arXiv++ Combinatorics

For two digraph properties $P_1$ and $P_2$, a $(P_1,P_2)$-arc-decomposition of a digraph $D$ is a partition $A(D)=A_1\mathbin{\dot\cup}A_2$ such that the spanning subdigraphs $D[A_1]$ and $D[A_2]$ have properties $P_1$ and $P_2$, respectively. For example, a (strong,strong)-arc-decomposition of a digraph $D=(V,A)$ is a partitioning $A=A_1\cup{}A_2$ of $A$ so that each of the spanning digraphs $D_i=(V,A_i)$, $i=1,2$ are strongly connected. We prove that it is NP-complete to decide whether a digraph admits an arc-decomposition with properties $(P_1,P_2)$ where $(P_1,P_2)\in \{$(is a perfect matching, having no odd directed cycle), (perfect matching, strong), (perfect matching, having an out-branching), (is a cycle factor, having no odd directed cycle)$\}$. These results settle some open problems posed by Bang-Jensen, Bessy, Gonçalves, and Picasarri-Arrieta [Theoret. Comput. Sci. 928 (2022), 167--182].

Jackson and Thomassen conjectured that every $2k$-strong digraph admits a spanning $k$-strong oriented subdigraph [Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 555 (1989) 402-412]. The conjecture holds for $k=1$ but other than some partial results that have been obtained for general $k$ in some special families of digraphs, including symmetric digraphs, the conjecture remains wide open in general. Even the existence of an integer $K$ such that every $K$-strong digraph has a 2-strong spanning oriented subdigraph is open. As a natural optimization counterpart, the minimum spanning $k$-strong subdigraph (MSSS$_k$) problem, is to find the minimum number of arcs in a spanning $k$-strong subdigraph of a $k$-strong digraph. This problem is NP-hard already for $k=1$ as it generalizes the hamiltonian cycle problem. In this paper, we address both problems simultaneously for the class of split digraphs, by constructing sparse spanning $k$-strong oriented subdigraphs. Specifically, we prove that every $k$-strong split digraph $D = (V_1, V_2; A)$ with minimum semi-degree {$δ^0(D)\geq 26k+15$} contains a spanning $k$-strong oriented subdigraph with no more than $kn+k|V_1|+98k^2+38k+3$ arcs, where $kn + k|V_1|$ is tight and the $k^{2}$ term is tight up to a constant factor. For the class of $k$-strong tournaments with minimum semi-degree at least $26k+15$ our results improve the bound obtained by Kang in [Combin. Probab. Comput., 27:892-907, 2018].

Results by Jackson and Frank imply that every 2k-arc-strong digraph D contains a spanning k-arc-strong oriented subdigraph. This is best possible, even for very dense digraphs. A digraph is semicomplete if at least one of the arcs xy,yx is present for every pair of distinct vertices x,y. A tournament has exactly one of xy,yx for every such pair. Clearly every semicomplete digraph D contains a spanning tournament T which is obtained by deleting one arc from every 2-cycle of D. We prove that every (2k-1)-arc-strong semicomplete digraph on at least 2k+1 vertices contains a spanning k-arc-strong tournament. Both bounds 2k-1 and 2k+1 are best possible. The proof uses Frank's general orientation theorem for graphs as well as counting arguments based on the semicomplete structure.

