arXiv++ Combinatorics

This paper continues the study of a new variant of graph coloring with a connectivity constraint recently introduced by Hsieh et al. [COCOON 2024]. A path in a vertex-colored graph is called conflict-free if there is a color that appears exactly once on its vertices. A connected graph is said to be strongly conflict-free vertex-connection $k$-colorable if it admits a (proper) vertex $k$-coloring such that any two distinct vertices are connected by a conflict-free shortest path. Among others, we show that deciding, for a given graph $G$ and an integer $k$, whether $G$ is strongly conflict-free $k$-colorable is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the vertex cover number. But under the standard complexity-theoretic assumption NP $\not\subseteq$ coNP/poly, deciding, for a given graph $G$, whether $G$ is strongly conflict-free $3$-colorable does not admit a polynomial kernel, even for bipartite graphs. This kernel lower bound is in stark contrast to the ordinal $k$-Coloring problem which is known to admit a polynomial kernel when parameterized by the vertex cover number.

The well-known Cluster Vertex Deletion problem (CVD) asks for a given graph $G$ and an integer $k$ whether it is possible to delete a set $S$ of at most $k$ vertices of $G$ such that the resulting graph $G-S$ is a cluster graph (a disjoint union of cliques). We give a complete characterization of graphs $H$ for which CVD on $H$-free graphs is polynomially solvable and for which it is NP-complete. Moreover, in the NP-completeness cases, CVD cannot be solved in sub-exponential time in the vertex number of the $H$-free input graphs unless the Exponential-Time Hypothesis fails. We also consider the connected variant of CVD, the Connected Cluster Vertex Deletion problem (CCVD), in which the set $S$ has to induce a connected subgraph of $G$. It turns out that CCVD admits the same complexity dichotomy for $H$-free graphs. Our results enlarge a list of rare dichotomy theorems for well-studied problems on $H$-free graphs.

A matching cut in a graph G is an edge cut of G that is also a matching. This short survey gives an overview of old and new results and open problems for Maximum Matching Cut, which is to determine the size of a largest matching cut in a graph. We also compare this problem with the related problems Matching Cut, Minimum Matching Cut, and Perfect Matching Cut, which are to determine if a graph has a matching cut; the size of a smallest matching cut in a graph; and if a graph has a matching cut that is a perfect matching, respectively. Moreover, we discuss a relationship between Maximum Matching Cut and Max Cut, which is to determine the size of a largest edge cut in a graph, as well as a relationship between Minimum Matching Cut and Min Cut, which is to determine the size of a smallest edge cut in a graph.

A graph G is a k-leaf power, for an integer k >= 2, if there is a tree T with leaf set V(G) such that, for all vertices x, y in V(G), the edge xy exists in G if and only if the distance between x and y in T is at most k. Such a tree T is called a k-leaf root of G. The computational problem of constructing a k-leaf root for a given graph G and an integer k, if any, is motivated by the challenge from computational biology to reconstruct phylogenetic trees. For fixed k, Lafond [SODA 2022] recently solved this problem in polynomial time. In this paper, we propose to study optimal leaf roots of graphs G, that is, the k-leaf roots of G with minimum k value. Thus, all k'-leaf roots of G satisfy k <= k'. In terms of computational biology, seeking optimal leaf roots is more justified as they yield more probable phylogenetic trees. Lafond's result does not imply polynomial-time computability of optimal leaf roots, because, even for optimal k-leaf roots, k may (exponentially) depend on the size of G. This paper presents a linear-time construction of optimal leaf roots for chordal cographs (also known as trivially perfect graphs). Additionally, it highlights the importance of the parity of the parameter k and provides a deeper insight into the differences between optimal k-leaf roots of even versus odd k. Keywords: k-leaf power, k-leaf root, optimal k-leaf root, trivially perfect leaf power, chordal cograph

