arXiv++ Combinatorics

Autocatalysis, the ability of a chemical subsystem to sustain its own constituents when supplied with sufficient food molecules, has been closely related to the origin of life on Earth. Emerging from Wilhelm Ostwald's considerations about an explicit autocatalytic reaction, different notions of autocatalysis have been developed over the years. The two most prominent are reflexively autocatalytic F-generated sets (RAFs) and stoichiometric autocatalysis. After having shown that each RAFs is, under reasonable conditions, in general stoichiometrically autocatalytic, we examine here the relationship between the two notions of minimality: irreducible RAFs and autocatalytic cores. To this end, we overcome the obstacle that RAFs and stoichiometric autocatalysis have been formalized in distinct systems of chemical reactions, i.e., catalytic reaction systems (CRS) and chemical reaction networks (CRNs), respectively. We show that reactions in a CRS constitute equivalence classes of reactions of the corresponding CRNs w.r.t. their specific catalyzations. Using the fact that CRN and CRS can be canonically identified whenever each CRS reaction is associated with a single catalyzation, we demonstrate that the Kőnig graph of a monocatalyzed, irreducible RAF is composed of strong blocks devoid of food and waste species that are separated by reaction vertices, each of which contains an autocatalytic core. In fact, a single irreducible RAF can, in general, contain exponentially many autocatalytic cores.

Godsil, Roberson, Šámal and Severini conjectured that the quantum chromatic number of the categorical product of two graphs equals the minimum of the quantum chromatic numbers of the factors. We disprove this conjecture: we construct explicit finite graphs $G,H$ with \[ χ(G\times H) \leq 1538 < 1539 = \min(χ_q(G),χ_q(H)).\]The graphs are obtained from Zhu's counterexample to Hedetniemi's conjecture by using a base graph for which the Lovász theta number of the complement, and not only the fractional chromatic number, is large. The lower bound for the first factor is the theta bound. For the second factor we adapt Zhu's argument to projections that do not commute: the step that fixes the colors of a clique is replaced by identities between operators. Both lower bounds hold for colorings by projections in an arbitrary nonzero unital $C^*$-algebra. Hence the conjecture also fails for the spatial, approximate, commuting-operator and $C^*$-algebraic variants of the quantum chromatic number. We also give smaller counterexamples certified by exact integer data. The graph constructions, the certificates and the counterexample statements in the projective formulation are formalized in Lean~4.

A Leech tree of order $n$ is a tree with positive integral edge weights whose $n(n-1)/2$ pairwise weighted distances are precisely $1,2,\ldots,n(n-1)/2$. This paper gives a computer-assisted proof that no Leech tree of order $18$ exists. The argument has three layers. First, a development in Lean 4 verifies the structural facts used in the paper. These facts reduce every putative example to one of eight local configurations and justify several necessary conditions. Second, conventional mathematical arguments prove a component-pair whole-block exact-cover condition and the completeness of a recursive search. Third, exhaustive computations close all eight configurations. The computation records exact coverage, source and input hashes, terminal receipts, and checked exact-zero results. The structural layer is kernel-checked, but the search program, its execution, and the certificate checker have not been formalized in Lean. The result is therefore a computer-assisted proof, not an end-to-end Lean proof.

We prove that a path maximizes the expected range of a uniformly chosen graph homomorphism into the integers, with one vertex pinned at zero, among all connected bipartite graphs of the same order. This establishes the expectation form of the Benjamini--Häggström--Mossel conjecture. The proof restricts and rescales a homomorphism on each bipartition class, then contracts the edges on which the resulting height function is constant. A quantitative estimate for the rank of these zero edges compensates for a parity term in the expected range of a simple random walk, allowing an induction on the number of vertices. We then prove that the BHM inequality implies the Loebl--Ne\v set\v ril--Reed inequality for uniformly chosen integer 1-Lipschitz functions on arbitrary connected graphs, and hence obtain the LNR conjecture as a corollary of BHM. The proof was obtained through interaction with OpenAI GPT-6 Astra and verified by the author. The main results have also been formalized and checked in Lean~4.