Let $k$ be a positive integer. Jackson and Thomassen conjectured in 1989 that there exists an integer function $f(k)$ such that every $f(k)$-strong digraph admits a spanning $k$-strong oriented subdigraph. They even conjectured that one can take $f(k)=2k$ [Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 555 (1989) 402-412]. Already the existence of $f(2)$ is open for general digraphs. Thomassen proved that $f(2)=4$ for symmetric digraphs. For general $k$, the existence of $f(k)$ was only known for locally semicomplete digraphs and quasi-transitive digraphs. Guo proved that every ${(3k-2)}$-strong locally semicomplete digraph contains a spanning $k$-strong local tournament [Discrete Appl. Math. 79 (1997) 119--125]. One can deduce from Guo's result that we have $f(k)\leq 3k-2$ for quasi-transitive digraphs. In this paper, we prove the existence of $f(k)$ for two subclasses of the semicomplete multipartite digraphs, namely extended semicomplete digraphs and semicomplete split digraphs. We prove that every $(4k+1)$-strong extended semicomplete digraph contains a spanning $k$-strong oriented subdigraph and every $5k$-strong semicomplete split digraph contains a spanning $k$-strong oriented subdigraph. The first result implies that for the large class of digraphs which can be obtained from some semicomplete digraph $S$ on at least 3 vertices by substituting arbitrary digraphs for each vertex of $S$ we also have $f(k)\leq 4k+1$.

A digraph is {\bf \( k \)-linked} if for arbitary two disjoint vertex sets \(\{s_1, \ldots, s_k\}\) and \(\{t_1, \ldots, t_k\}\), there exist vertex-disjoint directed paths \(P_1, \ldots, P_k\) {such that \(P_i\) is a directed path from \(s_i\) to \(t_i\) for each $i\in [k]$}. A {\bf split digraph} is a digraph \( D = (V_1, V_2; A) \) whose vertex set is a disjoint union of two nonempty sets \( V_1 \) and \( V_2 \) such that \( V_1 \) is an independent set and the subdigraph induced by \( V_2 \) is semicomplete (no pair of non-adjacent vertices). A {\bf semicomplete split digraph} is a split digraph \( D = (V_1, V_2; A) \) in which every vertex in the independent set \( V_1 \) is adjacent to every vertex in \( V_2 \). {Semicomplete split digraphs form an important subclass of the class of semicomplete multipartite digraphs.} In this paper, we prove that every 6-strong split digraph is 2-linked. This solves a problem posed by Bang-Jensen and Wang [J. Graph Theory, 2025]. We also show that every 5-strong semicomplete split digraph is 2-linked. This bound is tight already for semicomplete digraphs.

Given an oriented graph $D$, the inversion of a subset $X$ of vertices consists in reversing the orientation of all arcs with both endpoints in $X$. When the subset $X$ is of size $p$ (resp. at most $p$), this operation is called an $(=p)$-inversion (resp. $(\leq p)$-inversion). Then, an oriented graph is $(=p)$-invertible if it can be made acyclic by a sequence of $p$-inversions. We observe that, for $n=|V(D)|$, deciding whether $D$ is $(=n-1)$-invertible is equivalent to deciding whether $D$ is acyclically pushable, and thus NP-complete. In all other cases, when $p \neq n-1$, we construct a polynomial-time algorithm to decide $(=p)$-invertibility. We then consider the $(= p)$-inversion number, $\text{inv}^{= p}(D)$ (resp. $(\leq p)$-inversion number, $\text{inv}^{\leq p}(D)$), defined as the minimum number of $(=p)$-inversions (resp. $(\leq p)$-inversions) rendering $D$ acyclic. We show that every $(=p)$-invertible digraph $D$ satisfies $\text{inv}^{= p}(D) \leq |A(D)|$ for every integer $p\geq 2$. When $p$ is even, we bound $\text{inv}^{= p}$ by a (linear) function of the feedback arc set number, and rule out the existence of any bounding function for odd $p$. Finally, we study the complexity of deciding whether the $(= p)$-inversion number, or the $(\leq p)$-inversion number, of a given oriented graph is at most a given integer $k$. For any fixed positive integer $p \geq 2$, when $k$ is part of the input, we show that both problems are NP-hard even in tournaments. In general oriented graphs, we prove $W[1]$-hardness for both problems when parameterized by $p$, even for $k=1$. In contrast, we exhibit polynomial kernels in $p + k$ for both problems in tournaments.

