arXiv++ Combinatorics

Tangle structure trees, introduced in [3], offer a unified data structure that displays all the tangles of a graph or data set together with certificates for the non-existence of any other tangles, either locally or overall. In this paper we apply tangle structure trees to derive new versions of the two fundamental tangle theorems: the tree-of-tangles theorem, and the tangle-tree duality theorem. We extend the tree-of-tangles theorem to $\mathcal F$-tangles that need not be profiles. When $\mathcal F$ consists of stars of separations, as it does in classical tangle-tree duality theorems, we show how to convert tangle structure trees that certify the non-existence of $\mathcal F$-tangles into tree-decompositions that certify this in the way known from graph tangles, as $S$-trees over~$\mathcal F$.

We introduce a comprehensive data structure, tangle structure trees, which simultaneously displays all the $\mathcal{F}$-tangles of an abstract separation system for very general obstruction sets $\mathcal{F}$. It simultaneously also displays certificates $σ\in\mathcal{F}$ for any non-existence of such tangles, or for the non-extendability of low-order tangles to higher-order ones. Our theorem can be applied to produce the structures of the classical tree-of-tangles and tangle-tree duality theorems, both for graph tangles and for their known generalizations to more general separation systems. It extends those theorems to obstruction sets $\mathcal{F}$ that need not define profiles (as they must in trees of tangles) or consist of stars of separations (as they must in tangle-tree duality). Our existence proof for these structure trees is constructive. The construction has been implemented in open-source software available for tangle detection and further analysis.

Using the recently developed mathematical theory of tangles, we re-assess the mathematical foundations for applications of the five factor model in personality tests by a new, mathematically rigorous, quantitative method. Our findings broadly confirm the validity of current tests, but also show that more detailed information can be extracted from existing data. We found that the big five traits appear at different levels of scrutiny. Some already emerge at a coarse resolution of our tools at which others cannot yet be discerned, while at a resolution where these _can_ be discerned, and distinguished, some of the former traits are no longer visible but have split into more refined traits or disintegrated altogether. We also identified traits other than the five targeted in those tests. These include more general traits combining two or more of the big five, as well as more specific traits refining some of them. All our analysis is structural and quantitative, and thus rigorous in explicitly defined mathematical terms. Since tangles, once computed, can be described concisely in terms of very few explicit statements referring only to the test questions used, our findings are also directly open to interpretation by experts in psychology. Tangle analysis can be applied similarly to other topics in psychology. Our paper is intended to serve as a first indication of what may be possible.

It is an easy observation that if a graph~$G$ admits a path-decomposition whose parts have small radius, then $G$ contains no large subdivision of $K_{1,3}$ or $K^3$ as a (quasi-)geodesic subgraph. We show that these are in fact the only obstructions to such path-decompositions of small radial width, and we prove analogous results for decompositions modelled on cycles and subdivided stars instead of paths. With our results we confirm in a strong form a conjecture of Georgakopoulos and Papasoglu on fat-minor-characterisations of graphs quasi-isometric to paths, cycles and paths, and subdivided stars, respectively. For this, we present a novel view on quasi-isometries between graphs by graph-decompositions of bounded radial width and spread. This new perspective enables us to prove further results in coarse graph theory, and may thus be of independent interest.

We show that a graph contains a large wall as a strong immersion minor if and only if the graph does not admit a tree-cut decomposition of small `width', which is measured in terms of its adhesion and the path-likeness of its torsos.

We present a canonical way to decompose finite graphs into highly connected local parts. The decomposition depends only on an integer parameter whose choice sets the intended degree of locality. The global structure of the graph, as determined by the relative position of these parts, is described by a coarser $\it model$. This is a simpler graph determined entirely by the decomposition, not imposed. The model and decomposition are obtained as projections of the tangle-tree structure of a covering of the given graph that reflects its local structure while unfolding its global structure. In this way, the tangle theory from graph minors is brought to bear canonically on arbitrary graphs, which need not be tree-like. Our theorem extends to locally finite quasi-transitive graphs, and in particular to locally finite Cayley graphs. It thereby offers a canonical decomposition for finitely generated groups into local parts, whose relative structure is displayed by a graph.

