arXiv++ Combinatorics

By a well known theorem of Robbins, a graph $G$ has a strongly connected orientation if and only if $G$ is 2-edge-connected and it is easy to find, in linear time, either a cut edge of $G$ or a strong orientation of $G$. A result of Durand de Gevigny shows that for every $k\geq 3$ it is NP-hard to decide if a given graph $G$ has a $k$-strong orientation. Thomassen showed that one can check in polynomial time whether a given graph has a 2-strong orientation. This implies that for a given digraph $D$ we can determine in polynomial time whether we can reorient (=reverse) some arcs of $D=(V,A)$ to obtain a 2-strong digraph $D'=(V,A')$. This naturally leads to the question of determining the minimum number of such arcs to reverse before the resulting graph is 2-strong. In this paper we show that finding this number is NP-hard. If a 2-connected graph $G$ has no 2-strong orientation, we may ask how many of its edges we may orient so that the resulting mixed graph is still 2-strong. Similarly, we may ask for a 2-edge-connected graph $G$ how many of its edges we can orient such that the resulting mixed graph remains 2-arc-strong. We prove that when restricted to graphs satisfying suitable connectivity conditions, both of these problems are equivalent to finding the minimum number of edges we must double in a 2-edge-connected graph in order to obtain a 4-edge-connected graph. Using this, we show that all these three problems are NP-hard. Finally, we consider the operation of deorienting an arc $uv$ of a digraph $D$ meaning replacing it by an undirected edge between the same vertices. In terms of connectivity properties, this is equivalent to adding the opposite arc $vu$ to $D$. We prove that for every $\ell\geq 3$ it is NP-hard to find the minimum number of arcs to deorient in a digraph $D$ in order to obtain an $\ell$-strong digraph $D'$.

Recently, it was proved by Bérczi and Schwarcz that the problem of factorizing a matroid into rainbow bases with respect to a given partition of its ground set is algorithmically intractable. On the other hand, many special cases were left open. We first show that the problem remains hard if the matroid is graphic, answering a question of Bérczi and Schwarcz. As another special case, we consider the problem of deciding whether a given digraph can be factorized into subgraphs which are spanning trees in the underlying sense and respect upper bounds on the indegree of every vertex. We prove that this problem is also hard. This answers a question of Frank. In the second part of the article, we deal with the relaxed problem of covering the ground set of a matroid by rainbow bases. Among other results, we show that there is a linear function $f$ such that every matroid that can be factorized into $k$ bases for some $k \geq 3$ can be covered by $f(k)$ rainbow bases if every partition class contains at most 2 elements.

Results on the existence of various types of spanning subgraphs of graphs are milestones in structural graph theory and have been diversified in several directions. In the present paper, we consider "local" versions of such statements. In 1966, for instance, D. W. Barnette proved that a $3$-connected planar graph contains a spanning tree of maximum degree at most $3$. A local translation of this statement is that if $G$ is a planar graph, $X$ is a subset of specified vertices of $G$ such that $X$ cannot be separated in $G$ by removing $2$ or fewer vertices of $G$, then $G$ has a tree of maximum degree at most $3$ containing all vertices of $X$. Our results constitute a general machinery for strengthening statements about $k$-connected graphs (for $1 \leq k \leq 4$) to locally spanning versions, i.e. subgraphs containing a set $X\subseteq V(G)$ of a (not necessarily planar) graph $G$ in which only $X$ has high connectedness. Given a graph $G$ and $X\subseteq V(G)$, we say $M$ is a minor of $G$ rooted at $X$, if $M$ is a minor of $G$ such that each bag of $M$ contains at most one vertex of $X$ and $X$ is a subset of the union of all bags. We show that $G$ has a highly connected minor rooted at $X$ if $X\subseteq V(G)$ cannot be separated in $G$ by removing a few vertices of $G$. Combining these investigations and the theory of Tutte paths in the planar case yields to locally spanning versions of six well-known results about degree-bounded trees, hamiltonian paths and cycles, and $2$-connected subgraphs of graphs.

We prove for k at most 10, that every graph of chromatic number k with a unique k-coloring admits a clique minor of order k.