The dichromatic number $\vecχ(D)$ of a digraph $D=(V,A)$ is the minimum number of sets in a partition $V_1,\ldots{},V_k$ of $V$ into $k$ subsets so that the induced subdigraph $D[V_i]$ is acyclic for each $i\in [k]$. This is a generalization of the chromatic number for undirected graphs as a graph has chromatic number at most $k$ if and only if the complete biorientation of $G$ (replace each edge by a directed 2-cycle) has dichromatic number at most $k$. In this paper we introduce the acyclic dichromatic number $\vecχ_{\rm a}(D)$ of a digraph $D$ as the minimum number of sets in a partition $V_1,\ldots{},V_k$ of $V$ so that the induced subdigraph $D[V_i]$ is acyclic for each $i\in [k]$ and each of the bipartite induced subdigraphs $D[V_i,V_j]$ is acyclic for each $1\leq i<j\leq k$. This parameter, which resembles the definition of acyclic chromatic number for undirected graphs, has apparently not been studied before. We derive a number of results which display the difference between the dichromatic number and the acyclic dichromatic number, in particular, there are digraphs $D$ with arbitrarily large $\vecχ_{\rm a}(D)-\vecχ(D)$, even among tournaments with dichromatic number 2 and bipartite tournaments (where the dichromatic number is always 2). We prove several complexity results, including that deciding whether $\vecχ_{\rm a}(D)\leq 2$ is NP-complete already for bipartite digraphs, while it is polynomial for tournaments (contrary to the case for dichromatic number). We also generalize the concept of heroes of a tournament to acyclic heroes of tournaments.

A {\bf $\mathbf{k}$-majority coloring} of a digraph $D=(V,A)$ is a coloring of $V$ with $k$ colors so that each vertex $v\in V$ has at least as many out-neighbours of color different from its own color as it has out-neighbours with the same color as itself. Majority colorings have received much attention in the last years and many interesting open problems remain. Inspired by this and the fact that digraphs can be modelled via 2-edge-colored graphs we study several problems concerning vertex partitions of 2-edge-colored graphs. In particular we study vertex partitions with the property that for each $c=1,2$ every vertex $v$ has least as many edges of colour $c$ to vertices outside the set it belongs to as it has to vertices inside its own set. We call such a vertex partition with $k$ sets a {\bf $\mathbf{k}$-majority partition. Among other things we show that every 2-edge-coloured graph has a 4-majority partition and that it is NP-complete to decide whether a 2-edge-coloured graph has a 3-majority partition. We also apply probabilistic tools to show that every $2$-edge-colored graph $G$ of minimum color-degree $δ$ and maximum degree $Δ\le \frac{e^{δ/18}}{9δ}-2$ has a balanced majority $3$-partition.

A directed graph (digraph) $ D $ is $ k $-linked if $ |D| \geq 2k $, and for any $ 2k $ distinct vertices $ x_1, \ldots, x_k, y_1, \ldots, y_k $ of $ D $, there exist vertex-disjoint paths $ P_1, \ldots, P_k $ such that $ P_i $ is a path from $ x_i $ to $ y_i $ for each $ i \in [k] $. In 1980, Thomassen conjectured that there exists a function $ f(k) $ such that every $ f(k) $-strong digraph is $ k $-linked. He later disproved this conjecture by showing that $ f(2) $ does not exist for general digraphs and proved that the function $f(k)$ exists for the class of tournaments. In this paper we consider a large class $\mathcal{ D} $ of digraphs which includes all semicomplete digraphs (digraphs with no pair of non-adjacent vertices) and all quasi-transitive digraphs (a digraph $D$ is quasi-transitive if for any three vertices $x, y, z$ of $D$, whenever $xy$ and $yz$ are arcs, then $x$ and $z$ are adjacent). We prove that every $ 3k $-strong digraph $D\in \mathcal{D}$ with minimum out-degree at least $ 23k $ is $ k $-linked. A digraph $D$ is $l$-quasi-transitive if whenever there is a path of length $l$ between vertices $u$ and $v$ in $D$ the vertices $u$ and $v$ are adjacent. Hence 2-quasi-transitive digraphs are exactly the quasi-transitive digraphs. We prove that there is a function $f(k,l)$ so that every $f(k,l)$-strong $l$-quasi-transitive digraph is $k$-linked. The main new tool in our proofs significantly strengthens an important property of vertices with maximum in-degree in a tournament. While Landau in 1953 already proved that such a vertex $v$ is reachable by all other vertices by paths of length at most 2, we show that, in fact, the structure of these paths is much richer. In general there are many such paths for almost all out-neighbours of $v$ and this property is crucial in our proofs.

