arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given an integer $Δ\ge 3$, let ${\cal G}_{Δ}$ be the set of connected graphs $G\neq K_{Δ+1}$ with maximum degree $Δ$ and, for $i=1,\cdots, Δ$, let $V_i(G)$ be the set of vertices of $G$ of degree $i$. Using a result of T. Kelly and L. Postle, we prove that $\sum\limits_{i=1}^Δc_i|V_i(G)|$ is a lower bound on the independence number $α(G)$ of $G\in {\cal G}_Δ$, where $c_Δ=\frac{1}Δ$ and $ic_{i}=1-c_{i+1}$ for $i=1,\cdots,Δ-1$. Moreover, if $\varepsilon >0$ and $j\in \{1,\cdots, Δ\}$, then the inequality $α(G)\ge \varepsilon|V_j(G)|+\sum\limits_{i=1}^Δc_i|V_i(G)|$ does not hold for infinitely many graphs $G\in {\cal G}_Δ$. Finally, further lower bounds on $α(G)$ in terms of degrees of $G$ are presented.

For a connected subcubic graph $G\neq K_1$ let $V_i(G) = \{v \in V(G) ~|~ d_G(v)=i\}$ for $1 \leq i \leq 3.$ Given $c_1, c_2, c_ 3 \in \mathbb{R}^+$ and $ d \in \mathbb{R}$, we show several results of type $α(G) \geq c_1|V_1(G)| + c_2|V_2(G)| + c_3|V_3(G)| - d.$ We also derive classes of graphs $G$ showing sharpness of these lower bounds on the independence number $α(G)$ of $G$.

Given a graph $G$ and sets $\{α_v~|~v \in V(G)\}$ and $\{β_v~|~v \in V(G)\}$ of non-negative integers, it is known that the decision problem whether $G$ contains a spanning tree $T$ such that $α_v \le d_T (v) \le β_v $ for all $v \in V(G)$ is $NP$-complete. In this article, we relax the problem by demanding that the degree restrictions apply to vertices $v\in U$ only, where $U$ is a stable set of $G$. In this case, the problem becomes tractable. A. Frank presented a result characterizing the positive instances of that relaxed problem. Using matroid intersection developed by J. Edmonds, we give a new and short proof of Frank's result and show that if $U$ is stable and the edges of $G$ are weighted by arbitrary real numbers, then even a minimum-cost tree $T$ with $α_v \le d_T (v) \le β_v $ for all $v \in U$ can be found in polynomial time if such a tree exists.

A $3$-connected graph $G$ is essentially $4$-connected if, for any $3$-cut $S\subseteq V(G)$ of $G$, at most one component of $G-S$ contains at least two vertices. We prove that every essentially $4$-connected maximal planar graph $G$ on $n$ vertices contains a cycle of length at least $\frac{2}{3}(n+4)$; moreover, this bound is sharp.

We propose new bounds on the domination number and on the independence number of a graph and show that our bounds compare favorably to recent ones. Our bounds are obtained by using the Bhatia-Davis inequality linking the variance, the expected value, the minimum, and the maximum of a random variable with bounded distribution.

Results on the existence of various types of spanning subgraphs of graphs are milestones in structural graph theory and have been diversified in several directions. In the present paper, we consider "local" versions of such statements. In 1966, for instance, D. W. Barnette proved that a $3$-connected planar graph contains a spanning tree of maximum degree at most $3$. A local translation of this statement is that if $G$ is a planar graph, $X$ is a subset of specified vertices of $G$ such that $X$ cannot be separated in $G$ by removing $2$ or fewer vertices of $G$, then $G$ has a tree of maximum degree at most $3$ containing all vertices of $X$. Our results constitute a general machinery for strengthening statements about $k$-connected graphs (for $1 \leq k \leq 4$) to locally spanning versions, i.e. subgraphs containing a set $X\subseteq V(G)$ of a (not necessarily planar) graph $G$ in which only $X$ has high connectedness. Given a graph $G$ and $X\subseteq V(G)$, we say $M$ is a minor of $G$ rooted at $X$, if $M$ is a minor of $G$ such that each bag of $M$ contains at most one vertex of $X$ and $X$ is a subset of the union of all bags. We show that $G$ has a highly connected minor rooted at $X$ if $X\subseteq V(G)$ cannot be separated in $G$ by removing a few vertices of $G$. Combining these investigations and the theory of Tutte paths in the planar case yields to locally spanning versions of six well-known results about degree-bounded trees, hamiltonian paths and cycles, and $2$-connected subgraphs of graphs.

A graph is $1$-planar if it has a drawing in the plane such that each edge is crossed at most once by another edge. Moreover, if this drawing has the additional property that for each crossing of two edges the end vertices of these edges induce a complete subgraph, then the graph is locally maximal $1$-planar. For a $3$-connected locally maximal $1$-planar graph $G$, we show the existence of a spanning $3$-connected planar subgraph and prove that $G$ is hamiltonian if $G$ has at most three $3$-vertex-cuts, and that $G$ is traceable if $G$ has at most four $3$-vertex-cuts. Moreover, infinitely many non-traceable $5$-connected $1$-planar graphs are presented.

A planar graph is essentially $4$-connected if it is 3-connected and every of its 3-separators is the neighborhood of a single vertex. Jackson and Wormald proved that every essentially 4-connected planar graph $G$ on $n$ vertices contains a cycle of length at least $\frac{2n+4}{5}$, and this result has recently been improved multiple times. In this paper, we prove that every essentially 4-connected planar graph $G$ on $n$ vertices contains a cycle of length at least $\frac{5}{8}(n+2)$. This improves the previously best-known lower bound $\frac{3}{5}(n+2)$.

A planar 3-connected graph $G$ is called \emph{essentially $4$-connected} if, for every 3-separator $S$, at least one of the two components of $G-S$ is an isolated vertex. Jackson and Wormald proved that the length $\mathop{\rm circ}\nolimits(G)$ of a longest cycle of any essentially 4-connected planar graph $G$ on $n$ vertices is at least $\frac{2n+4}{5}$ and Fabrici, Harant and Jendrol' improved this result to $\mathop{\rm circ}\nolimits(G)\geq \frac{1}{2}(n+4)$. In the present paper, we prove that an essentially 4-connected planar graph on $n$ vertices contains a cycle of length at least $\frac{3}{5}(n+2)$ and that such a cycle can be found in time $O(n^2)$.

For a graph $G$ with vertex set $V(G)$ and independence number $α(G)$, S. M. Selkow (Discrete Mathematics, 132(1994)363--365) established the famous lower bound $\sum\limits_{v\in V(G)}\frac{1}{d(v)+1}(1+\max\{\frac{d(v)}{d(v)+1}-\sum\limits_{u\in N(v)}\frac{1}{d(u)+1},0 \})$ on $α(G)$, where $N(v)$ and $d(v)=|N(v)|$ denote the neighborhood and the degree of a vertex $v\in V(G)$, respectively. However, Selkow's original proof of this result is incorrect. We give a new probabilistic proof of Selkow's bound here.