arXiv++ Combinatorics

We prove that no strongly regular graph with parameters $(266, 45, 0, 9)$ exists. The proof is formalized in Lean 4 and Mathlib without external infeasibility certificates or assumed classification theorems. A hypothetical graph gives a rank-$12$ integral Gram lattice with an integral centroid. A Lorentzian change of form, a marked $D_7$ gluing, and an explicit rank-six complement produce a positive-definite even unimodular lattice of rank $24$, together with the original indexed family of $220$ vectors. Harmonic theta identities and a root-isolation inequality force the root system $A_{11} \perp D_7 \perp E_6$. First and second moments then exclude the possible complements: the final case reduces to an impossible binary projection identity $4x + 4y - 2z = 50$. A type-$A$ subcase is closed by a separate classification-free proof of the known nonexistence of a quasi-symmetric $2$-$(56, 12, 9)$ design with intersections $0, 3$. That argument constructs a Krein graph and forces a Steiner $3$-$(12, 4, 1)$ design, contradicting its replication equation. The formal theorem depends only on the three standard Lean axioms and has also been checked independently with nanoda. The archived formalization is release v2.0.0.

For each integer $n\geq 1$, let $N(n)$ denote the number of distinct subsets of $\{2,\ldots,n+1\}$ obtained by choosing one forbidden residue class modulo each integer from $2$ to $n$; this is OEIS sequence A396595 (https://oeis.org/A396595). Equivalently, $N(n)$ is the initial-restriction complexity of the family of global residue-profile survivor sequences. We derive a closed formula, depending on the parity of $n$, for the number of locally distinct residue profiles, and an exact inclusion--exclusion formula for profiles realizing a prescribed survivor set. We prove that $\log N(n)$ has order $n/\log n$, with any possible leading constant between $\log 2$ and $2\log 2$. For prime traces, the logarithm of their number is asymptotic to $(\log 2)n/\log n$. Our main comparison theorem shows that $N(n)$ is exponentially equivalent to the block complexity of prime-admissible subsets of an interval of length $n$. The combinatorial component of the private composite coordinates argument used in the comparison theorem is formalized in Lean 4/Mathlib. We also establish an exact structural recurrence, characterize extendibility by a residue-class covering criterion, and give a dynamic enumeration algorithm. As further illustrations of the model, we exhibit purely periodic global profiles generating prime-valued survivor sequences for which we have not identified corresponding OEIS entries.

For a fixed graph F, the F-degree of a vertex v in a host graph H is the number of subgraphs of H isomorphic to F that contain v, and H is F-irregular if its F-degrees are pairwise distinct. We show that every finite connected graph F on at least three vertices admits a finite connected F-irregular host. For noncomplete F, the proof builds the host from a threshold graph with one deleted edge; when the minimum degree is at least two, a small incidence gadget with distinct weighted column sums separates the remaining exceptional vertices. The construction also yields infinitely many pairwise non-isomorphic finite connected F-irregular hosts for every noncomplete F. The complete-pattern case follows from a theorem of Chartrand, Holbert, Oellermann and Swart. A Lean 4 formalization of Theorem 1.1 is described, taking the published complete-pattern theorem as its sole custom axiom.

We prove that the realization graph of every graphical degree sequence is maximally Hamiltonian: it is Hamilton-laceable when bipartite on more than one vertex, and Hamilton-connected otherwise. This answers Problem P59 of Mütze's survey of combinatorial Gray codes, and the Hamiltonicity question recorded as open by Barrus, in the strongest form either admits. The argument is an induction on the number of ground vertices, cutting the realization graph at a single ground vertex into fibers and the quotient they lie over. The proof is formalized in Lean 4 and checked by its kernel, with seven results cited from the literature and nothing else assumed. Its engine is a classification. The realizable neighborhoods of a ground vertex form a shifted family -- one closed under replacing an element by a smaller one -- and the quotient is the Johnson graph of that family. Such a Johnson graph can fail to be Hamilton-connected, and we determine exactly when: the failures are one explicit family of examples, the Y-families, and each of them fails between a single pair of its members. A shifted family with a greatest member never fails, and those families are exactly the shifted matroids, where the conclusion already follows from the theorem of Naddef and Pulleyblank on the graphs of 0/1-polytopes. The obstruction lives entirely outside the matroid case, which is why it has not been met before.