A 2-edge-coloured graph $G$ is called {\bf locally complete} if for each vertex $v$, the vertices adjacent to $v$ through edges of the same colour induce a complete subgraph in $G$. Locally complete 2-edge-coloured graphs have nice properties and there exists a polynomial algorithm to decide whether such a graph has an alternating hamiltonian cycle, where alternating means that the colour of two consecutive edges on the cycle are different. In this paper we show that graphs having locally complete 2-edge-colourings can be recognized in polynomial time. We give a forbidden substructure characterization for this class of graphs analogous to Gallai's characterization for cocomparability graphs. Finally, we characterize proper interval graphs and proper circular-arc graphs which have locally complete 2-edge-colourings by forbidden subgraphs.

It is well-known and easy to show that even the following version of the directed travelling salesman problem is NP-complete: Given a strongly connected complete digraph $D=(V,A)$, a cost function $w: A\rightarrow \{0,1\}$ and a natural number $K$; decide whether $D$ has a directed Hamiltonian cycle of cost at most $K$. We study the following variant of this problem for $\{0,1\}$-weighted semicomplete digraphs where the set of arcs which have cost 1 form a collection of vertex-disjoint complete digraphs. A digraph is \textbf{semicomplete multipartite} if it can be obtained from a semicomplete digraph $D$ by choosing a collection of vertex-disjoint subsets $X_1,\ldots{},X_c$ of $V(D)$ and then deleting all arcs both of whose end-vertices lie inside some $X_i$. Let $D$ be a semicomplete digraph with a cost function $w$ as above, where $w(a)=1$ precisely when $a$ is an arc inside one of the subsets $X_1,\ldots{},X_c$ and let $D^*$ be the corresponding \smd{} that we obtain by deleting all arcs inside the $X_i$'s. Then every cycle $C$ of $D$ corresponds to a {\bf generalized cycle} $C^g$ of $D^*$ which is either the cycle $C$ itself if $w(C)=0$ or a collection of two or more paths that we obtain by deleting all arcs of cost 1 on $C$. Similarly we can define a {\bf generalized path} $P^g$ in a semicomplete multipartite digraph. The purpose of this paper is to study structural and algorithmic properties of generalized paths and cycles in semicomplete multipartite digraphs. This allows us to identify classes of directed $\{0,1\}$-weighted TSP instances that can be solved in polynomial time as well as others for which we can get very close to the optimum in polynomial time. Along with these results we also show that two natural questions about properties of cycles meeting all partite sets in semicomplete multipartite digraphs are NP-complete.