We study graphs which admit an acyclic orientation that contains an out-branching and in-branching which are arc-disjoint (such an orientation is called {\bf good}). A {\bf 2T-graph} is a graph whose edge set can be decomposed into two edge-disjoint spanning trees. Clearly a graph has a good orientation if and only if it contains a spanning 2T-graph with a good orientation, implying that 2T-graphs play a central role. Vertex-minimal 2T-graphs with at least two vertices, also known as {\bf generic circuits}, play an important role in rigidity theory for graphs. It was shown in \cite{bangGOpaper} that every generic circuit has a good orientation. Using this, several results on good orientations of 2T-graphs were obtained in \cite{bangGOpaper}. It is an open problem whether there exist a polynomial algorithm for deciding whether a given 2T-graph has a good orientation. In \cite{bangGOpaper} complex constructions of 2T-graphs with no good orientation were given, indicating that the problem might be very difficult. In this paper we focus on so-called {\bf quartics} which are 2T-graphs where every vertex has degree 3 or 4. We identify a sufficient condition for a quartic to have a good orientation, give a polynomial algorithm to recognize quartics satisfying the condition and a polynomial algorithm to produce such an orientation when this condition is met. As a consequence of these results we prove that every 4-regular and 4-connected graph has a good orientation. \iffalse We also provide evidence that even for quartics it may be difficult to find a characterization of those instances which have a good orientation.\fi We also show that every graph on $n\geq 8$ vertices and of minimum degree at least $\lfloor{}n/2\rfloor$ has a good orientation. Finally we pose a number of open problems.

A (minimal) transversal of a partition is a set which contains exactly one element from each member of the partition and nothing else. A coloring of a graph is a partition of its vertex set into anticliques, that is, sets of pairwise nonadjacent vertices. We study the following problem: Given a transversal $T$ of a proper coloring $\mathfrak{C}$ of some graph $G$, is there a partition $\mathfrak{H}$ of a subset of $V(G)$ into connected sets such that $T$ is a transversal of $\mathfrak{H}$ and such that two sets of $\mathfrak{H}$ are adjacent if their corresponding vertices from $T$ are connected by a path in $G$ using only two colors? It has been suggested by the first author to study the following question: for any transversal $T$ of a coloring $\mathfrak{C}$ of order $k$ of some graph $G$ such that any pair of color classes induces a connected graph, does there exist such a partition $\mathfrak{H}$ with pairwise adjacent sets (which would prove Hadwiger's Conjecture for the class of uniquely optimally colorable graphs)? This is open for small $k \geq 5$, here we give a proof for the case that $k=5$ and the subgraph induced by $T$ is connected. Moreover, we show that for $k\geq 7$, it is not sufficient for the existence of $\mathfrak{H}$ as above just to force any two transversal vertices to be connected by a 2-colored path.

It has been conjectured that if a finite graph has a vertex coloring such that the union of any two color classes induces a connected graph, then for every set $T$ of vertices containing exactly one member from each color class there exists a complete minor such that $T$ contains exactly one member from each branching set. Here we prove the statement for line graphs.

An edge in a $k$-connected graph $G$ is called {\em $k$-contractible} if the graph $G/e$ obtained from $G$ by contracting $e$ is $k$-connected. Generalizing earlier results on $3$-contractible edges in spanning trees of $3$-connected graphs, we prove that (except for the graphs $K_{k+1}$ if $k \in \{1,2\}$) (a) every spanning tree of a $k$-connected triangle free graph has two $k$-contractible edges, (b) every spanning tree of a $k$-connected graph of minimum degree at least $\frac{3}{2}k-1$ has two $k$-contractible edges, (c) for $k>3$, every DFS tree of a $k$-connected graph of minimum degree at least $\frac{3}{2}k-\frac{3}{2}$ has two $k$-contractible edges, (d) every spanning tree of a cubic $3$-connected graph nonisomorphic to $K_4$ has at least $\frac{1}{3}|V(G)|-1$ many $3$-contractible edges, and (e) every DFS tree of a $3$-connected graph nonisomorphic to $K_4$, the prism, or the prism plus a single edge has two 3-contractible edges. We also discuss in which sense these theorems are best possible.

Let $G$ be a graph, $r \geq t$ integers, and $N \subseteq E(G)$. An $(r,t)$-threshold-coloring of $G$ with respect to $N$ is a mapping $c: V(G) \rightarrow \{0,\ldots,r-1\}$ such that $|c(u)-c(v)| \leq t$ for every $uv \in N$ and $|c(u)-c(v)|>t$ for every $uv \in E(G) \setminus N$. A graph is total threshold colorable if there exist integers $r,t$ such that for every $N \subseteq E(G)$, $G$ admits an $(r,t)$-threshold-coloring with respect to $N$. We show that every prism is total threshold colorable, and that the Petersen graph is total threshold colorable. In contrast to this fact we show that Moebius ladders are not total threshold colorable, from which it follows that there is no characterization of being total threshold colorable in terms of a finite set of forbidden subgraphs.

We call a finite undirected graph minimally k-matchable if it has at least k distinct perfect matchings but deleting any edge results in a graph which has not. An odd subdivision of some graph G is any graph obtained by replacing every edge of G by a path of odd length connecting its end vertices such that all these paths are internally disjoint. We prove that for every k>0 there exists a finite set of graphs S(k) such that every minimally k-matchable graph is isomorphic to a disjoint union of an odd subdivision of some graph from S(k) and any number of copies of the complete graph on two vertices.

