arXiv++ Combinatorics

There has been much research on the topic of finding a large rainbow matching (with no two edges having the same color) in a properly edge-colored graph, where a proper edge coloring is a coloring of the edge set such that no same-colored edges are incident. Recently, Gao, Ramadurai, Wanless, and Wormald proved that in every proper edge coloring of a graph with $q$ colors where each color appears at least $q+o(q)$ times, there is always a rainbow matching using every color. We strengthen this result by simultaneously relaxing two conditions: (i) we lift the condition on the number of colors and allow any finite number of colors and instead, put a weaker condition requiring the maximum degree of the graph to be at most $q$, and (ii) we also relax the proper coloring condition and require that the graph induced by each of the colors have bounded degree. This strengthening resolves a natural question inspired by the remarks made by Gao, Ramadurai, Wanless, and Wormald. As an application of this result, we show that for every proper edge coloring of a graph with $2q+o(q)$ colors where each color appears at least $q$ times, there is always a rainbow matching of size $q$. This can be seen as an asymptotic version of a conjecture of Barát, Gyárfás, and Sárközy restricted on simple graphs. We also provide a construction showing that having $q+1$ colors is not enough, disproving a conjecture of Aharoni and Berger. As a by-product of our techniques, we obtain a new asymptotic version of the Brualdi--Ryser--Stein Conjecture, which is one of the central open questions in combinatorics.

We systematically study a natural problem in extremal graph theory, to minimize the number of edges in a graph with a fixed number of vertices, subject to a certain local condition: each vertex must be in a copy of a fixed graph $H$. We completely solve this problem when $H$ is a clique, as well as more generally when $H$ is any regular graph with degree at least about half its number of vertices. We also characterize the extremal graphs when $H$ is an Erdős-Rényi random graph. The extremal structures turn out to have the similar form as the conjectured extremal structures for a well-studied but elusive problem of similar flavor with local constraints: to maximize the number of copies of a fixed clique in graphs in which all degrees have a fixed upper bound.

This paper considers two important questions in the well-studied theory of graphs that are $F$-saturated. A graph $G$ is called $F$-saturated if $G$ does not contain a subgraph isomorphic to $F$, but the addition of any edge creates a copy of $F$. We first resolve a fundamental question of minimizing the number of cliques of size $r$ in a $K_s$-saturated graph for all sufficiently large numbers of vertices, confirming a conjecture of Kritschgau, Methuku, Tait, and Timmons. We also go further and prove a corresponding stability result. Next we minimize the number of cycles of length $r$ in a $K_s$-saturated graph for all sufficiently large numbers of vertices, and classify the extremal graphs for most values of $r$, answering another question of Kritschgau, Methuku, Tait, and Timmons for most $r$. We then move on to a central and longstanding conjecture in graph saturation made by Tuza, which states that for every graph $F$, the limit $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\sat(n, F)}{n}$ exists, where $\sat(n, F)$ denotes the minimum number of edges in an $n$-vertex $F$-saturated graph. Pikhurko made progress in the negative direction by considering families of graphs instead of a single graph, and proved that there exists a graph family $\mathcal{F}$ of size $4$ for which $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\sat(n, \mathcal{F})}{n}$ does not exist (for a family of graphs $\mathcal{F}$, a graph $G$ is called $\mathcal{F}$-saturated if $G$ does not contain a copy of any graph in $\mathcal{F}$, but the addition of any edge creates a copy of a graph in $\mathcal{F}$, and $\sat(n, \mathcal{F})$ is defined similarly). We make the first improvement in 15 years by showing that there exist infinitely many graph families of size $3$ where this limit does not exist. Our construction also extends to the generalized saturation problem when we minimize the number of fixed-size cliques.

Let $\mathcal{P}$ be a graph property which is preserved by removal of edges, and consider the random graph process that starts with the empty $n$-vertex graph and then adds edges one-by-one, each chosen uniformly at random subject to the constraint that $\mathcal{P}$ is not violated. These types of random processes have been the subject of extensive research over the last 20 years, having striking applications in extremal combinatorics, and leading to the discovery of important probabilistic tools. In this paper we consider the $k$-matching-free process, where $\mathcal{P}$ is the property of not containing a matching of size $k$. We are able to analyse the behaviour of this process for a wide range of values of $k$; in particular we prove that if $k=o(n)$ or if $n-2k=o(\sqrt{n}/\log n)$ then this process is likely to terminate in a $k$-matching-free graph with the maximum possible number of edges, as characterised by Erdős and Gallai. We also show that these bounds on $k$ are essentially best possible, and we make a first step towards understanding the behaviour of the process in the intermediate regime.

