arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given a finite family $\mathcal F$ of forbidden $r$-graphs, the Turán problem asks for the maximum asymptotic edge density of $\mathcal F$-free $r$-graphs and the structure of near-extremal examples. We show that both questions can encode arbitrary computation. Fix a universal Turing machine $\mathsf U$. For every sufficiently large fixed $r$, there is a rational $τ_r\in(0,1)$ such that, from each binary word $β$, one can construct a finite family $\mathcal F_{r,β}$ with $π(\mathcal F_{r,β})=τ_r$ if $\mathsf U$ does not halt on $β$, and $π(\mathcal F_{r,β})>τ_r$ otherwise. The same dichotomy governs extremal structure. We construct finite families $\mathcal G_{r,β}$ such that nonhalting gives a unique extremal limit and Erdős--Simonovits stability, whereas halting gives two nonempty compact extremal phases separated by the sign of a fixed continuous statistic. Hence uniqueness and connectedness of the extremal space, symmetry breaking, two-phase behavior, and stability are all undecidable. The reductions are effective and verifiable in ZFC by finite certificates. Consequently, for every consistent computably axiomatized extension of ZFC and every sufficiently large fixed $r$, there is a finite family $\mathcal F$ for which the true equality $π(\mathcal F)=τ_r$ is neither provable nor refutable; analogous independence holds for the five structural properties above. We also obtain effective approximation, classify exact comparison complexity, and show that the smallest improvement witnesses have Busy-Beaver growth, with no uniform computable positive lower bound on the density gain.

We prove that the existence of finite combinatorial objects such as affine planes, mutually orthogonal Latin squares, and resolvable balanced incomplete block designs can be reformulated as the existence of certain algorithmic reductions between problems related to the pigeonhole principle. We then study the latter using counting arguments and computability theory. In particular, we demonstrate that computability theoretic techniques can be used to refine and prove new results in finite combinatorics.

We count the number of countable homogeneous colored linear orderings in $k$ colors. Relatedly, we count the number of countable $C_{n,m}$-homogeneous linear orderings. $C_{n,m}$-homogeneity is a strong homogeneity notion that approximates $sp-$homogeneity, a notion recently uncovered in [2] to have important computability theoretic properties. Explicit formulas are derived for both of the quantities in question, along with asymptotic bounds. The objects being counted are generally infinite, and it is not obvious that there are even only finitely many. This fact, along with the more precise counting, is demonstrated by corresponding the linear orderings with finite objects.

The tropical rank of a semimodule of rational functions on a metric graph mirrors the concept of rank in linear algebra. Defined in terms of the maximal number of tropically independent elements within the semimodule, this quantity has remained elusive due to the challenges of computing it in practice. In this note, we establish that the tropical rank is, in fact, precisely equal to the topological dimension of the semimodule, one more than the dimension of the associated linear system of divisors. Moreover, we show that the equality of divisorial and tropical ranks in the definition of tropical linear series is equivalent to the pure dimensionality of the corresponding linear system. We conclude with several complementary results and questions on combinatorial, topological, and computability properties of the tropical rank.

An integer sequence $(a_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ is \emph{MC-finite} if for all $m$, the sequence $a_n \bmod m$ is eventually periodic. There are MC-finite sequences $(a_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ such that the function $F: (m,n) \mapsto a_n \bmod m$ is not computable. In \cite{filmus2023mc} we presented concrete examples of MC-finite sequences taken from the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (OEIS) without discussing the computability of $F$. In this paper we discuss cases when this $F$ is effectively computable.

We study the complexity of locally checkable labeling (LCL) problems on $\mathbb{Z}^n$ from the point of view of descriptive set theory, computability theory, and factors of i.i.d. Our results separate various complexity classes that were not previously known to be distinct and serve as counterexamples to a number of natural conjectures in the field.

We consider the restriction of Ramsey's theorem that arises from considering only translation-invariant colourings of pairs, and show that this has the same strength (both from the viewpoint of Reverse Mathematics and from the viewpoint of Computability Theory) as the {\em Adjacent Hindman's Theorem}, proposed by L. Carlucci (Arch. Math. Log. {\bf 57} (2018), 381--359). We also investigate some higher dimensional versions of both of these statements.

