arXiv++ Combinatorics

Edge open packing is a relaxation of induced matching in which the selected edges may induce disjoint stars. We study the \textsc{Maximum Edge Open Packing} problem on permutation graphs, interval graphs, and well-partitioned chordal graphs. For the first two classes, we introduce an oriented star-conflict graph whose vertices are ordered edges. We prove that its compatibility graph admits a natural transitive orientation: a product-order orientation for permutation graphs and a left-to-right orientation for interval graphs. In each case, a maximum edge open packing is obtained from a maximum clique, equivalently a longest directed path, in the compatibility graph. Given the corresponding representation, both algorithms run in \(O(n^2+m^2)\leq O(n^4)\) time, where \(n=|V(G)|\) and \(m=|E(G)|\). For well-partitioned chordal graphs, we give a dynamic program over a partition tree. Its states use the fact that the endpoint set of an edge open packing meets each clique bag in at most two vertices. Given a partition-tree representation, the edge open packing number is computed in \(O(n^4)\) time, and an optimal packing can be reconstructed within the same time bound.

A proper coloring of a graph is called a strong odd coloring if, for every vertex \(v\) and every color appearing in the open neighborhood of \(v\), that color appears an odd number of times in \(N(v)\). The corresponding minimum number of colors is the strong odd chromatic number, denoted by \(χ_{\mathrm{so}}(G)\). Caro et al.~\cite{CaroPetrusevskiSkrekovskiTuzaStrongOdd} proved that every planar graph has strong odd chromatic number at most \(388\). Manattu et al.~\cite{ManattuVinayLakshmanan2026} later constructed planar graphs with strong odd chromatic number \(17\) and asked whether larger values are possible and whether the upper bound \(388\) can be improved. We address these questions as follows. First, we improve the general upper bound by proving that every planar graph \(G\) satisfies \(χ_{\mathrm{so}}(G)\le 368\). This follows by improving the auxiliary proper facially odd coloring bound for loopless \(2\)-connected plane multigraphs from \(97\) colors to \(92\) colors and combining this with the reduction of Caro et al. and the Four Color Theorem. Second, we give a different explicit planar construction with \(χ_{\mathrm{so}}(G)=20\), together with a self-contained proof of the exact value. We emphasize that Goetze et al.~\cite{GoetzeKluteKnauerParadaPenaUeckerdt2025} had already posted an arXiv preprint in May 2025 containing a planar example with strong odd chromatic number \(20\). Thus our construction is not a priority claim for the value \(20\), but rather an independent and fully verified construction whose value exceeds \(17\), the value that motivated Problem~1 of Manattu et al.

Roman domination and its variants form an important family of domination-type graph parameters motivated by protection, fault tolerance, and resource allocation. A Roman dominating function of a graph \(G\) is a function \(f:V(G)\rightarrow\{0,1,2\}\) such that every vertex \(v\) with \(f(v)=0\) has a neighbour \(u\) with \(f(u)=2\). The weight of \(f\) is \(w(f)=\sum_{v\in V(G)}f(v)\), and the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function of \(G\) is the Roman domination number, denoted by \(γ_R(G)\). In this paper, we study four variants of Roman domination on two natural subclasses of bipartite graphs, namely convex bipartite graphs and chordal bipartite graphs. On the positive side, we develop a unified left-to-right dynamic programming framework for Roman-\(\{2\}\) domination, double Roman domination, perfect Roman domination, and unique response Roman domination on convex bipartite graphs. The algorithms exploit the interval structure of one bipartition class and represent all unfinished requirements using a constant number of boundary indices. Consequently, each of the four parameters can be computed in \(O(n^6)\) time, where \(n=|V(G)|\). On the negative side, we prove that Roman-\(\{2\}\) domination, perfect Roman domination, and unique response Roman domination remain NP-complete on chordal bipartite graphs. These results establish a clear algorithmic separation between convex bipartite graphs, where the interval ordering yields polynomial-time solvability, and the broader class of chordal bipartite graphs, where several Roman-type domination problems remain computationally intractable.