The support of a flow $x$ in a network is the subdigraph induced by the arcs $uv$ for which $x(uv)>0$. We discuss a number of results on flows in networks where we put certain restrictions on structure of the support of the flow. Many of these problems are NP-hard because they generalize linkage problems for digraphs. For example deciding whether a network ${\cal N}=(D,s,t,c)$ has a maximum flow $x$ such that the maximum out-degree of the support $D_x$ of $x$ is at most 2 is NP-complete as it contains the 2-linkage problem as a very special case. Another problem which is NP-complete for the same reason is that of computing the maximum flow we can send from $s$ to $t$ along $p$ paths (called a maximum {\bf $p$-path-flow}) in ${\cal N}$. Baier et al. (2005) gave a polynomial time algorithm which finds a $p$-path-flow $x$ whose value is at least $\frac{2}{3}$ of the value of a optimum $p$-path-flow when $p\in \{2,3\}$, and at least $\frac{1}{2}$ when $p\geq 4$. When $p=2$, they show that this is best possible unless P=NP. We show for each $p\geq 2$ that the value of a maximum $p$-path-flow cannot be approximated by any ratio larger than $\frac{9}{11}$, unless P=NP. We also consider a variant of the problem where the $p$ paths must be disjoint. For this problem, we give an algorithm which gets within a factor $\frac{1}{H(p)}$ of the optimum solution, where $H(p)$ is the $p$'th harmonic number ($H(p) \sim \ln(p)$). We show that in the case where the network is acyclic, we can find such a maximum $p$-path-flow in polynomial time for every $p$. We determine the complexity of a number of related problems concerning the structure of flows. For the special case of acyclic digraphs, some of the results we obtain are in some sense best possible.

By a well known theorem of Robbins, a graph $G$ has a strongly connected orientation if and only if $G$ is 2-edge-connected and it is easy to find, in linear time, either a cut edge of $G$ or a strong orientation of $G$. A result of Durand de Gevigny shows that for every $k\geq 3$ it is NP-hard to decide if a given graph $G$ has a $k$-strong orientation. Thomassen showed that one can check in polynomial time whether a given graph has a 2-strong orientation. This implies that for a given digraph $D$ we can determine in polynomial time whether we can reorient (=reverse) some arcs of $D=(V,A)$ to obtain a 2-strong digraph $D'=(V,A')$. This naturally leads to the question of determining the minimum number of such arcs to reverse before the resulting graph is 2-strong. In this paper we show that finding this number is NP-hard. If a 2-connected graph $G$ has no 2-strong orientation, we may ask how many of its edges we may orient so that the resulting mixed graph is still 2-strong. Similarly, we may ask for a 2-edge-connected graph $G$ how many of its edges we can orient such that the resulting mixed graph remains 2-arc-strong. We prove that when restricted to graphs satisfying suitable connectivity conditions, both of these problems are equivalent to finding the minimum number of edges we must double in a 2-edge-connected graph in order to obtain a 4-edge-connected graph. Using this, we show that all these three problems are NP-hard. Finally, we consider the operation of deorienting an arc $uv$ of a digraph $D$ meaning replacing it by an undirected edge between the same vertices. In terms of connectivity properties, this is equivalent to adding the opposite arc $vu$ to $D$. We prove that for every $\ell\geq 3$ it is NP-hard to find the minimum number of arcs to deorient in a digraph $D$ in order to obtain an $\ell$-strong digraph $D'$.

A digraph $D$ is $k$-linked if it satisfies that for every choice of disjoint sets $\{x_1,\ldots{},x_k\}$ and $\{y_1,\ldots{},y_k\}$ of vertices of $D$ there are vertex disjoint paths $P_1,\ldots{},P_k$ such that $P_i$ is an $(x_i,y_i)$-path. Confirming a conjecture by Kühn et al, Pokrovskiy proved in 2015 that every $452k$-strong tournament is $k$-linked and asked for a better linear bound. Very recently Meng et al proved that every $(40k-31)$-strong tournament is $k$-linked. In this note we use an important lemma from their paper to give a short proof that every $(13k-6)$-strong tournament of minimum out-degree at least $28k-13$ is $k$-linked.