An $ε$-distance-uniform graph is one in which from every vertex, all but an $ε$-fraction of the remaining vertices are at some fixed distance $d$, called the critical distance. We consider the maximum possible value of $d$ in an $ε$-distance-uniform graph with $n$ vertices. We show that for $\frac1n \le ε\le \frac1{\log n}$, there exist $ε$-distance-uniform graphs with critical distance $2^{Ω(\frac{\log n}{\log ε^{-1}})}$, disproving a conjecture of Alon et al. that $d$ can be at most logarithmic in $n$. We also show that our construction is best possible, in the sense that an upper bound on $d$ of the form $2^{O(\frac{\log n}{\log ε^{-1}})}$ holds for all $ε$ and $n$.

Let $T(d,r) = (r-1)(d+1)+1$ be the parameter in Tverberg's theorem, and call a partition $\mathcal I$ of $\{1,2,\ldots,T(d,r)\}$ into $r$ parts a "Tverberg type". We say that $\mathcal I$ "occurs" in an ordered point sequence $P$ if $P$ contains a subsequence $P'$ of $T(d,r)$ points such that the partition of $P'$ that is order-isomorphic to $\mathcal I$ is a Tverberg partition. We say that $\mathcal I$ is "unavoidable" if it occurs in every sufficiently long point sequence. In this paper we study the problem of determining which Tverberg types are unavoidable. We conjecture a complete characterization of the unavoidable Tverberg types, and we prove some cases of our conjecture for $d\le 4$. Along the way, we study the avoidability of many other geometric predicates. Our techniques also yield a large family of $T(d,r)$-point sets for which the number of Tverberg partitions is exactly $(r-1)!^d$. This lends further support for Sierksma's conjecture on the number of Tverberg partitions.

The classical Kővári-Sós-Turán theorem states that if $G$ is an $n$-vertex graph with no copy of $K_{s,t}$ as a subgraph, then the number of edges in $G$ is at most $O(n^{2-1/s})$. We prove that if one forbids $K_{s,t}$ as an induced/ subgraph, and also forbids any/ fixed graph $H$ as a (not necessarily induced) subgraph, the same asymptotic upper bound still holds, with different constant factors. This introduces a nontrivial angle from which to generalize Turán theory to induced forbidden subgraphs, which this paper explores. Along the way, we derive a nontrivial upper bound on the number of cliques of fixed order in a $K_r$-free graph with no induced copy of $K_{s,t}$. This result is an induced analog of a recent theorem of Alon and Shikhelman and is of independent interest.

It is known that w.h.p. the hitting time $τ_{2σ}$ for the random graph process to have minimum degree $2σ$ coincides with the hitting time for $σ$ edge disjoint Hamilton cycles. In this paper we prove an online version of this property. We show that, for a fixed integer $σ\geq 2$, if random edges of $K_n$ are presented one by one then w.h.p. it is possible to color the edges online with $σ$ colors so that at time $τ_{2σ}$, each color class is Hamiltonian.

Aigner and Fromme initiated the systematic study of the cop number of a graph by proving the elegant and sharp result that in every connected planar graph, three cops are sufficient to win a natural pursuit game against a single robber. This game, introduced by Nowakowski and Winkler, is commonly known as Cops and Robbers in the combinatorial literature. We extend this study to directed planar graphs, and establish separation from the undirected setting. We exhibit a geometric construction which shows that a more sophisticated robber strategy can indefinitely evade three cops on a particular strongly connected planar directed graph.