The Roman Domination Problem (RDP) on a simple, finite, undirected graph \(G=(V,E)\) asks for a labeling function \(f:V\rightarrow\{0,1,2\}\) such that every vertex assigned value \(0\) is adjacent to at least one vertex assigned value \(2\). The objective is to minimize the total weight \(\sum_{v\in V} f(v)\), and this minimum value is called the Roman domination number of \(G\), denoted by \(γ_R(G)\). Since the RDP is NP-complete for bipartite graphs, a natural direction is to study its complexity on restricted subclasses of bipartite graphs. The problem remains NP-complete even under strong structural restrictions, such as star-convex and comb-convex bipartite graphs. Therefore, identifying the borderline subclasses where the problem changes from NP-complete to polynomial-time solvable remains an important challenge. In this paper, we investigate the RDP on convex bipartite graphs and on their superclass, chordal bipartite graphs. First, we present a dynamic programming algorithm for convex bipartite graphs. The algorithm uses the interval ordering of one bipartition class and keeps a compact boundary state, which is sufficient to control the domination requirements of both processed and future vertices. This gives an \(O(n^3)\)-time algorithm for computing \(γ_R(G)\) on an \(n\) vertex convex bipartite graph. In contrast, we prove that the decision version of the RDP is NP-complete on chordal bipartite graphs by a polynomial reduction from \textsc{Dominating Set} on chordal bipartite graphs. Thus, our results show a clear separation between the tractability of convex bipartite graphs and the hardness of the larger chordal bipartite class.

Packing problems form a central theme in graph theory, owing to their relevance in modeling conflict-free resource allocation, network design, and communication constraints. Motivated by applications in wireless networks where each device can participate in at most one communication at a time and simultaneous links must avoid interference we consider a generalization of induced matching known as \emph{edge open packing}. Two edges of a graph are said to conflict if a third edge connects one endpoint of each; an \emph{edge open packing set} is a set of edges containing no such conflicting pair. The largest cardinality of such a set is the \emph{edge open packing number} of a graph. In this work, we study the computational complexity of the Maximum Edge Open Packing Problem. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for the problem in \emph{distance-hereditary graphs}, exploiting their canonical decomposition via twin-set interactions. We further show that the problem remains polynomial-time solvable on \emph{biconvex bipartite graphs}, thereby identifying a tractable subclass within bipartite graphs, in contrast to the known NP-hardness of the problem on Eulerian bipartite graphs. Finally, we initiate the parameterized complexity study of the problem and present a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm for \emph{chordal graphs}, parameterized by the clique number $ω$, running in $O(2^ω\cdot\mathrm{poly}(n))$ time.

Given a simple undirected graph $G = (V, E)$, the open neighbourhood of a vertex $v \in V$ is defined as $N_G(v) = \{u \in V \mid uv \in E\}$, and the closed neighbourhood as $N_G[v] = N_G(v) \cup \{v\}$. A subset $D \subseteq V$ is called a vertex-edge dominating set if, for every edge $uv \in E$, at least one vertex from $D$ appears in $N_G[u] \cup N_G[v]$; that is, $\vert (N_G[u] \cup N_G[v]) \cap D\vert \geq 1$. Intuitively, a vertex-edge dominating set ensures that every edge, as well as all edges incident to either of its endpoints, is dominated by at least one vertex from the set. The \textsc{Min-VEDS} problem asks for a vertex-edge dominating set of minimum size in a given graph. This problem is known to be NP-complete even for bipartite graphs. In this paper, we strengthen this hardness result by proving that the problem remains NP-complete for two specific subclasses of bipartite graphs: star-convex and comb-convex bipartite graphs. For a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices, it is known that the \textsc{Min-VEDS} problem cannot be approximated within a factor of $(1 - ε)\ln |V|$ for any $ε> 0$, unless $\text{NP} \subseteq \text{DTIME}(|V|^{O(\log \log |V|)})$. We also prove that this inapproximability result holds even for star-convex and comb-convex bipartite graphs. On the positive side, we present a polynomial-time algorithm for computing a minimum vertex-edge dominating set in convex bipartite graphs. A polynomial-time algorithm for this graph class was also proposed by B{ü}y{ü}k{ç}olak et al.~\cite{buyukccolak2025linear}, but we show that their algorithm has certain flaws by providing instances where it fails to produce an optimal solution. We address this issue by presenting a modified algorithm that correctly computes an optimal solution.