Recent major breakthroughs in $q,t$-combinatorics include the introduction of the Dyck path algebra $\mathbb{A}_{q,t}$ by Carlsson and Mellit and of the Catalanimals by Blasiak et al., both of which led, among other things, to independent proofs of different extensions of the rational shuffle conjecture of Bergeron et al. The first main contribution of this paper is a simple, explicit formula inside the algebra $\mathbb{A}_{q,t}$ for the Negut operators, yielding a direct, elementary connection between the original operators of the rational shuffle conjecture and the corresponding Catalanimals. Our formula bypasses the elliptic Hall algebra, turning these operators into transparent, workable tools whose action we can compute exactly and efficiently on any symmetric function, not just constants. Our second main contribution consists of a series of explicit formulas relating the Negut operators to the Theta operators introduced by D'Adderio et al. To prove these formulas, we provide an extension of the aforementioned Theta operators to the entire algebra $\mathbb{A}_{q,t}$, allowing us to obtain a series of new combinatorial results. The algebraic computations underlying this extension have been formalized in Lean. To showcase the power of our results, we give a proof, also partially formalized in Lean, of the Theta conjecture of D'Adderio et al., first stated in 2019.

We prove the Colomo-Pronko conjecture for alternating sign matrices with a prescribed square of zeros at a corner, for all matrix sizes and freezing parameters. A known multiple-integral formula for the frozen-corner count yields determinant representations built from fixed polynomial kernels. We relate these kernels to the conjectured determinant through an inverse identity for the commutator of a signed Pascal matrix with reversal. In odd dimension, the comparison uses the one-dimensional nullspace and projection along it to eliminate the central coordinate. Combined with the asymptotic analysis of Colomo and Pronko, our result removes the conjectural assumption from their GUE Tracy-Widom fluctuation theorem for the intersection of the frozen boundary with the main diagonal in uniformly random alternating sign matrices. The finite-dimensional algebraic core of the proof has been formalized in Lean 4.

Kolokolnikov conjectured that, among all simple graphs on \(n\) vertices with exactly \(2(n-2)\) edges, the complete bipartite graph maximizes algebraic connectivity. This paper proves the conjecture. The underlying Lean~4 formalization was generated with MerLean and checked by the Lean kernel.

We classify the polyominoes obtained by adjoining four straight arms to a single square, allowing zero arm lengths, according to their ability to tile rectangles, half-strips, bent strips, quadrants, strips, half-planes, and the plane. We also classify their ability to tile an integer enlargement of themselves. Tiles occupy whole square-grid cells; translations, rotations, and reflections are permitted. Exactly five capability profiles occur. For the family $P(n,1,1,0)$, the rectangle profile holds for $n\le3$ and the bent-strip profile, with no half-strip or rep-tiling, for every $n\ge4$. A cross with four positive arms tiles the plane precisely when two opposite arms have length one; it never tiles a half-plane. Explicit periodic constructions and geometric obstructions are combined with finite symbolic case certificates. A Lean 4 development verifies the full classification for every natural four-tuple, including the interpretation of the certificates as statements about arbitrary infinite tilings. The account incorporates the author's 2020--2021 L- and T-polyomino work, reconstructs Dahlke's gun argument, and documents the subsequent AI-assisted proof development and formalization.

