arXiv++ Combinatorics

The Tchoukaillon array is an infinite array of the positive integers, arising from a one-row Mancala solitaire, in which each positive integer occurs exactly once. Its zeroth column is the Flavius Josephus sieve and its zeroth row is the sequence of Tchoukaillon numbers; the asymptotics of these two edges are classical results of Andersson and of Broline and Loeb. On the basis of numerical evidence, N. Beluhov conjectured (as relayed by Knuth) that the general entry $T_{i,j}$ satisfies $T_{i,j} \approx (πi+2j)^2/(4π)$ as $i,j \to \infty$. We prove this conjecture. In fact we establish the stronger uniform estimate $T_{i,j} = (πi+2j+2)^2/(4π) + O((i+j+1)^{4/3})$, in which both constants $π$ and $2$ are produced by the array's own recursion through a Wallis product, independently of the two edge theorems. Equivalently, the square root of the entry is asymptotically linear, $\sqrt{T_{i,j}} = (\sqrtπ/2)\, i + (1/\sqrtπ)(j+1) + O((i+j+1)^{1/3})$, the linear blend of the two edge growth-rates. As corollaries we obtain that the level regions $\{T_{i,j} \le V\}$ are triangles up to a boundary of width $O(V^{1/6})$, and an $O(\sqrt{M})$ algorithm that locates the row and column of a given integer $M$.

We prove that every natural number is a finite sum of distinct unit fractions whose denominators are semiprimes (products of two distinct primes). This is the $ω=2$ integer case of a problem of Erdős and Graham, stated only as a conjecture by Butler, Erdős and Graham (Integers 15 (2015), A51), who proved the $ω=3$ analogue. Counterintuitively the problem hardens as $ω$ decreases -- the induction's feed thins -- so $ω=2$ is the hard case; our proof adapts the Butler-Erdős-Graham induction to this thin-feed regime, where the entire content of the induction step reduces to an explicit onset inequality $Y_0(N)\le\min\{β(N),β'(N)\}$, proved for all $N\ge10$ by Olson's addition theorem and elementary Chebyshev bounds above a finite, machine-checked base range. The same engine extends to the rationals: for every squarefree $b$, every $a/b$ above an explicit threshold $\min\{B_{N_b}/6,\,1/5\}$ is $ω=2$ representable, unconditionally. As an application we give the first complete proof of the rational $ω=3$ statement -- every $a/b$ with squarefree $b$ is a sum of distinct sphenic unit fractions -- that Butler, Erdős and Graham conjectured but left unpublished; a descent settles every $ω\ge3$. What remains open is the $ω=2$ regime below this threshold, which we reduce to a single explicit conjecture -- that the gap-free floor of a semiprime subset-sum set tends to zero. This work is a human-AI collaboration: AI tools (notably Anthropic's Claude, used through Claude Code) contributed substantially to the Lean formalisation, the experiments, and the writing; correspondingly, every result is machine-checked in Lean 4 / Mathlib (no sorry; two cited classical axioms, plus the native_decide compiler-trust base for the finite computations), so its correctness is independent of the tools used.

We resolve exercise 7.2.2.4--224 of Knuth's Pre-Fascicle 8a (10 April 2026 draft, rated [46]): the digraph $\mathit{SB}(3,n)$ has no Hamiltonian cycle when $n$ is even. The argument is a sign-of-permutation obstruction. Writing the successor map of a candidate Hamiltonian cycle as $f_S = A_b \circ σ$, $\operatorname{sgn}(A_b)=+1$ when $m$ is odd, so $\operatorname{sgn}(f_S)=\operatorname{sgn}(σ)$ for every choice set $S$. A short dihedral Burnside computation shows $\operatorname{sgn}(σ)=-1$ on $Σ_3^n$ for even $n$, contradicting the sign $+1$ required of a single $3^n$-cycle. The same argument gives the stronger statement that $\mathit{SB}(m,n)$ has no Hamiltonian cycle whenever $m$ is odd with $m\equiv 3\pmod 4$ and $n$ is even; this restricts the residue classes in which Knuth's hint to Ex.~225 (existence of Hamiltonian cycles in $\mathit{SB}(m,n)$ for all $m>3$ and $n>2$) can hold.

A whirling knight's tour is a Hamiltonian cycle in the digraph of counter-clockwise knight steps about the centre of an $n \times n$ board; its coil count $c$ is the winding number around the centre. We prove that no such tour with $c = n/2$ exists when $n \equiv 4 \pmod 8$ ($n \ge 4$) or $n \equiv 6 \pmod 8$ ($n \ge 6$), settling a conjecture of Beluhov. For each residue class we exhibit a closed-form Farkas certificate for infeasibility of a cycle-cover LP relaxation; the two certificates are structurally distinct.