arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Ashwin Jacob

4 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
Eccentricity Shortest Path: the structural parameter landscape
The Eccentricity Shortest Path problem asks, given a connected graph and a nonnegative integer $R$, whether some shortest path is within distance $R$ of every vertex. We study its structural parameterized complexity. We give fixed-parameter algorithms for vertex-deletion distance to cographs, vertex-deletion distance to interval graphs, and bandwidth. The interval-deletion result answers a question of Bhyravarapu et al. (IWOCA 2023). We obtain XP algorithms for vertex-deletion distance to chordal graphs, clique-width, and rank-width, without requiring expressions or decompositions for the latter two. Consequently, the problem is polynomial-time solvable for every fixed treewidth, answering a question of Chakraborty et al. (2026). We also derive fixed-parameter tractability for treedepth and XP membership for diameter from earlier algorithms. We prove $\mathsf{W}[3]$-hardness for cutwidth, and hence pathwidth and treewidth, even on graphs of maximum degree at most five; $\mathsf{W}[2]$-hardness for vertex clique-cover number; and NP-hardness on graphs of tree-independence number at most two. For maximum leaf number $\ell$, we obtain an $O(\ell^4)$-bit compression and a polynomial kernel. Finally, unless $\mathsf{NP}\subseteq\mathrm{coNP}/\mathrm{poly}$, we exclude polynomial kernels for bandwidth, feedback edge number, vertex-deletion distance to a clique, and vertex cover number. The last bound also excludes polynomial kernels for vertex-deletion distance to proper interval graphs.
Improved bounds for the lazy cops and robbers on generalized hypercubes
In Lazy Cops and Robbers, at most one cop moves on each cop turn. We study the lazy cop number of the generalized hypercube $Q(n,m)$, whose vertex set is ${\{0,1,\ldots,m\}}^n$. For each fixed integer $m\geq2$, we prove the asymptotic upper bound $$c_{\mathrm{L}}(Q(n,m))=O\!\left(\frac{{(m+1)}^n}{n^{3/2}}\right).$$ This result improves the upper bound of Sim, Tan, and Wong by a factor of $\log n$. The proof combines a moving dominating-set argument with an explicit dominating-set construction inside the support classes of each level. As a separate domination result, we show that, for fixed integers $m\geq2$ and $d\geq1$, the Hamming graph $K_m^{\square k}$ has a distance-$d$ dominating set of asymptotic size $O(m^k/k^d)$. This order is optimal up to a constant factor.
2026-04-07
A counterexample to the conjecture on Biclique Partition number of Split Graphs and related problems
The biclique partition number of a graph \(G\), denoted \( \operatorname{bp}(G)\), is the minimum number of biclique subgraphs needed to partition the edge set of $G$. Lyu and Hicks \cite{lyu2023finding} posed the open problem of whether \( \operatorname{bp}(G) = \operatorname{mc}(G^c) - 1 \) holds for every co-chordal graph or split graph, where \( \operatorname{mc}(G^c) \) denotes the number of maximal cliques in the complement of \( G \). Such a result would extend the celebrated Graham--Pollak theorem to a more general class of graphs. In this note, we answer this problem in the negative by providing a counterexample using a split graph. We also construct an infinite family of counterexamples and prove some structural properties of biclique partitions of split graphs. Finally, we solve an open problem posed by Siewert \cite{siewert2000biclique} on the existence of singular \(n\)-tournaments with binary rank \(n\).
2025-07-10
Exact Biclique Partition number of Split Graphs
The biclique partition number of a graph \(G\), denoted \( \operatorname{bp}(G)\), is the minimum number of biclique subgraphs that partition the edge set of \(G\). The Graham-Pollak theorem states that the complete graph on \( n \) vertices cannot be partitioned into fewer than \( n-1 \) bicliques. In this note, we show that for any split graph \( G \), the biclique partition number satisfies \( \operatorname{bp}(G) = \operatorname{mc}(G^c) - 1 \), where \( \operatorname{mc}(G^c) \) denotes the number of maximal cliques in the complement of \( G \). This extends the celebrated Graham-Pollak theorem to a broader class of graphs.