Pate proved ordinary irreducible-immanant permanental dominance through order $13$ and identified $(4,4,3,3)$ as the sole remaining order-$14$ case, with $(5,4,3,3)$ and $(3^5)$ forming the order-$15$ frontier. These three cases are settled here; consequently $d_λ(A)/f^λ\le \operatorname{per}(A)$ for every partition $λ\vdash n$ with $n\le15$ and every complex Hermitian positive-semidefinite matrix $A$. The argument also yields results beyond this finite frontier: an exact four-term bridge for $(4,4,3,3)$, the uniform family $(m,4,3,3)$, a two-parameter family $(a,b,3,3)$ for $a\ge b\ge4$ and $5a\ge8b$, and a long-first-row criterion for arbitrary fixed tails. These results arise from explicit specializations of Pate's $W$-function positivity framework using partial swaps, Young projectors, Pieri--content identities, and branching data. For $(3^5)$, an exact Farkas certificate shows that the central-projector partial-swap cone is insufficient; a branching-refined one-swap construction escapes this obstruction and yields a positive $106+19$-witness certificate. Boundary-compression and node-moving results further describe the reach and limitations of the local-filter method. All finite certificates are checked by exact integer or rational arithmetic and are supplied as ancillary material. The order-$14$ bridge is additionally formalized and kernel-checked in Lean 4 for all complex Hermitian positive-semidefinite matrices, including the exact coefficient normalization and the deduction of $(4,4,3,3)$ permanental dominance from four explicitly stated Pate inequalities.

We prove that no strongly regular graph with parameters $(266, 45, 0, 9)$ exists. The proof is formalized in Lean 4 and Mathlib without external infeasibility certificates or assumed classification theorems. A hypothetical graph gives a rank-$12$ integral Gram lattice with an integral centroid. A Lorentzian change of form, a marked $D_7$ gluing, and an explicit rank-six complement produce a positive-definite even unimodular lattice of rank $24$, together with the original indexed family of $220$ vectors. Harmonic theta identities and a root-isolation inequality force the root system $A_{11} \perp D_7 \perp E_6$. First and second moments then exclude the possible complements: the final case reduces to an impossible binary projection identity $4x + 4y - 2z = 50$. A type-$A$ subcase is closed by a separate classification-free proof of the known nonexistence of a quasi-symmetric $2$-$(56, 12, 9)$ design with intersections $0, 3$. That argument constructs a Krein graph and forces a Steiner $3$-$(12, 4, 1)$ design, contradicting its replication equation. The formal theorem depends only on the three standard Lean axioms and has also been checked independently with nanoda. The archived formalization is release v2.0.0.

We prove the conjecture of Borowiecki and Broere that every finite simple planar graph admits a generalized total coloring with four colors: a proper vertex coloring with four colors together with an edge coloring with four colors in which each edge color class is a forest and no edge receives the color of either endpoint. In fact every proper four-coloring of such a graph extends to an edge coloring of the required kind. The proof combines a component-count inequality for planar graphs whose vertices are partitioned into four independent sets, obtained by completing to a triangulation, with the matroid partition theorem applied to four graphic matroids. A Lean 4 formalization relative to six named background assumptions is described below.

For a fixed graph F, the F-degree of a vertex v in a host graph H is the number of subgraphs of H isomorphic to F that contain v, and H is F-irregular if its F-degrees are pairwise distinct. We show that every finite connected graph F on at least three vertices admits a finite connected F-irregular host. For noncomplete F, the proof builds the host from a threshold graph with one deleted edge; when the minimum degree is at least two, a small incidence gadget with distinct weighted column sums separates the remaining exceptional vertices. The construction also yields infinitely many pairwise non-isomorphic finite connected F-irregular hosts for every noncomplete F. The complete-pattern case follows from a theorem of Chartrand, Holbert, Oellermann and Swart. A Lean 4 formalization of Theorem 1.1 is described, taking the published complete-pattern theorem as its sole custom axiom.

We prove that the realization graph of every graphical degree sequence is maximally Hamiltonian: it is Hamilton-laceable when bipartite on more than one vertex, and Hamilton-connected otherwise. This answers Problem P59 of Mütze's survey of combinatorial Gray codes, and the Hamiltonicity question recorded as open by Barrus, in the strongest form either admits. The argument is an induction on the number of ground vertices, cutting the realization graph at a single ground vertex into fibers and the quotient they lie over. The proof is formalized in Lean 4 and checked by its kernel, with seven results cited from the literature and nothing else assumed. Its engine is a classification. The realizable neighborhoods of a ground vertex form a shifted family -- one closed under replacing an element by a smaller one -- and the quotient is the Johnson graph of that family. Such a Johnson graph can fail to be Hamilton-connected, and we determine exactly when: the failures are one explicit family of examples, the Y-families, and each of them fails between a single pair of its members. A shifted family with a greatest member never fails, and those families are exactly the shifted matroids, where the conclusion already follows from the theorem of Naddef and Pulleyblank on the graphs of 0/1-polytopes. The obstruction lives entirely outside the matroid case, which is why it has not been met before.

