arXiv++ Combinatorics

The Internet has emerged as perhaps the most important network in modern computing, but rather miraculously, it was created through the individual actions of a multitude of agents rather than by a central planning authority. This motivates the game theoretic study of network formation, and our paper considers one of the most-well studied models, originally proposed by Fabrikant et al. In it, each of N agents corresponds to a vertex, which can create edges to other vertices at a cost of alpha each, for some parameter alpha. Every edge can be freely used by every vertex, regardless of who paid the creation cost. To reflect the desire to be close to other vertices, each agent's cost function is further augmented by the sum total of all (graph theoretic) distances to all other vertices. Previous research proved that for many regimes of the (alpha, N) parameter space, the total social cost (sum of all agents' costs) of every Nash equilibrium is bounded by at most a constant multiple of the optimal social cost. In algorithmic game theoretic nomenclature, this approximation ratio is called the price of anarchy. In our paper, we significantly sharpen some of those results, proving that for all constant non-integral alpha > 2, the price of anarchy is in fact 1+o(1), i.e., not only is it bounded by a constant, but it tends to 1 as N tends to infinity. For constant integral alpha >= 2, we show that the price of anarchy is bounded away from 1. We provide quantitative estimates on the rates of convergence for both results.

In the game of pegging, each vertex of a graph is considered a hole into which a peg can be placed. A pegging move is performed by jumping one peg over another peg, and then removing the peg that has been jumped over from the graph. We define the pegging number as the smallest number of pegs needed to reach all the vertices in a graph no matter what the distribution. Similarly, the optimal-pegging number of a graph is defined as the smallest distribution of pegs for which all the vertices in the graph can be reached. We obtain tight bounds on the pegging numbers and optimal-pegging numbers of complete binary trees and compute the optimal-pegging numbers of complete infinitary trees. As a result of these computations, we deduce that there is a tree whose optimal-pegging number is strictly increased by removing a leaf. We also compute the optimal-pegging number of caterpillar graphs and the tightest upper bound on the optimal-pegging numbers of lobster graphs.