Let $D$ be an oriented graph. The inversion of a set $X$ of vertices in $D$ consists in reversing the direction of all arcs with both ends in $X$. The inversion number of $D$, denoted by ${\rm inv}(D)$, is the minimum number of inversions needed to make $D$ acyclic. Denoting by $τ(D)$, $τ' (D)$, and $ν(D)$ the cycle transversal number, the cycle arc-transversal number and the cycle packing number of $D$ respectively, one shows that ${\rm inv}(D) \leq τ' (D)$, ${\rm inv}(D) \leq 2τ(D)$ and there exists a function $g$ such that ${\rm inv}(D)\leq g(ν(D))$. We conjecture that for any two oriented graphs $L$ and $R$, ${\rm inv}(L\rightarrow R) ={\rm inv}(L) +{\rm inv}(R)$ where $L\rightarrow R$ is the dijoin of $L$ and $R$. This would imply that the first two inequalities are tight. We prove this conjecture when ${\rm inv}(L)\leq 1$ and ${\rm inv}(R)\leq 2$ and when ${\rm inv}(L) ={\rm inv}(R)=2$ and $L$ and $R$ are strongly connected. We also show that the function $g$ of the third inequality satisfies $g(1)\leq 4$. We then consider the complexity of deciding whether ${\rm inv}(D)\leq k$ for a given oriented graph $D$. We show that it is NP-complete for $k=1$, which together with the above conjecture would imply that it is NP-complete for every $k$. This contrasts with a result of Belkhechine et al. which states that deciding whether ${\rm inv}(T)\leq k$ for a given tournament $T$ is polynomial-time solvable.

Let $D$ be a digraph, let $p \geq 1$ be an integer, and let $f: V(D) \to \mathbb{N}_0^p$ be a vector function with $f=(f_1,f_2,\ldots,f_p)$. We say that $D$ has an $f$-partition if there is a partition $(D_1,D_2,\ldots,D_p)$ into induced subdigraphs of $D$ such that for all $i \in [1,p]$, the digraph $D_i$ is weakly $f_i$-degenerate, that is, in every non-empty subdigraph $D'$ of $D_i$ there is a vertex $v$ such that $\min\{d_{D'}^+(v), d_{D'}^-(v)\} < f_i(v)$. In this paper, we prove that the condition $f_1(v) + f_2(v) + \ldots + f_p(v) \geq \max \{d_D^+(v),d_D^-(v)\}$ for all $v \in V(D)$ is almost sufficient for the existence of an $f$-partition and give a full characterization of the bad pairs $(D,f)$. Moreover, we describe a polynomial time algorithm that (under the previous conditions) either verifies that $(D,f)$ is a bad pair or finds an $f$-partition. Among other applications, this leads to a generalization of Brooks' Theorem as well as the list-version of Brooks' Theorem for digraphs, where a coloring of digraph is a partition of the digraph into acyclic induced subdigraphs. We furthermore obtain a result bounding the $s$-degenerate chromatic number of a digraph in terms of the maximum of maximum in-degree and maximum out-degree.

A 2-edge-coloured graph $G$ is {\bf supereulerian} if $G$ contains a spanning closed trail in which the edges alternate in colours. An {\bf eulerian factor} of a 2-edge-coloured graph is a collection of vertex disjoint induced subgraphs which cover all the vertices of $G$ such that each of these subgraphs is supereulerian. We give a polynomial algorithm to test if a 2-edge-coloured graph has an eulerian factor and to produce one when it exists. A 2-edge-coloured graph is {\bf (trail-)colour-connected} if it contains a pair of alternating $(u,v)$-paths ($(u,v)$-trails) whose union is an alternating closed walk for every pair of distinct vertices $u,v$. A 2-edge-coloured graph is {\bf M-closed} if $xz$ is an edge of $G$ whenever some vertex $u$ is joined to both $x$ and $z$ by edges of the same colour. M-closed 2-edge-coloured graphs, introduced in \cite{balbuenaDMTCS21}, form a rich generalization of 2-edge-coloured complete graphs. We show that if $G$ is an extension of an M-closed 2-edge-coloured complete graph, then $G$ is supereulerian if and only if $G$ is trail-colour-connected and has an eulerian factor. We also show that for general 2-edge-coloured graphs it is NP-complete to decide whether the graph is supereulerian. Finally we pose a number of open problems.