Let $G=(V, E)$ be a graph where $V(G)$ and $E(G)$ are the vertex and edge sets, respectively. In a graph $G$, two edges $e_1, e_2\in E(G)$ are said to have a \emph{common edge} $e\neq e_1, e_2$ if $e$ joins an endpoint of $e_1$ to an endpoint of $e_2$ in $G$. A subset $D\subseteq E(G)$ is called an \emph{edge open packing set} in $G$ if no two edges in $D$ share a common edge in $G$, and the largest size of such a set in $G$ is known as the \emph{edge open packing number}, represented by $ρ_{e}^o(G)$. The \textsc{Maximum Edge Open Packing Problem} is to find an edge open packing set of a given graph with maximum size. In [Bre{š}ar and Samadi. Edge open packing: complexity, algorithmic aspects, and bounds. Theor. Comput. Sci., 2024.], Bre{š}ar and Samadi pose an open question of the edge open packing problem in chordal graphs. In this paper, we partially answer this open question by showing a polynomial-time algorithm to solve the maximum edge open packing problem in the subclasses of chordal graphs. First, we show that the \textsc{Maximum Edge Open Packing Problem} can be solved in polynomial time for \emph{proper interval graphs}. Furthermore, we show that in \emph{block graphs} we can solve this problem in polynomial time. Finally, we prove that this problem can be solved in linear time for \emph{split graphs}.

We study the problem of color reversal in bicolored graphs under local inversions. A \emph{bicoloration} of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a mapping $β: V \to \{-1,1\}$. A \emph{local inversion} at a vertex $v \in V$ consists of reversing the colors of all neighbors of $v$ and replacing the subgraph induced by these neighbors with its complement, while leaving $v$ and the rest of $G$ unchanged. Sabidussi (Discrete Mathematics, 1987) showed that any bicolored graph on $n$ vertices without isolated vertices can be color-reversed (that is, all vertex colors flipped while preserving the underlying graph) in at most $6n+3$ local inversions, and that any bicolored graph can be transformed into another bicolored graph on the same underlying graph in at most $9n$ local inversions. We improve both bounds: we prove that the first task can be accomplished in at most $4n-3$ local inversions, and the second in at most $ \left \lfloor \frac{11n-3}{2} \right \rfloor$ local inversions. Furthermore, we show that for stars and complete graphs, color reversal can be performed with at most $3n$ local inversions.

Let $G=(V, E)$ be a graph where $V(G)$ and $E(G)$ are the vertex and edge sets, respectively. In a graph $G$, two edges $e_1, e_2\in E(G)$ are said to have \emph{common edge} $e\neq e_1, e_2$ if $e$ joins an endpoint of $e_1$ to an endpoint of $e_2$ in $G$. A subset $D\subseteq E(G)$ is called an \emph{edge open packing set} in $G$ if no two edges in $D$ share a common edge in $G$, and the largest size of such a set in $G$ is known as \emph{edge open packing number}, represented by $ρ_{e}^o(G)$. In the introductory paper (Chelladurai et al. (2022)), necessary and sufficient conditions for $ρ_{e}^o(G)=1, 2$ were provided, and the graphs $G$ with $ρ_{e}^o(G)\in \{m-2, m-1, m\}$ were characterized, where $m$ is the number of edges of $G$. In this paper, we further characterize the graphs $G$. First, we show necessary and sufficient conditions for $ρ_{e}^o(G)=t$, for any integer $t\geq 3$. Finally, we characterize the graphs with $ρ_{e}^o(G)=m-3$.

Let $G = (V, E)$ be a graph where $V$ and $E$ are the vertex and edge sets, respectively. For two disjoint subsets $A$ and $B$ of $V$, we say that $A$ \emph{dominates} $B$ if every vertex of $B$ is adjacent to at least one vertex of $A$. A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called a \emph{transitive partition} of size $k$ if $V_i$ dominates $V_j$ for all $1 \leq i < j \leq k$. In this article, we study a variation of the transitive partition, namely the \emph{total transitive partition}. The total transitivity $Tr_t(G)$ is defined as the maximum order of a vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ obtained by repeatedly removing a total dominating set from $G$ until no vertices remain. Thus, $V_1$ is a total dominating set of $G$, $V_2$ is a total dominating set of the graph $G_1 = G - V_1$, and, for $2 \leq i \leq k - 1$, $V_{i+1}$ is a total dominating set in the graph $G_i = G - \bigcup_{j=1}^i V_j$. A vertex partition of order $Tr_t(G)$ is called a $Tr_t$-partition. The \textsc{Maximum Total Transitivity Problem} is to find a total transitive partition of a given graph with the maximum number of parts. First, we characterize split graphs with total transitivity equal to $1$ and $ω(G) - 1$. Moreover, for a split graph $G$ and $1 \leq p \leq ω(G) - 1$, we provide necessary conditions for $Tr_t(G) = p$. Furthermore, we show that the decision version of this problem is NP-complete for bipartite graphs. On the positive side, we prove that this problem can be solved in linear time for bipartite chain graphs. Finally, we design a polynomial-time algorithm to solve the \textsc{Maximum Total Transitivity Problem} in trees.

