arXiv++ Combinatorics

Connection matrices are one of the central tools in Conley's approach to the study of dynamical systems, as they provide information on the existence of connecting orbits in Morse decompositions. They may be considered a generalisation of the boundary operator in the Morse complex in Morse theory. Their computability has recently been addressed by Harker, Mischaikow, and Spendlove in the context of lattice filtered chain complexes. In the current paper, we extend the recently introduced Conley theory for combinatorial vector and multivector fields on Lefschetz complexes by transferring the concept of connection matrix to this setting. This is accomplished by the notion of connection matrix for arbitrary poset filtered chain complexes, as well as an associated equivalence, which allows for changes in the underlying posets. We show that for the special case of gradient combinatorial vector fields in the sense of Forman, connection matrices are necessarily unique. Thus, the classical results of Reineck have a natural analogue in the combinatorial setting.

We show that a question of Miller and Solomon -- that whether there exists a coloring $c:d^{<ω}\rightarrow k$ that does not admit a $c$-computable variable word infinite solution, is equivalent to a natural, nontrivial combinatorial question. The combinatorial question asked whether there is an infinite sequence of integers such that each of its initial segment satisfies a Ramsian type property. This is the first computability theoretic question known to be equivalent to a natural, nontrivial question that does not concern complexity notions. It turns out that the negation of the combinatorial question is a generalization of Hales-Jewett theorem. We solve some special cases of the combinatorial question and obtain a generalization of Hales-Jewett theorem on some particular parameters.

The celebrated Erdős--Stone--Simonovits theorem characterizes the asymptotic maximum edge density in $\mathcal{F}$-free graphs as $1 - 1/(χ(\mathcal{F})-1) + o(1)$, where $χ(\mathcal{F})$ is the minimum chromatic number of a graph in $\mathcal{F}$. In Examples 25 and 31 of [L. N. Coregliano and A. A. Razborov. Semantic limits of dense combinatorial objects. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 75(4(454)):45-152, 2020], it was shown that this result can be extended to the general setting of graphs with extra structure: the maximum asymptotic density of a graph with extra structure without some induced subgraphs is $1 - 1/(χ(I) - 1) + o(1)$ for an appropriately defined abstract chromatic number $χ(I)$. As the name suggests, the original formula for the abstract chromatic number is so abstract that its (algorithmic) computability was left open. In this paper, we both extend this result to characterize maximum asymptotic density of $t$-cliques in of graphs with extra structure without some induced subgraphs in terms of $χ(I)$ and we present a more concrete formula for $χ(I)$ that allows us to show its computability when both the extra structure and the forbidden subgraphs can be described by a finitely axiomatizable universal first-order theory. Our alternative formula for $χ(I)$ makes use of a partite version of Ramsey's Theorem for structures on first-order relational languages.

The eternal vertex cover problem is a dynamic variant of the classical vertex cover problem. It is NP-hard to compute the eternal vertex cover number of graphs and known algorithmic results for the problem are very few. This paper presents a linear time recursive algorithm for computing the eternal vertex cover number of cactus graphs. Unlike other graph classes for which polynomial time algorithms for eternal vertex cover number are based on efficient computability of a known lower bound directly derived from minimum vertex cover, we show that it is a certain substructure property that helps the efficient computation of eternal vertex cover number of cactus graphs. An extension of the result to graphs in which each block is an edge, a cycle or a biconnected chordal graph is also presented.

Persistent homology enables fast and computable comparison of topological objects. However, it is naturally limited to the analysis of topological spaces. We extend the theory of persistence, by guaranteeing robustness and computability to significant data types as simple graphs and quivers. We focus on categorical persistence functions that allow us to study in full generality strong kinds of connectedness such as clique communities, $k$-vertex and $k$-edge connectedness directly on simple graphs and monic coherent categories.

We investigate the relative computability of exchangeable binary relational data when presented in terms of the distribution of an invariant measure on graphs, or as a graphon in either $L^1$ or the cut distance. We establish basic computable equivalences, and show that $L^1$ representations contain fundamentally more computable information than the other representations, but that $0'$ suffices to move between computable such representations. We show that $0'$ is necessary in general, but that in the case of random-free graphons, no oracle is necessary. We also provide an example of an $L^1$-computable random-free graphon that is not weakly isomorphic to any graphon with an a.e. continuous version.