Applications of tangles of connectivity systems suggest a duality between these, in which for two sets $X$ and $Y\!$ the elements $x$ of $X$ map to subsets $Y_x$ of $Y\!$, and the elements $y$ of $Y\!$ map to subsets $X_y$ of $X$, so that $x\in X_y$ if and only if $y\in Y_x$ for all $x\in X$ and $y\in Y\!$. We explore this duality, and relate the tangles arising from the dual systems to each other.

Tangles, as introduced by Robertson and Seymour, were designed as an indirect way of capturing clusters in graphs and matroids. They have since been shown to capture clusters in much broader discrete structures too. But not all tangles are induced by a set of points, let alone a cluster. We characterise those that are: the tangles that are induced by a subset of or function on the set of data points whose connectivity structure they are meant to capture. We offer two such characterisations. The first is in terms of how many small sides of a tangle's separations it takes to cover the ground set. The second uses a new notion of duality for oriented set separations that becomes possible if these are no longer required to be separations of graph or matroids.

We define an algebraic setup of homology for hypergraphs, which defaults to simplicial homology in the case of graphs, and study its basic properties. As part of our study we define algebraic spanning trees of hypergraphs, along with fundamental cuts and cycles playing their usual roles.

Traditional clustering identifies groups of objects that share certain qualities. Tangles do the converse: they identify groups of qualities that often occur together. They can thereby discover, relate, and structure types: of behaviour, political views, texts, or viruses. If desired, tangles can also be used as a new method for traditional clustering. They offer a precise, quantitative paradigm suited particularly to fuzzy clusters, since they do not require any assignment of objects to the clusters which these collectively form. This is the first of four parts of a book with the above title. The book explores applications outside mathematics of the notion and theory of tangles generalised from the graph tangles know from graph minor theory.

Traditional clustering identifies groups of objects that share certain qualities. Tangles do the converse: they identify groups of qualities that often occur together. They can thereby identify and discover 'types': of behaviour, views, abilities, dispositions. The mathematical theory of tangles has its origins in the connectivity theory of graphs, which it has transformed over the past 30 years. It has recently been axiomatized in a way that makes its two deepest results applicable to a much wider range of contexts. This expository paper indicates some contexts where this difference of approach is particularly striking. But these are merely examples of such contexts: in principle, it can apply to much of the quantitative social sciences. Our aim here is twofold: to indicate just enough of the theory of tangles to show how this can work in the various different contexts, and to give plenty of different examples illustrating this.

We prove a tangle-tree theorem and a tangle duality theorem for abstract separation systems $\vec S$ that are submodular in the structural sense that, for every pair of oriented separations, $\vec S$ contains either their meet or their join defined in some universe $\vec U$ of separations containing $\vec S$. This holds, and is widely used, if $\vec U$ comes with a submodular order function and $\vec S$ consists of all its separations up to some fixed order. Our result is that for the proofs of these two theorems, which are central to abstract tangle theory, it suffices to assume the above structural consequence for $\vec S$, and no order function is needed.

Separation systems are posets with additional structure that form an abstract setting in which tangle-like clusters in graphs, matroids and other combinatorial structures can be expressed and studied. This paper offers some basic theory about infinite separation systems and how they relate to the finite separation systems they induce. They can be used to prove tangle-type duality theorems for infinite graphs and matroids, which will be done in future work that will build on this paper.