In a graph, a (perfect) matching cut is an edge cut that is a (perfect) matching. Matching Cut (MC), respectively, Perfect Matching Cut (PMC), is the problem of deciding whether a given graph has a matching cut, respectively, a perfect matching cut. The Disconnected Perfect Matching problem (DPM) is to decide if a graph has a perfect matching that contains a matching cut. Solving an open problem posed in [Lucke, Paulusma, Ries (ISAAC 2022, Algorithmica 2023)], we show that PMC is NP-complete in graphs without induced 14-vertex path $P_{14}$. Our reduction also works simultaneously for MC and DPM, improving the previous hardness results of MC on $P_{15}$-free graphs and of DPM on $P_{19}$-free graphs to $P_{14}$-free graphs for both problems. Actually, we prove a slightly stronger result: within $P_{14}$-free 8-chordal graphs (graphs without chordless cycles of length at least 9), it is hard to distinguish between those without matching cuts (respectively, perfect matching cuts, disconnected perfect matchings) and those in which every matching cut is a perfect matching cut. Moreover, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis, none of these problems can be solved in $2^{o(n)}$ time for $n$-vertex $P_{14}$-free 8-chordal graphs. On the positive side, we show that, as for MC [Moshi (JGT 1989)], DPM and PMC are polynomially solvable when restricted to 4-chordal graphs. Together with the negative results, this partly answers an open question on the complexity of PMC in $k$-chordal graphs asked in [Le, Telle (WG 2021, TCS 2022) & Lucke, Paulusma, Ries (MFCS 2023, TCS 2024)].

A half-square of a bipartite graph $B=(X,Y,E_B)$ has one color class of $B$ as vertex set, say $X$; two vertices are adjacent whenever they have a common neighbor in $Y$. If $G=(V,E_G)$ is the half-square of a planar bipartite graph $B=(V,W,E_B)$, then $G$ is called a map graph, and $B$ is a witness of $G$. Map graphs generalize planar graphs, and have been introduced and investigated by Chen, Grigni and Papadimitriou [STOC 1998, J. ACM 2002]. They proved that recognizing map graphs is in $\mathsf{NP}$ by proving the existence of a witness. Soon later, Thorup [FOCS 1998] claimed that recognizing map graphs is in $\mathsf{P}$, by providing an $Ω(n^{120})$-time algorithm for $n$-vertex input graphs. In this note, we give good characterizations and efficient recognition for half-squares of bipartite graphs with girth at least a given integer $g\ge 8$. It turns out that map graphs having witnesses of girth at least $g$ are precisely the graphs whose vertex-clique incidence bipartite graph is planar and of girth at least $g$. Our structural characterization implies an $O(n^2m)$-time algorithm for recognizing if a given $n$-vertex $m$-edge graph $G$ is such a map graph.

Let $B=(X,Y,E)$ be a bipartite graph. A half-square of $B$ has one color class of $B$ as vertex set, say $X$; two vertices are adjacent whenever they have a common neighbor in $Y$. Every planar graph is a half-square of a planar bipartite graph, namely of its subdivision. Until recently, only half-squares of planar bipartite graphs, also known as map graphs (Chen, Grigni and Papadimitriou [STOC 1998, J. ACM 2002]), have been investigated, and the most discussed problem is whether it is possible to recognize these graphs faster and simpler than Thorup's $O(n^{120})$-time algorithm (Thorup [FOCS 1998]). In this paper, we identify the first hardness case, namely that deciding if a graph is a half-square of a balanced bisplit graph is NP-complete. (Balanced bisplit graphs form a proper subclass of star convex bipartite graphs.) For classical subclasses of tree convex bipartite graphs such as biconvex, convex, and chordal bipartite graphs, we give good structural characterizations of their half-squares that imply efficient recognition algorithms. As a by-product, we obtain new characterizations of unit interval graphs, interval graphs, and of strongly chordal graphs in terms of half-squares of biconvex bipartite, convex bipartite, and of chordal bipartite graphs, respectively. Good characterizations of half-squares of star convex and star biconvex bipartite graphs are also given, giving linear-time recognition algorithms for these half-squares.

A complete graph is the graph in which every two vertices are adjacent. For a graph $G=(V,E)$, the complete width of $G$ is the minimum $k$ such that there exist $k$ independent sets $\mathtt{N}_i\subseteq V$, $1\le i\le k$, such that the graph $G'$ obtained from $G$ by adding some new edges between certain vertices inside the sets $\mathtt{N}_i$, $1\le i\le k$, is a complete graph. The complete width problem is to decide whether the complete width of a given graph is at most $k$ or not. In this paper we study the complete width problem. We show that the complete width problem is NP-complete on $3K_2$-free bipartite graphs and polynomially solvable on $2K_2$-free bipartite graphs and on $(2K_2,C_4)$-free graphs. As a by-product, we obtain the following new results: the edge clique cover problem is NP-complete on $\overline{3K_2}$-free co-bipartite graphs and polynomially solvable on $C_4$-free co-bipartite graphs and on $(2K_2, C_4)$-free graphs. We also give a characterization for $k$-probe complete graphs which implies that the complete width problem admits a kernel of at most $2^k$ vertices. This provides another proof for the known fact that the edge clique cover problem admits a kernel of at most $2^k$ vertices. Finally we determine all graphs of small complete width $k\le 3$.