An antidirected trail in a digraph is a trail (a walk with no arc repeated) in which the arcs alternate between forward and backward arcs. An antidirected path is an antidirected trail where no vertex is repeated. We show that it is NP-complete to decide whether two vertices $x,y$ in a digraph are connected by an antidirected path, while one can decide in linear time whether they are connected by an antidirected trail. A digraph $D$ is antistrong if it contains an antidirected $(x,y)$-trail starting and ending with a forward arc for every choice of $x,y\in V(D)$. We show that antistrong connectivity can be decided in linear time. We discuss relations between antistrong connectivity and other properties of a digraph and show that the arc-minimal antistrong spanning subgraphs of a digraph are the bases of a matroid on its arc-set. We show that one can determine in polynomial time the minimum number of new arcs whose addition to $D$ makes the resulting digraph the arc-disjoint union of $k$ antistrong digraphs. In particular, we determine the minimum number of new arcs which need to be added to a digraph to make it antistrong. We use results from matroid theory to characterize graphs which have an antistrong orientation and give a polynomial time algorithm for constructing such an orientation when it exists. This immediately gives analogous results for graphs which have a connected bipartite 2-detachment. Finally, we study arc-decompositions of antistrong digraphs and pose several problems and conjectures.

For a graph G, let h(G) denote the largest k such that G has k pairwise disjoint pairwise adjacent connected nonempty subgraphs, and let s(G) denote the largest k such that G has k pairwise disjoint pairwise adjacent connected subgraphs of size 1 or 2. Hadwiger's conjecture states that h(G) is at least c(G), where c(G) is the chromatic number of G. Seymour conjectured that s(G) is at least |V(G)|/2 for all graphs without antitriangles, i. e. three pairwise nonadjacent vertices. Here we concentrate on graphs G with exactly one c(G)-coloring. We prove generalizations of (i) if c(G) is at most 6 and G has exactly one c(G)-coloring then h(G) is at least c(G), where the proof does not use the four-color-theorem, and (ii) if G has no antitriangles and G has exactly one c(G)-coloring then s(G) is at least |V(G)|/2.

A graph is ambiguously k-colorable if its vertex set admits two distinct partitions each into at most k anticliques. We give a full characterization of the maximally ambiguously k-colorable graphs in terms of quadratic matrices. As an application, we calculate the maximum number of edges an ambiguously k-colorable graph can have, and characterize the extremal graphs.

The colouring number col(G) of a graph G is the smallest integer k for which there is an ordering of the vertices of G such that when removing the vertices of G in the specified order no vertex of degree more than k-1 in the remaining graph is removed at any step. An edge e of a graph G is said to be double-col-critical if the colouring number of G-V(e) is at most the colouring number of G minus 2. A connected graph G is said to be double-col-critical if each edge of G is double-col-critical. We characterise the double-col-critical graphs with colouring number at most 5. In addition, we prove that every 4-col-critical non-complete graph has at most half of its edges being double-col-critical, and that the extremal graphs are precisely the odd wheels on at least six vertices. We observe that for any integer k greater than 4 and any positive number r, there is a k-col-critical graph with the ratio of double-col-critical edges between 1- r and 1.

The dicycle transversal number t(D) of a digraph D is the minimum size of a dicycle transversal of D, i. e. a set T of vertices of D such that D-T is acyclic. We study the following problem: Given a digraph D, decide if there is a dicycle B in D and a cycle C in the underlying undirected graph of D such such that B,C are disjoint. It is known that there is a polynomial time algorithm for this problem when restricted to strongly connected graphs, which actually finds B,C if they exist. We generalize this to any class of digraphs D with either t(D) not equal to 1 or t(D)=1 and a bounded number of dicycle transversals, and show that the problem is NP-complete for a special class of digraphs D with t(D)=1 and, hence, in general.

We first prove that for every vertex x of a 4-connected graph G there exists a subgraph H in G isomorphic to a subdivision of the complete graph K4 on four vertices such that G-V(H) is connected and contains x. This implies an affirmative answer to a question of W. Kuehnel whether every 4-connected graph G contains a subdivision H of K4 as a subgraph such that G-V(H) is connected. The motor for our induction is a result of Fontet and Martinov stating that every 4-connected graph can be reduced to a smaller one by contracting a single edge, unless the graph is the square of a cycle or the line graph of a cubic graph. It turns out that this is the only ingredience of the proof where 4-connectedness is used. We then generalize our result to connected graphs of minimum degree at least 4, by developing the respective motor: A structure theorem for the class of simple connected graphs of minimum degree at least 4.

A k-connected graph such that deleting any edge / deleting any vertex / contracting any edge results in a graph which is not k-connected is called minimally / critically / contraction-critically k-connected. These three classes play a prominent role in graph connectivity theory, and we give a brief introduction with a light emphasis on reduction- and construction theorems for classes of k-connected graphs.

We give axiomatic foundations for non-finitary infinite matroids with duality, in terms of independent sets, bases, circuits, closure and rank. This completes the solution to a problem of Rado of 1966.