arXiv++ Combinatorics

We calibrate the reverse mathematical strength of a family of extensions of Ramsey's theorem to finite colorings of certain subsets of the natural numbers of unbounded finite dimension. Specifically, we analyze the principles $\mathsf{RT}^{!α}_k$ asserting that every $k$-coloring of the exactly $α$-large subsets of an infinite $X \subseteq \mathbb{N}$ admits an infinite homogeneous set, where $α$-largeness is defined via systems of fundamental sequences in the style of Ketonen and Solovay. For each countable ordinal $α< Γ_0$ and each $k \geq 2$, we prove over $\mathsf{RCA}_0$ that the hierarchy of theorems $\mathsf{RT}^{!\a}_k$ corresponds exactly to the hierarchy of systems axiomatized by closure under transfinite Turing jumps, yielding a fine-grained classification between $\mathsf{ACA}_0$ and $\mathsf{ATR}_0$. Our results extend previous work on the case $α=ω$ and provide a uniform correspondence between countable indecomposable ordinals below $Γ_0$ and natural Ramsey-like theorems.

We study the relations under Weihrauch reducibility of the well-ordering preservation principle for the operator $X \mapsto X^ω$ and the Ordered Ramsey Theorem. Both principles are known to be equivalent to $Σ^0_2$-induction in Reverse Mathematics. We show that the Ordered Ramsey Theorem is Weihrauch-equivalent to the parallel product of the well-ordering preservation principle for the operator $X \mapsto X^ω$ and the Eventually Constant Tail principle. By previous work from Pauly, Pradic and Soldà, the Ordered Ramsey Theorem is known to be Weihrauch-equivalent to the parallel product of the Eventually Constant Tail principle and the parallelization of the jump of the Limited Principle of Omniscience. We show that the latter pinciple and the well-ordering preservation principle for $X \mapsto X^ω$ are Weihrauch-incomparable.

The family of finite subsets $s$ of the natural numbers such that $|s|=1+\min s$ is known as the Schreier barrier in combinatorics and Banach Space theory, and as the family of exactly $ω$-large sets in Logic. We formulate and prove the generalizations of Friedman's Free Set and Thin Set theorems and of Rainbow Ramsey's theorem to colorings of the Schreier barrier. We analyze the strength of these theorems from the point of view of Computability Theory and Reverse Mathematics. Surprisingly, the exactly $ω$-large counterparts of the Thin Set and Free Set theorems can code $\emptyset^{(ω)}$, while the exactly $ω$-large Rainbow Ramsey theorem does not code the halting set.

A well-ordering principle is a principle of the form: If $X$ is well-ordered then $F(X)$ is well-ordered, where $F$ is some natural operator transforming linear orders into linear orders. Many important subsystems of Second-order Arithmetic of interest in Reverse Mathematics are known to be equivalent to well-ordering principles. We give a unified treatment for proving lower bounds on the logical strength of various Ramsey-theoretic principles relations using characterizations of the corresponding formal systems in terms of well-ordering principles. Our implications (over $RCA_0$) from combinatorial theorems to $ACA_0$ and $ACA_0^+$ also establish uniform computable reductions of the corresponding well-ordering principles to the corresponding Ramsey-type theorems.

When the Canonical Ramsey's Theorem by Erdős and Rado is applied to regressive functions one obtains the Regressive Ramsey's Theorem by Kanamori and McAloon. Taylor proved a "canonical" version of Hindman's Theorem, analogous to the Canonical Ramsey's Theorem. We introduce the restriction of Taylor's Canonical Hindman's Theorem to a subclass of the regressive functions, the $λ$-regressive functions, relative to an adequate version of min-homogeneity and prove some results about the Reverse Mathematics of this Regressive Hindman's Theorem and of natural restrictions of it. In particular we prove that the first non-trivial restriction of the principle is equivalent to Arithmetical Comprehension. We furthermore prove that this same principle strongly computably reduces the well-ordering-preservation principle for base-$ω$ exponentiation.