Let $G=(V, E)$ be a graph where $V$ and $E$ are the vertex and edge sets, respectively. For two disjoint subsets $A$ and $B$ of $V$, we say $A$ \textit{dominates} $B$ if every vertex of $B$ is adjacent to at least one vertex of $A$ in $G$. A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called an \emph{upper domatic partition} of size $k$ if either $V_i$ dominates $V_j$ or $V_j$ dominates $V_i$ or both for all $i, j$, where $1\leq i<j\leq k$. The maximum integer $k$ for which the above partition exists is called the \emph{upper domatic number} of $G$, and it is denoted by $D(G)$. The \textsc{Maximum upper domatic number Problem} involves finding an upper domatic partition of a given graph with the maximum number of parts. It was known that the maximum upper domatic problem can be solved in linear time for trees. In this paper, we prove that this problem can be solved in linear time for \emph{split graphs} and for the \emph{complement of bipartite chain graphs}, two subclasses of chordal graphs. Moreover, we show that this problem can be solved in polynomial time for unicyclic graphs. Finally, we partially solve a conjecture regarding the sink set posed by Haynes et al. [The upper domatic number of a graph, \emph{AKCE Int. J. Graphs Comb.}, 17, 2020].

Let $G=(V, E)$ be a graph where $V$ and $E$ are the vertex and edge sets, respectively. For two disjoint subsets $A$ and $B$ of $V$, we say $A$ \textit{dominates} $B$ if every vertex of $B$ is adjacent to at least one vertex of $A$ in $G$. A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called a \emph{transitive partition} of size $k$ if $V_i$ dominates $V_j$ for all $1\leq i<j\leq k$. A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called a \emph{tournament transitive partition} of size $k$ if $V_i$ dominates $V_j$ for all $1\leq i<j\leq k$ and $V_j$ does not dominate $V_i$ for $i<j$. The maximum integer $k$ for which the above partition exists is called \emph{tournament transitivity} of $G$, and it is denoted by $TTr(G)$. The \textsc{Maximum Tournament Transitivity Problem} is to find a tournament transitive partition of a given graph with the maximum number of parts. In this article, we study this variation of transitive partition from a structure and algorithmic point of view. We show that the decision version of this problem is NP-complete for chordal graphs (connected), perfect elimination bipartite graphs (disconnected) and doubly chordal graphs (disconnected). On the positive side, we prove that this problem can be solved in polynomial time for trees. Furthermore, we characterize \textup{Type-I BCG} with equal transitivity and tournament transitivity and find some sufficient conditions under which the above two parameters are equal for a \textup{Type-II BCG}. Finally, we show that for \textup{Type-III BCG}, these two parameters are never equal.

Let $G=(V, E)$ be a graph where $V$ and $E$ are the vertex and edge sets, respectively. For two disjoint subsets $A$ and $B$ of $V$, we say $A$ \emph{dominates} $B$ if every vertex of $B$ is adjacent to at least one vertex of $A$. A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called a \emph{transitive partition} of size $k$ if $V_i$ dominates $V_j$ for all $1\leq i<j\leq k$. In this article, we study a variation of transitive partition, namely \emph{$2$-transitive partition}. For two disjoint subsets $A$ and $B$ of $V$, we say $A$ \emph{$2$-dominates} $B$ if every vertex of $B$ is adjacent to at least two vertices of $A$. A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called a \emph{$2$-transitive partition} of size $k$ if $V_i$ $2$-dominates $V_j$ for all $1\leq i<j\leq k$. The \textsc{Maximum $2$-Transitivity Problem} is to find a $2$-transitive partition of a given graph with the maximum number of parts. We show that the decision version of this problem is NP-complete for chordal and bipartite graphs. On the positive side, we design three linear-time algorithms for solving \textsc{Maximum $2$-Transitivity Problem} in trees, split and bipartite chain graphs.

A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called a \emph{transitive partition} of size $k$ if $V_i$ dominates $V_j$ for all $1\leq i<j\leq k$. For two disjoint subsets $A$ and $B$ of $V$, we say $A$ \emph{strongly dominates} $B$ if for every vertex $y\in B$, there exists a vertex $x\in A$, such that $xy\in E$ and $deg_G(x)\geq deg_G(y)$. A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called a \emph{strong transitive partition} of size $k$ if $V_i$ strongly dominates $V_j$ for all $1\leq i<j\leq k$. The \textsc{Maximum Strong Transitivity Problem} is to find a strong transitive partition of a given graph with the maximum number of parts. In this article, we initiate the study of this variation of transitive partition from algorithmic point of view. We show that the decision version of this problem is NP-complete for chordal graphs. On the positive side, we prove that this problem can be solved in linear time for trees and split graphs.