Starting from an innocent Ramsey-theoretic question regarding directed paths in tournaments, we discover a series of rich and surprising connections that lead into the theory around a fundamental problem in Combinatorics: the Ruzsa-Szemerédi induced matching problem. Using these relationships, we prove that every coloring of the edges of the transitive $n$-vertex tournament using three colors contains a directed path of length at least $\sqrt{n} \cdot e^{\log^* n}$ which entirely avoids some color. We also expose connections to a family of constructions for Ramsey tournaments, and introduce and resolve some natural generalizations of the Ruzsa-Szemerédi problem which we encounter through our investigation.

A graph is called diameter-$k$-critical if its diameter is $k$, and the removal of any edge strictly increases the diameter. In this paper, we prove several results related to a conjecture often attributed to Murty and Simon, regarding the maximum number of edges that any diameter-$k$-critical graph can have. In particular, we disprove a longstanding conjecture of Caccetta and Häggkvist (that in every diameter-2-critical graph, the average edge-degree is at most the number of vertices), which promised to completely solve the extremal problem for diameter-2-critical graphs. On the other hand, we prove that the same claim holds for all higher diameters, and is asymptotically tight, resolving the average edge-degree question in all cases except diameter-2. We also apply our techniques to prove several bounds for the original extremal question, including the correct asymptotic bound for diameter-$k$-critical graphs, and an upper bound of $(\frac{1}{6} + o(1))n^2$ for the number of edges in a diameter-3-critical graph.

If the edges of the complete graph $K_n$ are totally ordered, a simple path whose edges are in ascending order is called increasing. The worst-case length of the longest increasing path has remained an open problem for several decades, with asymptotic bounds between $\sqrt{n}$ (Graham and Kleitman, 1973) and $n/2$ (Calderbank, Chung, and Sturtevant, 1984). We consider the average case, when the ordering is chosen uniformly at random. We discover the surprising result that in the random setting, an increasing path of the maximum possible length of $n-1$ exists with probability at least about $1/e$. We also prove that with probability $1-o(1)$, there is an increasing path of length at least $0.85n$, suggesting that this Hamiltonian (or near-Hamiltonian) phenomenon may hold asymptotically almost surely.

Let $i_t(G)$ be the number of independent sets of size $t$ in a graph $G$. Engbers and Galvin asked how large $i_t(G)$ could be in graphs with minimum degree at least $δ$. They further conjectured that when $n\geq 2δ$ and $t\geq 3$, $i_t(G)$ is maximized by the complete bipartite graph $K_{δ, n-δ}$. This conjecture has drawn the attention of many researchers recently. In this short note, we prove this conjecture.

The Internet has emerged as perhaps the most important network in modern computing, but rather miraculously, it was created through the individual actions of a multitude of agents rather than by a central planning authority. This motivates the game theoretic study of network formation, and our paper considers one of the most-well studied models, originally proposed by Fabrikant et al. In it, each of N agents corresponds to a vertex, which can create edges to other vertices at a cost of alpha each, for some parameter alpha. Every edge can be freely used by every vertex, regardless of who paid the creation cost. To reflect the desire to be close to other vertices, each agent's cost function is further augmented by the sum total of all (graph theoretic) distances to all other vertices. Previous research proved that for many regimes of the (alpha, N) parameter space, the total social cost (sum of all agents' costs) of every Nash equilibrium is bounded by at most a constant multiple of the optimal social cost. In algorithmic game theoretic nomenclature, this approximation ratio is called the price of anarchy. In our paper, we significantly sharpen some of those results, proving that for all constant non-integral alpha > 2, the price of anarchy is in fact 1+o(1), i.e., not only is it bounded by a constant, but it tends to 1 as N tends to infinity. For constant integral alpha >= 2, we show that the price of anarchy is bounded away from 1. We provide quantitative estimates on the rates of convergence for both results.

The area of judicious partitioning considers the general family of partitioning problems in which one seeks to optimize several parameters simultaneously, and these problems have been widely studied in various combinatorial contexts. In this paper, we study essentially the most fundamental judicious partitioning problem for directed graphs, which naturally extends the classical Max Cut problem to this setting: we seek bipartitions in which many edges cross in each direction. It is easy to see that a minimum outdegree condition is required in order for the problem to be nontrivial, and we prove that every directed graph with M edges and minimum outdegree at least two admits a bipartition in which at least (1/6 + o(1))M edges cross in each direction. We also prove that if the minimum outdegree is at least three, then the constant can be increased to 1/5. If the minimum outdegree tends to infinity with N, then the constant increases to 1/4. All of these constants are best-possible, and provide asymptotic answers to a question of Alex Scott.