This article investigates emergence and complexity in complex systems that can share information on a network. To this end, we use a theoretical approach from information theory, computability theory, and complex networks. One key studied question is how much emergent complexity (or information) arises when a population of computable systems is networked compared with when this population is isolated. First, we define a general model for networked theoretical machines, which we call algorithmic networks. Then, we narrow our scope to investigate algorithmic networks that optimize the average fitnesses of nodes in a scenario in which each node imitates the fittest neighbor and the randomly generated population is networked by a time-varying graph. We show that there are graph-topological conditions that cause these algorithmic networks to have the property of expected emergent open-endedness for large enough populations. In other words, the expected emergent algorithmic complexity of a node tends to infinity as the population size tends to infinity. Given a dynamic network, we show that these conditions imply the existence of a central time to trigger expected emergent open-endedness. Moreover, we show that networks with small diameter compared to the network size meet these conditions. We also discuss future research based on how our results are related to some problems in network science, information theory, computability theory, distributed computing, game theory, evolutionary biology, and synergy in complex systems.

We prove upper and lower bounds on the effective content and logical strength for a variety of natural restrictions of Hindman's Finite Sums Theorem. For example, we show that Hindman's Theorem for sums of length at most 2 and 4 colors implies $\mathsf{ACA}_0$. An emerging {\em leitmotiv} is that the known lower bounds for Hindman's Theorem and for its restriction to sums of at most 2 elements are already valid for a number of restricted versions which have simple proofs and better computability- and proof-theoretic upper bounds than the known upper bound for the full version of the theorem. We highlight the role of a sparsity-like condition on the solution set, which we call apartness.

In this paper we investigate the extent to which the Lovász Local Lemma (an important tool in probabilistic combinatorics) can be adapted for the measurable setting. In most applications, the Lovász Local Lemma is used to produce a function $f \colon X \to Y$ with certain properties, where $X$ is some underlying combinatorial structure and $Y$ is a (typically finite) set. Can this function $f$ be chosen to be Borel or $μ$-measurable for some probability Borel measure $μ$ on $X$ (assuming that $X$ is a standard Borel space)? In the positive direction, we prove that if the set of constraints put on $f$ is, in a certain sense, "locally finite," then there is always a Borel choice for $f$ that is "$\varepsilon$-close" to satisfying these constraints, for any $\varepsilon > 0$. Moreover, if the combinatorial structure on $X$ is "induced" by the $[0;1]$-shift action of a countable group $Γ$, then, even without any local finiteness assumptions, there is a Borel choice for $f$ which satisfies the constraints on an invariant conull set (i.e., with $\varepsilon = 0$). A direct corollary of our results is an upper bound on the measurable chromatic number of the graph $G_n$ generated by the shift action of the free group $\mathbb{F}_n$ that is asymptotically tight up to a factor of at most $2$ (which answers a question of Lyons and Nazarov). On the other hand, our result for structures induced by measure-preserving group actions is, at least for amenable groups, sharp in the following sense: a probability measure-preserving action of a countably infinite amenable group satisfies the measurable version of the Lovász Local Lemma if and only if it admits a factor map to the $[0;1]$-shift action. To prove this, we combine the tools of the Ornstein--Weiss theory of entropy for actions of amenable groups with concepts from computability theory, specifically, Kolmogorov complexity.

We define the analogue of linear equivalence of graph divisors for the rotor-router model, and use it to prove polynomial time computability of some problems related to rotor-routing. Using the connection between linear equivalence for chip-firing and for rotor-routing, we give a simple proof for the fact that the number of rotor-router unicycle-orbits equals the order of the Picard group. We also show that the rotor-router action of the Picard group on the set of spanning in-arborescences can be interpreted in terms of the linear equivalence.