The family of finite subsets $s$ of the natural numbers such that $|s|=1+\min s$ is known as the Schreier barrier in combinatorics and Banach Space theory, and as the family of exactly $ω$-large sets in Logic. We formulate and prove the generalizations of Friedman's Free Set and Thin Set theorems and of Rainbow Ramsey's theorem to colorings of the Schreier barrier. We analyze the strength of these theorems from the point of view of Computability Theory and Reverse Mathematics. Surprisingly, the exactly $ω$-large counterparts of the Thin Set and Free Set theorems can code $\emptyset^{(ω)}$, while the exactly $ω$-large Rainbow Ramsey theorem does not code the halting set.

The study of equilibrium concepts in congestion games and two-sided markets with ties has been a primary topic in game theory, economics, and computer science. Ackermann, Goldberg, Mirrokni, Röglin, Vöcking (2008) gave a common generalization of these two models, in which a player more prioritized by a resource produces an infinite delay on less prioritized players. While presenting several theorems on pure Nash equilibria in this model, Ackermann et al.\ posed an open problem of how to design a model in which more prioritized players produce a large but finite delay on less prioritized players. In this paper, we present a positive solution to this open problem by combining the model of Ackermann et al.\ with a generalized model of congestion games due to Bilò and Vinci (2023). In the model of Bilò and Vinci, the more prioritized players produce a finite delay on the less prioritized players, while the delay functions are of a specific kind of affine function, and all resources have the same priorities. By unifying these two models, we achieve a model in which the delay functions may be finite and non-affine, and the priorities of the resources may be distinct. We prove some positive results on the existence and computability of pure Nash equilibria in our model, which extend those for the previous models and support the validity of our model.

We provide a characterization of when a countably infinite set of finite sets contains an infinite sunflower. We also show that the collection of such sets is Turing equivalent to the set of programs such that whenever the program converges it returns the code of a program with finite range.

A graph G is a k-leaf power, for an integer k >= 2, if there is a tree T with leaf set V(G) such that, for all vertices x, y in V(G), the edge xy exists in G if and only if the distance between x and y in T is at most k. Such a tree T is called a k-leaf root of G. The computational problem of constructing a k-leaf root for a given graph G and an integer k, if any, is motivated by the challenge from computational biology to reconstruct phylogenetic trees. For fixed k, Lafond [SODA 2022] recently solved this problem in polynomial time. In this paper, we propose to study optimal leaf roots of graphs G, that is, the k-leaf roots of G with minimum k value. Thus, all k'-leaf roots of G satisfy k <= k'. In terms of computational biology, seeking optimal leaf roots is more justified as they yield more probable phylogenetic trees. Lafond's result does not imply polynomial-time computability of optimal leaf roots, because, even for optimal k-leaf roots, k may (exponentially) depend on the size of G. This paper presents a linear-time construction of optimal leaf roots for chordal cographs (also known as trivially perfect graphs). Additionally, it highlights the importance of the parity of the parameter k and provides a deeper insight into the differences between optimal k-leaf roots of even versus odd k. Keywords: k-leaf power, k-leaf root, optimal k-leaf root, trivially perfect leaf power, chordal cograph

The syntactic nature of logic and computation separates them from other fields of mathematics. Nevertheless, syntax has been the only way to adequately capture the dynamics of proofs and programs such as cut-elimination, and the finiteness and the atomicity of syntax are preferable for foundational aims as seen in Hilbert's program. Another issue is that a uniform basis for logic and computation has been missing, and this problem hampers a coherent view on them. For instance, formal proofs in proof theory are far from (ordinary) proofs of the validity of a formula in model theory. Our goal is to solve these fundamental problems by rebuilding central concepts in logic and computation such as formal systems, validity (in such a way that it coincides with the existence of proofs), cut-elimination and computability uniformly in terms of finite graphs based on game semantics. Unlike game semantics, however, we do not rely on anything infinite or extrinsic to the graphs. A key idea that enables our finitary, autonomous approach is the shift from graphs in game semantics to dynamic ones. The resulting combinatorics establishes a single, syntax-free, finitary framework that recasts formal systems admitting proofs with cuts, validity, the finest computational steps of cut-elimination and higher-order computability. This subsumes fully complete semantics of intuitionistic linear logic, which solves a problem open for thirty years, and even extends the full completeness to proofs with cuts. As a byproduct, our dynamic graphs give rise to Hopf algebras, which opens up new applications of algebras to logic and computation.