We report on our ongoing project to develop a computational pipeline, AutoGraphForge, for an automated graph-theoretic conjecturing-refuting-formalizing-proving system. Conjecture generation is counterexample-guided and runs in rounds: a Graffiti3 generator proposes conjectures over a small, evolving snapshot table $T$ (initially a few hundred graphs with their computed invariants) that grows only by counterexamples to its own conjectures. A novelty filter of $559$ classical and folklore relations, closed under transitive composition and linear identity substitution, decides via a linear program whether a candidate is already implied by known results. Surviving candidates are tested against a dataset of about $348,000$ graphs, unioning the complete House of Graphs invariant export, the exhaustive census of all connected graphs on at most nine vertices, several extremal families (strongly regular, minimal Ramsey, Cayley, cages, barbells, lollipops, spiders), and random models. Counterexample-search algorithms then attack the remainder. Run for several rounds on an HPC cluster, the loop yields $6,522$ conjectures that survived the refutation dataset, the novelty filter and every active-search run -- among them nontrivial relations between the annihilation number and the edge-cover number for bipartite and regular graphs, which we prove by hand. A subsequent formalization and proving stage deterministically translates each surviving conjecture into a Lean 4 statement skeleton; every candidate proof is kernel-verified against a pinned mathlib4 and our custom invariant preamble. This stage integrates two neural provers -- DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B (served with vLLM) and the Lean-specialised OProver-32B -- behind the independent kernel check. It is implemented end-to-end and passes initial sanity checks, with the full pipeline currently running on the cluster.

Harwit and Sloane conjectured that every nonsingular entrywise-nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb R^{n\times n}$ satisfies $\|A^{-1}\|_F\ge 2n(n+1)^{-1}\|A\|_{\max}^{-1}$, with equality precisely for positive multiples of $S$-matrices. Cheng proved the conjecture in odd dimensions, while Frankel and Urschel proved the even-dimensional case for $n\ge1000$. We complete the remaining even-dimensional cases. Starting from the structural identities in Frankel--Urschel Lemma 2.1, we derive an exact global defect budget and combine binary rounding with Gram projection. A refined ten-row obstruction handles every even $n\ge66$; a finite exact calculation handles $4\le n\le64$, $n\ne6$; and a separate multi-column energy argument treats $n=6$. The order-two case follows from a direct calculation. The new even-dimensional proof has been formalized in Lean 4, with Frankel--Urschel Lemma 2.1 as its sole external mathematical input. Together with Cheng's odd-dimensional theorem, this proves the S-matrix conjecture in every dimension.

A $p$-ary bent partition of $\mathbb{F}_p^n$ is a partition into $K$ nonempty cells such that every balanced assignment of its cells to $\mathbb{F}_p$ produces a bent function. It was asked whether every possible depth $K$ is a power of $p$; for general $p$, previous affirmative results required regularity or cell-symmetry hypotheses. We prove the stronger unconditional statement that, for every nonzero $h$, exactly $p^n/K$ points remain in the same fine cell under translation by $h$. Thus the fine cells form a partitioned difference family and the fine label map is zero-difference balanced. Consequently $K\mid p^n$, so $K=p^t$; nonempty cells further give $1\le t<n$. In even dimension, the classical cell-size theorem yields $K\mid p^{n/2}$. Together with the known odd-dimensional ternary three-fibre parameter restriction, this gives the global bound $t\le\lfloor n/2\rfloor$. The proof is an exact finite average over balanced coarsenings. The main counting identity and selected consequences are formalized and kernel-checked in Lean 4.