We prove a general width duality theorem for combinatorial structures with well-defined notions of cohesion and separation. These might be graphs and matroids, but can be much more general or quite different. The theorem asserts a duality between the existence of high cohesiveness somewhere local and a global overall tree structure. We describe cohesive substructures in a unified way in the format of tangles: as orientations of low-order separations satisfying certain consistency axioms. These axioms can be expressed without reference to the underlying structure, such as a graph or matroid, but just in terms of the poset of the separations themselves. This makes it possible to identify tangles, and apply our tangle-tree duality theorem, in very diverse settings. Our result implies all the classical duality theorems for width parameters in graph minor theory, such as path-width, tree-width, branch-width or rank-width. It yields new, tangle-type, duality theorems for tree-width and path-width. It implies the existence of width parameters dual to cohesive substructures such as $k$-blocks, edge-tangles, or given subsets of tangles, for which no width duality theorems were previously known. Abstract separation systems can be found also in structures quite unlike graphs and matroids. For example, our theorem can be applied to image analysis by capturing the regions of an image as tangles of separations defined as natural partitions of its set of pixels. It can be applied in big data contexts by capturing clusters as tangles. It can be applied in the social sciences, e.g. by capturing as tangles the few typical mindsets of individuals found by a survey. It could also be applied in pure mathematics, e.g. to separations of compact manifolds.

We apply a recent duality theorem for tangles in abstract separation systems to derive tangle-type duality theorems for width-parameters in graphs and matroids. We further derive a duality theorem for the existence of clusters in large data sets. Our applications to graphs include new, tangle-type, duality theorems for tree-width, path-width, and tree-decompositions of small adhesion. Conversely, we show that carving width is dual to edge-tangles. For matroids we obtain a duality theorem for tree-width. Our results can be used to derive short proofs of all the classical duality theorems for width parameters in graph minor theory, such as path-width, tree-width, branch-width and rank-width.

We prove a duality theorem applicable to a a wide range of specialisations, as well as to some generalisations, of tangles in graphs. It generalises the classical tangle duality theorem of Robertson and Seymour, which says that every graph either has a large-order tangle or a certain low-width tree-decomposition witnessing that it cannot have such a tangle. Our result also yields duality theorems for profiles and for $k$-blocks. This solves a problem studied, but not solved, by Diestel and Oum and answers an earlier question of Carmesin, Diestel, Hamann and Hundertmark.

We show how an image can, in principle, be described by the tangles of the graph of its pixels. The tangle-tree theorem provides a nested set of separations that efficiently distinguish all the distinguishable tangles in a graph. This translates to a small data set from which the image can be reconstructed. The tangle duality theorem says that a graph either has a certain-order tangle or a tree-structure witnessing that this cannot exist. This tells us the maximum resolution at which the image contains meaningful information.

We study an abstract notion of tree structure which lies at the common core of various tree-like discrete structures commonly used in combinatorics: trees in graphs, order trees, nested subsets of a set, tree-decompositions of graphs and matroids etc. Unlike graph-theoretical or order trees, these _tree sets_ can provide a suitable formalization of tree structure also for infinite graphs, matroids, and set partitions. Order trees reappear as oriented tree sets. We show how each of the above structures defines a tree set, and which additional information, if any, is needed to reconstruct it from this tree set.

We show that an arbitrary infinite graph can be compactified by its ${\aleph_0}$-tangles in much the same way as the ends of a locally finite graph compactify it in its Freudenthal compactification. In general, the ends then appear as a subset of its ${\aleph_0}$-tangles. The ${\aleph_0}$-tangles of a graph are shown to form an inverse limit of the ultrafilters on the sets of components obtained by deleting a finite set of vertices. The ${\aleph_0}$-tangles that are ends are precisely the limits of principal ultrafilters. The ${\aleph_0}$-tangles that correspond to a highly connected part, or $\aleph_0$-block, of the graph are shown to be precisely those that are closed in the topological space of its finite-order separations.

Abstract separation systems provide a simple general framework in which both tree-shape and high cohesion of many combinatorial structures can be expressed, and their duality proved. Applications range from tangle-type duality and tree structure theorems in graphs, matroids or CW-complexes to, potentially, image segmentation and cluster analysis. This paper is intended as a concise common reference for the basic definitions and facts about abstract separation systems in these and any future papers using this framework.