We study the complexity of the following related computational tasks concerning a fixed countable graph G: 1. Does a countable graph H provided as input have a(n induced) subgraph isomorphic to G? 2. Given a countable graph H that has a(n induced) subgraph isomorphic to G, find such a subgraph. The framework for our investigations is given by effective Wadge reducibility and by Weihrauch reducibility. Our work follows on "Reverse mathematics and Weihrauch analysis motivated by finite complexity theory" (Computability, 2021) by BeMent, Hirst and Wallace, and we answer several of their open questions.

We show that every infinite, locally finite, and connected graph admitsa translation-like action by $\mathbb{Z}$, and that this action can be takento be transitive exactly when the graph has either one or two ends.The actions constructed satisfy $d(v,v\ast 1)\leq3$ for every vertex$v$. This strengthens a theorem by Brandon Seward. We also study the effective computability of translation-like actionson groups and graphs. We prove that every finitely generated infinitegroup with decidable word problem admits a translation-like actionby $\mathbb{Z}$ which is computable, and satisfies an extra condition whichwe call decidable orbit membership problem. As a nontrivial application of our results, we prove that for everyfinitely generated infinite group with decidable word problem, effectivesubshifts attain all $Π_{1}^{0}$ Medvedev degrees. This extends a classification proved by Joseph Miller for $\mathbb{Z}^{d},$ $d\geq1$.

The maximal minors of a matrix of indeterminates are a universal Gröbner basis by a theorem of Bernstein, Sturmfels and Zelevinsky. On the other hand it is known that they are not always a universal Sagbi basis. By an experimental approach we discuss their behavior under varying monomial orders and their extensions to Sagbi bases. These experiments motivated a new implementation of the Sagbi algorithm which is organized in a Singular script and falls back on Normaliz for the combinatorial computations. In comparison to packages in the current standard distributions of Macaulay 2 and Singular it extends the range of computability by at least one order of magnitude.

The (left) linear hull of a weighted automaton over a field is a topological invariant. If the automaton is minimal, the linear hull can be used to determine whether or not the automaton is equivalent to a deterministic one. Furthermore, the linear hull can also be used to determine whether the minimal automaton is equivalent to an unambiguous one. We show how to compute the linear hull, and thus prove that it is decidable whether or not a given automaton over a number field is equivalent to a deterministic one. In this case we are also able to compute an equivalent deterministic automaton. We also show the analogous decidability and computability result for the unambiguous case. Our results resolve a problem posed in a 2006 survey by Lombardy and Sakarovitch.

The simplest way to make a dynamical system out of a finite connected graph $G$ is to give it a polarization, that is to say a cyclic ordering of the edges incident to a vertex, for each vertex. The phase space $\mathcal{P}(G)$ then consists of all pairs $(v,e)$ where $v$ is a vertex and $e$ is an edge incident to $v$. Such an initial condition gives a position and a momentum. The data $(v,e)$ is of course equivalent to an edge endowed with an orientation $e_{\mathcal O}$. With the polarization, each initial data leads to a leftward walk defined by turning left at each vertex, or making a rebound if there is no other edge. A leftward walk is called complete if it goes through all edges of $G$, not necessarily in both directions. As usual, we define the valence of a vertex as the number of edges incident to it, and we define the valence of a graph as the average of the valences of its vertices. In this article, we prove that if a graph which is embedded in a closed oriented surface of genus $g$ admits a complete leftward walk, then its valence is at most $1 + \sqrt{6g+1}$. We prove furthermore that this result is sharp for infinitely many genera $g$, and that it is asymptotically optimal as $g \to + \infty$. This leads to obstructions for the embeddability of graphs on a surface in a way which admits a complete leftward walk. Since checking that a polarized graph admits a complete leftward walk or not is done in time $4N$, where $N$ is the cardinality of the edges, this obstruction is particularly efficient in terms of computability. This problem has its origins in interesting consequences for what we will call here the topological ergodicity of conservative systems, especially Hamiltonian systems $H$ in two dimensions where the existence of a complete leftward walk corresponds to a topologically ergodic orbit of the system, i.e. an orbit of $H$ visiting all the topology of the surface.