Let $F \subset S_k$ be a finite set of permutations and let $C_n(F)$ denote the number of permutations $σ$ in $S_n$ avoiding the set of patterns $F$. The Noonan-Zeilberger conjecture states that the sequence ${C_n(F)}$ is P-recursive. We use Computability Theory to disprove this conjecture.

Ramsey's theorem states that each coloring has an infinite homogeneous set, but these sets can be arbitrarily spread out. Paul Erdos and Fred Galvin proved that for each coloring f, there is an infinite set that is "packed together" which is given "a small number" of colors by f. We analyze the strength of this theorem from the perspective of computability theory and reverse mathematics. We show that this theorem is close in computational strength to standard Ramsey's theorem by giving arithmetical upper and lower bounds for solutions to computable instances. In reverse mathematics, we show that that this packed Ramsey's theorem is equivalent to Ramsey's theorem for exponents not equal to 2. When n=2, we show that it implies Ramsey's theorem, and that it does not imply ACA_0.

The classical paradox of social choice theory asserts that there is no fair way to deterministically select a winner in an election among more than two candidates; the only definite collective preferences are between individual pairs of candidates. Combinatorially, one may summarize this information with a graph-theoretic tournament on N vertices (one per candidate), placing an edge from U to V if U would beat V in an election between only those two candidates (no ties are permitted). One well-studied procedure for selecting a winner is to specify a complete binary tree whose leaves are labeled by the candidates, and evaluate it by running pairwise elections between the pairs of leaves, sending the winners to successive rounds of pairwise elections which ultimately terminate with a single winner. This structure is called a voting tree. Much research has investigated which functions on tournaments are computable in this way. Fischer, Procaccia, and Samorodnitsky quantitatively studied the computability of the Copeland rule, which returns a vertex of maximum out-degree in the given tournament. Perhaps surprisingly, the best previously known voting tree could only guarantee a returned out-degree of at least log_2 N, despite the fact that every tournament has a vertex of degree at least (N-1)/2. In this paper, we present three constructions, the first of which substantially improves this guarantee to Θ(sqrt{N}). The other two demonstrate the richness of the voting tree universe, with a tree that resists manipulation, and a tree which implements arithmetic modulo three.

In the final paper of the Graph Minors series N. Robertson and P. Seymour proved that graphs are well-quasi-ordered under the immersion ordering. A direct implication of this theorem is that each class of graphs that is closed under taking immersions can be fully characterized by forbidding a finite set of graphs (immersion obstruction set). However, as the proof of the well-quasi-ordering theorem is non-constructive, there is no generic procedure for computing such a set. Moreover, it remains an open issue to identify for which immersion-closed graph classes the computation of those sets can become effective. By adapting the tools that were introduced by I. Adler, M. Grohe and S. Kreutzer, for the effective computation of minor obstruction sets, we expand the horizon of computability to immersion obstruction sets. In particular, our results propagate the computability of immersion obstruction sets of immersion-closed graph classes to immersion obstruction sets of finite unions of immersion closed graph classes.

We study so-called invariant games played with a fixed number $d$ of heaps of matches. A game is described by a finite list $\mathcal{M}$ of integer vectors of length $d$ specifying the legal moves. A move consists in changing the current game-state by adding one of the vectors in $\mathcal{M}$, provided all elements of the resulting vector are nonnegative. For instance, in a two-heap game, the vector $(1,-2)$ would mean adding one match to the first heap and removing two matches from the second heap. If $(1,-2) \in \mathcal{M}$, such a move would be permitted provided there are at least two matches in the second heap. Two players take turns, and a player unable to make a move loses. We show that these games embrace computational universality, and that therefore a number of basic questions about them are algorithmically undecidable. In particular, we prove that there is no algorithm that takes two games $\mathcal{M}$ and $\mathcal{M}'$ (with the same number of heaps) as input, and determines whether or not they are equivalent in the sense that every starting-position which is a first player win in one of the games is a first player win in the other.

In this paper we extend test set based augmentation methods for integer linear programs to programs with more general convex objective functions. We show existence and computability of finite test sets for these wider problem classes by providing an explicit relationship to Graver bases. One candidate where this new approach may turn out fruitful is the Quadratic Assignment Problem.