We report on our ongoing project to develop a computational pipeline, AutoGraphForge, for an automated graph-theoretic conjecturing-refuting-formalizing-proving system. Conjecture generation is counterexample-guided and runs in rounds: a Graffiti3 generator proposes conjectures over a small, evolving snapshot table $T$ (initially a few hundred graphs with their computed invariants) that grows only by counterexamples to its own conjectures. A novelty filter of $559$ classical and folklore relations, closed under transitive composition and linear identity substitution, decides via a linear program whether a candidate is already implied by known results. Surviving candidates are tested against a dataset of about $348,000$ graphs, unioning the complete House of Graphs invariant export, the exhaustive census of all connected graphs on at most nine vertices, several extremal families (strongly regular, minimal Ramsey, Cayley, cages, barbells, lollipops, spiders), and random models. Counterexample-search algorithms then attack the remainder. Run for several rounds on an HPC cluster, the loop yields $6,522$ conjectures that survived the refutation dataset, the novelty filter and every active-search run -- among them nontrivial relations between the annihilation number and the edge-cover number for bipartite and regular graphs, which we prove by hand. A subsequent formalization and proving stage deterministically translates each surviving conjecture into a Lean 4 statement skeleton; every candidate proof is kernel-verified against a pinned mathlib4 and our custom invariant preamble. This stage integrates two neural provers -- DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B (served with vLLM) and the Lean-specialised OProver-32B -- behind the independent kernel check. It is implemented end-to-end and passes initial sanity checks, with the full pipeline currently running on the cluster.

A $p$-ary bent partition of $\mathbb{F}_p^n$ is a partition into $K$ nonempty cells such that every balanced assignment of its cells to $\mathbb{F}_p$ produces a bent function. It was asked whether every possible depth $K$ is a power of $p$; for general $p$, previous affirmative results required regularity or cell-symmetry hypotheses. We prove the stronger unconditional statement that, for every nonzero $h$, exactly $p^n/K$ points remain in the same fine cell under translation by $h$. Thus the fine cells form a partitioned difference family and the fine label map is zero-difference balanced. Consequently $K\mid p^n$, so $K=p^t$; nonempty cells further give $1\le t<n$. In even dimension, the classical cell-size theorem yields $K\mid p^{n/2}$. Together with the known odd-dimensional ternary three-fibre parameter restriction, this gives the global bound $t\le\lfloor n/2\rfloor$. The proof is an exact finite average over balanced coarsenings. The main counting identity and selected consequences are formalized and kernel-checked in Lean 4.

The Rogers--Ramanujan identities equate a $q$-series whose exponents are governed by a quadratic form with an infinite product supported on two residue classes modulo~$5$. Identities of this shape are scarce, and a central problem is to identify the structures that produce them in families. Huang, Jiang, and Oblomkov have proposed a source of a new kind: to each pair of coprime integers $a,b>1$ they attach an infinite-rank $q$-series $Z_{a,b}(q)$, assembled from counts of commuting nilpotent matrix pairs $(A,B)$ with $A^a=B^b$ over finite fields, and they conjecture that it equals an explicit product of $(a-1)(b-1)/2$ modular units of level $a+b$. The $a=2$ cases are the Andrews--Gordon identities; no case with $a>2$ was known. We prove the conjecture for $(a,b)=(3,4)$, $(3,5)$, $(3,7)$, and $(3,8)$. Our proofs pass through a finer sum-to-sum identity, which we conjecture for all $b$ coprime to $3$ and establish for all $b$ when $q=1$. Lau and Ono have since proved that identity in general, and with it the full $a=3$ case. These identities have been formalized and verified in Lean by AxiomProver.