Although there is a somewhat standard formalization of computability on countable sets given by Turing machines, the same cannot be said about uncountable sets. Among the approaches to define computability in these sets, order-theoretic structures have proven to be useful. Here, we discuss the mathematical structure needed to define computability using order-theoretic concepts. In particular, we introduce a more general framework and discuss its limitations compared to the previous one in domain theory. We expose four features in which the stronger requirements in the domain-theoretic structure allow to improve upon the more general framework: computable elements, computable functions, model dependence of computability and complexity theory. Crucially, we show computability of elements in uncountable spaces can be defined in this new setup, and argue why this is not the case for computable functions. Moreover, we show the stronger setup diminishes the dependence of computability on the chosen order-theoretic structure and that, although a suitable complexity theory can be defined in the stronger framework and the more general one posesses a notion of computable elements, there appears to be no proper notion of element complexity in the latter.

The following notion of growth rate can be seen as a generalization of joint spectral radius: Given a bilinear map $*:\mathbb R^d\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb R^d$ with nonnegative coefficients and a nonnegative vector $s\in\mathbb R^d$, denote by $g(n)$ the largest possible entry of a vector obtained by combining $n$ instances of $s$ using $n-1$ applications of $*$. Let $λ$ denote the growth rate $\limsup_{n\to\infty} \sqrt[n]{g(n)}$. Rosenfeld showed that the problem of checking $λ\le 1$ is undecidable by reducing the problem of joint spectral radius. In this article, we provide a simpler reduction using the observation that matrix multiplication is actually a bilinear map. Moreover, we extend the reduction to show that checking $λ\le 1$ is still undecidable even if $s$ is positive. If there is no restriction on the signs, we can also show that the problem of checking if the system can produce a zero vector is undecidable by reducing the problem of checking the mortality of a pair of matrices. This answers a question asked by Rosenfeld. Beside that, we confirm a remark of Rosenfeld that the problem does not become harder when we introduce more bilinear maps and more starting vectors. It is known that if the vector $s$ is strictly positive, then the limit superior $λ$ is actually a limit. However, we show that when $s$ is only nonnegative, the problem of checking the existence of the limit is undecidable. This also answers a question asked by Rosenfeld. We provide a formula for the growth rate $λ$ in terms of the diagonals of matrices corresponding to a special structure called ``linear pattern''. A condition is given so that the limit $λ$ exists. This actually provides a simpler proof for the existence of the limit $λ$ when $s>0$. An important corollary of the formula is the computability of the growth rate,....

Framed combinatorial topology is a novel theory describing combinatorial phenomena arising at the intersection of stratified topology, singularity theory, and higher algebra. The theory synthesizes elements of classical combinatorial topology with a new combinatorial approach to framings. The resulting notion of framed combinatorial spaces has unexpectedly good behavior when compared to classical, nonframed combinatorial notions of space. In discussing this behavior and its contrast with that of classical structures, we emphasize two broad themes, computability in combinatorial topology and combinatorializability of topological phenomena. The first theme of computability concerns whether certain combinatorial structures can be algorithmically recognized and classified. The second theme of combinatorializability concerns whether certain topological structures can be faithfully represented by a discrete structure. Combining these themes, we will find that in the context of framed combinatorial topology we can overcome a set of fundamental classical obstructions to the computable combinatorial representation of topological phenomena.