Recent results of Hindman, Leader and Strauss and of the second author and Rinot showed that some natural analogs of Hindman's Theorem fail for all uncountable cardinals. Results in the positive direction were obtained by Komjáth, the first author, and the second author and Lee, who showed that there are arbitrarily large Abelian groups satisfying some Hindman-type property. Inspired by an analogous result studied by the first author in the countable setting, we prove a new variant of Hindman's Theorem for uncountable cardinals, called the Adjacent Hindman's Theorem: For every $κ$ there is a $λ$ such that, whenever a group $G$ of cardinality $λ$ is coloured with $κ$ colours, there exists a $λ$-sized injective sequence of elements of $G$ with all finite products of adjacent terms of the sequence of the same colour. We obtain bounds on $λ$ as a function of $κ$, and prove that such bounds are optimal. This is the first example of a Hindman-type result for uncountable cardinals that we can prove also in the non-Abelian setting and, furthermore, it is the first such example where monochromatic products (or sums) of unbounded length are guaranteed.

Recent results of Hindman, Leader and Strauss and of Fernández-Bretón and Rinot showed that natural versions of Hindman's Theorem fail {\em for all} uncontable cardinals. On the other hand, Komjáth proved a result in the positive direction, showing that {\em there are} arbitrarily large abelian groups satisfying {\em some} Hindman-type property. In this note we show how a family of natural Hindman-type theorems for uncountable cardinals can be obtained by adapting some recent results of the author from their original countable setting. We also show how lower bounds for {\em some} of the variants considered can be obtained.

We prove upper and lower bounds on the effective content and logical strength for a variety of natural restrictions of Hindman's Finite Sums Theorem. For example, we show that Hindman's Theorem for sums of length at most 2 and 4 colors implies $\mathsf{ACA}_0$. An emerging {\em leitmotiv} is that the known lower bounds for Hindman's Theorem and for its restriction to sums of at most 2 elements are already valid for a number of restricted versions which have simple proofs and better computability- and proof-theoretic upper bounds than the known upper bound for the full version of the theorem. We highlight the role of a sparsity-like condition on the solution set, which we call apartness.

We present a natural restriction of Hindman's Finite Sums Theorem that admits a simple combinatorial proof (one that does not also prove the full Finite Sums Theorem) and low computability-theoretic and proof-theoretic upper bounds, yet implies the existence of the Turing Jump, thus realizing the only known lower bound for the full Finite Sums Theorem. This is the first example of this kind. In fact we isolate a rich family of similar restrictions of Hindman's Theorem with analogous properties.

Hirst investigated a slight variant of Hindman's Finite Sums Theorem -- called Hilbert's Theorem -- and proved it equivalent over $\RCA_0$ to the Infinite Pigeonhole Principle for all colors. This gave the first example of a natural restriction of Hindman's Theorem provably much weaker than Hindman's Theorem itself. We here introduce another natural variant of Hindman's Theorem -- which we name the Adjacent Hindman's Theorem -- and prove it to be provable from Ramsey's Theorem for pairs and strictly stronger than Hirst's Hilbert's Theorem. The lower bound is obtained by a direct combinatorial implication from the Adjacent Hindman's Theorem to the Increasing Polarized Ramsey's Theorem for pairs introduced by Dzhafarov and Hirst. In the Adjacent Hindman's Theorem homogeneity is required only for finite sums of adjacent elements.

We characterize the computational content and the proof-theoretic strength of a Ramsey-type theorem for bi-colorings of so-called {\em exactly large} sets. An {\it exactly large} set is a set $X\subset\Nat$ such that $\card(X)=\min(X)+1$. The theorem we analyze is as follows. For every infinite subset $M$ of $\Nat$, for every coloring $C$ of the exactly large subsets of $M$ in two colors, there exists and infinite subset $L$ of $M$ such that $C$ is constant on all exactly large subsets of $L$. This theorem is essentially due to Pudlàk and Rödl and independently to Farmaki. We prove that --- over Computable Mathematics --- this theorem is equivalent to closure under the $ω$ Turing jump (i.e., under arithmetical truth). Natural combinatorial theorems at this level of complexity are rare. Our results give a complete characterization of the theorem from the point of view of Computable Mathematics and of the Proof Theory of Arithmetic. This nicely extends the current knowledge about the strength of Ramsey Theorem. We also show that analogous results hold for a related principle based on the Regressive Ramsey Theorem. In addition we give a further characterization in terms of truth predicates over Peano Arithmetic. We conjecture that analogous results hold for larger ordinals.