Let $G=(V, E)$ be a graph where $V$ and $E$ are the vertex and edge sets, respectively. For two disjoint subsets $A$ and $B$ of $V$, we say $A$ \emph{dominates} $B$ if every vertex of $B$ is adjacent to at least one vertex of $A$. A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called a \emph{transitive partition} of size $k$ if $V_i$ dominates $V_j$ for all $1\leq i<j\leq k$. In this article, we initiate the study of a generalization of transitive partition, namely \emph{$d_2$-transitive partition}. For two disjoint subsets $A$ and $B$ of $V$, we say $A$ \emph{$d_2$-dominates} $B$ if, for every vertex of $B$, there exists a vertex in $A$, such that the distance between them is at most two. A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called a \emph{$d_2$-transitive partition} of size $k$ if $V_i$ $d_2$-dominates $V_j$ for all $1\leq i<j\leq k$. The maximum integer $k$ for which the above partition exists is called \emph{$d_2$-transitivity} of $G$, and it is denoted by $Tr_{d_2}(G)$. The \textsc{Maximum $d_2$-Transitivity Problem} is to find a $d_2$-transitive partition of a given graph with the maximum number of parts. We show that this problem can be solved in linear time for the complement of bipartite graphs and bipartite chain graphs. On the negative side, we prove that the decision version of the \textsc{Maximum $d_2$-Transitivity Problem} is NP-complete for split graphs, bipartite graphs, and star-convex bipartite graphs.

Let $G=(V, E)$ be a graph, where $V$ and $E$ are the vertex and edge sets, respectively. For two disjoint subsets $A$ and $B$ of $V$, we say $A$ \textit{dominates} $B$ if every vertex of $B$ is adjacent to at least one vertex of $A$ in $G$. A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called a \emph{transitive $k$-partition} if $V_i$ dominates $V_j$ for all $i,j$, where $1\leq i<j\leq k$. The maximum integer $k$ for which the above partition exists is called \emph{transitivity} of $G$ and it is denoted by $Tr(G)$. The \textsc{Maximum Transitivity Problem} is to find a transitive partition of a given graph with the maximum number of partitions. It was known that the decision version of \textsc{Maximum Transitivity Problem} is NP-complete for chordal graphs [Iterated colorings of graphs, \emph{Discrete Mathematics}, 278, 2004]. In this paper, we first prove that this problem can be solved in linear time for \emph{split graphs} and for the \emph{complement of bipartite chain graphs}, two subclasses of chordal graphs. We also discuss Nordhaus-Gaddum type relations for transitivity and provide counterexamples for an open problem posed by J. T. Hedetniemi and S. T. Hedetniemi [The transitivity of a graph, \emph{J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput}, 104, 2018]. Finally, we characterize transitively critical graphs having fixed transitivity.

Let $G=(V, E)$ be a graph where $V$ and $E$ are the vertex and edge set, respectively. For two disjoint subsets $A$ and $B$, we say $A$ dominates $B$ if every vertex of $B$ is adjacent to at least one vertex of $A$. A vertex partition $π= \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\}$ of $G$ is called a \emph{transitive $k$-partition} if $V_i$ dominates $V_j$ for all $i,j$ where $1\leq i<j\leq k$. The maximum integer $k$ for which the above partition exists is called \emph{transitivity} of $G$ and it is denoted by $Tr(G)$. The \textsc{Maximum Transitivity Problem} is to find a transitive partition of a given graph with the maximum number of partitions. It was known that the decision version of \textsc{Maximum Transitivity Problem} is NP-complete for general graphs, which was proved by Hedetniemi et al. [Iterated colorings of graphs, \emph{Discrete Mathematics}, 278, 2004]. This paper first strengthens the NP-completeness result by showing that this problem remains NP-complete for perfect elimination bipartite graphs. On the other hand, we propose a linear-time algorithm for finding the transitivity of a given bipartite chain graph. We then characterize graphs with transitivity at least $t$ for any integer $t$. This result answers two open questions posed by J. T. Hedetniemi and S. T. Hedetniemi [The transitivity of a graph, \emph{J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput}, 104, 2018].