Block graphs are graphs in which every block (biconnected component) is a clique. A graph $G=(V,E)$ is said to be an (unpartitioned) $k$-probe block graph if there exist $k$ independent sets $N_i\subseteq V$, $1\le i\le k$, such that the graph $G'$ obtained from $G$ by adding certain edges between vertices inside the sets $N_i$, $1\le i\le k$, is a block graph; if the independent sets $N_i$ are given, $G$ is called a partitioned $k$-probe block graph. In this paper we give good characterizations for $2$-probe block graphs, in both unpartitioned and partitioned cases. As an algorithmic implication, partitioned and unpartitioned probe block graphs can be recognized in linear time, improving a recognition algorithm of cubic time complexity previously obtained by Chang et al. [Block-graph width, Theoretical Computer Science 412 (2011), 2496--2502].

Motivated by investigations of rainbow matchings in edge colored graphs, we introduce the notion of color-line graphs that generalizes the classical concept of line graphs in a natural way. Let $H$ be a (properly) edge-colored graph. The (proper) color-line graph $C\!L(H)$ of $H$ has edges of $H$ as vertices, and two edges of $H$ are adjacent in $C\!L(H)$ if they are incident in $H$ or have the same color. We give Krausz-type characterizations for (proper) color-line graphs, and point out that, for any fixed $k\ge 2$, recognizing if a graph is the color-line graph of some graph $H$ in which the edges are colored with at most $k$ colors is NP-complete. In contrast, we show that, for any fixed $k$, recognizing color-line graphs of properly edge colored graphs $H$ with at most $k$ colors is polynomially. Moreover, we give a good characterization for proper $2$-color line graphs that yields a linear time recognition algorithm in this case.

A graph is an opposition graph, respectively, a coalition graph, if it admits an acyclic orientation which puts the two end-edges of every chordless 4-vertex path in opposition, respectively, in the same direction. Opposition and coalition graphs have been introduced and investigated in connection to perfect graphs. Recognizing and characterizing opposition and coalition graphs are long-standing open problems. This paper gives characterizations for opposition graphs and coalition graphs on some restricted graph classes. Implicit in our arguments are polynomial time recognition algorithms for these graphs. We also give a good characterization for the so-called generalized opposition graphs.

The square of a graph $G$, denoted $G^2$, is obtained from $G$ by putting an edge between two distinct vertices whenever their distance is two. Then $G$ is called a square root of $G^2$. Deciding whether a given graph has a square root is known to be NP-complete, even if the root is required to be a chordal graph or even a split graph. We present a polynomial time algorithm that decides whether a given graph has a ptolemaic square root. If such a root exists, our algorithm computes one with a minimum number of edges. In the second part of our paper, we give a characterization of the graphs that admit a 3-sun-free split square root. This characterization yields a polynomial time algorithm to decide whether a given graph has such a root, and if so, to compute one.

A rainbow matching in an edge-colored graph is a matching whose edges have distinct colors. We address the complexity issue of the following problem, \mrbm: Given an edge-colored graph $G$, how large is the largest rainbow matching in $G$? We present several sharp contrasts in the complexity of this problem. We show, among others, that * can be approximated by a polynomial algorithm with approximation ratio $2/3-\eps$. * is APX-complete, even when restricted to properly edge-colored linear forests without a $5$-vertex path, and is solvable in %time $O(m^{3/2})$ on edge-colored $m$-edge polynomial time for edge-colored forests without a $4$-vertex path. * is APX-complete, even when restricted to properly edge-colored trees without an $8$-vertex path, and is solvable in %time $O(n^{7/2})$ on edge-colored $n$-vertex polynomial time for edge-colored trees without a $7$-vertex path. * is APX-complete, even when restricted to properly edge-colored paths. These results provide a dichotomy theorem for the complexity of the problem on forests and trees in terms of forbidding paths. The latter is somewhat surprising, since, to the best of our knowledge, no (unweighted) graph problem prior to our result is known to be NP-hard for simple paths. We also address the parameterized complexity of the problem.

The Gallai graph $Γ(G)$ of a graph $G$ has the edges of $G$ as its vertices and two distinct vertices $e$ and $f$ of $Γ(G)$ are adjacent in $Γ(G)$ if the edges $e$ and $f$ of $G$ are adjacent in $G$ but do not span a triangle in $G$. Clearly, $Γ(G)$ is a subgraph of the line graph of $G$. While line graphs can be recognized efficiently the complexity of recognizing Gallai graphs is unknown. In the present paper we characterize those graphs whose Gallai graphs are forests or trees, respectively.