The Rogers--Ramanujan identities equate a $q$-series whose exponents are governed by a quadratic form with an infinite product supported on two residue classes modulo~$5$. Identities of this shape are scarce, and a central problem is to identify the structures that produce them in families. Huang, Jiang, and Oblomkov have proposed a source of a new kind: to each pair of coprime integers $a,b>1$ they attach an infinite-rank $q$-series $Z_{a,b}(q)$, assembled from counts of commuting nilpotent matrix pairs $(A,B)$ with $A^a=B^b$ over finite fields, and they conjecture that it equals an explicit product of $(a-1)(b-1)/2$ modular units of level $a+b$. The $a=2$ cases are the Andrews--Gordon identities; no case with $a>2$ was known. We prove the conjecture for $(a,b)=(3,4)$, $(3,5)$, $(3,7)$, and $(3,8)$. Our proofs pass through a finer sum-to-sum identity, which we conjecture for all $b$ coprime to $3$ and establish for all $b$ when $q=1$. Lau and Ono have since proved that identity in general, and with it the full $a=3$ case. These identities have been formalized and verified in Lean by AxiomProver.

In the transversal achievement game on the $n\times n$ board, two players alternately claim cells, and the first to own a transversal---a set of $n$ cells of which no two share a row or column---wins. Ranđelović showed that the first player wins for every $n\ge4$, while the game is a draw for $n=2,3$. We give an independent proof that the first player wins for $n\ge4$ that additionally establishes a bound on the length of the win: the given strategy forces a win by ply $2n+3$, i.e.\ on the first player's $(n+2)$-nd move, for every $n\ge4$. The proof yields a strategy that is fully determined by a fixed rule on the current position and can thus be implemented directly. We isolate the use of the hypothesis $n\ge4$ to two steps in the analysis, explaining why the argument fails at $n=3$. An exhaustive computational search implementing the strategy verifies it against every legal defense for $n=4,5,6$, confirming both the strategy's validity and that the $2n+3$ bound is attained in these cases. The main theorem has also been formalized and machine-checked in Lean 4.

Kolokolnikov conjectured that, among finite simple graphs on $n$ vertices with exactly $2(n-2)$ edges, the complete bipartite graph $K_{2,n-2}$ maximizes algebraic connectivity. We prove the conjectured statement for every $n\ge123$: every such graph has algebraic connectivity at most $2$, while $K_{2,n-2}$ attains $2$. The proof begins with explicit Rayleigh-quotient certificates that exclude several local configurations from a hypothetical counterexample. A global degree count then controls the number and total excess of vertices of degree at least $5$ and bounds the edge excess of the subgraph induced by vertices of degree at most $4$. A Moore-type breadth-first-search criterion uses this excess to guarantee a short cycle, while a spectral criterion excludes cycles in the same length range. An explicit arithmetic estimate shows that the two criteria apply simultaneously once $n\ge123$. A Lean formalization covering every $n\ge4$, including the complementary range $4\le n\le122$, has been produced with MerLean and checked by the Lean kernel; the present paper gives a self-contained mathematical account of the large-order component.

In 2016, Berkovich and Uncu proved that, for all nonnegative integers $i$, $j$, and $n$, the number of strict partitions of $n$ with $i$ odd-indexed odd parts and $j$ even-indexed odd parts equals the number of strict partitions of $n$ with $i$ parts congruent to $1$ modulo $4$ and $j$ parts congruent to $3$ modulo $4$. Their proof used generating functions, and they asked for a combinatorial proof. We answer their question with an explicit bijection, assembled from three classical ingredients: $2$-modular diagrams, an insertion algorithm of Chen, Gao, Ji, and Li, and Glaisher's bijection. AxiomProver autonomously formalized and verified the proof of the main theorem in Lean.

