arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Anand Babu

7 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
Improved bounds for the lazy cops and robbers on generalized hypercubes
In Lazy Cops and Robbers, at most one cop moves on each cop turn. We study the lazy cop number of the generalized hypercube $Q(n,m)$, whose vertex set is ${\{0,1,\ldots,m\}}^n$. For each fixed integer $m\geq2$, we prove the asymptotic upper bound $$c_{\mathrm{L}}(Q(n,m))=O\!\left(\frac{{(m+1)}^n}{n^{3/2}}\right).$$ This result improves the upper bound of Sim, Tan, and Wong by a factor of $\log n$. The proof combines a moving dominating-set argument with an explicit dominating-set construction inside the support classes of each level. As a separate domination result, we show that, for fixed integers $m\geq2$ and $d\geq1$, the Hamming graph $K_m^{\square k}$ has a distance-$d$ dominating set of asymptotic size $O(m^k/k^d)$. This order is optimal up to a constant factor.
2026-07-17
New bounds on the Graham-Pollak theorem for hypergraphs
For a fixed $r$, let $f_r(n)$ denote the minimum number of complete $r$-partite $r$-uniform hypergraphs required to partition the edge set of the complete $r$-uniform hypergraph on $n$ vertices. The Graham-Pollak theorem states that $f_2(n)=n-1$. It was known that $f_r(n) \leq (1+o(1)){n \choose \lfloor{\frac{r}{2}}\rfloor}$, which was subsequently improved to $f_r(n)\le \left[ \frac{r}{2} \left(\frac{14}{15}\right)^{r/4} +o(1) \right] \binom{n}{\lfloor r/2\rfloor}$. Let $c_r$ be $\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty}\frac{f_r(n)}{\binom{n}{\lfloor r/2 \rfloor}}$. It was known that $c_r<1$ for every even $r \geq 4$, while for odd $r$ the smallest known value satisfying $c_r<1$ was $113$. In this note we lower this to $85$ and also provide a constant-factor improvement in the known bounds for $f_r(n)$.
Almost balanced ordered biclique covering of graphs
Let $f(n,k)$ be the minimum size of a collection of bicliques such that (i) every edge of the complete graph $K_n$ is covered by at least one and at most $k$ bicliques in the collection, and (ii) for each edge $\{u,v\}$, the number of bicliques in which $u$ appears in the first class and $v$ in the second class differs by at most one from the number of bicliques in which $u$ appears in the second class and $v$ in the first class. For $k=1$, $f(n,k)$ reduces to the biclique partition number of $K_n$, and the Graham--Pollak theorem gives $f(n,1)=n-1$. For $k=2$, $f(n,k)$ is the ordered biclique partition number of $K_n$, for which it is known that $c_1 n^{1/2} \le f(n,2) \le c_2 n^{1/2+o(1)}$ for some positive constants $c_1$ and $c_2$. In this note, we establish almost tight bounds for $f(n,k)$ for general $k$.
2026-04-07
A counterexample to the conjecture on Biclique Partition number of Split Graphs and related problems
The biclique partition number of a graph \(G\), denoted \( \operatorname{bp}(G)\), is the minimum number of biclique subgraphs needed to partition the edge set of $G$. Lyu and Hicks \cite{lyu2023finding} posed the open problem of whether \( \operatorname{bp}(G) = \operatorname{mc}(G^c) - 1 \) holds for every co-chordal graph or split graph, where \( \operatorname{mc}(G^c) \) denotes the number of maximal cliques in the complement of \( G \). Such a result would extend the celebrated Graham--Pollak theorem to a more general class of graphs. In this note, we answer this problem in the negative by providing a counterexample using a split graph. We also construct an infinite family of counterexamples and prove some structural properties of biclique partitions of split graphs. Finally, we solve an open problem posed by Siewert \cite{siewert2000biclique} on the existence of singular \(n\)-tournaments with binary rank \(n\).
2025-07-10
Exact Biclique Partition number of Split Graphs
The biclique partition number of a graph \(G\), denoted \( \operatorname{bp}(G)\), is the minimum number of biclique subgraphs that partition the edge set of \(G\). The Graham-Pollak theorem states that the complete graph on \( n \) vertices cannot be partitioned into fewer than \( n-1 \) bicliques. In this note, we show that for any split graph \( G \), the biclique partition number satisfies \( \operatorname{bp}(G) = \operatorname{mc}(G^c) - 1 \), where \( \operatorname{mc}(G^c) \) denotes the number of maximal cliques in the complement of \( G \). This extends the celebrated Graham-Pollak theorem to a broader class of graphs.
2022-08-26
Improved bounds for covering hypergraphs
The Graham-Pollak theorem states that at least $n-1$ bicliques are required to partition the edge set of the complete graph on $n$ vertices. In this paper, we provide improvements for the generalizations of coverings of graphs and hypergraphs for some specific multiplicities. We study an extension of Katona Szemerédi theorem to $r$-uniform hypergraphs. We also discuss the $r$-partite covering number and matching number and how large the $r$-partite partition number would be in terms of $r$-partite covering number for $r$-uniform hypergraphs.
2017-12-18 v2
Bounds for the Graham-Pollak Theorem for Hypergraphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
Let $f_r(n)$ represent the minimum number of complete $r$-partite $r$-graphs required to partition the edge set of the complete $r$-uniform hypergraph on $n$ vertices. The Graham-Pollak theorem states that $f_2(n)=n-1$. An upper bound of $(1+o(1)){n \choose \lfloor{\frac{r}{2}}\rfloor}$ was known. Recently this was improved to $\frac{14}{15}(1+o(1)){n \choose \lfloor{\frac{r}{2}}\rfloor}$ for even $r \geq 4$. A bound of $\bigg[\frac{r}{2}(\frac{14}{15})^{\frac{r}{4}}+o(1)\bigg](1+o(1)){n \choose \lfloor{\frac{r}{2}}\rfloor}$ was also proved recently. The smallest odd $r$ for which $c_r < 1$ that was known was for $r=295$. In this note we improve this to $c_{113}<1$ and also give better upper bounds for $f_r(n)$, for small values of even $r$.