For a fixed graph H with t vertices, an H-factor of a graph G with n vertices, where t divides n, is a collection of vertex disjoint (not necessarily induced) copies of H in G covering all vertices of G. We prove that for a fixed tree T on t vertices and ε> 0, the random graph G_{n,p}, with n a multiple of t, with high probability contains a family of edge-disjoint T-factors covering all but an ε-fraction of its edges, as long as ε^4 n p >> (log n)^2. Assuming stronger divisibility conditions, the edge probability can be taken down to p > (C log n)/n. A similar packing result is proved also for pseudo-random graphs, defined in terms of their degrees and co-degrees.

The classical paradox of social choice theory asserts that there is no fair way to deterministically select a winner in an election among more than two candidates; the only definite collective preferences are between individual pairs of candidates. Combinatorially, one may summarize this information with a graph-theoretic tournament on N vertices (one per candidate), placing an edge from U to V if U would beat V in an election between only those two candidates (no ties are permitted). One well-studied procedure for selecting a winner is to specify a complete binary tree whose leaves are labeled by the candidates, and evaluate it by running pairwise elections between the pairs of leaves, sending the winners to successive rounds of pairwise elections which ultimately terminate with a single winner. This structure is called a voting tree. Much research has investigated which functions on tournaments are computable in this way. Fischer, Procaccia, and Samorodnitsky quantitatively studied the computability of the Copeland rule, which returns a vertex of maximum out-degree in the given tournament. Perhaps surprisingly, the best previously known voting tree could only guarantee a returned out-degree of at least log_2 N, despite the fact that every tournament has a vertex of degree at least (N-1)/2. In this paper, we present three constructions, the first of which substantially improves this guarantee to Θ(sqrt{N}). The other two demonstrate the richness of the voting tree universe, with a tree that resists manipulation, and a tree which implements arithmetic modulo three.

The first application of Szemerédi's powerful regularity method was the following celebrated Ramsey-Turán result proved by Szemerédi in 1972: any K_4-free graph on N vertices with independence number o(N) has at most (1/8 + o(1)) N^2 edges. Four years later, Bollobás and Erdős gave a surprising geometric construction, utilizing the isoperimetric inequality for the high dimensional sphere, of a K_4-free graph on N vertices with independence number o(N) and (1/8 - o(1)) N^2 edges. Starting with Bollobás and Erdős in 1976, several problems have been asked on estimating the minimum possible independence number in the critical window, when the number of edges is about N^2 / 8. These problems have received considerable attention and remained one of the main open problems in this area. In this paper, we give nearly best-possible bounds, solving the various open problems concerning this critical window.

Multiple-choice load balancing has been a topic of intense study since the seminal paper of Azar, Broder, Karlin, and Upfal. Questions in this area can be phrased in terms of orientations of a graph, or more generally a k-uniform random hypergraph. A (d,b)-orientation is an assignment of each edge to d of its vertices, such that no vertex has more than b edges assigned to it. Conditions for the existence of such orientations have been completely documented except for the "extreme" case of (k-1,1)-orientations. We consider this remaining case, and establish: - The density threshold below which an orientation exists with high probability, and above which it does not exist with high probability. - An algorithm for finding an orientation that runs in linear time with high probability, with explicit polynomial bounds on the failure probability. Previously, the only known algorithms for constructing (k-1,1)-orientations worked for k<=3, and were only shown to have expected linear running time.

An old problem raised independently by Jacobson and Schönheim asks to determine the maximum $s$ for which every graph with $m$ edges contains a pair of edge-disjoint isomorphic subgraphs with $s$ edges. In this paper we determine this maximum up to a constant factor. We show that every $m$-edge graph contains a pair of edge-disjoint isomorphic subgraphs with at least $c (m\log m)^{2/3}$ edges for some absolute constant $c$, and find graphs where this estimate is off only by a multiplicative constant. Our results improve bounds of Erdős, Pach, and Pyber from 1987.