Razborov's flag algebra method is a powerful tool for proving asymptotic inequalities in extremal graph theory, often reducing the task to finding a finite certificate by semidefinite programming. We present a machine-checked formalization of the method for finite simple graphs, together with a certificate-to-proof compiler that turns externally generated certificate data into algebraic proofs checked by Lean. The formalization covers the foundations of the method: partially labeled graphs, their densities in large graphs, the quotient algebra of density expressions, graph-limit semantics through positive homomorphisms, and the downward operators used to average out labels. The compiler treats the external semidefinite programming output as candidate data rather than trusted input: Lean independently computes the required density and multiplication facts, verifies positive semidefiniteness exactly over $\mathbb{Q}$, and carries out the algebraic normalization steps of flag-algebra proofs. Our case studies yield formal proofs of seven Turán-type upper bounds, including Mantel's theorem and the Erdős pentagon theorem, a $C_4$-density bound for triangle-free graphs, and edge-density bounds for $K_4$-free, $K_5$-free, and $C_5$-free graphs. Independently of the compiler, we formalize the matching constructions that complete the exact Turán densities of Mantel's theorem and the Erdős pentagon theorem, and prove two inequalities of Goodman. Our constrained semantics also prompted a meta-theoretic comparison of two ways of imposing graph constraints: building a hereditary constraint into the flag algebra from the start, or testing inequalities afterward on constrained graph limits with labels chosen at random. We state the resulting root-plantability criterion characterizing when the two approaches agree; a forthcoming paper will present the complete account.

We prove a conjecture of Monical, Tokcan, and Yong that every fixed positive power of the Vandermonde determinant is non-SNP in all sufficiently many variables, where a polynomial is non-SNP if there is a lattice point in its Newton polytope that does not appear with nonzero coefficient. This means our result proves that for every even power $k\geq4$, there is always such a missing lattice monomial in large enough dimensions. The odd case follows from alternation, and the quadratic case was previously known. For every even power $k\geq4$, we exhibit an explicit lattice point in the Newton polytope of $a_{δ_k}^k$ whose coefficient vanishes. The vanishing is obtained from a Dyson constant-term identity, proved using the finite-variable Jack scalar product and Macdonald's specialization formula. The key even-power construction and proof strategy arose from prompting with OpenAI Codex (GPT Sol 5.6 Extra High), a large language model; the complete transcript appears in the appendix. The authors subsequently checked and organized the argument. The accompanying Lean formalization is available at https://github.com/steven-le-thien/vandermonde-snp.

When $m = 1$, the Dyson rank generating function is a classical bridge between partition theory, Ramanujan's mock theta functions, and the theory of harmonic Maass forms and nonholomorphic Jacobi forms. The rank is a statistic on partitions, and the higher Dyson systems, for $m \geq 2$, are a natural multivariable refinement of it, combining $m$ graded rank contributions. Unlike the classical case, these higher systems are not expected to fit the mock-modular framework, which raises the question of what analytic structure governs them. We show that their root-of-unity specializations carry a hidden elliptic structure. A finite $q$-difference recurrence produces an explicit polynomial obstruction to the expected index $m$ elliptic transformation law, and because the obstruction is finite, its partial fractions canonically determine finitely many Appell--Lerch correction terms that remove it. The corrected functions satisfy a twisted index $m$ elliptic law; a natural translation removes the twist, and their holomorphic finite parts admit finite theta decompositions. Thus, the natural analogue of Dyson's mock-modular phenomenon at higher $m$ is not mock modularity but a finite theta decomposition governed by an index $m$ elliptic transformation law. These results grew out of a human--AI collaboration, and the key new formulas were formalized and machine-verified in Lean/Mathlib by AxiomProver.

For integer vectors R,S let A(R,S) denote the class of (0,1)-matrices with row sum vector R and column sum vector S. Its interchange graph G(R,S) has A(R,S) as its vertex set, two matrices being adjacent when they differ by a single 2 x 2 interchange. Brualdi conjectured that G(R,S) is Hamiltonian for every R,S. We prove the stronger statement that G(R,S) is maximally Hamiltonian: Hamilton-laceable when bipartite, and Hamilton-connected when not. The proof is a structural induction on the number of matrices in the class, organized by the structure theory of interchange graphs. Deleting inactive lines and splitting invariant positions expresses any class as a Cartesian product, reducing the argument to the prime factors. The bipartite classes are products of complete transposition graphs; we settle them together, without induction, by proving they are paired 2-disjoint-path-coverable and hence Hamilton-laceable, using a recent theorem of Coleman, Fischberg, Gong, Harrington and Wong on paired disjoint path covers. The non-bipartite classes divide into three cases: products assembled from smaller factors, a base of Johnson graphs and small classes, and the large prime classes, treated by a pivot-and-fiber construction whose line quotients are matroid base-exchange graphs. The complete argument has been machine-checked in the Lean 4 proof assistant from first principles together with seven cited results of the literature; the disjoint-path-cover results it imports are themselves proved within the formalization.