In the transversal achievement game on the $n\times n$ board, two players alternately claim cells, and the first to own a transversal---a set of $n$ cells of which no two share a row or column---wins. Ranđelović showed that the first player wins for every $n\ge4$, while the game is a draw for $n=2,3$. We give an independent proof that the first player wins for $n\ge4$ that additionally establishes a bound on the length of the win: the given strategy forces a win by ply $2n+3$, i.e.\ on the first player's $(n+2)$-nd move, for every $n\ge4$. The proof yields a strategy that is fully determined by a fixed rule on the current position and can thus be implemented directly. We isolate the use of the hypothesis $n\ge4$ to two steps in the analysis, explaining why the argument fails at $n=3$. An exhaustive computational search implementing the strategy verifies it against every legal defense for $n=4,5,6$, confirming both the strategy's validity and that the $2n+3$ bound is attained in these cases. The main theorem has also been formalized and machine-checked in Lean 4.

In 2016, Berkovich and Uncu proved that, for all nonnegative integers $i$, $j$, and $n$, the number of strict partitions of $n$ with $i$ odd-indexed odd parts and $j$ even-indexed odd parts equals the number of strict partitions of $n$ with $i$ parts congruent to $1$ modulo $4$ and $j$ parts congruent to $3$ modulo $4$. Their proof used generating functions, and they asked for a combinatorial proof. We answer their question with an explicit bijection, assembled from three classical ingredients: $2$-modular diagrams, an insertion algorithm of Chen, Gao, Ji, and Li, and Glaisher's bijection. AxiomProver autonomously formalized and verified the proof of the main theorem in Lean.

We prove a conjecture of Monical, Tokcan, and Yong that every fixed positive power of the Vandermonde determinant is non-SNP in all sufficiently many variables, where a polynomial is non-SNP if there is a lattice point in its Newton polytope that does not appear with nonzero coefficient. This means our result proves that for every even power $k\geq4$, there is always such a missing lattice monomial in large enough dimensions. The odd case follows from alternation, and the quadratic case was previously known. For every even power $k\geq4$, we exhibit an explicit lattice point in the Newton polytope of $a_{δ_k}^k$ whose coefficient vanishes. The vanishing is obtained from a Dyson constant-term identity, proved using the finite-variable Jack scalar product and Macdonald's specialization formula. The key even-power construction and proof strategy arose from prompting with OpenAI Codex (GPT Sol 5.6 Extra High), a large language model; the complete transcript appears in the appendix. The authors subsequently checked and organized the argument. The accompanying Lean formalization is available at https://github.com/steven-le-thien/vandermonde-snp.

When $m = 1$, the Dyson rank generating function is a classical bridge between partition theory, Ramanujan's mock theta functions, and the theory of harmonic Maass forms and nonholomorphic Jacobi forms. The rank is a statistic on partitions, and the higher Dyson systems, for $m \geq 2$, are a natural multivariable refinement of it, combining $m$ graded rank contributions. Unlike the classical case, these higher systems are not expected to fit the mock-modular framework, which raises the question of what analytic structure governs them. We show that their root-of-unity specializations carry a hidden elliptic structure. A finite $q$-difference recurrence produces an explicit polynomial obstruction to the expected index $m$ elliptic transformation law, and because the obstruction is finite, its partial fractions canonically determine finitely many Appell--Lerch correction terms that remove it. The corrected functions satisfy a twisted index $m$ elliptic law; a natural translation removes the twist, and their holomorphic finite parts admit finite theta decompositions. Thus, the natural analogue of Dyson's mock-modular phenomenon at higher $m$ is not mock modularity but a finite theta decomposition governed by an index $m$ elliptic transformation law. These results grew out of a human--AI collaboration, and the key new formulas were formalized and machine-verified in Lean/Mathlib by AxiomProver.