A non-empty subset $S$ of the vertices of a digraph $D$ is called a {\it safe set} if \begin{itemize} \item[(i)] for every strongly connected component $M$ of $D-S$, there exists a strongly connected component $N$ of $D[S]$ such that there exists an arc from $M$ to $N$; and \item[(ii)] for every strongly connected component $M$ of $D-S$ and every strongly connected component $N$ of $D[S]$, we have $|M|\leq |N|$ whenever there exists an arc from $M$ to $N$. \end{itemize} In the case of acyclic digraphs a set $X$ of vertices is a safe set precisely when $X$ is an {\it in-dominating set}, that is, every vertex not in $X$ has at least one arc to $X$. We prove that, even for acyclic digraphs which are traceable (have a hamiltonian path) it is NP-hard to find a minimum cardinality in-dominating set. Then we show that the problem is also NP-hard for tournaments and give, for every positive constant $c$, a polynomial algorithm for finding a minimum cardinality safe set in a tournament on $n$ vertices in which no strong component has size more than $c\log{}(n)$. Under the so called Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) this is close to best possible in the following sense: If ETH holds, then, for every $ε>0$ there is no polynomial time algorithm for finding a minimum cardinality safe set for the class of tournaments in which the largest strong component has size at most $\log^{1+ε}(n)$. We also discuss bounds on the cardinality of safe sets in tournaments.

The chromatic number $\overrightarrowχ(D)$ of a digraph $D$ is the minimum number of colors needed to color the vertices of $D$ such that each color class induces an acyclic subdigraph of $D$. A digraph $D$ is $k$-critical if $\overrightarrowχ(D) = k$ but $\overrightarrowχ(D') < k$ for all proper subdigraphs $D'$ of $D$. We examine methods for creating infinite families of critical digraphs, the Dirac join and the directed and bidirected Hajós join. We prove that a digraph $D$ has chromatic number at least $k$ if and only if it contains a subdigraph that can be obtained from bidirected complete graphs on $k$ vertices by (directed) Hajós joins and identifying non-adjacent vertices. Building upon that, we show that a digraph $D$ has chromatic number at least $k$ if and only if it can be constructed from bidirected $K_k$'s by using directed and bidirected Hajós joins and identifying non-adjacent vertices (so called Ore joins), thereby transferring a well-known result of Urquhart to digraphs. Finally, we prove a Gallai-type theorem that characterizes the structure of the low vertex subdigraph of a critical digraph, that is, the subdigraph, which is induced by the vertices that have in-degree $k-1$ and out-degree $k-1$ in $D$.

A digraph is {\bf eulerian} if it is connected and every vertex has its in-degree equal to its out-degree. Having a spanning eulerian subdigraph is thus a weakening of having a hamiltonian cycle. A digraph is {\bf semicomplete} if it has no pair of non-adjacent vertices. A {\bf tournament} is a semicomplete digraph without directed cycles of length 2. Fraise and Thomassen \cite{fraisseGC3} proved that every $(k+1)$-strong tournament has a hamiltonian cycle which avoids any prescribed set of $k$ arcs. In \cite{bangsupereuler} the authors demonstrated that a number of results concerning vertex-connectivity and hamiltonian cycles in tournaments and have analogues when we replace vertex connectivity by arc-connectivity and hamiltonian cycles by spanning eulerian subdigraphs. They showed the existence of a smallest function $f(k)$ such that every $f(k)$-arc-strong semicomplete digraph has a spanning eulerian subdigraph which avoids any prescribed set of $k$ arcs. They proved that $f(k)\leq \frac{(k+1)^2}{4}+1$ and also proved that $f(k)=k+1$ when $k=2,3$. Based on this they conjectured that $f(k)=k+1$ for all $k\geq 0$. In this paper we prove that $f(k)\leq (\lceil\frac{6k+1}{5}\rceil)$.