We prove Sabidussi's compatibility conjecture. Let $G$ be a finite connected multigraph in which every vertex has even degree and the minimum degree is at least four, and let $T$ be a closed trail that traverses every edge exactly once. The edges of $G$ can be partitioned into circuits (connected 2-regular subgraphs) so that no circuit contains the two edges used consecutively anywhere in $T$. In fact, the edges can be four-coloured so that every such pair receives two different colours and the subgraph formed by the edges of each colour has even degree at every vertex. Formalization in Lean 4 is also available in the author's github.

Let $p$ be a prime number. We introduce a sparseness condition on the supports of $p$-adic Hahn series, and prove that this condition implies transcendence over $\breve{\mathbf Q}_p$, the completed maximal unramified extension of $\mathbf{Q}_p$. As an application, we prove the order-type conjecture of $\mathbf{Q}_p$-algebraic $p$-adic Hahn series with bounded support under the condition that the support has only finitely many accumulation points. All results in this paper have been fully formalized in the Lean theorem prover (v 4.31.0), building over Mathlib.

For $n\ge1$, we let $$x_n:=\tan\bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{n}\arctan k\bigr).$$ In 2008, Amdeberhan, Medina, and Moll conjectured that $x_n\not \in \mathbb{Z}$ for every $n\ge5$. This was known for a set of positive integers of density $\tfrac{120}{817}\approx0.1469$. We prove that an integer value $x_n=m$ satisfies $|m|\ge e^{(1/2+o(1))\,n\log n}$, which we use to deduce that $$\#\{\,1\leq n\le N:x_n\in\mathbb{Z}\,\}=O(\log N). $$ In particular, the conjecture holds for a density-one set of $n$. The results in this note were formalized in Lean/Mathlib and produced autonomously by AxiomProver from natural-language statements.

The theory of $q$-series and basic hypergeometric series plays a crucial role at the intersection of combinatorics, number theory, and representation theory. From the classical partition identities of Euler and Jacobi to modern developments in class field theory, vertex operator algebras, and the Monstrous Moonshine conjecture, $q$-series provide the analytic framework for a wide range of profound applications. In this paper, we discuss the formalization of this theory in the Lean proof assistant, a process that requires careful design of scalable and versatile structures to reconcile formal algebraic identities with analytic convergence properties. We address these foundational challenges by focusing on the construction of $q$-Pochhammer symbols, $q$-binomial coefficients, Bailey's Lemma and similar primitives. To demonstrate the utility of this work, we provide fully verified proofs of the Jacobi Triple Product formula and the celebrated Rogers-Ramanujan identities, which serve as both historical and technical benchmarks for the field. This work establishes a rigorous computational foundation for the future formalization of mock theta functions, modular forms, and the diverse algebraic structures that underpin their applications across mathematics and physics.

Let $f_3(N)$ be the least integer such that every set $A\subseteq\{1,\ldots,N\}$ of size at least $f_3(N)$ contains distinct elements $a,b,c\in A$ such that $a+b\in A$, $a+c\in A$, and $b+c\in A$. We prove that $f_3(N)\le 5N/8+O(1)$. Together with the standard construction $[N/8,N/4]\cup[N/2,N]$, this gives $f_3(N)=5N/8+O(1)$, resolving Erdős Problem 865. The proof is self-contained. An earlier conditional version of the reduction has also been formalized in Lean 4/Mathlib with no sorries and no added axioms.