(V,E)$ is given. The objective of Roman domination problem is to find a function $f:V\rightarrow {\{0,1,2\}}$ such that for any vertex $v\in V$ with $f(v)=0$ must be adjacent to at least one vertex $u\in V$ with $f(u)=2$ and $\sum_{u\in V} f(u)$, called Roman domination number, is minimized. It is already proven that the Roman domination problem (RDP) is NP-complete for general graphs and it remains NP-complete for bipartite graphs. In this paper, we propose a dynamic programming based polynomial time algorithm for RDP in convex bipartite graph.
2019-07-26 v2
On $d$-distance $m$-tuple ($\ell, r$)-domination in graphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
In this article, we study the $d$-distance $m$-tuple ($\ell, r$)-domination problem. Given a simple undirected graph $G=(V, E)$, and positive integers $d, m, \ell$ and $r$, a subset $V' \subseteq V$ is said to be a $d$-distance $m$-tuple ($\ell, r$)-dominating set if it satisfies the following conditions: (i) each vertex $v \in V$ is $d$-distance dominated by at least $m$ vertices in $V'$, and (ii) each $r$ size subset $U$ of $V$ is $d$-distance dominated by at least $\ell$ vertices in $V'$. Here, a vertex $v$ is $d$-distance dominated by another vertex $u$ means the shortest path distance between $u$ and $v$ is at most $d$ in $G$. A set $U$ is $d$-distance dominated by a set of $\ell$ vertices means size of the union of the $d$-distance neighborhood of all vertices of $U$ in $V'$ is at least $\ell$. The objective of the $d$-distance $m$-tuple ($\ell, r$)-domination problem is to find a minimum size subset $V' \subseteq V$ satisfying the above two conditions. We prove that the problem of deciding whether a graph $G$ has (i) a 1-distance $m$-tuple ($\ell, r$)-dominating set for each fixed value of $m, \ell$, and $r$, and (ii) a $d$-distance $m$-tuple ($\ell, 2$)-dominating set for each fixed value of $d (> 1), m$, and $\ell$ of cardinality at most $k$ (here $k$ is a positive integer) are NP-complete. We also prove that for any $\varepsilon>0$, the 1-distance $m$-tuple $(\ell, r)$-domination problem and the $d$-distance $m$-tuple $(\ell,2)$-domination problem cannot be approximated within a factor of $(\frac{1}{2}- \varepsilon)\ln |V|$ and $(\frac{1}{4}- \varepsilon)\ln |V|$, respectively, unless $P = NP$.